Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Tennessee Case Commentaries

Obligations of Lessor to Rebuild After Total Fire Damage: EVCO Corp. v. Ross

Obligations of Lessor to Rebuild After Total Fire Damage: EVCO Corp. v. Ross

Date: Sep 16, 1975
Obligations of Lessor to Rebuild After Total Fire Damage: EVCO Corp. v. Ross Introduction The case of EVCO Corporation v. Richard Ross and Beryl Ross (528 S.W.2d 20, Supreme Court of Tennessee, 1975)...
Separate Convictions Affirmed Under Blockburger Test in Tennessee: State v. Black

Separate Convictions Affirmed Under Blockburger Test in Tennessee: State v. Black

Date: Jun 17, 1975
Separate Convictions Affirmed Under Blockburger Test in Tennessee: State v. Black Introduction State of Tennessee v. John Edward Black, 524 S.W.2d 913 (Tenn. 1975), adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Transition from "Farce and Mockery" to "Reasonable Competence" in Effective Assistance of Counsel: Baxter v. Rose

Transition from "Farce and Mockery" to "Reasonable Competence" in Effective Assistance of Counsel: Baxter v. Rose

Date: May 20, 1975
Transition from "Farce and Mockery" to "Reasonable Competence" in Effective Assistance of Counsel: Baxter v. Rose Introduction Robert Baxter, the petitioner, appealed to the Supreme Court of...
Valuation of Life Estates Under Section 30-1613 T.C.A.: Insights from Tidwell v. Collins

Valuation of Life Estates Under Section 30-1613 T.C.A.: Insights from Tidwell v. Collins

Date: Apr 15, 1975
Valuation of Life Estates Under Section 30-1613 T.C.A.: Insights from Tidwell v. Collins Introduction Tidwell v. Collins, 522 S.W.2d 674 (Tenn. 1975), is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Accrual of Cause of Action in Products Liability Cases: McCroskey v. Bryant Air Conditioning Company

Accrual of Cause of Action in Products Liability Cases: McCroskey v. Bryant Air Conditioning Company

Date: Apr 8, 1975
Accrual of Cause of Action in Products Liability Cases: McCroskey v. Bryant Air Conditioning Company Introduction McCroskey v. Bryant Air Conditioning Company, 524 S.W.2d 487 (Supreme Court of...
Precedent on Jury Instructions for Direct and Circumstantial Evidence in Criminal Trials: State v. Thompson

Precedent on Jury Instructions for Direct and Circumstantial Evidence in Criminal Trials: State v. Thompson

Date: Mar 4, 1975
Precedent on Jury Instructions for Direct and Circumstantial Evidence in Criminal Trials: State v. Thompson Introduction State v. Dee Washington Thompson, Jr. is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Establishing the Nature of Continuing Guaranties: Farmers-Peoples Bank v. Clemmer

Establishing the Nature of Continuing Guaranties: Farmers-Peoples Bank v. Clemmer

Date: Feb 19, 1975
Establishing the Nature of Continuing Guaranties: Farmers-Peoples Bank v. Clemmer Introduction The case of Farmers-Peoples Bank v. H.P. Clemmer and Pauline M. Clemmer (519 S.W.2d 801) adjudicated by...
Adoption of the Discovery Rule in Medical Malpractice: Norma L. Teeters v. Dr. Currey

Adoption of the Discovery Rule in Medical Malpractice: Norma L. Teeters v. Dr. Currey

Date: Dec 10, 1974
Adoption of the Discovery Rule in Medical Malpractice: Norma L. Teeters v. Dr. Doyle E. Currey Introduction Norma L. Teeters v. Dr. Doyle E. Currey is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Appellate Review of Trial Judges' Discretion in Suspending Sentences and Granting Probation: John V. Stiller v. State of Tennessee

Appellate Review of Trial Judges' Discretion in Suspending Sentences and Granting Probation: John V. Stiller v. State of Tennessee

Date: Nov 13, 1974
Appellate Review of Trial Judges' Discretion in Suspending Sentences and Granting Probation: John V. Stiller v. State of Tennessee Introduction John V. Stiller v. State of Tennessee is a landmark...
Distinct Identity Test in Multiple Charges: Insights from Da v. Duchac and Robinson

Distinct Identity Test in Multiple Charges: Insights from Da v. Duchac and Robinson

Date: Feb 20, 1974
Distinct Identity Test in Multiple Charges: Insights from Da v. Duchac and Robinson Introduction The case of Da v. Duchac and Robinson (505 S.W.2d 237) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Tennessee...
Mandatory Offense Election by Prosecution in Multiple Charge Indictments: Den v. D. Burlison

Mandatory Offense Election by Prosecution in Multiple Charge Indictments: Den v. D. Burlison

Date: Nov 20, 1973
Mandatory Offense Election by Prosecution in Multiple Charge Indictments: Den v. D. Burlison Introduction In the landmark case of Den v. D. Burlison, decided by the Supreme Court of Tennessee on...
STATE of Tennessee v. Charles Hasque Bishop (1973): Reinforcing the State's Duty in Ensuring the Right to a Speedy Trial

STATE of Tennessee v. Charles Hasque Bishop (1973): Reinforcing the State's Duty in Ensuring the Right to a Speedy Trial

Date: Apr 3, 1973
STATE of Tennessee v. Charles Hasque Bishop (1973): Reinforcing the State's Duty in Ensuring the Right to a Speedy Trial Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of Tennessee v. Charles Hasque...
Reinforcement of Standards for Conviction on Circumstantial Evidence: STATE OF TENNESSEE v. Crawford

Reinforcement of Standards for Conviction on Circumstantial Evidence: STATE OF TENNESSEE v. Crawford

Date: Sep 8, 1971
Reinforcement of Standards for Conviction on Circumstantial Evidence: STATE OF TENNESSEE v. Crawford Introduction The case of State of Tennessee v. Harry T. Crawford, Jr. (225 Tenn. 478) represents a...
Implied Admission of Sole Proximate Negligence in Default Judgments: Limitations on Mitigation Arguments

Implied Admission of Sole Proximate Negligence in Default Judgments: Limitations on Mitigation Arguments

Date: Jun 8, 1971
Implied Admission of Sole Proximate Negligence in Default Judgments: Limitations on Mitigation Arguments Introduction The case of Richard Adkisson v. Earl Huffman, Administrator of R.B. Huffman,...
Strict Statutory Compliance in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from Ussery v. Avery and Henderson

Strict Statutory Compliance in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from Ussery v. Avery and Henderson

Date: Oct 12, 1968
Strict Statutory Compliance in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from Ussery v. Avery and Henderson Introduction The case of Walter William Ussery v. Harry S. Avery and C. Murray Henderson, decided...
Credit for Time Served in Mental Institutions Under T.C.A. Sec. 40-3102: Analysis of Bobby Marsh v. C. Murray Henderson

Credit for Time Served in Mental Institutions Under T.C.A. Sec. 40-3102: Analysis of Bobby Marsh v. C. Murray Henderson

Date: Jan 27, 1968
Credit for Time Served in Mental Institutions Under T.C.A. Sec. 40-3102: Analysis of Bobby Marsh v. C. Murray Henderson Introduction Bobby Marsh v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden Tennessee State...
Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Dismissal in STATE OF TENNESSEE ex rel. OLLIE NEWSOM v. C. MURRAY HENDERSON

Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Dismissal in STATE OF TENNESSEE ex rel. OLLIE NEWSOM v. C. MURRAY HENDERSON

Date: Jan 27, 1968
Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Dismissal in STATE OF TENNESSEE ex rel. OLLIE NEWSOM v. C. MURRAY HENDERSON Introduction The case of STATE OF TENNESSEE ex rel. OLLIE NEWSOM v. C. MURRAY HENDERSON...
Affirmation of the Plain View Doctrine in Search and Seizure: Woodrow Sneed v. State of Tennessee

Affirmation of the Plain View Doctrine in Search and Seizure: Woodrow Sneed v. State of Tennessee

Date: Jan 9, 1968
Affirmation of the Plain View Doctrine in Search and Seizure: Woodrow Sneed v. State of Tennessee Introduction In the landmark case of Woodrow Sneed v. State of Tennessee (221 Tenn. 6), the Supreme...
Tennessee Supreme Court Affirms Dismissal of Habeas Corpus Petition Without Demonstrated Prejudice

Tennessee Supreme Court Affirms Dismissal of Habeas Corpus Petition Without Demonstrated Prejudice

Date: Nov 28, 1967
Tennessee Supreme Court Affirms Dismissal of Habeas Corpus Petition Without Demonstrated Prejudice Introduction The case of STATE OF TENNESSEE ex rel EDWARD EDMONDSON v. C. MURRAY HENDERSON presents...
Impartiality in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: The LEIGHTON v. HENDERSON Decision

Impartiality in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: The LEIGHTON v. HENDERSON Decision

Date: Apr 8, 1967
Impartiality in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: The LEIGHTON v. HENDERSON Decision Introduction The case of IRA Leighton v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden, decided by the Supreme Court of Tennessee in April...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert