Rapanos v. United States: Redefining 'Waters of the United States' Under the Clean Water Act Introduction Rapanos v. United States (547 U.S. 715, 2006) is a landmark Supreme Court decision that...
KIRCHER v. PUTNAM FUNDS TRUST: Defining Appellate Boundaries under the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act Introduction Kircher et al. v. Putnam Funds Trust et al. (547 U.S. 633, 2006) is a...
Reimbursement Claims under FEHBA and the Limits of Federal Jurisdiction: Empire HealthChoice Assurance v. McVeigh Introduction The case of Empire HealthChoice Assurance, Inc., DBA Empire Blue Cross...
Exclusion of Workers' Compensation Premiums from Employee Benefit Plan Priority under 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(5): Howard Delivery Service v. Zurich Introduction Howard Delivery Service, Inc. v. Zurich...
Hudson v. Michigan: Reevaluating the Exclusionary Rule in Knock-and-Announce Violations Introduction Hudson v. Michigan, 547 U.S. 586 (2006), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
HOUSE v. BELL: Establishing the Actual Innocence Exception for Federal Habeas Corpus Relief Introduction HOUSE v. BELL, Warden, 547 U.S. 518 (2006), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Hill v. McDonough: Establishing §1983 as a Viable Avenue for Execution Method Challenges Introduction Hill v. McDonough, 547 U.S. 573 (2006), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Reinforcing Proximate Causation in Private RICO Claims: ANZA v. IDEAL STEEL SUPPLY CORPORATION Introduction The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), codified at 18 U.S.C. §§...
Zedner v. United States: Prospective Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights Introduction Zedner v. United States, 547 U.S. 489 (2006), is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that addresses the...
Garcetti v. Ceballos: Defining First Amendment Protections for Public Employees' Official Speech Introduction Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), is a landmark decision by the United States...
BRIGHAM CITY v. STUART: Establishing the Expanded Scope of the Emergency Aid Doctrine Introduction Brigham City, Utah v. Stuart et al. (547 U.S. 398, 2006) is a landmark decision by the United States...
EBAY Inc. v. MercExchange: Establishing the Four-Factor Test for Patent Injunctions Introduction The landmark case EBAY Inc. et al. v. MercExchange, L. L. C., decided by the United States Supreme...
DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno: Affirming the Restrictions on State Taxpayer Standing Introduction In DaimlerChrysler Corp. et al. v. Cuno et al., 547 U.S. 332 (2006), the United States Supreme Court...
ERISA §502(a)(3) Equitable Relief: Upholding Fiduciary Rights in Plan Reimbursements Introduction Sereboff et ux. v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc. (547 U.S. 356) is a pivotal United States...
Expanding the Scope of §401 State Certification: S.D. Warren Co. v. Maine Board of Environmental Protection Introduction S. D. Warren Co. v. Maine Board of Environmental Protection, 547 U.S. 370...
Limitations on Medicaid Recovery from Third-Party Settlements: Insights from Arkansas Dept. of Health and Human Services v. Ahlborn Introduction Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services et...
Marshall v. Marshall: Clarifying the Probate Exception in Federal Bankruptcy Jurisdiction Introduction Marshall v. Marshall, 547 U.S. 293 (2006), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Holmes v. South Carolina: Affirming Defendants' Rights to Third-Party Guilt Evidence Introduction Holmes v. South Carolina (547 U.S. 319, 2006) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Requiring Absence of Probable Cause in Retaliatory-Prosecution Claims: Hartman v. Moore Introduction Hartman et al. v. Moore, 547 U.S. 250 (2006), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Enhanced Notice Requirements in Tax Sales: JONES v. FLOWERS Establishes Due Process Obligations Introduction JONES v. FLOWERS et al., 547 U.S. 220 (2006), addresses a critical aspect of property law...