Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Control as the Principal Factor in Defining Employee Status under the ADA: Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P.C. v. Wells Introduction Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P.C. v. Wells is a...
Virginia v. Black ET AL.: Defining the Limits of First Amendment Protections on Cross Burning Introduction Virginia v. Black ET AL., 538 U.S. 343 (2003), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that...
Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements in RICO Claims: Supreme Court Reverses Lower Courts Introduction In the landmark case PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc., et al. v. Book et al. AJ, the United...
State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. v. Campbell: Supreme Court Sets New Limits on Punitive Damages Introduction In State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003), the...
Kentucky AWP Statutes Upheld: Establishing State Regulation Over Insurance Practices under ERISA Introduction In the landmark case Kentucky Association of Health Plans, Inc., et al. v. Miller,...
Branch v. Smith: Affirming Judicial Authority in Congressional Redistricting under the Voting Rights Act Introduction Branch et al. v. Smith et al. (538 U.S. 254) is a significant United States...
Undischargeability of Settlement Debts for Fraud: Archer v. Warner Introduction In the landmark case Archer et ux. v. Warner, the United States Supreme Court addressed the critical issue of whether a...
Regulatory Takings and the IOLTA Program: An Analysis of Brown v. Legal Foundation of Washington Introduction In the landmark case of Brown v. Legal Foundation of Washington (538 U.S. 216, 2003), the...
Requiring Clear Evidence of Discriminatory Intent in Equal Protection Claims: Analysis of Cuyahoga Falls v. Buckeye Community Hope Foundation Introduction Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, et al. v. Buckeye...
Threshold for AEDPA Applicability in Federal Habeas Proceedings: Insights from Woodford v. Garceau Introduction Woodford v. Garceau, 538 U.S. 202 (2003), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that...
Kenyeres v. Ashcroft: Clarifying Standards for Temporary Stay of Removal Introduction Kenyeres v. Ashcroft, 538 U.S. 1301 (2003), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court that...
Recovery for Fear of Future Illness under FELA: Insights from Norfolk Western Railway Co. v. Ayers Et Al. Introduction Norfolk Western Railway Co. v. Ayers Et Al. (538 U.S. 135) is a landmark...
Expansion of False Claims Act Liability to Local Governments Introduction Cook County, Illinois v. United States ex rel. Chandler (538 U.S. 119, 2003) is a landmark decision by the United States...
Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe: Upholding Statutory Classification Over Procedural Due Process Introduction In the landmark case of Connecticut Department of Public Safety et al. v....
Clarifying AEDPA's 'Unreasonable Application' Standard in Lockyer v. Andrade Introduction Lockyer, Attorney General of California v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63 (2003), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision...
Three Strikes and You're Out: Ewing v. California and the Proportionality Principle under the Eighth Amendment Introduction Ewing v. California, 538 U.S. 11 (2003), is a landmark case in which the...
Alaska Sex Offender Registration Act Upheld as Nonpunitive under the Ex Post Facto Clause Introduction In the landmark case Smith et al. v. Doe et al., 538 U.S. 84 (2003), the United States Supreme...
Allocation of R&D Expenses Under DISC Regulations: Insights from Boeing Co. v. United States Introduction Boeing Co. et al. v. United States, 537 U.S. 437 (2003), is a landmark case adjudicated by...
Victor's Little Secret v. Victoria's Secret: Clarifying Actual Dilution Requirements under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act Introduction In the landmark case of Victor's Little Secret v. Victoria's...
Indian Tucker Act Jurisdiction Expanded: United States v. White Mountain Apache Tribe Introduction United States v. White Mountain Apache Tribe (537 U.S. 465, 2003) marks a significant development in...