Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Cherokee Nation v. Leavitt: Establishing Government's Binding Obligation to Pay Contract Support Costs

Cherokee Nation v. Leavitt: Establishing Government's Binding Obligation to Pay Contract Support Costs

Date: Mar 2, 2005
Cherokee Nation v. Leavitt: Establishing Government's Binding Obligation to Pay Contract Support Costs Introduction Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma et al. v. Leavitt, Secretary of Health and Human...
Supreme Court Remands Multiple Cases Under United States v. Booker: Reinforcing Advisory Sentencing Guidelines

Supreme Court Remands Multiple Cases Under United States v. Booker: Reinforcing Advisory Sentencing Guidelines

Date: Mar 1, 2005
Supreme Court Remands Multiple Cases Under United States v. Booker: Reinforcing Advisory Sentencing Guidelines Introduction On February 28, 2005, the United States Supreme Court issued a series of...
Strict Scrutiny Applied to Racial Segregation in Prisons: Insights from JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA

Strict Scrutiny Applied to Racial Segregation in Prisons: Insights from JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA

Date: Feb 24, 2005
Strict Scrutiny Applied to Racial Segregation in Prisons: Insights from JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA Introduction Case: JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA et al. Court: United States Supreme Court Date: February 23,...
Double Jeopardy Clause Limits on Midtrial Acquittals: Insights from Smith v. Massachusetts

Double Jeopardy Clause Limits on Midtrial Acquittals: Insights from Smith v. Massachusetts

Date: Feb 23, 2005
Double Jeopardy Clause Limits on Midtrial Acquittals: Insights from Smith v. Massachusetts Introduction Smith v. Massachusetts, 543 U.S. 462 (2005), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Dredges Classified as Vessels under LHWCA: Stewart v. Dutra Construction Co.

Dredges Classified as Vessels under LHWCA: Stewart v. Dutra Construction Co.

Date: Feb 23, 2005
Dredges Classified as Vessels under LHWCA: Stewart v. Dutra Construction Co. Introduction Stewart v. Dutra Construction Co. (543 U.S. 481, 2005) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that...
Supreme Court Remands Multiple Cases for Reconsideration Following United States v. Booker

Supreme Court Remands Multiple Cases for Reconsideration Following United States v. Booker

Date: Jan 25, 2005
Supreme Court Remands Multiple Cases for Reconsideration Following United States v. Booker Introduction On January 24, 2005, the United States Supreme Court issued a series of summary dispositions in...
Anticipatory Assignment of Income in Contingent-Fee Agreements: Commissioner v. Banks

Anticipatory Assignment of Income in Contingent-Fee Agreements: Commissioner v. Banks

Date: Jan 25, 2005
Anticipatory Assignment of Income in Contingent-Fee Agreements: Commissioner v. Banks Introduction COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. BANKS, 543 U.S. 426 (2005), is a landmark decision by the United...
Illinois v. Caballes: Fourth Amendment Implications of Drug-Detection Dog Sniffs During Lawful Traffic Stops

Illinois v. Caballes: Fourth Amendment Implications of Drug-Detection Dog Sniffs During Lawful Traffic Stops

Date: Jan 25, 2005
Illinois v. Caballes: Fourth Amendment Implications of Drug-Detection Dog Sniffs During Lawful Traffic Stops Introduction Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (2005), is a landmark Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Vacates Judgments and Remands Multiple Cases Following United States v. Booker (2005)

Supreme Court Vacates Judgments and Remands Multiple Cases Following United States v. Booker (2005)

Date: Jan 25, 2005
Supreme Court Vacates Judgments and Remands Multiple Cases Following United States v. Booker (2005) Introduction On January 24, 2005, the United States Supreme Court issued a significant procedural...
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Multiple Cases – January 24, 2005

Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Multiple Cases – January 24, 2005

Date: Jan 25, 2005
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Multiple Cases – January 24, 2005 Introduction On January 24, 2005, the United States Supreme Court issued a comprehensive list of denials for petitions of writs of...
BELL v. CONE: Clarifying Vagueness in Aggravating Circumstances under the Eighth Amendment

BELL v. CONE: Clarifying Vagueness in Aggravating Circumstances under the Eighth Amendment

Date: Jan 25, 2005
BELL v. CONE: Clarifying Vagueness in Aggravating Circumstances under the Eighth Amendment Introduction BELL v. CONE, 535 U.S. 685 (2002), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Proper Presentation of Federal Claims in State Courts: Implications from Howell v. Mississippi

Proper Presentation of Federal Claims in State Courts: Implications from Howell v. Mississippi

Date: Jan 25, 2005
Proper Presentation of Federal Claims in State Courts: Implications from Howell v. Mississippi Introduction Howell, aka Cox v. Mississippi is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Supreme...
United States v. Booker: Establishing Advisory Federal Sentencing Guidelines

United States v. Booker: Establishing Advisory Federal Sentencing Guidelines

Date: Jan 13, 2005
United States v. Booker: Establishing Advisory Federal Sentencing Guidelines Introduction United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that fundamentally...
Removal of Aliens Without Advance Government Consent under 8 U.S.C. §1231(b)(2): Comprehensive Analysis of JAMA v. ICE

Removal of Aliens Without Advance Government Consent under 8 U.S.C. §1231(b)(2): Comprehensive Analysis of JAMA v. ICE

Date: Jan 13, 2005
Removal of Aliens Without Advance Government Consent under 8 U.S.C. §1231(b)(2): Comprehensive Analysis of JAMA v. ICE Introduction JAMA v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (543 U.S. 335, 2005) is...
Clarifying Detention Periods for Inadmissible Aliens: Insights from Clark v. Martinez

Clarifying Detention Periods for Inadmissible Aliens: Insights from Clark v. Martinez

Date: Jan 13, 2005
Clarifying Detention Periods for Inadmissible Aliens: Insights from Clark v. Martinez Introduction Clark, Field Office Director, Seattle, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al. v. Martinez, 543...
Whitfield v. United States: Overturning the Overt Act Requirement in Money Laundering Conspiracies

Whitfield v. United States: Overturning the Overt Act Requirement in Money Laundering Conspiracies

Date: Jan 12, 2005
Whitfield v. United States: Overturning the Overt Act Requirement in Money Laundering Conspiracies Introduction Whitfield v. United States, 543 U.S. 209 (2005), addresses a critical aspect of federal...
Supreme Court's Denial of Certiorari: Implications and Insights

Supreme Court's Denial of Certiorari: Implications and Insights

Date: Jan 11, 2005
Supreme Court's Denial of Certiorari: Implications and Insights Introduction On January 10, 2005, the United States Supreme Court issued a series of decisions pertaining to petitions for writs of...
Limitation on CERCLA §113(f)(1) Contribution Claims: Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.

Limitation on CERCLA §113(f)(1) Contribution Claims: Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.

Date: Dec 14, 2004
Limitation on CERCLA §113(f)(1) Contribution Claims: Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc. Introduction Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc., 543 U.S. 157 (2004), is a landmark...
Third-Party Standing and the Denial of Appellate Counsel: Insights from TESMER v. GRANHOLM

Third-Party Standing and the Denial of Appellate Counsel: Insights from TESMER v. GRANHOLM

Date: Dec 14, 2004
Third-Party Standing and the Denial of Appellate Counsel: Insights from TESMER v. GRANHOLM Introduction TESMER v. GRANHOLM, 543 U.S. 125 (2004), addresses a pivotal issue in constitutional law:...
DEVENPECK v. ALFORD: Clarifying Probable Cause in Warrantless Arrests

DEVENPECK v. ALFORD: Clarifying Probable Cause in Warrantless Arrests

Date: Dec 14, 2004
DEVENPECK v. ALFORD: Clarifying Probable Cause in Warrantless Arrests Introduction Devenpeck et al. v. Alford (543 U.S. 146, 2004) is a landmark United States Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert