Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Texas Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Public Use in Urban Renewal and Rejection of Trial de Novo in Eminent Domain

Affirmation of Public Use in Urban Renewal and Rejection of Trial de Novo in Eminent Domain

Date: Jul 16, 1959
Affirmation of Public Use in Urban Renewal and Rejection of Trial de Novo in Eminent Domain Introduction The case of R. B. Davis et al. v. City of Lubbock and Urban Renewal Agency of the City of...
Remittitur Standards and Negligence in Emergency Vehicle Operation: Flanigan v. Carswell

Remittitur Standards and Negligence in Emergency Vehicle Operation: Flanigan v. Carswell

Date: Jun 25, 1959
Remittitur Standards and Negligence in Emergency Vehicle Operation: Flanigan v. Carswell Introduction Flanigan et al. v. Carswell et al. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Texas on...
Indemnity Obligations and Summary Judgment: Gulf, Colorado Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McBride

Indemnity Obligations and Summary Judgment: Gulf, Colorado Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McBride

Date: Apr 23, 1959
Indemnity Obligations and Summary Judgment: Gulf, Colorado Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McBride Introduction The case of Gulf, Colorado Santa Fe Railway Company v. G. C. McBride et al., 322 S.W.2d 492...
STRAYHORN v. JONES: Supreme Court of Texas Establishes Precedent on Allocation of Receivership Expenses

STRAYHORN v. JONES: Supreme Court of Texas Establishes Precedent on Allocation of Receivership Expenses

Date: Mar 26, 1959
STRAYHORN v. JONES: Supreme Court of Texas Establishes Precedent on Allocation of Receivership Expenses Introduction The case of Ruth Legett JONES et al. v. J. R. STRAYHORN et al. (321 S.W.2d 290)...
Establishing Equitable Relief in Mineral Rights Disputes: Analysis of Miles v. J.O. Martin

Establishing Equitable Relief in Mineral Rights Disputes: Analysis of Miles v. J.O. Martin

Date: Feb 19, 1959
Establishing Equitable Relief in Mineral Rights Disputes: Analysis of Miles v. J.O. Martin Introduction Miles v. J.O. Martin, 321 S.W.2d 62 (Tex. 1959), is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court...
Supreme Court of Texas Clarifies Venue Rules for Easement and Title Cloud Disputes under Article 1995

Supreme Court of Texas Clarifies Venue Rules for Easement and Title Cloud Disputes under Article 1995

Date: Feb 19, 1959
Supreme Court of Texas Clarifies Venue Rules for Easement and Title Cloud Disputes under Article 1995 Introduction The case of Edward C. James et al. v. Robert W. Drye et al. ([320 S.W.2d 319](#)),...
Enforceability of Collateral Oral Agreements: Analyzing F. A. Hubacek v. Ennis State Bank

Enforceability of Collateral Oral Agreements: Analyzing F. A. Hubacek v. Ennis State Bank

Date: Oct 9, 1958
Enforceability of Collateral Oral Agreements: Analyzing F. A. Hubacek v. Ennis State Bank Introduction F. A. Hubacek v. Ennis State Bank is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Texas...
Consolidation of Specialized Motor Carrier Applications: Alamo Express v. Union City Transfer

Consolidation of Specialized Motor Carrier Applications: Alamo Express v. Union City Transfer

Date: Mar 6, 1958
Consolidation of Specialized Motor Carrier Applications: Alamo Express, Inc. v. Union City Transfer et al. Introduction The case of Alamo Express, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v. Union City Transfer et...
State Immunity in Declaratory Judgment: The W. D. Haden Company v. Howard D. Dodgen et al.

State Immunity in Declaratory Judgment: The W. D. Haden Company v. Howard D. Dodgen et al.

Date: Jan 16, 1958
State Immunity in Declaratory Judgment: The W. D. Haden Company v. Howard D. Dodgen et al. Introduction In the landmark case The W. D. Haden Company v. Howard D. Dodgen et al. (308 S.W.2d 838),...
Judicial Discretion in Receiver's Attorney Appointment Affirmed: State Board of Insurance v. Judge Betts

Judicial Discretion in Receiver's Attorney Appointment Affirmed: State Board of Insurance v. Judge Betts

Date: Jan 16, 1958
Judicial Discretion in Receiver's Attorney Appointment Affirmed: State Board of Insurance et al. v. Judge Chas. O. Betts Introduction In the landmark case of State Board of Insurance et al. v....
Admissibility of Parol Evidence to Establish Fraud Despite Merger Clauses

Admissibility of Parol Evidence to Establish Fraud Despite Merger Clauses

Date: Dec 19, 1957
Admissibility of Parol Evidence to Establish Fraud Despite Merger Clauses Introduction In Dallas Farm Machinery Company v. Ben Reaves, 307 S.W.2d 233 (Tex. 1957), the Supreme Court of Texas addressed...
Excessive Speed as Proximate Cause: Insights from Biggers v. Continental Bus System

Excessive Speed as Proximate Cause: Insights from Biggers v. Continental Bus System

Date: Jul 11, 1957
Excessive Speed as Proximate Cause: Insights from Biggers v. Continental Bus System Introduction The case of Mrs. Patricia Biggers et al. v. Continental Bus System, Inc., adjudicated by the Supreme...
Negligence and Liability in One-Way Street Collisions: Dallas Railway Terminal Co. v. Gossett

Negligence and Liability in One-Way Street Collisions: Dallas Railway Terminal Co. v. Gossett

Date: Nov 8, 1956
Negligence and Liability in One-Way Street Collisions: Dallas Railway Terminal Co. v. Gossett Introduction The case of Dallas Railway Terminal Company v. Vernon A. Gossett et al. (294 S.W.2d 377)...
Establishing Venue Under Subdivision 29a of Art. 1995: Insights from N.W. LADNER v. RELIANCE CORPoration

Establishing Venue Under Subdivision 29a of Art. 1995: Insights from N.W. LADNER v. RELIANCE CORPoration

Date: Oct 4, 1956
Establishing Venue Under Subdivision 29a of Art. 1995: Insights from N.W. LADNER v. RELIANCE CORPoration Introduction The case of N.W. Ladner, Appellant, v. Reliance Corporation et al., adjudicated...
Reasonable Person Standard in Railroad Crossing Statutes and Habit Evidence Admissibility: McFerrin v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co.

Reasonable Person Standard in Railroad Crossing Statutes and Habit Evidence Admissibility: McFerrin v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co.

Date: Jul 26, 1956
Reasonable Person Standard in Railroad Crossing Statutes and Habit Evidence Admissibility: McFerrin v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. Introduction The case of Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad...
Mandamus Remedy for Improper Stay and Failure to Sever Cases under the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act: Da v. Womack

Mandamus Remedy for Improper Stay and Failure to Sever Cases under the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act: Da v. Womack

Date: Jul 19, 1956
Mandamus Remedy for Improper Stay and Failure to Sever Cases under the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act: Da v. Womack Introduction Da v. Womack, 156 Tex. 44 (1956), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Texas Supreme Court Establishes Liability for Unlicensed Securities Dealers in Edmond L. Brown v. Harold G. Cole et al.

Texas Supreme Court Establishes Liability for Unlicensed Securities Dealers in Edmond L. Brown v. Harold G. Cole et al.

Date: Jun 21, 1956
Texas Supreme Court Establishes Liability for Unlicensed Securities Dealers in Edmond L. Brown v. Harold G. Cole et al. (291 S.W.2d 704) Introduction In the landmark case of Edmond L. Brown v. Harold...
Judicial Estoppel and Community Property in Betty Knox Long v. Harryett H. Knox

Judicial Estoppel and Community Property in Betty Knox Long v. Harryett H. Knox

Date: May 31, 1956
Judicial Estoppel and Community Property in Betty Knox Long v. Harryett H. Knox Introduction Betty Knox Long et vir, Petitioners, v. Harryett H. Knox et al., Respondents, decided by the Supreme Court...
Directory Nature of Filing Requirements Under Article 3523 in Probate Claims

Directory Nature of Filing Requirements Under Article 3523 in Probate Claims

Date: Mar 29, 1956
Directory Nature of Filing Requirements Under Article 3523 in Probate Claims Introduction The case of Cecil J. Chisholm, Administrator v. Bewley Mills, a Corporation (287 S.W.2d 943) adjudicated by...
Affirmation of Policy Cancellation: Analysis of Malcolm Womack v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Affirmation of Policy Cancellation: Analysis of Malcolm Womack v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Date: Jan 31, 1956
Affirmation of Policy Cancellation: Analysis of Malcolm Womack v. Allstate Insurance Co. Introduction In Malcolm Womack et al. v. Allstate Insurance Company, 286 S.W.2d 308 (Tex. Civ. App. 1956), the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert