Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Pennsylvania Case Commentaries

Burden of Proof in Unemployment Compensation: Insights from Kirkwood v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Burden of Proof in Unemployment Compensation: Insights from Kirkwood v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Date: May 13, 1987
Burden of Proof in Unemployment Compensation: Insights from Kirkwood v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Introduction The case of Jerrianne S. Kirkwood v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, adjudicated by the...
Reaffirmation of Local Agency Immunity: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Mascaro v. Youth Study Center

Reaffirmation of Local Agency Immunity: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Mascaro v. Youth Study Center

Date: Apr 8, 1987
Reaffirmation of Local Agency Immunity: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Mascaro v. Youth Study Center Introduction The case of Michelle Mascaro, a Minor, and Kenneth Mascaro, a Minor, by their...
Redefining 'Torture' in Capital Sentencing: An In-Depth Analysis of Commonwealth v. Nelson

Redefining 'Torture' in Capital Sentencing: An In-Depth Analysis of Commonwealth v. Nelson

Date: Apr 4, 1987
Redefining 'Torture' in Capital Sentencing: An In-Depth Analysis of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Nelson Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. John A. Nelson is a landmark 1987 decision by...
Procedural Rigor in Sentencing Appeals: Commonwealth v. Tuladziiecki Establishes Strict Requirements

Procedural Rigor in Sentencing Appeals: Commonwealth v. Tuladziiecki Establishes Strict Requirements

Date: Mar 11, 1987
Procedural Rigor in Sentencing Appeals: Commonwealth v. Tuladziiecki Establishes Strict Requirements Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Regis C. Tuladziiecki, 513 Pa. 508 (1987), is a...
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Rules Out Implied Duty to Mine in Mineral Leases with Advance Royalties: Hutchison v. Sunbeam Coal Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Rules Out Implied Duty to Mine in Mineral Leases with Advance Royalties: Hutchison v. Sunbeam Coal Corp.

Date: Dec 17, 1986
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Rules Out Implied Duty to Mine in Mineral Leases with Advance Royalties: Hutchison v. Sunbeam Coal Corp. Introduction The case of Glenn C. Hutchison and Virginia...
Balancing Resentencing Authority and Double Jeopardy Protections: An Analysis of Commonwealth v. Goldhammer

Balancing Resentencing Authority and Double Jeopardy Protections: An Analysis of Commonwealth v. Goldhammer

Date: Nov 20, 1986
Balancing Resentencing Authority and Double Jeopardy Protections: An Analysis of Commonwealth v. Goldhammer Introduction In the landmark case Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Benjamin Goldhammer, the...
Punitive Damages Against State Agencies: Comprehensive Commentary on Feingold v. SEPTA

Punitive Damages Against State Agencies: Comprehensive Commentary on Feingold v. SEPTA

Date: Nov 19, 1986
Punitive Damages Against State Agencies: Comprehensive Commentary on Feingold v. SEPTA Introduction Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) is a landmark case decided...
Revisiting Class Action Intervention: Insights from Wilson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Revisiting Class Action Intervention: Insights from Wilson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Date: Nov 18, 1986
Revisiting Class Action Intervention: Insights from Wilson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Introduction The case of Cynthia D. Wilson, Administratrix of the Estate of Keith L....
Admissibility of Expert Testimony on Child Witness Credibility: Insights from COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. SeeSe

Admissibility of Expert Testimony on Child Witness Credibility: Insights from COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. SeeSe

Date: Nov 18, 1986
Admissibility of Expert Testimony on Child Witness Credibility: Insights from COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. SeeSe Introduction The case of COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Harry Ray SeeSe (512 Pa....
Clarifying General Liability Insurance Exclusions in Negligent Construction: Gene Harvey Builders v. PA Manufacturers' Association Insurance Co.

Clarifying General Liability Insurance Exclusions in Negligent Construction: Gene Harvey Builders v. PA Manufacturers' Association Insurance Co.

Date: Nov 18, 1986
Clarifying General Liability Insurance Exclusions in Negligent Construction: Gene Harvey Builders v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Association Insurance Co. Introduction Gene Harvey Builders, Inc. v....
Reaffirming Sufficiency of Evidence in DUI Convictions: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Griscavage

Reaffirming Sufficiency of Evidence in DUI Convictions: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Griscavage

Date: Nov 18, 1986
Reaffirming Sufficiency of Evidence in DUI Convictions: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Griscavage Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Charles J. Griscavage is a significant decision by the...
Estate of Francis J. McGovern v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: Affirming Common Law Standards for Mental Competency in Retirement Contract Execution

Estate of Francis J. McGovern v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: Affirming Common Law Standards for Mental Competency in Retirement Contract Execution

Date: Nov 6, 1986
Estate of Francis J. McGovern v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: Affirming Common Law Standards for Mental Competency in Retirement Contract Execution Introduction The case of Estate of Francis J....
Affirmation of "Clear and Convincing" Standard for Terminating Parental Rights of Impaired Parents in Pennsylvania

Affirmation of "Clear and Convincing" Standard for Terminating Parental Rights of Impaired Parents in Pennsylvania

Date: Sep 27, 1986
Affirmation of "Clear and Convincing" Standard for Terminating Parental Rights of Impaired Parents in Pennsylvania Introduction In re Adoption of J.J. James Phillips, Appellee, v. Children and Youth...
Reaffirming the Exclusivity of the Workmen's Compensation Act: Della LeFlar v. Gulf Creek Industrial Park #2

Reaffirming the Exclusivity of the Workmen's Compensation Act: Della LeFlar v. Gulf Creek Industrial Park #2

Date: Sep 27, 1986
Reaffirming the Exclusivity of the Workmen's Compensation Act: Della LeFlar v. Gulf Creek Industrial Park #2 Introduction The case of Della LeFlar, the Widow of Paul LeFlar and Administratrix of his...
Affirmation of Death Penalty Procedures and Standards in Commonwealth v. Peterkin

Affirmation of Death Penalty Procedures and Standards in Commonwealth v. Peterkin

Date: Jul 26, 1986
Affirmation of Death Penalty Procedures and Standards in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Peterkin (1986) Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Otis Peterkin is a pivotal 1986 decision by the...
Establishing Forcible Compulsion in Rape Under 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3121: Insights from Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Rhodes

Establishing Forcible Compulsion in Rape Under 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3121: Insights from Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Rhodes

Date: Jun 7, 1986
Establishing Forcible Compulsion in Rape Under 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3121: Insights from Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Rhodes Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Nicholas Rhodes is a landmark...
Affirmation of Death Sentence Based on Circumstantial Evidence in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Roger Peter Buehl

Affirmation of Death Sentence Based on Circumstantial Evidence in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Roger Peter Buehl

Date: May 1, 1986
Affirmation of Death Sentence Based on Circumstantial Evidence in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Roger Peter Buehl Introduction The case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Roger Peter Buehl was...
Establishing Constructive Possession in Joint-Controlled Residences: Insights from Commonwealth v. Mudrick

Establishing Constructive Possession in Joint-Controlled Residences: Insights from Commonwealth v. Mudrick

Date: Apr 11, 1986
Establishing Constructive Possession in Joint-Controlled Residences: Insights from Commonwealth v. Mudrick Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Donald John Mudrick, 510 Pa. 305 (1986), is a...
Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: Establishing Taxpayer Standing Under Biester Exception

Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: Establishing Taxpayer Standing Under Biester Exception

Date: Mar 28, 1986
Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: Establishing Taxpayer Standing Under Biester Exception Introduction Consumer Party of Pennsylvania, et al., v. Commonwealth of...
Expanding the Boundaries of Judicial Immunity: Insights from Barton L. Post v. M. Mark Mendel

Expanding the Boundaries of Judicial Immunity: Insights from Barton L. Post v. M. Mark Mendel

Date: Mar 28, 1986
Expanding the Boundaries of Judicial Immunity: Insights from Barton L. Post v. M. Mark Mendel Introduction Barton L. Post v. M. Mark Mendel is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert