Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Due Process in Administrative Forfeitures: An Analysis of DUSENBERY v. UNITED STATES

Due Process in Administrative Forfeitures: An Analysis of DUSENBERY v. UNITED STATES

Date: Jan 9, 2002
Due Process in Administrative Forfeitures: An Analysis of Dusenbery v. United States Introduction Parties Involved: Larry Dean Dusenbery (Petitioner) v. United States Court: United States Supreme...
Warrantless Searches of Probationers Under Reasonable Suspicion: United States v. Knights

Warrantless Searches of Probationers Under Reasonable Suspicion: United States v. Knights

Date: Dec 11, 2001
Warrantless Searches of Probationers Under Reasonable Suspicion: United States v. Knights Introduction In United States v. Knights, 534 U.S. 112 (2001), the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the...
Utility Patent Eligibility for Domestic Plant Breeds Confirmed under 35 U.S.C. § 101

Utility Patent Eligibility for Domestic Plant Breeds Confirmed under 35 U.S.C. § 101

Date: Dec 11, 2001
Utility Patent Eligibility for Domestic Plant Breeds Confirmed under 35 U.S.C. § 101 Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case J. E. M. AG SUPPLY, INC., dba FARM ADVANTAGE, INC., et al. v. PIONEER...
Supreme Court Rules Indian Gaming Regulatory Act Does Not Exempt Tribes from Chapter 35 Taxes

Supreme Court Rules Indian Gaming Regulatory Act Does Not Exempt Tribes from Chapter 35 Taxes

Date: Nov 28, 2001
Supreme Court Rules Indian Gaming Regulatory Act Does Not Exempt Tribes from Chapter 35 Taxes Introduction In the landmark case of Chickasaw Nation v. United States Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma,...
Limitation of Bivens Actions to Individuals: Correctional Services v. Malesko

Limitation of Bivens Actions to Individuals: Correctional Services v. Malesko

Date: Nov 28, 2001
Limitation of Bivens Actions to Individuals: Correctional Services v. Malesko Introduction Correctional Services Corporation, Petitioner v. John E. Malesko (534 U.S. 61, 2001) is a pivotal United...
Supreme Court Dismisses Adarand Constructors v. Mineta, Emphasizing Limitations on Reviewing Changed Legal Postures

Supreme Court Dismisses Adarand Constructors v. Mineta, Emphasizing Limitations on Reviewing Changed Legal Postures

Date: Nov 28, 2001
Supreme Court Dismisses Adarand Constructors v. Mineta, Emphasizing Limitations on Reviewing Changed Legal Postures Introduction In the case of Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Norman Y. Mineta,...
Independent Review of Pending Grievances by MSPB Upheld in USPS v. Gregory

Independent Review of Pending Grievances by MSPB Upheld in USPS v. Gregory

Date: Nov 14, 2001
Independent Review of Pending Grievances by MSPB Upheld in USPS v. Gregory Introduction The case of United States Postal Service v. Gregory, 534 U.S. 1 (2001), addresses a pivotal issue in federal...
TRW Inc. v. Andrews: Supreme Court Upholds Specific Limitations Period in FCRA

TRW Inc. v. Andrews: Supreme Court Upholds Specific Limitations Period in FCRA

Date: Nov 14, 2001
TRW Inc. v. Andrews: Supreme Court Upholds Specific Limitations Period in FCRA Introduction TRW Inc. v. Andrews is a significant U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarifies the interpretation of the...
Palazzolo v. Rhode Island: Affirming Ripeness and Successive Owners in Regulatory Takings Claims

Palazzolo v. Rhode Island: Affirming Ripeness and Successive Owners in Regulatory Takings Claims

Date: Jun 29, 2001
Palazzolo v. Rhode Island: Affirming Ripeness and Successive Owners in Regulatory Takings Claims Introduction Palazzolo v. Rhode Island, 533 U.S. 606 (2001), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case...
Clarifying Retroactivity of Supreme Court Rules under AEDPA: The Tyler v. Burlcain, Warden Decision

Clarifying Retroactivity of Supreme Court Rules under AEDPA: The Tyler v. Burlcain, Warden Decision

Date: Jun 29, 2001
Clarifying Retroactivity of Supreme Court Rules under AEDPA: The Tyler v. Burlcain, Warden Decision Introduction The United States Supreme Court case Melvin Tyler, Petitioner v. Burlcain, Warden, 533...
Zadvydas v. Davis: Establishing 'Reasonable Time' Limitation on Post-Removal Period Detention of Aliens

Zadvydas v. Davis: Establishing 'Reasonable Time' Limitation on Post-Removal Period Detention of Aliens

Date: Jun 29, 2001
Zadvydas v. Davis: Establishing 'Reasonable Time' Limitation on Post-Removal Period Detention of Aliens Introduction Zadvydas v. Davis et al. is a landmark 2001 U.S. Supreme Court decision that...
LORILLARD TOBACCO CO. v. REILLY: Supreme Court's Stance on Pre-emption and Commercial Speech

LORILLARD TOBACCO CO. v. REILLY: Supreme Court's Stance on Pre-emption and Commercial Speech

Date: Jun 29, 2001
LORILLARD TOBACCO CO. v. REILLY: Supreme Court's Stance on Pre-emption and Commercial Speech Introduction In Lorillard Tobacco Co. et al. v. Thomas F. Reilly, Attorney General of Massachusetts, et...
Tribal Court Jurisdiction Limited in Cases Involving State Officials and Off-Reservation Crimes

Tribal Court Jurisdiction Limited in Cases Involving State Officials and Off-Reservation Crimes

Date: Jun 26, 2001
Tribal Court Jurisdiction Limited in Cases Involving State Officials and Off-Reservation Crimes Introduction Nevada et al. v. Hicks et al., 533 U.S. 353 (2001), addresses a critical question...
Establishing Limits on Political Parties' Coordinated Expenditures: Analysis of FEC v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee

Establishing Limits on Political Parties' Coordinated Expenditures: Analysis of FEC v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee

Date: Jun 26, 2001
Establishing Limits on Political Parties' Coordinated Expenditures: Analysis of FEC v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee Introduction Federal Election Commission (FEC) v. Colorado...
St. Cyr v. INS: Upholding Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction in Immigration Law Post-AEDPA and IIRIRA

St. Cyr v. INS: Upholding Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction in Immigration Law Post-AEDPA and IIRIRA

Date: Jun 26, 2001
St. Cyr v. INS: Upholding Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction in Immigration Law Post-AEDPA and IIRIRA Introduction IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, PETITIONER v. ENRICO ST. CYR (533 U.S. 289) is a...
United States v. United Foods: Compelled Speech and First Amendment Rights in Agricultural Marketing

United States v. United Foods: Compelled Speech and First Amendment Rights in Agricultural Marketing

Date: Jun 26, 2001
United States v. United Foods: Compelled Speech and First Amendment Rights in Agricultural Marketing Introduction Case: United States and Department of Agriculture v. United Foods, Inc. Court: U.S....
INS v. St. Cyr: Upholding Habeas Corpus Rights and §212(c) Relief in Immigration Deportation Cases

INS v. St. Cyr: Upholding Habeas Corpus Rights and §212(c) Relief in Immigration Deportation Cases

Date: Jun 26, 2001
INS v. St. Cyr: Upholding Habeas Corpus Rights and §212(c) Relief in Immigration Deportation Cases Introduction Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) v. Enrico St. Cyr is a landmark decision...
TASINI v. NEW YORK TIMES COmpany: Upholding Freelance Authors' Copyrights in the Digital Age

TASINI v. NEW YORK TIMES COmpany: Upholding Freelance Authors' Copyrights in the Digital Age

Date: Jun 26, 2001
TASINI v. NEW YORK TIMES COmpany: Upholding Freelance Authors' Copyrights in the Digital Age Introduction TASINI v. NEW YORK TIMES COmpany (533 U.S. 483, 2001) is a landmark United States Supreme...
Federal Trust Ownership of Submerged Lands Affirmed in IDAHO v. UNITED STATES

Federal Trust Ownership of Submerged Lands Affirmed in IDAHO v. UNITED STATES

Date: Jun 19, 2001
Federal Trust Ownership of Submerged Lands Affirmed in IDAHO v. UNITED STATES Introduction IDAHO v. UNITED STATES et al., 533 U.S. 262 (2001), is a landmark Supreme Court decision addressing the...
Separation of Qualified Immunity and Excessive Force Analysis in Saucier v. Katz

Separation of Qualified Immunity and Excessive Force Analysis in Saucier v. Katz

Date: Jun 19, 2001
Separation of Qualified Immunity and Excessive Force Analysis in Saucier v. Katz Introduction Saucier v. Katz (533 U.S. 194, 2001) is a landmark Supreme Court decision that addressed the application...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert