Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Pennsylvania Case Commentaries

Establishing Liability for Unprivileged Interference with Business Relations: Insights from Birl v. Philadelphia Electric Co.

Establishing Liability for Unprivileged Interference with Business Relations: Insights from Birl v. Philadelphia Electric Co.

Date: Mar 23, 1960
Establishing Liability for Unprivileged Interference with Business Relations: Insights from Birl v. Philadelphia Electric Co. Introduction The case of Birl v. Philadelphia Electric Co., decided by...
Establishing the Necessity of an Affirmative Act in Assault Claims: Insights from Cucinotti v. Ortmann

Establishing the Necessity of an Affirmative Act in Assault Claims: Insights from Cucinotti v. Ortmann

Date: Mar 23, 1960
Establishing the Necessity of an Affirmative Act in Assault Claims: Insights from Cucinotti v. Ortmann Introduction Cucinotti, Appellant, v. Ortmann, 399 Pa. 26 (1960), is a landmark decision by the...
Establishing Vicarious Criminal Liability with Due Process Limitations: COMMONWEALTH v. KOCZWARA

Establishing Vicarious Criminal Liability with Due Process Limitations: COMMONWEALTH v. KOCZWARA

Date: Nov 26, 1959
Establishing Vicarious Criminal Liability with Due Process Limitations: COMMONWEALTH v. KOCZWARA Introduction COMMONWEALTH v. KOCZWARA, 397 Pa. 575 (1959), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Defining Competency of Child Witnesses in Tender Years: Insights from Rosche v. McCoy

Defining Competency of Child Witnesses in Tender Years: Insights from Rosche v. McCoy

Date: Nov 26, 1959
Defining Competency of Child Witnesses in Tender Years: Insights from Rosche v. McCoy Introduction Rosche v. McCoy, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in 1959, establishes significant...
Discovery Rule in Medical Malpractice: Statute of Limitations Tolls Until Injury is Discoverable

Discovery Rule in Medical Malpractice: Statute of Limitations Tolls Until Injury is Discoverable

Date: Oct 22, 1959
Discovery Rule in Medical Malpractice: Statute of Limitations Tolls Until Injury is Discoverable Introduction Ayers v. Morgan (397 Pa. 282), decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on October...
Collective Bargaining Agreements Cannot Waive Unemployment Compensation Rights: Warner Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Collective Bargaining Agreements Cannot Waive Unemployment Compensation Rights: Warner Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Date: Jul 25, 1959
Collective Bargaining Agreements Cannot Waive Unemployment Compensation Rights: Warner Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review Introduction The case of Warner Company v. Unemployment...
Reformulation of Circumstantial Evidence Sufficiency and Statute of Limitations: Smith v. Bell Telephone Co. (1959)

Reformulation of Circumstantial Evidence Sufficiency and Statute of Limitations: Smith v. Bell Telephone Co. (1959)

Date: Jul 3, 1959
Reformulation of Circumstantial Evidence Sufficiency and Statute of Limitations: Smith v. Bell Telephone Co. (1959) Introduction Smith v. Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania is a landmark case...
Insurer's Duty to Defend Under Coverage Ambiguities: Cadwallader v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company

Insurer's Duty to Defend Under Coverage Ambiguities: Cadwallader v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company

Date: Jul 1, 1959
Insurer's Duty to Defend Under Coverage Ambiguities: Cadwallader v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company Introduction The case of Cadwallader v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, decided by the Supreme Court...
Establishing Alibi Defense Protocol and Burden of Proof: COMMONWEALTH v. BONOMO (1959)

Establishing Alibi Defense Protocol and Burden of Proof: COMMONWEALTH v. BONOMO (1959)

Date: May 29, 1959
Establishing Alibi Defense Protocol and Burden of Proof: COMMONWEALTH v. BONOMO (1959) Introduction COMMONWEALTH v. BONOMO is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, rendered on May...
Judgment Satisfaction Limits Recovery Against Joint Tortfeasors: An Analysis of Hilbert v. Roth

Judgment Satisfaction Limits Recovery Against Joint Tortfeasors: An Analysis of Hilbert v. Roth

Date: Mar 21, 1959
Judgment Satisfaction Limits Recovery Against Joint Tortfeasors: An Analysis of Hilbert v. Roth (1959) Introduction Hilbert v. Roth, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in 1959,...
Commonwealth v. Novak: Reaffirming Standards for Mental Capacity and Insanity Defense in First-Degree Murder

Commonwealth v. Novak: Reaffirming Standards for Mental Capacity and Insanity Defense in First-Degree Murder

Date: Mar 17, 1959
Commonwealth v. Novak: Reaffirming Standards for Mental Capacity and Insanity Defense in First-Degree Murder Introduction Commonwealth v. Novak is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Absolute Privilege of Public Officials in Defamation: Insights from Montgomery v. Philadelphia

Absolute Privilege of Public Officials in Defamation: Insights from Montgomery v. Philadelphia

Date: Mar 25, 1958
Absolute Privilege of Public Officials in Defamation: Insights from Montgomery v. Philadelphia Introduction The legal landscape governing defamation, especially involving public officials, is...
SCHULZ ESTATE: Authority of Register of Wills in Administration d.b.n.c.t.a. Appointments

SCHULZ ESTATE: Authority of Register of Wills in Administration d.b.n.c.t.a. Appointments

Date: Mar 18, 1958
SCHULZ ESTATE: Authority of Register of Wills in Administration d.b.n.c.t.a. Appointments Introduction The SCHULZ ESTATE case, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on March 17, 1958,...
Revisiting Felony-Murder Doctrine: Commonwealth v. Redline and Its Legal Implications

Revisiting Felony-Murder Doctrine: Commonwealth v. Redline and Its Legal Implications

Date: Jan 11, 1958
Revisiting Felony-Murder Doctrine: Commonwealth v. Redline and Its Legal Implications Introduction In the landmark case of Commonwealth v. Redline, Appellant. (391 Pa. 486), decided by the Supreme...
Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. Martucci: Reasonable Restrictive Covenants and Trade Secret Protection

Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. Martucci: Reasonable Restrictive Covenants and Trade Secret Protection

Date: Nov 23, 1957
Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. Martucci: Reasonable Restrictive Covenants and Trade Secret Protection Introduction In the landmark case of Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. Martucci, decided on...
Negligence in Firearm Accessibility: A Comprehensive Review of Kuhns v. Brugger, 390 Pa. 331

Negligence in Firearm Accessibility: A Comprehensive Review of Kuhns v. Brugger, 390 Pa. 331

Date: Oct 8, 1957
Negligence in Firearm Accessibility: A Comprehensive Review of Kuhns v. Brugger, 390 Pa. 331 Introduction Kuhns v. Brugger, decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on October 7, 1957, addresses...
Strict Construction of Common Terms in Insurance Policies: Insights from Easton v. Washington County Insurance Company

Strict Construction of Common Terms in Insurance Policies: Insights from Easton v. Washington County Insurance Company

Date: Oct 8, 1957
Strict Construction of Common Terms in Insurance Policies: Insights from Easton v. Washington County Insurance Company Introduction In the landmark case of Easton v. Washington County Insurance...
Cowden v. Aetna Casualty: Establishing Insurer's Duty of Good Faith Beyond Policy Limits

Cowden v. Aetna Casualty: Establishing Insurer's Duty of Good Faith Beyond Policy Limits

Date: Jun 29, 1957
Cowden v. Aetna Casualty: Establishing Insurer's Duty of Good Faith Beyond Policy Limits Introduction Cowden v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Limits on Zoning Board Discretion in Granting Special Exceptions: Archbishop O'Hara's Appeal

Limits on Zoning Board Discretion in Granting Special Exceptions: Archbishop O'Hara's Appeal

Date: Apr 27, 1957
Limits on Zoning Board Discretion in Granting Special Exceptions: Archbishop O'Hara's Appeal Introduction Archbishop O'Hara's Appeal (389 Pa. 35), decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on...
Liability of Innkeepers for Property Loss Due to Unintentional Fires: Analysis of Sherwood v. Elgart

Liability of Innkeepers for Property Loss Due to Unintentional Fires: Analysis of Sherwood v. Elgart

Date: Jun 28, 1955
Liability of Innkeepers for Property Loss Due to Unintentional Fires: Analysis of Sherwood v. Elgart Introduction Sherwood v. Elgart, decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on June 27, 1955,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert