Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Ripeness Doctrine Affirmed: National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the Interior

Ripeness Doctrine Affirmed: National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the Interior

Date: May 28, 2003
Ripeness Doctrine Affirmed: National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the Interior Introduction The case of National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the Interior et al.,...
Chavez v. Martinez: Defining the Limits of Fifth Amendment Protections in Civil Actions

Chavez v. Martinez: Defining the Limits of Fifth Amendment Protections in Civil Actions

Date: May 28, 2003
Chavez v. Martinez: Defining the Limits of Fifth Amendment Protections in Civil Actions Introduction Chavez v. Martinez, 538 U.S. 760 (2003), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that clarifies the...
Retroactive Application of Statutory Interpretation: Bunkley v. Florida

Retroactive Application of Statutory Interpretation: Bunkley v. Florida

Date: May 28, 2003
Retroactive Application of Statutory Interpretation: Bunkley v. Florida Introduction Bunkley v. Florida, 538 U.S. 835 (2003), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that addresses...
ERISA Does Not Require Special Deference to Treating Physicians: BLACK DECKER DISABILITY PLAN v. NORD

ERISA Does Not Require Special Deference to Treating Physicians: BLACK DECKER DISABILITY PLAN v. NORD

Date: May 28, 2003
ERISA Does Not Require Special Deference to Treating Physicians: BLACK DECKER DISABILITY PLAN v. NORD Introduction BLACK DECKER DISABILITY PLAN v. NORD is a landmark Supreme Court decision that...
Double Jeopardy Clause and the Indicia of Finality: Insights from Price v. Vincent

Double Jeopardy Clause and the Indicia of Finality: Insights from Price v. Vincent

Date: May 20, 2003
Double Jeopardy Clause and the Indicia of Finality: Insights from Price v. Vincent Introduction Price v. Vincent, 538 U.S. 1 (2003), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that delves into the...
Tribal Sovereign Immunity Not Enforceable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Tribal Sovereign Immunity Not Enforceable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Date: May 20, 2003
Tribal Sovereign Immunity Not Enforceable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Introduction In the landmark case Inyo County, California, et al. v. Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community of the Bishop...
Section 216(b) Does Not Bar Removal of FLSA Suits: Comprehensive Commentary on BREUER v. JIM'S CONCRETE OF BREVARD, INC.

Section 216(b) Does Not Bar Removal of FLSA Suits: Comprehensive Commentary on BREUER v. JIM'S CONCRETE OF BREVARD, INC.

Date: May 20, 2003
Section 216(b) Does Not Bar Removal of FLSA Suits: Comprehensive Commentary on BREUER v. JIM'S CONCRETE OF BREVARD, INC. Introduction BREUER v. JIM'S CONCRETE OF BREVARD, INC. AJ CERTIORARI (538 U.S....
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Walsh: Upholding State Medicaid Programs Against Federal Preemption

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Walsh: Upholding State Medicaid Programs Against Federal Preemption

Date: May 20, 2003
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Walsh: Upholding State Medicaid Programs Against Federal Preemption Introduction The Supreme Court case Pharmaceutical Research and...
Price, Warden v. Vincent: Clarifying Double Jeopardy Protections in Judicial Proceedings

Price, Warden v. Vincent: Clarifying Double Jeopardy Protections in Judicial Proceedings

Date: May 20, 2003
Price, Warden v. Vincent: Clarifying Double Jeopardy Protections in Judicial Proceedings Introduction Price, Warden v. Vincent (538 U.S. 634) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Affirmation of State Authority in Medicaid Prior Authorization Programs

Affirmation of State Authority in Medicaid Prior Authorization Programs

Date: May 20, 2003
Affirmation of State Authority in Medicaid Prior Authorization Programs Introduction In Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Walsh, Acting Commissioner, Maine Department of Human...
Fraud Actions in Charitable Solicitation: An Analysis of Illinois Ex Rel. Lisa Madigan v. Telemarketing Associates, Inc.

Fraud Actions in Charitable Solicitation: An Analysis of Illinois Ex Rel. Lisa Madigan v. Telemarketing Associates, Inc.

Date: May 6, 2003
Fraud Actions in Charitable Solicitation: An Analysis of Illinois Ex Rel. Lisa Madigan v. Telemarketing Associates, Inc. Introduction Illinois Ex Rel. Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of Illinois v....
Reinforcement of Fourth Amendment Protections: Suppression of Confessions from Illegal Arrests – Kaupp v. Texas

Reinforcement of Fourth Amendment Protections: Suppression of Confessions from Illegal Arrests – Kaupp v. Texas

Date: May 6, 2003
Reinforcement of Fourth Amendment Protections: Suppression of Confessions from Illegal Arrests – Kaupp v. Texas Introduction Kaupp v. Texas, 538 U.S. 626 (2003), is a landmark Supreme Court decision...
Protecting Donor Integrity: Upholding Fraud Claims in Charitable Solicitation

Protecting Donor Integrity: Upholding Fraud Claims in Charitable Solicitation

Date: May 6, 2003
Protecting Donor Integrity: Upholding Fraud Claims in Charitable Solicitation Introduction Illinois ex rel. Madigan, Attorney General of Illinois v. Telemarketing Associates, Inc., et al. (538 U.S....
Fourth Amendment Protection Against Illegal Arrests: The Robert Kaupp v. Texas Decision

Fourth Amendment Protection Against Illegal Arrests: The Robert Kaupp v. Texas Decision

Date: May 6, 2003
Fourth Amendment Protection Against Illegal Arrests: The Robert Kaupp v. Texas Decision Introduction Robert Kaupp v. Texas, 538 U.S. 1 (2003), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that delves into the...
Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction Confirmed Over Mandatory Detention of Lawful Permanent Residents

Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction Confirmed Over Mandatory Detention of Lawful Permanent Residents

Date: Apr 30, 2003
Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction Confirmed Over Mandatory Detention of Lawful Permanent Residents Introduction In DeMore, District Director, San Francisco District of Immigration and Naturalization...
Implied Consent to Magistrate Judges Under the Federal Magistrate Act: The Roell v. Withrow Decision

Implied Consent to Magistrate Judges Under the Federal Magistrate Act: The Roell v. Withrow Decision

Date: Apr 30, 2003
Implied Consent to Magistrate Judges Under the Federal Magistrate Act: The Roell v. Withrow Decision Introduction Roell et al. v. Withrow, 538 U.S. 580 (2003), is a landmark decision by the United...
Massaro v. United States: Ineffective Assistance Claims Permitted Under §2255 Without Prior Direct Appeal

Massaro v. United States: Ineffective Assistance Claims Permitted Under §2255 Without Prior Direct Appeal

Date: Apr 24, 2003
Massaro v. United States: Ineffective Assistance Claims Permitted Under §2255 Without Prior Direct Appeal Introduction Massaro v. United States, 538 U.S. 500 (2003), is a landmark Supreme Court case...
Full Faith and Credit Clause: Nevada's Autonomy in Granting Sovereign Immunity – A Comprehensive Analysis of Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt et al.

Full Faith and Credit Clause: Nevada's Autonomy in Granting Sovereign Immunity – A Comprehensive Analysis of Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt et al.

Date: Apr 24, 2003
Full Faith and Credit Clause: Nevada's Autonomy in Granting Sovereign Immunity – A Comprehensive Analysis of Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt et al. Introduction The United States Supreme...
Direct Ownership Required for Instrumentality Status under FSIA: Dole Food Co. v. Patrickson

Direct Ownership Required for Instrumentality Status under FSIA: Dole Food Co. v. Patrickson

Date: Apr 23, 2003
Direct Ownership Required for Instrumentality Status under FSIA: Dole Food Co. v. Patrickson Introduction The Supreme Court case DOLE FOOD CO. ET AL. v. PATRICKSON ET AL., decided on April 22, 2003,...
Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of 28 U.S.C. §1367(d) in JINKS v. RICHLAND COUNTY

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of 28 U.S.C. §1367(d) in JINKS v. RICHLAND COUNTY

Date: Apr 23, 2003
Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of 28 U.S.C. §1367(d) in JINKS v. RICHLAND COUNTY Introduction JINKS v. RICHLAND COUNTY, South Carolina, et al., 538 U.S. 456 (2003), is a landmark case...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert