Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Pennsylvania Case Commentaries

Commonwealth v. Blystone: Affirmation of Consent-Based Surveillance and Capital Sentencing

Commonwealth v. Blystone: Affirmation of Consent-Based Surveillance and Capital Sentencing

Date: Oct 18, 1988
Commonwealth v. Blystone: Affirmation of Consent-Based Surveillance and Capital Sentencing Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Scott Wayne Blystone is a landmark decision rendered by the...
Establishing Finality in Criminal Sentences: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Bobby Joe Lawson

Establishing Finality in Criminal Sentences: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Bobby Joe Lawson

Date: Oct 18, 1988
Establishing Finality in Criminal Sentences: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Bobby Joe Lawson Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Bobby Joe Lawson is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Balancing Peremptory Challenges and Capital Sentencing: Insights from Commonwealth v. Hardcastle

Balancing Peremptory Challenges and Capital Sentencing: Insights from Commonwealth v. Hardcastle

Date: Aug 11, 1988
Balancing Peremptory Challenges and Capital Sentencing: Insights from Commonwealth v. Hardcastle Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Donald Hardcastle is a pivotal case decided by the...
Probable Cause Affirmed via Counsel's Advice in Malicious Prosecution: Kelley v. Teamsters

Probable Cause Affirmed via Counsel's Advice in Malicious Prosecution: Kelley v. Teamsters

Date: Jul 29, 1988
Establishing Probable Cause Through Counsel's Advice in Malicious Prosecution: Kelley v. Teamsters Introduction The case of Nancy Kelley v. General Teamsters, Chauffeurs, and Helpers, Local Union 249...
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Devers: Clarifying Sentencing Disclosure Requirements

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Devers: Clarifying Sentencing Disclosure Requirements

Date: Jul 28, 1988
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Devers: Clarifying Sentencing Disclosure Requirements Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Joseph Francis Devers is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Strict Liability Limited: Pennsylvania Supreme Court's Decision on Liquor License Liability

Strict Liability Limited: Pennsylvania Supreme Court's Decision on Liquor License Liability

Date: Jul 28, 1988
Strict Liability Limited: Pennsylvania Supreme Court's Decision on Liquor License Liability Introduction Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. TLK, Inc., t/a Peter P's, 518 Pa. 500 (1988), presents a...
Spang v. United States Steel: Establishing New Precedent on Damages in Breach of Contract Cases

Spang v. United States Steel: Establishing New Precedent on Damages in Breach of Contract Cases

Date: Jul 13, 1988
Spang v. United States Steel: Establishing New Precedent on Damages in Breach of Contract Cases Introduction The case of Spang Company v. United States Steel Corporation (519 Pa. 14) addressed...
Valuation Date for Marital Assets and Standard of Proof in Equitable Distribution: SUTLIFF v. SUTLIFF

Valuation Date for Marital Assets and Standard of Proof in Equitable Distribution: SUTLIFF v. SUTLIFF

Date: Jun 2, 1988
Valuation Date for Marital Assets and Standard of Proof in Equitable Distribution: SUTLIFF v. SUTLIFF Introduction SUTLIFF v. SUTLIFF is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania,...
Operation of Motor Vehicles Under Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act: Insights from Catherine Love v. City of Philadelphia

Operation of Motor Vehicles Under Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act: Insights from Catherine Love v. City of Philadelphia

Date: Jun 2, 1988
Operation of Motor Vehicles Under Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act: Insights from Catherine Love v. City of Philadelphia Introduction Catherine Love v. City of Philadelphia (518 Pa. 370, 1988)...
Reversing Conviction Due to Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Davis

Reversing Conviction Due to Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Davis

Date: May 21, 1988
Reversing Conviction Due to Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Davis Introduction The case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Kenneth Richard Davis serves as a pivotal...
Application of Collateral Estoppel in Subsequent Murder Prosecutions: Commonwealth v. Smith

Application of Collateral Estoppel in Subsequent Murder Prosecutions: Commonwealth v. Smith

Date: Mar 30, 1988
Application of Collateral Estoppel in Subsequent Murder Prosecutions: Commonwealth v. Smith Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. James Melvin Smith is a landmark decision rendered by the...
Prohibiting Unlawful Police Roadblocks for DUI Enforcement under Pennsylvania Law: Commonwealth v. Tarbert and Commonwealth v. Dannaker

Prohibiting Unlawful Police Roadblocks for DUI Enforcement under Pennsylvania Law: Commonwealth v. Tarbert and Commonwealth v. Dannaker

Date: Dec 30, 1987
Prohibiting Unlawful Police Roadblocks for DUI Enforcement under Pennsylvania Law: Commonwealth v. Tarbert and Commonwealth v. Dannaker Introduction The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, in the landmark...
Mary Jane McGEE v. FEEGE: Redefining the Elements of Abuse of Process in Pennsylvania

Mary Jane McGEE v. FEEGE: Redefining the Elements of Abuse of Process in Pennsylvania

Date: Dec 29, 1987
Mary Jane McGEE v. FEEGE: Redefining the Elements of Abuse of Process in Pennsylvania Introduction The case of Mary Jane McGee v. Edward H. Feege et al., decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania...
Duty to Defend in Insurance Policies: Erie Insurance Exchange v. Transamerica Insurance Company

Duty to Defend in Insurance Policies: Erie Insurance Exchange v. Transamerica Insurance Company

Date: Dec 3, 1987
Duty to Defend in Insurance Policies: Erie Insurance Exchange v. Transamerica Insurance Company Introduction The case Erie Insurance Exchange, Appellant, v. Transamerica Insurance Company, Appellee....
Actual Job Availability Standard for Benefit Modification: Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Actual Job Availability Standard for Benefit Modification: Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Date: Oct 16, 1987
Actual Job Availability Standard for Benefit Modification: Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board Introduction The case Joseph Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Vepco...
Defamation and Employment Contract Obligations in Academic Settings: Analysis of Mel v. Baker

Defamation and Employment Contract Obligations in Academic Settings: Analysis of Mel v. Baker

Date: Oct 16, 1987
Defamation and Employment Contract Obligations in Academic Settings: Analysis of Mel v. Baker Introduction Melvin Baker, an Assistant Professor in the Art Department at Lafayette College, initiated...
Molineux v. Reed et al.: Clarifying Statute of Limitations in Wrongful Death Actions

Molineux v. Reed et al.: Clarifying Statute of Limitations in Wrongful Death Actions

Date: Oct 16, 1987
Molineux v. Reed et al.: Clarifying the Statute of Limitations in Wrongful Death Actions Introduction The landmark case Molineux v. Reed et al. (516 Pa. 398), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Exclusion of Negligence Concepts in Strict Liability: Lewis v. Coffing Hoist Division

Exclusion of Negligence Concepts in Strict Liability: Lewis v. Coffing Hoist Division

Date: Jul 10, 1987
Exclusion of Negligence Concepts in Strict Liability: Lewis v. Coffing Hoist Division Introduction In the landmark case Eugene R. Lewis and Jane Lewis, his wife, Appellees, v. Coffing Hoist Division,...
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Affirms Strict Requirements for Emotional Distress Claims under Restatement (Second) §46

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Affirms Strict Requirements for Emotional Distress Claims under Restatement (Second) §46

Date: Jun 16, 1987
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Affirms Strict Requirements for Emotional Distress Claims under Restatement (Second) §46 Introduction In Harvey and Marsha Kazatsky v. King David Memorial Park, Inc., the...
Reaffirmation of the Dual Standard for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Commonwealth v. Pierce

Reaffirmation of the Dual Standard for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Commonwealth v. Pierce

Date: Jun 10, 1987
Reaffirmation of the Dual Standard for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Commonwealth v. Pierce Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Charles Pierce, 515 Pa. 153 (1987), represents a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert