Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Pennsylvania Case Commentaries

Concord Township Appeal: Landmark Ruling on Exclusionary Zoning and Minimum Lot Sizes

Concord Township Appeal: Landmark Ruling on Exclusionary Zoning and Minimum Lot Sizes

Date: Feb 25, 1970
Concord Township Appeal: Landmark Ruling on Exclusionary Zoning and Minimum Lot Sizes Introduction The Concord Township Appeal (439 Pa. 466), decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on February...
Zoning Ordinance Must Accommodate Legitimate Land Uses: The Girsh Appeal Decision

Zoning Ordinance Must Accommodate Legitimate Land Uses: The Girsh Appeal Decision

Date: Feb 14, 1970
Zoning Ordinance Must Accommodate Legitimate Land Uses: The Girsh Appeal Decision Introduction The Girsh Appeal (437 Pa. 237) represents a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in...
Niederman v. Brodsky: Abandoning the Impact Rule in Pennsylvania Tort Law

Niederman v. Brodsky: Abandoning the Impact Rule in Pennsylvania Tort Law

Date: Jan 10, 1970
Niederman v. Brodsky: Abandoning the Impact Rule in Pennsylvania Tort Law Introduction Case: Niederman, Appellant, v. Brodsky Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Date: January 9, 1970 Citation: 436...
Establishing Liability in Employee Suggestion Programs: Schott v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation

Establishing Liability in Employee Suggestion Programs: Schott v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation

Date: Nov 29, 1969
Establishing Liability in Employee Suggestion Programs: Schott v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation Introduction Schott v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, 436 Pa. 279 (1969), is a pivotal case...
Finality of Arbitration Awards for Third Class Cities: Insights from the Washington Arbitration Case

Finality of Arbitration Awards for Third Class Cities: Insights from the Washington Arbitration Case

Date: Nov 29, 1969
Finality of Arbitration Awards for Third Class Cities: Insights from the Washington Arbitration Case Introduction The Washington Arbitration Case (436 Pa. 168), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Reevaluating Reasonable Suspicion: The Landmark Decision in COMMONWEALTH v. HICKS

Reevaluating Reasonable Suspicion: The Landmark Decision in COMMONWEALTH v. HICKS

Date: Apr 24, 1969
Reevaluating Reasonable Suspicion: The Landmark Decision in COMMONWEALTH v. HICKS Introduction COMMONWEALTH v. HICKS, decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on April 23, 1969, serves as a...
Preservation of Jury Instruction Errors in Criminal Appeals: Commonwealth v. Simon (432 Pa. 386)

Preservation of Jury Instruction Errors in Criminal Appeals: Commonwealth v. Simon (432 Pa. 386)

Date: Nov 28, 1968
Preservation of Jury Instruction Errors in Criminal Appeals: Commonwealth v. Simon (432 Pa. 386) Introduction Commonwealth v. Simon, 432 Pa. 386 (1968), is a pivotal case in Pennsylvania's criminal...
Elimination of Privity Requirement in Breach of Implied Warranty Actions under the Uniform Commercial Code

Elimination of Privity Requirement in Breach of Implied Warranty Actions under the Uniform Commercial Code

Date: Oct 12, 1968
Elimination of Privity Requirement in Breach of Implied Warranty Actions under the Uniform Commercial Code Introduction The case of Kassab et ux. v. Central Soya represents a pivotal moment in...
Reasonableness of Attorney Fees in Trust Estates: The LaRocca Estate Decision

Reasonableness of Attorney Fees in Trust Estates: The LaRocca Estate Decision

Date: Oct 4, 1968
Reasonableness of Attorney Fees in Trust Estates: The LaRocca Estate Decision Introduction The LaRocca Estate case, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on October 3, 1968, addresses...
Limits on Employer Liability for Employee Misconduct: Insights from Walso Bureau Inc. v. Dempsey

Limits on Employer Liability for Employee Misconduct: Insights from Walso Bureau Inc. v. Dempsey

Date: Oct 4, 1968
Limits on Employer Liability for Employee Misconduct: Insights from Walso Bureau Inc. v. Dempsey Introduction The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania's decision in Dempsey v. Walso Bureau, Inc. (431 Pa....
Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.: Shifting the Burden of Proof to Employer in Partial Disability Claims

Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.: Shifting the Burden of Proof to Employer in Partial Disability Claims

Date: Oct 4, 1968
Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.: Shifting the Burden of Proof to Employer in Partial Disability Claims Introduction Barrett, Appellant, v. Otis Elevator Company, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Reinforcing Warrant Necessity in Vehicle Searches: COMMONWEALTH v. COCKFIELD

Reinforcing Warrant Necessity in Vehicle Searches: COMMONWEALTH v. COCKFIELD

Date: Oct 4, 1968
Reinforcing Warrant Necessity in Vehicle Searches: COMMONWEALTH v. COCKFIELD Introduction COMMONWEALTH v. COCKFIELD, decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on October 3, 1968, represents a...
Hammermill v. Rust: Clarifying Independent Contractor Status and Liability in Construction Contracts

Hammermill v. Rust: Clarifying Independent Contractor Status and Liability in Construction Contracts

Date: Jul 2, 1968
Hammermill v. Rust: Clarifying Independent Contractor Status and Liability in Construction Contracts Introduction The case Hammermill Paper Company v. Rust Engineering Company (430 Pa. 365)...
Intelligent Waiver of Appeal Rights and Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Commonwealth v. Wilson

Intelligent Waiver of Appeal Rights and Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Commonwealth v. Wilson

Date: May 4, 1968
Intelligent Waiver of Appeal Rights and Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Commonwealth v. Wilson Introduction Commonwealth v. Wilson, 430 Pa. 1 (1968), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Expanding Uninsured Motorist Coverage: Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co. v. Blumling

Expanding Uninsured Motorist Coverage: Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co. v. Blumling

Date: Apr 17, 1968
Expanding Uninsured Motorist Coverage: Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co. v. Blumling Introduction Harleysville Mutual Casualty Company v. Blumling is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Commonwealth v. Baker: Enhancing the Right to Effective Appellate Representation Under ANDERS v. CALIFORNIA

Commonwealth v. Baker: Enhancing the Right to Effective Appellate Representation Under ANDERS v. CALIFORNIA

Date: Mar 16, 1968
Commonwealth v. Baker: Enhancing the Right to Effective Appellate Representation Under ANDERS v. CALIFORNIA Introduction Commonwealth v. Baker, 429 Pa. 209 (1968), is a landmark decision by the...
Revisiting the Voluntariness Standard for Confessions: The Butler v. Rundle Decision

Revisiting the Voluntariness Standard for Confessions: The Butler v. Rundle Decision

Date: Mar 16, 1968
Revisiting the Voluntariness Standard for Confessions: The Butler v. Rundle Decision Introduction The case of Commonwealth ex rel. Butler v. Rundle (429 Pa. 141) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Pappas Estate: Burden of Proof in Inter Vivos Gift of Securities

Pappas Estate: Burden of Proof in Inter Vivos Gift of Securities

Date: Mar 16, 1968
Pappas Estate: Burden of Proof in Inter Vivos Gift of Securities Introduction The Pappas Estate case, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on March 15, 1968, addresses crucial issues...
Defining Strike vs. Lock-Out in Unemployment Compensation Law: Insights from Philco Corporation v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Defining Strike vs. Lock-Out in Unemployment Compensation Law: Insights from Philco Corporation v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Date: Jan 10, 1968
Defining Strike vs. Lock-Out in Unemployment Compensation Law: Insights from Philco Corporation v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review Introduction The case of Philco Corporation v....
Defining Effective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Commonwealth ex rel. Washington v. Maroney

Defining Effective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Commonwealth ex rel. Washington v. Maroney

Date: Nov 15, 1967
Defining Effective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Commonwealth ex rel. Washington v. Maroney Introduction Commonwealth ex rel. Washington v. Maroney is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert