Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Finality Date for §2255 Postconviction Relief Established in Clay v. United States Introduction Clay v. United States, 537 U.S. 522 (2003), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Limits on Fiduciary Duty Claims Under the Indian Mineral Leasing Act Comprehensive Commentary on UNITED STATES v. NAVAJO NATION, 537 U.S. 488 (2003) Introduction UNITED STATES v. NAVAJO NATION,...
Scheidler v. National Organization for Women: Clarifying the 'Obtaining Property' Requirement under the Hobbs Act Introduction Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc., et al. (537 U.S....
State Representative Payee Practices and the Antiattachment Provision: Insights from Washington State Dept. of Social and Health Services et al. v. Guardianship Estate of Keffeler et al. Introduction...
Miller-El v. Cockrell: Supreme Court Reinforces the Importance of Substantial Showing for Certificates of Appealability in Racial Jury Selection Introduction Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322...
Supreme Court Clarifies §525 Bankruptcy Protections Against FCC's License Revocations Introduction In Federal Communications Commission v. NextWave Personal Communications Inc. et al., 537 U.S. 293...
Vicarious Liability Under the Fair Housing Act: Meyer v. Holley et al. Introduction Meyer v. Holley et al., 537 U.S. 280 (2003), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court addressing...
Supreme Court Reverses Ninth Circuit's Conspiracy Termination Rule Introduction United States v. Jimenez Recio et al. is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, decided on January 21, 2003....
Price v. United States: Requirement of Prior Conviction Notice under 21 U.S.C. §851(a) Introduction Price v. United States (537 U.S. 1152, 2003) is a significant Supreme Court case that addresses the...
ELDRED v. ASHCROFT: Upholding Retroactive Copyright Extensions Introduction Eldred et al. v. Ashcroft, 537 U.S. 186 (2003), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that addressed...
Validating Untimely Assignments Under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act: Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co. Introduction Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security v. Peabody Coal Co. et al., 537...
Upholding Federal Privileges: Pierce County v. Guillen and the Scope of 23 U.S.C. § 409 Introduction Pierce County, Washington v. Guillen is a landmark Supreme Court decision that delves into the...
Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania: Clarifying Double Jeopardy in Capital Sentencing Introduction Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania, 537 U.S. 101 (2003), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision addressing the application...
ABDUR'RAHMAN v. BELL Warden: Clarifying the Scope of Rule 60(b) Motions in Habeas Corpus Proceedings Introduction In ABDUR'RAHMAN v. BELL Warden, 537 U.S. 88 (2002), the United States Supreme Court...
Arbitrator's Authority to Decide Procedural Time Limits: Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. Introduction Howsam, Individually and as Trustee for the E. Richard Howsam, Jr., Irrevocable Life...
Judicial Review Under 18 U.S.C. §925(c) Requires an Actual Denial Introduction United States et al. v. Bean, 537 U.S. 71 (2002), addresses a critical issue regarding the statutory interpretation of...
FBSA Pre-emption and State Common-Law Tort Claims: Analysis of SPRIETSMA v. MERCURY MARINE Introduction SPRIETSMA v. MERCURY MARINE, 537 U.S. 51 (2002), is a landmark case in the realm of federal...
Limitations on the All Writs Act for Removal Jurisdiction: Syngenta v. Henson Introduction Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., et al. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28 (2002), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision...
Maintaining Reciprocity Agreements: Supreme Court Upholds ICC's Fee-Cap Interpretation under ISTEA in YELLOW TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. MICHIGAN Introduction YELLOW TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. MICHIGAN ET...
Limiting Habeas Corpus Relief: Insights from Early Warden v. Packer Introduction Early Warden et al. v. Packer, 537 U.S. 3 (2002) is a pivotal United States Supreme Court decision that addressed the...