Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Pennsylvania Case Commentaries

Interpretation of "Insured" in Employee Exclusions: Pennsyl v. Nia Manufacturers' Association Insurance Company

Interpretation of "Insured" in Employee Exclusions: Pennsyl v. Nia Manufacturers' Association Insurance Company

Date: Sep 27, 1967
Interpretation of "Insured" in Employee Exclusions: Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Association Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Insurance Co. Introduction The case of Pennsylvania...
Affirmation of Procedural Standards and Jury Impartiality in Commonwealth v. Lopinson

Affirmation of Procedural Standards and Jury Impartiality in Commonwealth v. Lopinson

Date: Sep 27, 1967
Affirmation of Procedural Standards and Jury Impartiality in Commonwealth v. Lopinson Introduction Commonwealth v. Lopinson is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on...
Establishing Limits on Constructive Trusts and Laches in Truver v. Kennedy

Establishing Limits on Constructive Trusts and Laches in Truver v. Kennedy

Date: Apr 19, 1967
Establishing Limits on Constructive Trusts and Laches in Truver v. Kennedy Introduction Truver v. Kennedy, decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on April 18, 1967, is a landmark case that...
Bata v. Central-Penn National Bank: Affirmation of Judgment on Insufficient Fraud Allegations

Bata v. Central-Penn National Bank: Affirmation of Judgment on Insufficient Fraud Allegations

Date: Nov 16, 1966
Bata v. Central-Penn National Bank: Affirmation of Judgment on Insufficient Fraud Allegations Introduction Bata v. Central-Penn National Bank of Philadelphia (et al., Appellant). (423 Pa. 373) is a...
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Establishes Home State Law Supremacy in Wrongful Death Actions

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Establishes Home State Law Supremacy in Wrongful Death Actions

Date: Sep 28, 1966
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Establishes Home State Law Supremacy in Wrongful Death Actions Introduction The case of Kuchinic, Appellant, v. McCrory, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on...
Gray v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.: Expanding Insurer Liability and Assigning Excess Judgments

Gray v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.: Expanding Insurer Liability and Assigning Excess Judgments

Date: Sep 28, 1966
Gray v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.: Expanding Insurer Liability and Assigning Excess Judgments Introduction Gray v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Establishing Strict Product Liability under Restatement §402A: Webb v. Zern

Establishing Strict Product Liability under Restatement §402A: Webb v. Zern

Date: Jun 25, 1966
Establishing Strict Product Liability under Restatement §402A: Webb v. Zern Introduction Webb v. Zern, 422 Pa. 424 (1966), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania that...
State Preemption of Local Ordinances in the Regulation of Anthracite Strip Mining: Harris-Walsh, Inc. v. Dickson City Borough

State Preemption of Local Ordinances in the Regulation of Anthracite Strip Mining: Harris-Walsh, Inc. v. Dickson City Borough

Date: Jan 18, 1966
State Preemption of Local Ordinances in the Regulation of Anthracite Strip Mining: Harris-Walsh, Inc. v. Dickson City Borough Introduction The landmark case Harris-Walsh, Inc. v. Dickson City Borough...
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Rules Four-Acre Minimum Lot Size Zoning Ordinance Unconstitutional

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Rules Four-Acre Minimum Lot Size Zoning Ordinance Unconstitutional

Date: Nov 10, 1965
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Rules Four-Acre Minimum Lot Size Zoning Ordinance Unconstitutional Introduction In National Land and Investment Company v. Easttown Township Board of Adjustment (1965),...
Van Products v. General Welding: State Courts’ Jurisdiction Over Trade Secret Misappropriation

Van Products v. General Welding: State Courts’ Jurisdiction Over Trade Secret Misappropriation

Date: Oct 14, 1965
Van Products v. General Welding: State Courts’ Jurisdiction Over Trade Secret Misappropriation Introduction Van Products Company v. General Welding and Fabricating Company, Appellant. (419 Pa. 248)...
Comprehensive Commentary on Commonwealth v. Rieck Investment Corporation

Comprehensive Commentary on Commonwealth v. Rieck Investment Corporation

Date: Sep 30, 1965
Apportionment of Franchise Tax for Foreign Corporations: Insights from Commonwealth v. Rieck Investment Corporation Introduction Commonwealth v. Rieck Investment Corporation is a landmark decision...
Retrospective Application of ESCOBEDO v. ILLINOIS: COMMONWEALTH v. NEGRI

Retrospective Application of ESCOBEDO v. ILLINOIS: COMMONWEALTH v. NEGRI

Date: Sep 30, 1965
Retrospective Application of ESCOBEDO v. ILLINOIS: COMMONWEALTH v. NEGRI Introduction COMMONWEALTH v. NEGRI, Appellant. (419 Pa. 117) is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania...
Wilful Misconduct in Subway Operations: Establishing Liability Standards in Pennsylvania

Wilful Misconduct in Subway Operations: Establishing Liability Standards in Pennsylvania

Date: Jul 21, 1965
Wilful Misconduct in Subway Operations: Establishing Liability Standards in Pennsylvania Introduction The case of Evans v. Philadelphia Transportation Company (418 Pa. 567) serves as a pivotal moment...
Amenability of Housing Authorities to Foreign Attachment and Enforceability of Forum Selection Clauses: Central Contracting Co. v. Youngdahl Co.

Amenability of Housing Authorities to Foreign Attachment and Enforceability of Forum Selection Clauses: Central Contracting Co. v. Youngdahl Co.

Date: May 4, 1965
Amenability of Housing Authorities to Foreign Attachment and Enforceability of Forum Selection Clauses Introduction In the landmark case of Central Contracting Company v. C. E. Youngdahl Company,...
Strict Compliance with Zoning Ordinance Procedures: The Kurren Appeal

Strict Compliance with Zoning Ordinance Procedures: The Kurren Appeal

Date: Apr 21, 1965
Strict Compliance with Zoning Ordinance Procedures: The Kurren Appeal Introduction The Kurren Appeal, decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on April 20, 1965, addresses a critical issue...
Overruling Charitable Immunity: Flagiello v. Pennsylvania Hospital Establishes Liability for Negligent Charitable Hospitals

Overruling Charitable Immunity: Flagiello v. Pennsylvania Hospital Establishes Liability for Negligent Charitable Hospitals

Date: Mar 23, 1965
Overruling Charitable Immunity: Flagiello v. Pennsylvania Hospital Establishes Liability for Negligent Charitable Hospitals Introduction Flagiello, Appellant v. Pennsylvania Hospital (417 Pa. 486),...
Uniformity in Real Estate Tax Assessments: McKnight Shopping Center, Inc. v. Board of Property Assessment

Uniformity in Real Estate Tax Assessments: McKnight Shopping Center, Inc. v. Board of Property Assessment

Date: Feb 26, 1965
Uniformity in Real Estate Tax Assessments: McKnight Shopping Center, Inc. v. Board of Property Assessment Introduction The case of McKnight Shopping Center, Inc. v. Board of Property Assessment is a...
Ensuring Uniformity and Proper Burden of Proof in Real Estate Tax Assessments: Deitch Co. v. Board of Property Assessment

Ensuring Uniformity and Proper Burden of Proof in Real Estate Tax Assessments: Deitch Co. v. Board of Property Assessment

Date: Feb 26, 1965
Ensuring Uniformity and Proper Burden of Proof in Real Estate Tax Assessments: Deitch Co. v. Board of Property Assessment Introduction The case of Deitch Company, Appellant v. Board of Property...
Equitable Estoppel and Statute of Limitations in Nesbitt v. Erie Coach Company

Equitable Estoppel and Statute of Limitations in Nesbitt v. Erie Coach Company

Date: Nov 11, 1964
Equitable Estoppel and Statute of Limitations in Nesbitt v. Erie Coach Company Introduction The case of Nesbitt v. Erie Coach Company (416 Pa. 89), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on...
Commonwealth v. Coyle: Establishing Separate Judicial Determination of Confession Voluntariness

Commonwealth v. Coyle: Establishing Separate Judicial Determination of Confession Voluntariness

Date: Oct 15, 1964
Commonwealth v. Coyle: Establishing Separate Judicial Determination of Confession Voluntariness Introduction Commonwealth v. Coyle is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert