Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Texas Case Commentaries

Enforceability of Unilateral Supply Agreements and Requirements Contracts: Insights from PACE CORP. v. JACKSON

Enforceability of Unilateral Supply Agreements and Requirements Contracts: Insights from PACE CORP. v. JACKSON

Date: Dec 22, 1955
Enforceability of Unilateral Supply Agreements and Requirements Contracts: Insights from Pace Corporation v. Jackson Introduction Pace Corporation et al., Petitioners, v. Allan Jackson, Respondent...
Invalidation of Multi-Subject Legislative Amendments: BOARD OF WATER ENGINEERS v. CITY OF SAN ANTONIO

Invalidation of Multi-Subject Legislative Amendments: BOARD OF WATER ENGINEERS v. CITY OF SAN ANTONIO

Date: Nov 24, 1955
Invalidation of Multi-Subject Legislative Amendments: BOARD OF WATER ENGINEERS v. CITY OF SAN ANTONIO Introduction The case of BOARD OF WATER ENGINEERS OF THE STATE of Texas v. CITY OF SAN ANTONIO...
Assessor-Collector of Taxes in Independent School Districts Defined as Agents, Not Public Officers

Assessor-Collector of Taxes in Independent School Districts Defined as Agents, Not Public Officers

Date: Jul 21, 1955
Assessor-Collector of Taxes in Independent School Districts Defined as Agents, Not Public Officers Introduction The case of Aldine Independent School District v. L. B. Standley (154 Tex. 547, 1955)...
Invalid Conveyance of Public Mineral Estates: Supreme Court of Texas Establishes Strict Compliance with Relinquishment Act

Invalid Conveyance of Public Mineral Estates: Supreme Court of Texas Establishes Strict Compliance with Relinquishment Act

Date: Jul 14, 1955
Invalid Conveyance of Public Mineral Estates: Supreme Court of Texas Establishes Strict Compliance with Relinquishment Act Introduction The case of The Texas Company, Petitioner, v. The State of...
Inclusive Interpretation of 'Physical Injury' in Workers' Compensation: Bailey v. American General Insurance Company

Inclusive Interpretation of 'Physical Injury' in Workers' Compensation: Bailey v. American General Insurance Company

Date: Jun 9, 1955
Inclusive Interpretation of 'Physical Injury' in Workers' Compensation: Bailey v. American General Insurance Company Introduction In the landmark case of Emery Eugene Bailey v. American General...
Taylor v. Meek: Reinforcing the Best Interest Standard in Child Custody Cases

Taylor v. Meek: Reinforcing the Best Interest Standard in Child Custody Cases

Date: Apr 21, 1955
Taylor v. Meek: Reinforcing the Best Interest Standard in Child Custody Cases Introduction Taylor v. Meek, 276 S.W.2d 787 (Supreme Court of Texas, 1955), is a landmark case that delves into the...
Duty of Care in Traffic Collisions: Insights from DeWinne v. Allen

Duty of Care in Traffic Collisions: Insights from DeWinne v. Allen

Date: Apr 21, 1955
Duty of Care in Traffic Collisions: Insights from DeWinne v. Allen Introduction Camille DE WINNE et ux., Petitioners, v. William ALLEN et al. is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Texas...
Texas Supreme Court Affirms Fractional Royalty Interests as Defined in Original Mineral Deeds

Texas Supreme Court Affirms Fractional Royalty Interests as Defined in Original Mineral Deeds

Date: Jan 13, 1955
Texas Supreme Court Affirms Fractional Royalty Interests as Defined in Original Mineral Deeds Introduction The case of J. D. Woods et al. v. S.W. Sims (273 S.W.2d 617) adjudicated by the Supreme...
Equal and Uniform Taxation of Mineral Interests: STATE v. WHITTENBURG et al. (1954)

Equal and Uniform Taxation of Mineral Interests: STATE v. WHITTENBURG et al. (1954)

Date: Apr 1, 1954
Equal and Uniform Taxation of Mineral Interests: Analysis of STATE v. WHITTENBURG et al. (1954) Introduction STATE v. WHITTENBURG et al. (153 Tex. 205) is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court...
Summary Judgment Standards under Rule 166-A Affirmed: Sparkman v. McWhirter

Summary Judgment Standards under Rule 166-A Affirmed: Sparkman v. McWhirter

Date: Jan 16, 1954
Summary Judgment Standards under Rule 166-A Affirmed: Sparkman et ux. v. McWhirter et al. (263 S.W.2d 832) Introduction The case of Sparkman et ux. v. McWhirter et al., adjudicated by the Court of...
Equal and Uniform Taxation Standards: Analysis of CITY OF ARLINGTON v. CANNON

Equal and Uniform Taxation Standards: Analysis of CITY OF ARLINGTON v. CANNON

Date: Jan 9, 1954
Equal and Uniform Taxation Standards: Analysis of City of Arlington et al. v. Cannon et al. Introduction The case City of Arlington et al. v. Cannon et al. (263 S.W.2d 299) adjudicated by the Court...
Defining "Time of War" in Insurance Contracts: Western Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Meadows

Defining "Time of War" in Insurance Contracts: Western Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Meadows

Date: Nov 12, 1953
Defining "Time of War" in Insurance Contracts: Western Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Meadows Introduction Western Reserve Life Insurance Company v. Meadows, 152 Tex. 559 (1953), is a landmark case in...
Clarifying Rule 683 Requirements for Temporary Injunctions

Clarifying Rule 683 Requirements for Temporary Injunctions

Date: Nov 12, 1953
Clarifying Rule 683 Requirements for Temporary Injunctions in TRANSPORT CO. OF TEXAS v. ROBERTSON TRANSPORTS Introduction TRANSPORT CO. OF TEXAS et al. v. ROBERTSON TRANSPORTS, Inc. et al., 261...
Limits on Reversible Errors Regarding Counsel’s Arguments: Aultman v. Dallas Railway Terminal Co.

Limits on Reversible Errors Regarding Counsel’s Arguments: Aultman v. Dallas Railway Terminal Co.

Date: Oct 8, 1953
Limits on Reversible Errors Regarding Counsel’s Arguments: Aultman v. Dallas Railway Terminal Co. Introduction In Aultman et al. v. Dallas Railway Terminal Company, 260 S.W.2d 596 (Tex. 1953), the...
Enforcement of Foreign Child Support Orders under Texas Jurisdiction: The Ex parte Helms Decision

Enforcement of Foreign Child Support Orders under Texas Jurisdiction: The Ex parte Helms Decision

Date: Jul 23, 1953
Enforcement of Foreign Child Support Orders under Texas Jurisdiction: The Ex parte Helms Decision Introduction Ex parte HELMS. (259 S.W.2d 184) is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Texas...
BENGE v. SCHARBAUER: Establishing New Precedents in Mineral Rights and Royalty Allocations

BENGE v. SCHARBAUER: Establishing New Precedents in Mineral Rights and Royalty Allocations

Date: Jul 16, 1953
BENGE v. SCHARBAUER: Establishing New Precedents in Mineral Rights and Royalty Allocations Introduction The case of Benge et al. v. Scharbauer et al. (259 S.W.2d 166) was adjudicated by the Supreme...
Reaffirmation of the Doctrine of Discovered Peril in Ford v. Panhandle Santa Fe Ry. Co.

Reaffirmation of the Doctrine of Discovered Peril in Ford v. Panhandle Santa Fe Ry. Co.

Date: Dec 4, 1952
Reaffirmation of the Doctrine of Discovered Peril in Ford v. Panhandle Santa Fe Ry. Co. Introduction Ford v. Panhandle Santa Fe Ry. Co. is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Texas on...
Estoppel and Laches in Licensing Agreements: Insights from Gulbenkian v. Penn

Estoppel and Laches in Licensing Agreements: Insights from Gulbenkian v. Penn

Date: Oct 2, 1952
Estoppel and Laches in Licensing Agreements: Insights from Gulbenkian et al. v. Penn Introduction The case of Gulbenkian et al. v. Penn, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Texas on October 1, 1952,...
Individual Responsibility in Contributory Negligence: Dallas Railway Terminal Co. v. Bailey

Individual Responsibility in Contributory Negligence: Dallas Railway Terminal Co. v. Bailey

Date: Jul 24, 1952
Individual Responsibility in Contributory Negligence: Dallas Railway Terminal Co. v. Bailey Introduction Dallas Railway Terminal Co. v. Bailey, 250 S.W.2d 379 (Supreme Court of Texas, 1952), is a...
Scope of Employment and Gross Negligence: Insights from BURT v. LOCHAUSEN

Scope of Employment and Gross Negligence: Insights from BURT v. LOCHAUSEN

Date: Jun 19, 1952
Scope of Employment and Gross Negligence: Insights from BURT v. LOCHAUSEN (151 Tex. 289) Introduction BURT v. LOCHAUSEN et al. is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Texas on June 18,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert