Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A.: Redefining Pleading Standards in Employment Discrimination Cases

Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A.: Redefining Pleading Standards in Employment Discrimination Cases

Date: Feb 27, 2002
Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A.: Redefining Pleading Standards in Employment Discrimination Cases Introduction Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A., 534 U.S. 506 (2002) is a pivotal United States Supreme Court...
PLRA Exhaustion Requirement Extended to Excessive Force Claims: Porter v. Nussle

PLRA Exhaustion Requirement Extended to Excessive Force Claims: Porter v. Nussle

Date: Feb 27, 2002
PLRA Exhaustion Requirement Extended to Excessive Force Claims: Porter v. Nussle Introduction Porter v. Nussle, 534 U.S. 516 (2002), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Permissibility of the Income-First Approach Under the Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act: Insights from Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services v. Blumer

Permissibility of the Income-First Approach Under the Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act: Insights from Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services v. Blumer

Date: Feb 21, 2002
Permissibility of the Income-First Approach Under the Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act: Insights from Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services v. Blumer 1. Introduction Wisconsin...
Owasso Independent School District v. Falvo: Clarifying FERPA’s Scope on Peer Grading

Owasso Independent School District v. Falvo: Clarifying FERPA’s Scope on Peer Grading

Date: Feb 20, 2002
Owasso Independent School District v. Falvo: Clarifying FERPA’s Scope on Peer Grading Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case, Owasso Independent School District No. I-011 v. Kristja J. Falvo,...
Limits on Successor Liability under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act: Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Company

Limits on Successor Liability under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act: Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Company

Date: Feb 20, 2002
Limits on Successor Liability under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act: Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Company Introduction In Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Company, the United States Supreme Court...
Federal Habeas Corpus Review in Remon Lee v. Mike Kemna: Balancing State Procedural Rules and Federal Due Process Rights

Federal Habeas Corpus Review in Remon Lee v. Mike Kemna: Balancing State Procedural Rules and Federal Due Process Rights

Date: Jan 23, 2002
Federal Habeas Corpus Review in Remon Lee v. Mike Kemna: Balancing State Procedural Rules and Federal Due Process Rights Introduction Remon Lee v. Mike Kemna, Superintendent, Crossroads Correctional...
Kansas v. Crane: Clarifying Due Process Standards for Civil Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators

Kansas v. Crane: Clarifying Due Process Standards for Civil Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators

Date: Jan 23, 2002
Kansas v. Crane: Clarifying Due Process Standards for Civil Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators Introduction Kansas v. Michael T. Crane, 534 U.S. 407 (2002), represents a significant Supreme...
NATIONAL CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. GULF POWER CO.: Expanding the Scope of Pole Attachments Regulation

NATIONAL CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. GULF POWER CO.: Expanding the Scope of Pole Attachments Regulation

Date: Jan 17, 2002
NATIONAL CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. GULF POWER CO.: Expanding the Scope of Pole Attachments Regulation Introduction NATIONAL CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. GULF...
Reaffirmation of Totality of Circumstances in Reasonable Suspicion Analysis: United States v. Arvizu

Reaffirmation of Totality of Circumstances in Reasonable Suspicion Analysis: United States v. Arvizu

Date: Jan 16, 2002
Reaffirmation of Totality of Circumstances in Reasonable Suspicion Analysis: United States v. Arvizu Introduction United States v. Ralph Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266 (2002), is a pivotal Supreme Court case...
EEOC v. Waffle House: EEOC's Authority to Bypass Arbitration Agreements for Victim-Specific Relief under ADA

EEOC v. Waffle House: EEOC's Authority to Bypass Arbitration Agreements for Victim-Specific Relief under ADA

Date: Jan 16, 2002
EEOC v. Waffle House: EEOC's Authority to Bypass Arbitration Agreements for Victim-Specific Relief under ADA Introduction In Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. Waffle House, Inc., 534...
Content-Neutral Permit Schemes Do Not Require Freedman Procedural Safeguards: An In-Depth Analysis of Cronk THOMAS v. CHICAGO PARK DISTRICT

Content-Neutral Permit Schemes Do Not Require Freedman Procedural Safeguards: An In-Depth Analysis of Cronk THOMAS v. CHICAGO PARK DISTRICT

Date: Jan 16, 2002
Content-Neutral Permit Schemes Do Not Require Freedman Procedural Safeguards: An In-Depth Analysis of Cronk THOMAS v. CHICAGO PARK DISTRICT Introduction In the landmark case of Careen Cronk Thomas...
OSHA Jurisdiction Affirmed Over Uninspected Vessels in Absence of Specific Coast Guard Regulation

OSHA Jurisdiction Affirmed Over Uninspected Vessels in Absence of Specific Coast Guard Regulation

Date: Jan 10, 2002
OSHA Jurisdiction Affirmed Over Uninspected Vessels in Absence of Specific Coast Guard Regulation Introduction In the landmark case Elaine L. Chao, Secretary of Labor, Petitioner v. Mallard Bay...
Parole Ineligibility Instructions in Capital Sentencing: An Analysis of Kelly v. South Carolina

Parole Ineligibility Instructions in Capital Sentencing: An Analysis of Kelly v. South Carolina

Date: Jan 10, 2002
Parole Ineligibility Instructions in Capital Sentencing: An Analysis of Kelly v. South Carolina Introduction William Arthur Kelly v. South Carolina is a significant case decided by the U.S. Supreme...
ERISA §502(a)(3) Limits to Equitable Remedies: Analyzing Great-West Life v. Knudson

ERISA §502(a)(3) Limits to Equitable Remedies: Analyzing Great-West Life v. Knudson

Date: Jan 9, 2002
ERISA §502(a)(3) Limits to Equitable Remedies: Analyzing Great-West Life v. Knudson Introduction In Great-West Life Annuity Insurance Company v. Knudson, 534 U.S. 204 (2002), the United States...
Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Ella Williams: Redefining Disability Standards under the ADA

Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Ella Williams: Redefining Disability Standards under the ADA

Date: Jan 9, 2002
Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Ella Williams: Redefining Disability Standards under the ADA Introduction The case of Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Ella Williams, 534...
Due Process in Administrative Forfeitures: An Analysis of DUSENBERY v. UNITED STATES

Due Process in Administrative Forfeitures: An Analysis of DUSENBERY v. UNITED STATES

Date: Jan 9, 2002
Due Process in Administrative Forfeitures: An Analysis of Dusenbery v. United States Introduction Parties Involved: Larry Dean Dusenbery (Petitioner) v. United States Court: United States Supreme...
Warrantless Searches of Probationers Under Reasonable Suspicion: United States v. Knights

Warrantless Searches of Probationers Under Reasonable Suspicion: United States v. Knights

Date: Dec 11, 2001
Warrantless Searches of Probationers Under Reasonable Suspicion: United States v. Knights Introduction In United States v. Knights, 534 U.S. 112 (2001), the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the...
Utility Patent Eligibility for Domestic Plant Breeds Confirmed under 35 U.S.C. § 101

Utility Patent Eligibility for Domestic Plant Breeds Confirmed under 35 U.S.C. § 101

Date: Dec 11, 2001
Utility Patent Eligibility for Domestic Plant Breeds Confirmed under 35 U.S.C. § 101 Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case J. E. M. AG SUPPLY, INC., dba FARM ADVANTAGE, INC., et al. v. PIONEER...
Supreme Court Rules Indian Gaming Regulatory Act Does Not Exempt Tribes from Chapter 35 Taxes

Supreme Court Rules Indian Gaming Regulatory Act Does Not Exempt Tribes from Chapter 35 Taxes

Date: Nov 28, 2001
Supreme Court Rules Indian Gaming Regulatory Act Does Not Exempt Tribes from Chapter 35 Taxes Introduction In the landmark case of Chickasaw Nation v. United States Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma,...
Limitation of Bivens Actions to Individuals: Correctional Services v. Malesko

Limitation of Bivens Actions to Individuals: Correctional Services v. Malesko

Date: Nov 28, 2001
Limitation of Bivens Actions to Individuals: Correctional Services v. Malesko Introduction Correctional Services Corporation, Petitioner v. John E. Malesko (534 U.S. 61, 2001) is a pivotal United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert