Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Orff v. United States: Limiting the Waiver of Sovereign Immunity in Federal Reclamation Contracts

Orff v. United States: Limiting the Waiver of Sovereign Immunity in Federal Reclamation Contracts

Date: Jun 24, 2005
Orff v. United States: Limiting the Waiver of Sovereign Immunity in Federal Reclamation Contracts Introduction Orff et al. v. United States et al., 545 U.S. 596 (2005), is a landmark case addressed...
Michigan's Intrastate Trucking Fee Upheld: A Dormant Commerce Clause Analysis

Michigan's Intrastate Trucking Fee Upheld: A Dormant Commerce Clause Analysis

Date: Jun 21, 2005
Michigan's Intrastate Trucking Fee Upheld: A Dormant Commerce Clause Analysis Introduction In American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Michigan Public Service Commission, 545 U.S. 429 (2005), the...
San Remo Hotel v. City of San Francisco: No Federal Forum Exception for Takings Claims Under Full Faith and Credit

San Remo Hotel v. City of San Francisco: No Federal Forum Exception for Takings Claims Under Full Faith and Credit

Date: Jun 21, 2005
San Remo Hotel v. City of San Francisco: No Federal Forum Exception for Takings Claims Under Full Faith and Credit Introduction San Remo Hotel, L.P., et al. v. City and County of San Francisco,...
Rompilla v. Beard: Reinforcing the Duty of Defense Counsel in Reviewing Prosecution's Evidence

Rompilla v. Beard: Reinforcing the Duty of Defense Counsel in Reviewing Prosecution's Evidence

Date: Jun 21, 2005
Rompilla v. Beard: Reinforcing the Duty of Defense Counsel in Reviewing Prosecution's Evidence Introduction Rompilla v. Beard, 545 U.S. 374 (2005), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Dodd v. United States: Clarifying the Limitation Period Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(3)

Dodd v. United States: Clarifying the Limitation Period Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(3)

Date: Jun 21, 2005
Dodd v. United States: Clarifying the Limitation Period Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(3) Introduction Dodd v. United States, 545 U.S. 353 (2005), addresses a critical aspect of federal habeas corpus law,...
Supreme Court Determines State Statutes Govern Statute of Limitations for FCA Retaliation Claims

Supreme Court Determines State Statutes Govern Statute of Limitations for FCA Retaliation Claims

Date: Jun 21, 2005
Supreme Court Determines State Statutes Govern Statute of Limitations for FCA Retaliation Claims Introduction Graham County Soil Water Conservation District et al. v. United States ex rel. Wilson,...
Supreme Court Affirms Michigan’s $100 Interstate Truck Registration Fee Under Narrow SSRS Preemption

Supreme Court Affirms Michigan’s $100 Interstate Truck Registration Fee Under Narrow SSRS Preemption

Date: Jun 21, 2005
Supreme Court Affirms Michigan’s $100 Interstate Truck Registration Fee Under Narrow SSRS Preemption Introduction The United States Supreme Court, in the landmark decision of Mid-Con Freight Systems,...
Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences: Expanding the Scope of §271(e)(1) Safe Harbor in Patent Infringement

Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences: Expanding the Scope of §271(e)(1) Safe Harbor in Patent Infringement

Date: Jun 14, 2005
Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences: Expanding the Scope of §271(e)(1) Safe Harbor in Patent Infringement Introduction Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd., et al., 545 U.S. 193 (2005), is a...
Wilkinson v. Austin: Supreme Court Upholds Ohio's Supermax Placement Procedures

Wilkinson v. Austin: Supreme Court Upholds Ohio's Supermax Placement Procedures

Date: Jun 14, 2005
Wilkinson v. Austin: Supreme Court Upholds Ohio's Supermax Placement Procedures Introduction In the landmark case of Wilkinson, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, et al. v....
MILLER-EL v. DRETKE: Supreme Court Reaffirms Batson Protections Against Racial Discrimination in Jury Selection

MILLER-EL v. DRETKE: Supreme Court Reaffirms Batson Protections Against Racial Discrimination in Jury Selection

Date: Jun 14, 2005
MILLER-EL v. DRETKE: Supreme Court Reaffirms Batson Protections Against Racial Discrimination in Jury Selection Introduction MILLER-EL v. DRETKE Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice,...
JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA: Supreme Court Refines Batson Standard for Prima Facie Discrimination

JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA: Supreme Court Refines Batson Standard for Prima Facie Discrimination

Date: Jun 14, 2005
JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA: Supreme Court Refines Batson Standard for Prima Facie Discrimination Introduction JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA, 545 U.S. 162 (2005), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Grable Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering Manufacturing: Expanding Federal-Question Jurisdiction in Tax-Related Quiet Title Actions

Grable Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering Manufacturing: Expanding Federal-Question Jurisdiction in Tax-Related Quiet Title Actions

Date: Jun 14, 2005
Grable Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering Manufacturing: Expanding Federal-Question Jurisdiction in Tax-Related Quiet Title Actions Introduction Grable Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue...
Ensuring Informed Guilty Pleas and Addressing Prosecutorial Consistencies: A Comprehensive Analysis of BRADSHAW, WARDEN v. STUMPF

Ensuring Informed Guilty Pleas and Addressing Prosecutorial Consistencies: A Comprehensive Analysis of BRADSHAW, WARDEN v. STUMPF

Date: Jun 14, 2005
Ensuring Informed Guilty Pleas and Addressing Prosecutorial Consistencies: A Comprehensive Analysis of BRADSHAW, WARDEN v. STUMPF Introduction BRADSHAW, WARDEN v. STUMPF, 545 U.S. 175 (2005),...
Federal Retention of Submerged Lands in Glacier Bay: A Comprehensive Analysis of Alaska v. United States

Federal Retention of Submerged Lands in Glacier Bay: A Comprehensive Analysis of Alaska v. United States

Date: Jun 7, 2005
Federal Retention of Submerged Lands in Glacier Bay: A Comprehensive Analysis of Alaska v. United States Introduction Alaska v. United States, 545 U.S. 75 (2005), is a pivotal United States Supreme...
Federal Authority Over Intrastate Medical Marijuana: Analyzing Gonzales v. Raich

Federal Authority Over Intrastate Medical Marijuana: Analyzing Gonzales v. Raich

Date: Jun 7, 2005
Federal Authority Over Intrastate Medical Marijuana: Analyzing Gonzales v. Raich Introduction Gonzales v. Raich, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 6, 2005, represents a pivotal moment in the...
ADA Title III Extends Protections to Foreign-Flag Cruise Ships in U.S. Waters: An In-depth Analysis of SPECTOR v. NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE LTD. (545 U.S. 119)

ADA Title III Extends Protections to Foreign-Flag Cruise Ships in U.S. Waters: An In-depth Analysis of SPECTOR v. NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE LTD. (545 U.S. 119)

Date: Jun 7, 2005
ADA Title III Extends Protections to Foreign-Flag Cruise Ships in U.S. Waters: An In-depth Analysis of SPECTOR v. NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE LTD. (545 U.S. 119) Introduction Spector et al. v. Norwegian...
Reevaluating Injunctive Relief in Defamation of Public Figures: Analysis of Tory v. Cochran

Reevaluating Injunctive Relief in Defamation of Public Figures: Analysis of Tory v. Cochran

Date: Jun 1, 2005
Reevaluating Injunctive Relief in Defamation of Public Figures: Analysis of Tory v. Cochran Introduction Tory et al. v. Cochran, 544 U.S. 734 (2005), is a landmark case adjudicated by the United...
RLUIPA's Institutionalized-Persons Provision Upholding Religious Freedoms in Correctional Facilities

RLUIPA's Institutionalized-Persons Provision Upholding Religious Freedoms in Correctional Facilities

Date: Jun 1, 2005
RLUIPA's Institutionalized-Persons Provision Upholding Religious Freedoms in Correctional Facilities Introduction CUTTER v. WILKINSON (544 U.S. 709, 2005) is a landmark decision by the United States...
Defining "Knowingly Corrupt Persuasion" in Obstruction of Justice: Insights from Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States

Defining "Knowingly Corrupt Persuasion" in Obstruction of Justice: Insights from Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States

Date: Jun 1, 2005
Defining "Knowingly Corrupt Persuasion" in Obstruction of Justice: Insights from Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States Introduction The case Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States, 544 U.S. 696 (2005),...
Oklahoma Semiclosed Primary System Upheld: Balancing Freedom of Association and State Regulatory Interests

Oklahoma Semiclosed Primary System Upheld: Balancing Freedom of Association and State Regulatory Interests

Date: May 24, 2005
Oklahoma Semiclosed Primary System Upheld: Balancing Freedom of Association and State Regulatory Interests Introduction In the landmark case Clingman, Secretary, Oklahoma State Election Board, et al....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert