Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Pennsylvania Case Commentaries

Griffith v. United Air Lines: Establishing the 'Most Significant Relationship' Test in Pennsylvania's Choice of Law for Tort Actions

Griffith v. United Air Lines: Establishing the 'Most Significant Relationship' Test in Pennsylvania's Choice of Law for Tort Actions

Date: Oct 15, 1964
Griffith v. United Air Lines: Establishing the 'Most Significant Relationship' Test in Pennsylvania's Choice of Law for Tort Actions Introduction Griffith, Appellant, v. United Air Lines, Inc. (416...
Carl A. Colteryahn Dairy, Inc. v. Schneider Dairy: Clarifying the Boundaries of Competitive Solicitation and Fair Competition

Carl A. Colteryahn Dairy, Inc. v. Schneider Dairy: Clarifying the Boundaries of Competitive Solicitation and Fair Competition

Date: Sep 30, 1964
Carl A. Colteryahn Dairy, Inc. v. Schneider Dairy: Clarifying the Boundaries of Competitive Solicitation and Fair Competition Introduction Carl A. Colteryahn Dairy, Inc. v. Schneider Dairy is a...
Conversion by Refusal of Access to Safe Deposit Box: Stevenson v. Economy Bank

Conversion by Refusal of Access to Safe Deposit Box: Stevenson v. Economy Bank

Date: Jan 22, 1964
Conversion by Refusal of Access to Safe Deposit Box: Stevenson v. Economy Bank Introduction Stevenson v. Economy Bank of Ambridge is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in 1964...
Uniformity in Occupational Privilege Tax: Saulsbury v. Bethlehem Steel Company

Uniformity in Occupational Privilege Tax: Saulsbury v. Bethlehem Steel Company

Date: Jan 9, 1964
Uniformity in Occupational Privilege Tax: Saulsbury v. Bethlehem Steel Company Introduction Saulsbury v. Bethlehem Steel Company is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on...
Lurie v. Republican Alliance: Exclusive Jurisdiction of Quarter Sessions in Election Accounting

Lurie v. Republican Alliance: Exclusive Jurisdiction of Quarter Sessions in Election Accounting

Date: Jul 3, 1963
Lurie v. Republican Alliance: Exclusive Jurisdiction of Quarter Sessions in Election Accounting Introduction Lurie v. Republican Alliance (412 Pa. 61) is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court...
Executive Authority in Appointment of Magistrates' Court Employees Upheld: Daly v. Hemphill, Reese

Executive Authority in Appointment of Magistrates' Court Employees Upheld: Daly v. Hemphill, Reese

Date: Jun 5, 1963
Executive Authority in Appointment of Magistrates' Court Employees Upheld: Daly v. Hemphill, Reese (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1963) Introduction Daly v. Hemphill, Reese is a pivotal case...
Chambers v. Montgomery: Establishing Standards for Punitive Damages in Assault and Battery Cases

Chambers v. Montgomery: Establishing Standards for Punitive Damages in Assault and Battery Cases

Date: Jun 5, 1963
Chambers v. Montgomery: Establishing Standards for Punitive Damages in Assault and Battery Cases Introduction Chambers v. Montgomery, decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on June 4, 1963, is...
Establishing the Commonwealth's Right to Appeal Pretrial Suppression Orders: Commonwealth v. Bosurgi

Establishing the Commonwealth's Right to Appeal Pretrial Suppression Orders: Commonwealth v. Bosurgi

Date: Apr 17, 1963
Establishing the Commonwealth's Right to Appeal Pretrial Suppression Orders: Commonwealth v. Bosurgi Introduction Commonwealth v. Bosurgi, 411 Pa. 56 (1963), is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Restitution and Unjust Enrichment: Jurisdictional Clarifications in Meehan v. Cheltenham Township

Restitution and Unjust Enrichment: Jurisdictional Clarifications in Meehan v. Cheltenham Township

Date: Mar 29, 1963
Restitution and Unjust Enrichment: Jurisdictional Clarifications in Meehan v. Cheltenham Township Introduction The case of Meehan, Appellant, v. Cheltenham Township, adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Schaffer v. Larzelere: Expanding the Doctrine on Statute of Limitations and Pleading Amendments in Wrongful Death Actions

Schaffer v. Larzelere: Expanding the Doctrine on Statute of Limitations and Pleading Amendments in Wrongful Death Actions

Date: Mar 20, 1963
Schaffer v. Larzelere: Expanding the Doctrine on Statute of Limitations and Pleading Amendments in Wrongful Death Actions Introduction Schaffer v. Larzelere is a seminal case decided by the Supreme...
Independent Contractor Liability in Hader v. Coplay Cement Mfg. Co.

Independent Contractor Liability in Hader v. Coplay Cement Mfg. Co.

Date: Mar 20, 1963
Independent Contractor Liability in Hader v. Coplay Cement Mfg. Co. Introduction Case: Hader, Appellant, v. Coplay Cement Mfg. Co. (410 Pa. 139) Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Date: March 19,...
Duty to Defend Under Automobile Liability Insurance Policies: Insights from Gedeon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (1963)

Duty to Defend Under Automobile Liability Insurance Policies: Insights from Gedeon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (1963)

Date: Jan 22, 1963
Duty to Defend Under Automobile Liability Insurance Policies: Insights from Gedeon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (1963) Introduction The case of Gedeon v. State Farm Mutual...
Brown v. Pittsburgh: Clarifying Charitable Immunity and Joint Tortfeasor Releases under Pennsylvania Law

Brown v. Pittsburgh: Clarifying Charitable Immunity and Joint Tortfeasor Releases under Pennsylvania Law

Date: Nov 27, 1962
Brown v. Pittsburgh: Clarifying Charitable Immunity and Joint Tortfeasor Releases under Pennsylvania Law Introduction Brown v. Pittsburgh, 409 Pa. 357 (1962), is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Establishing Res Judicata in Utility Cost Allocations: Delaware River Port Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Establishing Res Judicata in Utility Cost Allocations: Delaware River Port Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Date: Jun 29, 1962
Establishing Res Judicata in Utility Cost Allocations: Delaware River Port Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Introduction The case Delaware River Port Authority v. Pennsylvania...
Defamation Per Se in Commercial Advertising: Cosgrove v. Studio and Camera Shop, Inc.

Defamation Per Se in Commercial Advertising: Cosgrove v. Studio and Camera Shop, Inc.

Date: Jun 29, 1962
Defamation Per Se in Commercial Advertising: Cosgrove v. Studio and Camera Shop, Inc. - A Comprehensive Commentary Introduction Cosgrove Studio and Camera Shop, Inc. v. Pane is a seminal case decided...
Invalidation of Section 3-500 of the Philadelphia Home Rule Charter: Cali v. Philadelphia

Invalidation of Section 3-500 of the Philadelphia Home Rule Charter: Cali v. Philadelphia

Date: Feb 14, 1962
Invalidation of Section 3-500 of the Philadelphia Home Rule Charter: Cali v. Philadelphia Introduction Cali v. Philadelphia, Appellant. Burns (406 Pa. 290) is a landmark case decided by the Supreme...
Imposing Tort Duty on Service Providers to Third Parties Through Contractual Obligations: Evans v. Otis Elevator Company

Imposing Tort Duty on Service Providers to Third Parties Through Contractual Obligations: Evans v. Otis Elevator Company

Date: Mar 14, 1961
Imposing Tort Duty on Service Providers to Third Parties Through Contractual Obligations: Evans v. Otis Elevator Company Introduction Evans v. Otis Elevator Company is a seminal case decided by the...
Invalidity of Fixed-Term Employment Contracts in Public Authorities: Scott v. Philadelphia Parking Authority

Invalidity of Fixed-Term Employment Contracts in Public Authorities: Scott v. Philadelphia Parking Authority

Date: Dec 2, 1960
Invalidity of Fixed-Term Employment Contracts in Public Authorities: Scott v. Philadelphia Parking Authority Introduction Scott v. Philadelphia Parking Authority, 402 Pa. 151 (1960), adjudicated by...
Lockout Defined: Eligibility for Unemployment Compensation in Erie Forge and Steel Corp. Case

Lockout Defined: Eligibility for Unemployment Compensation in Erie Forge and Steel Corp. Case

Date: Jul 1, 1960
Lockout Defined: Eligibility for Unemployment Compensation in Erie Forge and Steel Corporation v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review Introduction The Erie Forge and Steel Corporation v....
Affirmation of Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Commonwealth v. Kravitz

Affirmation of Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Commonwealth v. Kravitz

Date: Apr 19, 1960
Affirmation of Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Commonwealth v. Kravitz Introduction Commonwealth v. Kravitz is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on April 18,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert