Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Texas Case Commentaries

Joint and Several Liability in Indivisible Torts: Landers v. East Texas Salt Water Disposal Co.

Joint and Several Liability in Indivisible Torts: Landers v. East Texas Salt Water Disposal Co.

Date: May 29, 1952
Joint and Several Liability in Indivisible Torts: Landers v. East Texas Salt Water Disposal Co. Introduction Landers v. East Texas Salt Water Disposal Co., 248 S.W.2d 731 (Tex. 1952), is a landmark...
Supreme Court of Texas Limits Judicial Intervention in Delegate Selection to Party Executive Committees - LANE v. ROSS (1952)

Supreme Court of Texas Limits Judicial Intervention in Delegate Selection to Party Executive Committees - LANE v. ROSS (1952)

Date: May 29, 1952
Supreme Court of Texas Limits Judicial Intervention in Delegate Selection to Party Executive Committees - LANE v. ROSS (1952) Introduction In the landmark case of LANE et al. v. ROSS, Secretary of...
Affirmation of Lower Court's Temporary Injunction in Labor Picketing Cases

Affirmation of Lower Court's Temporary Injunction in Labor Picketing Cases

Date: May 22, 1952
Affirmation of Lower Court's Temporary Injunction in Labor Picketing Cases Introduction The case of TEXAS FOUNDRIES, Inc. v. INTERNATIONAL MOULDERS FOUNDRY WORKERS' UNION et al., 248 S.W.2d 460,...
Distinguishing Liquidated Damages from Penalties: STEWART v. BASEY

Distinguishing Liquidated Damages from Penalties: STEWART v. BASEY

Date: Jan 17, 1952
Distinguishing Liquidated Damages from Penalties: Stewart et ux. v. Basey Introduction Stewart et ux. v. Basey (245 S.W.2d 484) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Texas on January...
Interpreting 'Without Recourse' Clauses in Credit Agreements: A Precedent from Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp. v. Daniel

Interpreting 'Without Recourse' Clauses in Credit Agreements: A Precedent from Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp. v. Daniel

Date: Nov 1, 1951
Interpreting 'Without Recourse' Clauses in Credit Agreements: A Precedent from Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp. v. Daniel Introduction The case of Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp. v. Daniel (243 S.W.2d...
Establishing Causal Connection in Disability Pension Claims: Marks v. Board of Firemen's Relief Retirement Fund

Establishing Causal Connection in Disability Pension Claims: Marks v. Board of Firemen's Relief Retirement Fund

Date: Oct 4, 1951
Establishing Causal Connection in Disability Pension Claims: Marks v. Board of Firemen's Relief Retirement Fund Introduction The case of Board of Firemen's Relief Retirement Fund Trustees of Houston...
Duress in Property Conveyance: Analysis of UNITED STATES FIDELITY GUARANTY CO. v. CARR.

Duress in Property Conveyance: Analysis of UNITED STATES FIDELITY GUARANTY CO. v. CARR.

Date: Sep 6, 1951
Duress in Property Conveyance: Analysis of UNITED STATES FIDELITY GUARANTY CO. v. CARR. Introduction The case of UNITED STATES FIDELITY GUARANTY CO. v. CARR. (242 S.W.2d 224), decided on September 5,...
Defining Second Residence for Legal Venue: Insights from Snyder v. Pitts

Defining Second Residence for Legal Venue: Insights from Snyder v. Pitts

Date: Jul 26, 1951
Defining Second Residence for Legal Venue: Insights from Snyder v. Pitts Introduction Snyder et al. v. Pitts, Chief Justice et al., 241 S.W.2d 136, is a pivotal 1951 decision by the Supreme Court of...
Consent in Court-Ordered Settlements: Insights from BURNAMAN v. HEATON

Consent in Court-Ordered Settlements: Insights from BURNAMAN v. HEATON

Date: Jun 28, 1951
Consent in Court-Ordered Settlements: Insights from BURNAMAN v. HEATON Introduction BURNAMAN v. HEATON, 240 S.W.2d 288 (Tex. 1951), is a landmark case in Texas jurisprudence that addresses the...
Limits on Judicial Review of Administrative Demotions: CITY OF AMARILLO v. HANCOCK

Limits on Judicial Review of Administrative Demotions: CITY OF AMARILLO v. HANCOCK

Date: Jun 14, 1951
Limits on Judicial Review of Administrative Demotions: CITY OF AMARILLO v. HANCOCK Introduction City of Amarillo et al. v. Hancock (239 S.W.2d 788) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Benoit v. Wilson: Reinforcing Standards for Jury Determination of Negligence and Proximate Cause in Wrongful Death Claims

Benoit v. Wilson: Reinforcing Standards for Jury Determination of Negligence and Proximate Cause in Wrongful Death Claims

Date: Jun 14, 1951
Benoit v. Wilson: Reinforcing Standards for Jury Determination of Negligence and Proximate Cause in Wrongful Death Claims Introduction Benoit v. Wilson et al. (239 S.W.2d 792) is a landmark judgment...
Establishing Notice Requirements in Tax Foreclosure Sales: Analysis of Woodward v. Ortiz

Establishing Notice Requirements in Tax Foreclosure Sales: Analysis of Woodward v. Ortiz

Date: Apr 5, 1951
Establishing Notice Requirements in Tax Foreclosure Sales: Analysis of Woodward v. Ortiz Introduction Woodward et al. v. Ortiz et al. (237 S.W.2d 286), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Texas on...
Constructive Trusts in Joint Oil and Gas Ventures: Texas Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling in Fitzgerald v. Hull

Constructive Trusts in Joint Oil and Gas Ventures: Texas Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling in Fitzgerald v. Hull

Date: Apr 5, 1951
Constructive Trusts in Joint Oil and Gas Ventures: Texas Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling in Fitzgerald v. Hull Introduction Fitzgerald v. Hull et al. (237 S.W.2d 256), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Utility Companies' Rights Under Article 1436a: City of Mason v. West Texas Utilities Co.

Utility Companies' Rights Under Article 1436a: City of Mason v. West Texas Utilities Co.

Date: Apr 5, 1951
Utility Companies' Rights Under Article 1436a: City of Mason v. West Texas Utilities Co. Introduction In the landmark case City of Mason v. West Texas Utilities Co. (150 Tex. 18), adjudicated by the...
Establishing Proximate Cause in Jones Act Claims: Analysis of HOPSON v. GULF OIL CORP.

Establishing Proximate Cause in Jones Act Claims: Analysis of HOPSON v. GULF OIL CORP.

Date: Mar 22, 1951
Establishing Proximate Cause in Jones Act Claims: Analysis of HOPSON v. GULF OIL CORP. (1951) Introduction HOPSON v. GULF OIL CORP., decided by the Supreme Court of Texas on March 21, 1951, is a...
Cautious Approach to Adoption by Estoppel Reinforced in Cavanaugh v. Davis

Cautious Approach to Adoption by Estoppel Reinforced in Cavanaugh v. Davis

Date: Feb 22, 1951
Cautious Approach to Adoption by Estoppel Reinforced in Cavanaugh et al. v. Davis Introduction Cavanaugh et al. v. Davis, 149 Tex. 573 (1951), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Landlord Liability and Indemnity in Joint Tortfeasor Scenarios: RENFRO DRUG CO. v. LEWIS

Landlord Liability and Indemnity in Joint Tortfeasor Scenarios: RENFRO DRUG CO. v. LEWIS

Date: Feb 8, 1951
Landlord Liability and Indemnity in Joint Tortfeasor Scenarios: RENFRO DRUG CO. v. LEWIS Introduction Renfro Drug Co. et al. v. Lewis (235 S.W.2d 609), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Texas in...
Estoppel and Equitable Division of Property in Divorce: Insights from CARLE et al. v. CARLE

Estoppel and Equitable Division of Property in Divorce: Insights from CARLE et al. v. CARLE

Date: Jan 11, 1951
Estoppel and Equitable Division of Property in Divorce: Insights from CARLE et al. v. CARLE Introduction CARLE et al. v. CARLE (234 S.W.2d 1002) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Revisiting Procedures for Reviving Default Judgments: Insights from Jim Sanders et al. v. O.Z. Harder

Revisiting Procedures for Reviving Default Judgments: Insights from Jim Sanders et al. v. O.Z. Harder

Date: Feb 9, 1950
Revisiting Procedures for Reviving Default Judgments: Insights from Jim Sanders et al. v. O.Z. Harder Introduction The case of Jim Sanders et al. v. O.Z. Harder, decided by the Supreme Court of Texas...
Supreme Court of Texas Reinforces Statutory Compliance in Commissioners Court Delegation

Supreme Court of Texas Reinforces Statutory Compliance in Commissioners Court Delegation

Date: Oct 21, 1948
Supreme Court of Texas Reinforces Statutory Compliance in Commissioners Court Delegation Introduction In the landmark case of Gus Canales et al. v. C. Woodrow Laughlin et al., decided by the Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert