Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Tennessee Case Commentaries

Mandatory District Attorney Intervention in Quo Warranto Actions - STATE OF TENNESSEE ex rel. Wallen v. Miller

Mandatory District Attorney Intervention in Quo Warranto Actions - STATE OF TENNESSEE ex rel. Wallen v. Miller

Date: Jun 8, 1957
Mandatory District Attorney Intervention in Quo Warranto Actions STATE OF TENNESSEE ex rel. J.H. WALLEN et al. v. WALLACE S. MILLER, SR. Supreme Court of Tennessee, June 7, 1957 Introduction The case...
Discretionary Standards in Parole Revocation: Hooper v. State of Tennessee

Discretionary Standards in Parole Revocation: Hooper v. State of Tennessee

Date: Dec 8, 1956
Discretionary Standards in Parole Revocation: Hooper v. State of Tennessee Introduction Paul (Cue) Hooper v. State of Tennessee, 201 Tenn. 156 (1956), is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Corpus Delicti and Lawful Search: A Comprehensive Analysis of Liakas and Ellsworth v. Tennessee

Corpus Delicti and Lawful Search: A Comprehensive Analysis of Liakas and Ellsworth v. Tennessee

Date: Feb 4, 1956
Corpus Delicti and Lawful Search: A Comprehensive Analysis of Liakas and Ellsworth v. Tennessee Introduction The case of Dean Defort Liakas and Frank James Ellsworth v. State of Tennessee, decided by...
Limits on Alimony Awards Post-Divorce Decree: Brown v. Brown (198 Tenn. 600)

Limits on Alimony Awards Post-Divorce Decree: Brown v. Brown (198 Tenn. 600)

Date: Jun 11, 1955
Limits on Alimony Awards Post-Divorce Decree: Brown v. Brown (198 Tenn. 600) Introduction In the landmark case of CLYDE O. BROWN v. PAMELIA C. BROWN et al. (198 Tenn. 600), the Supreme Court of...
Interpretation of Contractual Terms: 'Treatment' Encompasses Surgical Operations – Petty v. Sloan (Tenn. 1955)

Interpretation of Contractual Terms: 'Treatment' Encompasses Surgical Operations – Petty v. Sloan (Tenn. 1955)

Date: Mar 12, 1955
Interpretation of Contractual Terms: 'Treatment' Encompasses Surgical Operations – Petty v. Sloan (Tenn. 1955) Introduction In Dr. David Gordon Petty et al. v. Dr. Lillard Sloan et al., the Supreme...
Limits on Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions: Insights from Hoover Motor Express Co. v. Railroad Public Utilities Commission

Limits on Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions: Insights from Hoover Motor Express Co. v. Railroad Public Utilities Commission

Date: Jul 18, 1953
Limits on Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions: Insights from Hoover Motor Express Co., Inc. v. Railroad Public Utilities Commission Introduction Hoover Motor Express Co., Inc. et al. v....
Custody Best Interests Doctrine Established in Holloway v. Bradley (1950)

Custody Best Interests Doctrine Established in Holloway v. Bradley (1950)

Date: Jun 10, 1950
Custody Best Interests Doctrine Established in Holloway v. Bradley (1950) Introduction The case of Holloway v. Bradley et al., adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Tennessee in 1950, represents a...
Defining Employer Liability: Insights from D.M. ROSE Co. v. SNYDER

Defining Employer Liability: Insights from D.M. ROSE Co. v. SNYDER

Date: Nov 30, 1947
Defining Employer Liability: Insights from D.M. ROSE Co. v. SNYDER Introduction The case of D.M. ROSE Co. v. SNYDER, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Tennessee in 1947, serves as a pivotal...
Limits on Attorney Authority in Cross-Actions and the Effect of Adultery on Widow's Claims: Keicher v. Mysinger

Limits on Attorney Authority in Cross-Actions and the Effect of Adultery on Widow's Claims: Keicher v. Mysinger

Date: Dec 1, 1946
Limits on Attorney Authority in Cross-Actions and the Effect of Adultery on Widow's Claims: Keicher v. Mysinger Introduction The case of Keicher v. Mysinger, Administrator, et al., adjudicated by the...
McCanless v. Klein: Regulation of the Liquor Industry and Constitutional Limits

McCanless v. Klein: Regulation of the Liquor Industry and Constitutional Limits

Date: Jul 1, 1945
McCanless v. Klein: Regulation of the Liquor Industry and Constitutional Limits Introduction McCanless v. Klein (182 Tenn. 631, 1945) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Tennessee...
Ensuring Juror Impartiality: Insights from Durham v. State

Ensuring Juror Impartiality: Insights from Durham v. State

Date: Jun 10, 1945
Ensuring Juror Impartiality: Insights from Durham v. State Introduction Durham v. State is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Tennessee in 1945. The case involves George Durham, Jr., who...
Estoppel and Insurable Interest in BAIRD v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance Co.

Estoppel and Insurable Interest in BAIRD v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance Co.

Date: May 30, 1942
Estoppel and Insurable Interest in BAIRD v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance Co. Introduction BAIRD v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance Co. is a landmark judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of...
Implied Invitee Liability in Railroad Premises: Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Nichols

Implied Invitee Liability in Railroad Premises: Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Nichols

Date: Jul 3, 1938
Implied Invitee Liability in Railroad Premises: Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Nichols Introduction Illinois Central Railroad Co. et al. v. Nichols is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court...
Johnson v. White: Circuit Court Jurisdiction in Election Contests for County Superintendent of Public Instruction

Johnson v. White: Circuit Court Jurisdiction in Election Contests for County Superintendent of Public Instruction

Date: Jun 11, 1937
Johnson v. White: Circuit Court Jurisdiction in Election Contests for County Superintendent of Public Instruction Introduction The case of Johnson v. White (171 Tenn. 536) adjudicated by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Quarterly County Court Authority in School Bond Issuance: STATE ex rel. v. J.F. Brown (1929)

Affirmation of Quarterly County Court Authority in School Bond Issuance: STATE ex rel. v. J.F. Brown (1929)

Date: Nov 17, 1929
Affirmation of Quarterly County Court Authority in School Bond Issuance STATE ex rel. v. J.F. BROWN, 159 Tenn. 591 (Supreme Court of Tennessee, 1929) Introduction The case of STATE ex rel. v. J.F....
Constructive Possession and Permission in Automobile Liability Insurance: Insights from M.G. Stovall v. New York Indemnity Company

Constructive Possession and Permission in Automobile Liability Insurance: Insights from M.G. Stovall v. New York Indemnity Company

Date: Jul 17, 1928
Constructive Possession and Permission in Automobile Liability Insurance: Insights from M.G. Stovall v. New York Indemnity Company Introduction The case of M.G. Stovall et al. v. New York Indemnity...
Previous
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert