Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Impact of Medellín v. Dretke on Vienna Convention Rights and Federal Habeas Corpus Introduction Medellín v. Dretke, 544 U.S. 660 (2005), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that delves into the...
Government Speech and Compelled Subsidies: The Supreme Court's Decision in Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Association Introduction The Supreme Court case Johanns, Secretary of Agriculture, et al. v....
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Lingle: Redefining Regulatory Takings Under the Fifth Amendment Introduction In Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Lingle, 544 U.S. 528 (2005), the United States Supreme Court addressed a...
Restricting the Use of Visible Shackles in Capital Sentencing: Deck v. Missouri Introduction The Supreme Court's decision in Deck v. Missouri, 544 U.S. 622 (2005), represents a significant...
Granholm v. Heald: Equal Access in Direct Wine Shipments Under the Commerce Clause Introduction Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S. 460 (2005), is a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed the...
Pace v. DiGuglielmo: Clarifying AEDPA's Statute of Limitations on Federal Habeas Petitions Introduction Pace v. DiGuglielmo, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford, et al. (544...
FIFRA Preemption Clarified: Bates v. Dow AgroSciences Commentary Introduction The Supreme Court's decision in Bates et al. v. Dow AgroSciences LLC. (544 U.S. 431, 2005) marks a significant moment in...
Interpretation of "Convicted in Any Court": Small v. United States Establishes Domestic Limitation Introduction Small v. United States, 544 U.S. 385 (2005), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that...
Affirmation of Federal Wire Fraud Statute's Applicability to Schemes Defrauding Foreign Governments Introduction Pasquantino et al. v. United States, 544 U.S. 349 (2005), is a pivotal Supreme Court...
Loss Causation in Securities Fraud: Insights from Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo Introduction Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. Broudo et al. is a pivotal United States Supreme Court...
Limits on Prior Restraint: First Coast News v. Circuit Court of Florida Introduction In the landmark case Multimedia Holdings Corp. DBA First Coast News v. Circuit Court of Florida, St. Johns County,...
Johnson v. United States: Clarifying §2255 Limitation Period for Enhanced Federal Sentences Following Vacated State Convictions Introduction Johnson v. United States, 544 U.S. 295 (2005), is a...
Rousey v. Jacoway: Affirming IRA Exemptions under Bankruptcy Code §522(d)(10)(E) Introduction The landmark case Rousey et ux. v. Jacoway, 544 U.S. 320 (2005), addressed the complex interplay between...
ADEA Permits Disparate Impact Claims Affirmed in Smith v. City of Jackson Introduction Smith et al. v. City of Jackson, Mississippi, et al. (544 U.S. 228, 2005) is a significant case in the realm of...
RHINES v. WEBER: Establishing District Court Authority to Stay Mixed Habeas Petitions Under AEDPA Introduction In RHINES v. WEBER, 544 U.S. 269 (2005), the United States Supreme Court addressed a...
Exxon Mobil v. SABIC: Clarifying the Scope of the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Introduction Exxon Mobil Corporation et al. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (544 U.S. 280) is a landmark decision by...
Limits on Reasserting Tribal Sovereignty Over Historical Reservation Land Established in Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation Introduction Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York et al., 544 U.S....
Title IX's Private Right of Action Now Includes Retaliation Claims: Comprehensive Commentary on Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education Introduction Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education, 544...
Ensuring Fair Consideration of Mitigation Evidence in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Brown Warden v. Payton Introduction Brown Warden v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133 (2005), is a pivotal case addressing...
Muehler v. Mena: Upholding Fourth Amendment Protections in Lawful Detentions Introduction Muehler et al. v. Mena, 544 U.S. 93 (2005), is a pivotal U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing the...