Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Tennessee Case Commentaries

Coram Nobis Standard Reinforced in STATE OF TENNESSEE ex rel. Carlson and Coates v. State of Tennessee

Coram Nobis Standard Reinforced in STATE OF TENNESSEE ex rel. Carlson and Coates v. State of Tennessee

Date: Oct 8, 1966
Coram Nobis Standard Reinforced in STATE OF TENNESSEE ex rel. Carlson and Coates v. State of Tennessee Introduction STATE OF TENNESSEE ex rel. Raymond Carlson and David Lee Coates v. State of...
Recognition of Unjust Enrichment Claims by Material Suppliers Without Privity: Paschall's, Inc. v. J.P. Dozier

Recognition of Unjust Enrichment Claims by Material Suppliers Without Privity: Paschall's, Inc. v. J.P. Dozier

Date: Sep 24, 1966
Recognition of Unjust Enrichment Claims by Material Suppliers Without Privity Introduction The case of Paschall's, Inc. v. J.P. Dozier and Wife, Mrs. Ethel A. Dozier (219 Tenn. 45) adjudicated by the...
Bobby Edward Bolin v. State of Tennessee: Affirmation of Robbery Conviction and Procedural Standards

Bobby Edward Bolin v. State of Tennessee: Affirmation of Robbery Conviction and Procedural Standards

Date: Jun 4, 1966
Bobby Edward Bolin v. State of Tennessee: Affirmation of Robbery Conviction and Procedural Standards Introduction Bobby Edward Bolin v. State of Tennessee, 219 Tenn. 4, 1966, is a landmark decision...
Emotional Distress Claims Require Outrageous Conduct – Medlin v. Allied Investment Co.

Emotional Distress Claims Require Outrageous Conduct – Medlin v. Allied Investment Co.

Date: Jan 6, 1966
Emotional Distress Claims Require Outrageous Conduct – Medlin v. Allied Investment Co. Introduction The case of Roy Medlin and Jean Medlin v. Allied Investment Company embodies a significant judicial...
Reaffirmation of Murder Conviction in WILLIAM CHARLES STUBBS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE: Legal Principles and Implications

Reaffirmation of Murder Conviction in WILLIAM CHARLES STUBBS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE: Legal Principles and Implications

Date: Jun 3, 1965
Reaffirmation of Murder Conviction in WILLIAM CHARLES STUBBS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE: Legal Principles and Implications Introduction WILLIAM CHARLES STUBBS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE is a landmark decision...
Standard for Revoking Suspended Sentences: Analysis of Bledsoe v. State of Tennessee

Standard for Revoking Suspended Sentences: Analysis of Bledsoe v. State of Tennessee

Date: Mar 5, 1965
Standard for Revoking Suspended Sentences: Analysis of Bledsoe v. State of Tennessee Introduction The case of Jackie Bledsoe v. State of Tennessee (215 Tenn. 553) presents a significant examination...
Affirmation of Limited Confrontation Rights and Indictment Specificity in Tennessee Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Affirmation of Limited Confrontation Rights and Indictment Specificity in Tennessee Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Date: Jul 16, 1964
Affirmation of Limited Confrontation Rights and Indictment Specificity in Tennessee Habeas Corpus Proceedings Introduction In the case of State of Tennessee ex rel. Charles Byrd v. Lynn Bomar (214...
Requirement to Charge on Circumstantial Evidence: Monts and West v. State of Tennessee

Requirement to Charge on Circumstantial Evidence: Monts and West v. State of Tennessee

Date: Mar 6, 1964
Requirement to Charge on Circumstantial Evidence: Monts and West v. State of Tennessee Introduction Monts and West v. State of Tennessee is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Contempt of Court and the Limits of Attorney Immunity: Insights from Robinson v. Air Draulics Engineering Company, Inc.

Contempt of Court and the Limits of Attorney Immunity: Insights from Robinson v. Air Draulics Engineering Company, Inc.

Date: Mar 6, 1964
Contempt of Court and the Limits of Attorney Immunity: Insights from Robinson v. Air Draulics Engineering Company, Inc. Introduction The case of James H. Robinson v. Air Draulics Engineering Company,...
Corroboration of Accomplice Testimony in Tennessee Larceny Conviction: Analysis of STATE OF TENNESSEE v. OVANLEY FOWLER and VAN DUNHAM

Corroboration of Accomplice Testimony in Tennessee Larceny Conviction: Analysis of STATE OF TENNESSEE v. OVANLEY FOWLER and VAN DUNHAM

Date: Dec 6, 1963
Corroboration of Accomplice Testimony in Tennessee Larceny Conviction: Analysis of STATE OF TENNESSEE v. OVANLEY FOWLER and VAN DUNHAM Introduction The case of State of Tennessee v. Ovanley Fowler...
Reaffirmation and Clarification of Rescue and Sudden Emergency Doctrines in Negligence Claims: Ruth v. Ruth

Reaffirmation and Clarification of Rescue and Sudden Emergency Doctrines in Negligence Claims: Ruth v. Ruth

Date: Nov 7, 1963
Reaffirmation and Clarification of Rescue and Sudden Emergency Doctrines in Negligence Claims: Ruth v. Ruth Introduction In the landmark case of George Robert Ruth v. Dean A. Ruth, adjudicated by the...
Establishing the Relevance of Concurrent Crimes: Insights from Carroll v. Tennessee

Establishing the Relevance of Concurrent Crimes: Insights from Carroll v. Tennessee

Date: Sep 12, 1963
Establishing the Relevance of Concurrent Crimes: Insights from Carroll v. Tennessee Introduction William D. Carroll, Jr. v. State of Tennessee is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Second-Degree Murder Conviction in McBee v. Tennessee

Affirmation of Second-Degree Murder Conviction in McBee v. Tennessee

Date: Sep 12, 1963
Affirmation of Second-Degree Murder Conviction in McBee v. Tennessee (213 Tenn. 15) Introduction McBee v. Tennessee is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Tennessee in 1963. The...
Mandatory Jury Instruction on Lesser Included Offenses: The STRADER v. STATE of Tennessee Decision

Mandatory Jury Instruction on Lesser Included Offenses: The STRADER v. STATE of Tennessee Decision

Date: Nov 10, 1962
Mandatory Jury Instruction on Lesser Included Offenses: The STRADER v. STATE of Tennessee Decision Introduction Herbert STRADER v. STATE of Tennessee is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Defining Sentencing Parameters in Assault Cases: Holt v. State of Tennessee

Defining Sentencing Parameters in Assault Cases: Holt v. State of Tennessee

Date: May 5, 1962
Defining Sentencing Parameters in Assault Cases: Holt v. State of Tennessee Introduction Roy E. Holt v. State of Tennessee, 210 Tenn. 188 (1962), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Consideration in Insurance Policy Modifications: Johnson v. Central National Insurance Co.

Consideration in Insurance Policy Modifications: Johnson v. Central National Insurance Co.

Date: Apr 5, 1962
Consideration in Insurance Policy Modifications: Johnson v. Central National Insurance Co. Introduction In the case of Johnson v. Central National Insurance Company of Omaha, Nebraska, the Supreme...
Alamo v. Forcum-James: Clarifying Jury Discharge Authority and De Novo Review Standards in Complex Contractual Cases

Alamo v. Forcum-James: Clarifying Jury Discharge Authority and De Novo Review Standards in Complex Contractual Cases

Date: Jun 28, 1959
Alamo v. Forcum-James: Clarifying Jury Discharge Authority and De Novo Review Standards in Complex Contractual Cases Introduction The case of Town of Alamo, Tennessee v. Forcum-James Company (205...
Corroboration Requirements for Accomplice Testimony in Sexual Offense Cases: Sherrill v. State of Tennessee

Corroboration Requirements for Accomplice Testimony in Sexual Offense Cases: Sherrill v. State of Tennessee

Date: Jan 24, 1959
Corroboration Requirements for Accomplice Testimony in Sexual Offense Cases: Sherrill v. State of Tennessee Introduction Sherrill v. State of Tennessee is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court...
Marable v. State of Tennessee: Establishing the Bounds of Circumstantial Evidence in Homicide Cases

Marable v. State of Tennessee: Establishing the Bounds of Circumstantial Evidence in Homicide Cases

Date: Apr 10, 1958
Marable v. State of Tennessee: Establishing the Bounds of Circumstantial Evidence in Homicide Cases Introduction Marable v. State of Tennessee (203 Tenn. 440) is a landmark decision rendered by the...
Protection of Professional Reputation in Legal Proceedings: Insights from Barnes v. Kyle

Protection of Professional Reputation in Legal Proceedings: Insights from Barnes v. Kyle

Date: Jun 8, 1957
Protection of Professional Reputation in Legal Proceedings: Insights from Barnes v. Kyle Introduction Katherine G. Barnes v. G.A. Kyle et al., adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Tennessee in 1957,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert