Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
DEVENPECK v. ALFORD: Clarifying Probable Cause in Warrantless Arrests Introduction Devenpeck et al. v. Alford (543 U.S. 146, 2004) is a landmark United States Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Clarifying the Scope of Qualified Immunity in Use of Deadly Force Cases: Analysis of BROSSEAU v. HAUGEN Introduction BROSSEAU v. HAUGEN, 543 U.S. 194 (2004), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that...
Fair Use Defense in Trademark Infringement: No Burden to Negate Consumer Confusion Established in KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc. Introduction The landmark case of KP...
KANSAS v. COLORADO: Supreme Court Establishes Guidelines on Interstate Water Disputes and Prejudgment Interest Introduction KANSAS v. COLORADO (543 U.S. 86, 2004) represents a pivotal Supreme Court...
Defining the Limits of Public Concern: The Supreme Court's Ruling in CITY OF SAN DIEGO ET AL. v. ROE Introduction In CITY OF SAN DIEGO ET AL. v. ROE (543 U.S. 77, 2004), the United States Supreme...
Understanding Supreme Court's Denial of Certiorari: Implications and Insights Introduction On December 6, 2004, the United States Supreme Court issued a significant order titled CERTIORARI DENIED....
Supreme Court Upholds $1,000 Cap on Statutory Damages in TILA Violations for Personal Property Secured Loans Introduction Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc. v. Nigh, 543 U.S. 50 (2004), is a landmark...
Implications of the U.S. Supreme Court's Denial of Certiorari on November 29, 2004 Introduction On November 29, 2004, the United States Supreme Court issued a series of decisions denying petitions...
Impact of Supreme Court's Denial of Certiorari on Judicial Precedents Introduction On November 15, 2004, the United States Supreme Court denied petitions for writs of certiorari in numerous cases,...
Smith v. Texas: Enhancing Jury Instructions on Mitigating Evidence in Capital Sentencing Introduction Smith v. Texas, 543 U.S. 37 (2004), addresses critical aspects of jury instructions in capital...
State DUI Offenses Without Mens Rea Not Classified as Crimes of Violence Under 18 U.S.C. § 16: Leocal v. Ashcroft Disclaimer: This commentary is intended for informational purposes only and does not...
Expanding the Reach of Himalaya Clauses in Maritime Contracts: Insights from Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd. Introduction Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty...
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari: Implications and Insights from November 1, 2004 Decisions Introduction On November 1, 2004, the United States Supreme Court issued a comprehensive list of denial of...
Understanding Certiorari Denials: Insights from the U.S. Supreme Court's October 18, 2004 Decision Introduction On October 18, 2004, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision denying several...
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Multiple Cases: Implications and Analysis Introduction On October 12, 2004, the United States Supreme Court issued a series of orders denying petitions for writs of...
The Implications of Certiorari Denials: An In-Depth Analysis of U.S. Supreme Court Decisions on October 4, 2004 Introduction On October 4, 2004, the United States Supreme Court issued a comprehensive...
One Person, One Vote Established in Georgia Legislative Reapportionment Introduction Cox, Georgia Secretary of State v. Larios et al. (542 U.S. 947) is a landmark decision by the United States...
ASHCROFT v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION: Upholding First Amendment Protections in Online Content Regulation Introduction ASHCROFT v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION et al., 542 U.S. 656 (2004), is...
SOSA v. ALVAREZ-MACHAIN: Strengthening the Foreign-Country Exception under the FTCA and Defining the Scope of the ATS Introduction SOSA v. ALVAREZ-MACHAIN, 542 U.S. 692 (2004), is a landmark Supreme...
United States v. Patane: Clarifying Miranda's Scope on Physical Evidence Introduction United States v. Patane, 542 U.S. 630 (2004), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that addresses the intersection...