Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Removal of Aliens Without Advance Government Consent under 8 U.S.C. §1231(b)(2): Comprehensive Analysis of JAMA v. ICE Introduction JAMA v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (543 U.S. 335, 2005) is...
Clarifying Detention Periods for Inadmissible Aliens: Insights from Clark v. Martinez Introduction Clark, Field Office Director, Seattle, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al. v. Martinez, 543...
Whitfield v. United States: Overturning the Overt Act Requirement in Money Laundering Conspiracies Introduction Whitfield v. United States, 543 U.S. 209 (2005), addresses a critical aspect of federal...
Supreme Court's Denial of Certiorari: Implications and Insights Introduction On January 10, 2005, the United States Supreme Court issued a series of decisions pertaining to petitions for writs of...
Limitation on CERCLA §113(f)(1) Contribution Claims: Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc. Introduction Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc., 543 U.S. 157 (2004), is a landmark...
Third-Party Standing and the Denial of Appellate Counsel: Insights from TESMER v. GRANHOLM Introduction TESMER v. GRANHOLM, 543 U.S. 125 (2004), addresses a pivotal issue in constitutional law:...
DEVENPECK v. ALFORD: Clarifying Probable Cause in Warrantless Arrests Introduction Devenpeck et al. v. Alford (543 U.S. 146, 2004) is a landmark United States Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Florida v. Nixon: Reevaluating Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Trials Introduction Florida v. Nixon, 857 So. 2d 172 (2003), addressed a critical issue in criminal defense: whether a...
Clarifying the Scope of Qualified Immunity in Use of Deadly Force Cases: Analysis of BROSSEAU v. HAUGEN Introduction BROSSEAU v. HAUGEN, 543 U.S. 194 (2004), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that...
Fair Use Defense in Trademark Infringement: No Burden to Negate Consumer Confusion Established in KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc. Introduction The landmark case of KP...
KANSAS v. COLORADO: Supreme Court Establishes Guidelines on Interstate Water Disputes and Prejudgment Interest Introduction KANSAS v. COLORADO (543 U.S. 86, 2004) represents a pivotal Supreme Court...
Understanding Supreme Court's Denial of Certiorari: Implications and Insights Introduction On December 6, 2004, the United States Supreme Court issued a significant order titled CERTIORARI DENIED....
Defining the Limits of Public Concern: The Supreme Court's Ruling in CITY OF SAN DIEGO ET AL. v. ROE Introduction In CITY OF SAN DIEGO ET AL. v. ROE (543 U.S. 77, 2004), the United States Supreme...
Supreme Court Upholds $1,000 Cap on Statutory Damages in TILA Violations for Personal Property Secured Loans Introduction Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc. v. Nigh, 543 U.S. 50 (2004), is a landmark...
Implications of the U.S. Supreme Court's Denial of Certiorari on November 29, 2004 Introduction On November 29, 2004, the United States Supreme Court issued a series of decisions denying petitions...
Impact of Supreme Court's Denial of Certiorari on Judicial Precedents Introduction On November 15, 2004, the United States Supreme Court denied petitions for writs of certiorari in numerous cases,...
Smith v. Texas: Enhancing Jury Instructions on Mitigating Evidence in Capital Sentencing Introduction Smith v. Texas, 543 U.S. 37 (2004), addresses critical aspects of jury instructions in capital...
State DUI Offenses Without Mens Rea Not Classified as Crimes of Violence Under 18 U.S.C. § 16: Leocal v. Ashcroft Disclaimer: This commentary is intended for informational purposes only and does not...
Expanding the Reach of Himalaya Clauses in Maritime Contracts: Insights from Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd. Introduction Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty...
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari: Implications and Insights from November 1, 2004 Decisions Introduction On November 1, 2004, the United States Supreme Court issued a comprehensive list of denial of...