Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Supreme Court Upholds Hot-Deck Imputation in Census, Clarifying Distinctions from Sampling Methods Introduction In UTAH, et al., APPELLANTS v. DONALD L. EVANS, SECRETARY OF COMMERCE, et al. ( 536...
Delegation of State Safety Regulatory Authority to Municipalities Under 49 U.S.C. §14501(c): City of Columbus et al. v. Ours Garage and Wrecker Service, Inc., et al. Introduction City of Columbus et...
ERISA Non-Preemption of State HMO Act: Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran Introduction In the landmark case of Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the intricate...
Limitation on Remedies under ADA §202 and Rehabilitation Act §504: Punitive Damages Unavailable Introduction In the landmark case KAY BARNES, in her official capacity as member of the Board of Police...
Permit Requirements for Door-to-Door Advocacy Violate First Amendment Rights Introduction In the landmark case of Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc. v. Village of Stratton, decided on...
Authorization of IRS's Aggregate Estimation Method for FICA Tax Assessments Introduction United States v. Fior D'Italia, Inc., 536 U.S. 238 (2002), is a significant Supreme Court case that addressed...
Carey v. Saffold: Defining "Pending" in Federal Habeas Corpus Under AEDPA Introduction Carey v. Saffold, 536 U.S. 214 (2002), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Mandatory Teague Analysis in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: BANKS v. HORN Introduction BANKS v. HORN, 536 U.S. 266 (2002), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case that addresses the procedural...
Voluntary Consent in Bus Searches: United States v. Drayton and Brown Introduction In United States v. Drayton and Brown, 536 U.S. 194 (2002), the United States Supreme Court addressed the Fourth...
JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Traffic Stream (BVI) Infrastructure Ltd.: Establishing Corporate Citizenship for Alienage Jurisdiction Introduction The Supreme Court case JPMorgan Chase Bank, Petitioner v....
Clarifying Filing Periods for Title VII Claims: Differentiating Discrete Discrimination and Hostile Work Environments Introduction NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION v. ABNER MORGAN, Jr., 536...
Affirming the EEOC's 'Direct Threat' Defense under the ADA: Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Echazabal Introduction In the landmark case of Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Mario Echazabal, decided on June 10, 2002, the...
McKune v. Lile: Upholding Rehabilitation Programs Without Compelling Self-Incrimination Introduction In McKune v. Lile, 536 U.S. 24 (2002), the United States Supreme Court addressed the...
Devlin v. Scardelletti: Affirming the Right of Non-Named Class Members to Appeal Class Action Settlements Introduction Devlin v. Scardelletti is a landmark 2002 decision by the United States Supreme...
U.S. Supreme Court Establishes Guidelines for Statute of Limitations in Repudiation of Government Contracts under the Tucker Act Introduction Franconia Associates, et al. v. UNITED STATES, 536 U.S....
Broad Interpretation of "In Connection With" under §10(b): SEC v. Zandford Introduction In Securities and Exchange Commission v. Charles Zandford, 535 U.S. 813 (2002), the United States Supreme Court...
Federal Circuit Jurisdiction Limited to Plaintiff's Claims: Analysis of Holmes Group v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems Introduction In the landmark case of The Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air...
STRICKLAND v. WASHINGTON Affirmed as Governing Standard in Habeas Corpus Claims: Bell v. Cone Introduction Ricky Bell, Warden, Petitioner v. Gary Bradford Cone (535 U.S. 685, 2002) is a pivotal...
Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Co., Ltd., et al. (535 U.S. 722) Introduction In the landmark case of Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Co., Ltd., et al., the United States Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Establishes Judicial Review of Contingent-Fee Agreements Under 42 U.S.C. §406(b) Introduction GARY E. GISBRECHT, BARBARA A. MILLER, NANCYSANDINE, and DONALD L. ANDERSON v. JO ANNE B....