Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Ripeness Doctrine Affirmed: National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the Interior Introduction The case of National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the Interior et al.,...
Chavez v. Martinez: Defining the Limits of Fifth Amendment Protections in Civil Actions Introduction Chavez v. Martinez, 538 U.S. 760 (2003), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that clarifies the...
Retroactive Application of Statutory Interpretation: Bunkley v. Florida Introduction Bunkley v. Florida, 538 U.S. 835 (2003), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that addresses...
ERISA Does Not Require Special Deference to Treating Physicians: BLACK DECKER DISABILITY PLAN v. NORD Introduction BLACK DECKER DISABILITY PLAN v. NORD is a landmark Supreme Court decision that...
Double Jeopardy Clause and the Indicia of Finality: Insights from Price v. Vincent Introduction Price v. Vincent, 538 U.S. 1 (2003), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that delves into the...
Tribal Sovereign Immunity Not Enforceable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Introduction In the landmark case Inyo County, California, et al. v. Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community of the Bishop...
Section 216(b) Does Not Bar Removal of FLSA Suits: Comprehensive Commentary on BREUER v. JIM'S CONCRETE OF BREVARD, INC. Introduction BREUER v. JIM'S CONCRETE OF BREVARD, INC. AJ CERTIORARI (538 U.S....
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Walsh: Upholding State Medicaid Programs Against Federal Preemption Introduction The Supreme Court case Pharmaceutical Research and...
Price, Warden v. Vincent: Clarifying Double Jeopardy Protections in Judicial Proceedings Introduction Price, Warden v. Vincent (538 U.S. 634) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Affirmation of State Authority in Medicaid Prior Authorization Programs Introduction In Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Walsh, Acting Commissioner, Maine Department of Human...
Fraud Actions in Charitable Solicitation: An Analysis of Illinois Ex Rel. Lisa Madigan v. Telemarketing Associates, Inc. Introduction Illinois Ex Rel. Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of Illinois v....
Reinforcement of Fourth Amendment Protections: Suppression of Confessions from Illegal Arrests – Kaupp v. Texas Introduction Kaupp v. Texas, 538 U.S. 626 (2003), is a landmark Supreme Court decision...
Protecting Donor Integrity: Upholding Fraud Claims in Charitable Solicitation Introduction Illinois ex rel. Madigan, Attorney General of Illinois v. Telemarketing Associates, Inc., et al. (538 U.S....
Fourth Amendment Protection Against Illegal Arrests: The Robert Kaupp v. Texas Decision Introduction Robert Kaupp v. Texas, 538 U.S. 1 (2003), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that delves into the...
Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction Confirmed Over Mandatory Detention of Lawful Permanent Residents Introduction In DeMore, District Director, San Francisco District of Immigration and Naturalization...
Implied Consent to Magistrate Judges Under the Federal Magistrate Act: The Roell v. Withrow Decision Introduction Roell et al. v. Withrow, 538 U.S. 580 (2003), is a landmark decision by the United...
Massaro v. United States: Ineffective Assistance Claims Permitted Under §2255 Without Prior Direct Appeal Introduction Massaro v. United States, 538 U.S. 500 (2003), is a landmark Supreme Court case...
Full Faith and Credit Clause: Nevada's Autonomy in Granting Sovereign Immunity – A Comprehensive Analysis of Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt et al. Introduction The United States Supreme...
Direct Ownership Required for Instrumentality Status under FSIA: Dole Food Co. v. Patrickson Introduction The Supreme Court case DOLE FOOD CO. ET AL. v. PATRICKSON ET AL., decided on April 22, 2003,...
Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of 28 U.S.C. §1367(d) in JINKS v. RICHLAND COUNTY Introduction JINKS v. RICHLAND COUNTY, South Carolina, et al., 538 U.S. 456 (2003), is a landmark case...