Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences: Expanding the Scope of §271(e)(1) Safe Harbor in Patent Infringement Introduction Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd., et al., 545 U.S. 193 (2005), is a...
Wilkinson v. Austin: Supreme Court Upholds Ohio's Supermax Placement Procedures Introduction In the landmark case of Wilkinson, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, et al. v....
MILLER-EL v. DRETKE: Supreme Court Reaffirms Batson Protections Against Racial Discrimination in Jury Selection Introduction MILLER-EL v. DRETKE Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice,...
JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA: Supreme Court Refines Batson Standard for Prima Facie Discrimination Introduction JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA, 545 U.S. 162 (2005), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Grable Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering Manufacturing: Expanding Federal-Question Jurisdiction in Tax-Related Quiet Title Actions Introduction Grable Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue...
Ensuring Informed Guilty Pleas and Addressing Prosecutorial Consistencies: A Comprehensive Analysis of BRADSHAW, WARDEN v. STUMPF Introduction BRADSHAW, WARDEN v. STUMPF, 545 U.S. 175 (2005),...
Federal Retention of Submerged Lands in Glacier Bay: A Comprehensive Analysis of Alaska v. United States Introduction Alaska v. United States, 545 U.S. 75 (2005), is a pivotal United States Supreme...
Federal Authority Over Intrastate Medical Marijuana: Analyzing Gonzales v. Raich Introduction Gonzales v. Raich, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 6, 2005, represents a pivotal moment in the...
ADA Title III Extends Protections to Foreign-Flag Cruise Ships in U.S. Waters: An In-depth Analysis of SPECTOR v. NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE LTD. (545 U.S. 119) Introduction Spector et al. v. Norwegian...
Reevaluating Injunctive Relief in Defamation of Public Figures: Analysis of Tory v. Cochran Introduction Tory et al. v. Cochran, 544 U.S. 734 (2005), is a landmark case adjudicated by the United...
RLUIPA's Institutionalized-Persons Provision Upholding Religious Freedoms in Correctional Facilities Introduction CUTTER v. WILKINSON (544 U.S. 709, 2005) is a landmark decision by the United States...
Defining "Knowingly Corrupt Persuasion" in Obstruction of Justice: Insights from Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States Introduction The case Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States, 544 U.S. 696 (2005),...
Oklahoma Semiclosed Primary System Upheld: Balancing Freedom of Association and State Regulatory Interests Introduction In the landmark case Clingman, Secretary, Oklahoma State Election Board, et al....
Impact of Medellín v. Dretke on Vienna Convention Rights and Federal Habeas Corpus Introduction Medellín v. Dretke, 544 U.S. 660 (2005), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that delves into the...
Government Speech and Compelled Subsidies: The Supreme Court's Decision in Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Association Introduction The Supreme Court case Johanns, Secretary of Agriculture, et al. v....
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Lingle: Redefining Regulatory Takings Under the Fifth Amendment Introduction In Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Lingle, 544 U.S. 528 (2005), the United States Supreme Court addressed a...
Restricting the Use of Visible Shackles in Capital Sentencing: Deck v. Missouri Introduction The Supreme Court's decision in Deck v. Missouri, 544 U.S. 622 (2005), represents a significant...
Granholm v. Heald: Equal Access in Direct Wine Shipments Under the Commerce Clause Introduction Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S. 460 (2005), is a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed the...
Pace v. DiGuglielmo: Clarifying AEDPA's Statute of Limitations on Federal Habeas Petitions Introduction Pace v. DiGuglielmo, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford, et al. (544...
FIFRA Preemption Clarified: Bates v. Dow AgroSciences Commentary Introduction The Supreme Court's decision in Bates et al. v. Dow AgroSciences LLC. (544 U.S. 431, 2005) marks a significant moment in...