Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Pennsylvania Case Commentaries

Reaffirmation of Employment At-Will Doctrine and Defamation in Pennsylvania: Pa v. Paul

Reaffirmation of Employment At-Will Doctrine and Defamation in Pennsylvania: Pa v. Paul

Date: Feb 2, 1990
Reaffirmation of Employment At-Will Doctrine and Defamation in Pennsylvania: Pa v. Paul Introduction The case of Pa v. Paul, M.D., decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in 1990, serves as a...
Chain-of-Causation Test Established for Work-Related Mental Disability Claims under Pennsylvania's Workmen's Compensation Act

Chain-of-Causation Test Established for Work-Related Mental Disability Claims under Pennsylvania's Workmen's Compensation Act

Date: Jan 5, 1990
Chain-of-Causation Test Established for Work-Related Mental Disability Claims under Pennsylvania's Workmen's Compensation Act Introduction The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, in the landmark case of...
Unconstitutional Delegation of Legislative Power: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Nullifies State Ethics Commission's Authority

Unconstitutional Delegation of Legislative Power: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Nullifies State Ethics Commission's Authority

Date: Dec 14, 1989
Unconstitutional Delegation of Legislative Power: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Nullifies State Ethics Commission's Authority Introduction The case of Blackwell, Cohen, and Rafferty v. Commonwealth...
PennDOT's Duty and Sovereign Immunity in Dangerous Conditions Outside Right-of-Way

PennDOT's Duty and Sovereign Immunity in Dangerous Conditions Outside Right-of-Way

Date: Jul 13, 1989
PennDOT's Duty and Sovereign Immunity in Dangerous Conditions Outside Right-of-Way Introduction The case of Donna K. Snyder et al. v. Kenneth C. Harmon et al. revisits the complex interplay between...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Required for Wrongful Discharge Claims: CLAY v. ADVANCED COMPUTER APPLICATIONS

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Required for Wrongful Discharge Claims: CLAY v. ADVANCED COMPUTER APPLICATIONS

Date: Jun 6, 1989
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Required for Wrongful Discharge Claims: CLAY v. ADVANCED COMPUTER APPLICATIONS Introduction In the landmark case of Jeffrey Clay and Mary Clay, Individually and...
Vested Rights and Res Judicata in Zoning Variance Cases: City of Pittsburgh v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

Vested Rights and Res Judicata in Zoning Variance Cases: City of Pittsburgh v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

Date: Jun 6, 1989
Vested Rights and Res Judicata in Zoning Variance Cases: City of Pittsburgh v. Zoning Board of Adjustment Introduction The case of City of Pittsburgh, Appellee, v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of City...
Upholding the Death Sentence for a Juvenile: An In-Depth Analysis of COMMONWEALTH v. Hughes (1989)

Upholding the Death Sentence for a Juvenile: An In-Depth Analysis of COMMONWEALTH v. Hughes (1989)

Date: Mar 14, 1989
Upholding the Death Sentence for a Juvenile: An In-Depth Analysis of COMMONWEALTH v. Hughes (1989) Introduction COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Kevin Hughes, decided on March 13, 1989, by the Supreme...
Jury Selection and Sentencing in Commonwealth v. Abu-Jamal: A Comprehensive Analysis

Jury Selection and Sentencing in Commonwealth v. Abu-Jamal: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Mar 7, 1989
Jury Selection and Sentencing in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Abu-Jamal: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Mumia Abu-Jamal is a landmark case decided by the...
Clarifying Police Responsibilities in Informing Arrestees about Counsel Rights: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. O'Connell

Clarifying Police Responsibilities in Informing Arrestees about Counsel Rights: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. O'Connell

Date: Mar 7, 1989
Clarifying Police Responsibilities in Informing Arrestees about Counsel Rights: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. O'Connell Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Patrick M. O'Connell is a...
Reinforcing Limits on Admissibility of Prior Criminal Acts in Capital Sentencing: Commonwealth v. Louis Billa

Reinforcing Limits on Admissibility of Prior Criminal Acts in Capital Sentencing: Commonwealth v. Louis Billa

Date: Mar 7, 1989
Reinforcing Limits on Admissibility of Prior Criminal Acts in Capital Sentencing: Commonwealth v. Louis Billa Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Louis Billa, 521 Pa. 168 (1989), adjudicated...
Enhancing Attorney Fiduciary Duties in Settlement Negotiations: RIZZO v. HAINES Establishes Standards for Legal Malpractice

Enhancing Attorney Fiduciary Duties in Settlement Negotiations: RIZZO v. HAINES Establishes Standards for Legal Malpractice

Date: Mar 7, 1989
Enhancing Attorney Fiduciary Duties in Settlement Negotiations: RIZZO v. HAINES Establishes Standards for Legal Malpractice Introduction In the landmark case of Frank L. Rizzo and Lena Rizzo v....
Punitive Damages Not Required to Be Proportionate to Compensatory Damages in Pennsylvania

Punitive Damages Not Required to Be Proportionate to Compensatory Damages in Pennsylvania

Date: Mar 4, 1989
Punitive Damages Not Required to Be Proportionate to Compensatory Damages in Pennsylvania Introduction The case of Edward Kirkbride and Carole KIRKBRIDE v. LISBON CONTRACTORS, INC. addressed a...
Establishing Union Standing to Challenge Quota Policies: South Whitehall Township Police Service v. South Whitehall Township

Establishing Union Standing to Challenge Quota Policies: South Whitehall Township Police Service v. South Whitehall Township

Date: Mar 4, 1989
Establishing Union Standing to Challenge Quota Policies: South Whitehall Township Police Service v. South Whitehall Township Introduction South Whitehall Township Police Service v. South Whitehall...
Revisiting Governmental Immunity and Implied Warranties: Insights from Gall v. Allegheny County Health Department

Revisiting Governmental Immunity and Implied Warranties: Insights from Gall v. Allegheny County Health Department

Date: Mar 4, 1989
Revisiting Governmental Immunity and Implied Warranties: Insights from Gall v. Allegheny County Health Department Introduction The case of Gall v. Allegheny County Health Department, decided by the...
Enhanced Duty of Insurance Companies to Inform Insureds of Legal Rights: Dercoli v. Pennsylvania National Mutual and Grange Mutual

Enhanced Duty of Insurance Companies to Inform Insureds of Legal Rights: Dercoli v. Pennsylvania National Mutual and Grange Mutual

Date: Mar 4, 1989
Enhanced Duty of Insurance Companies to Inform Insureds of Legal Rights: Dercoli v. Pennsylvania National Mutual and Grange Mutual Introduction The case of Dercoli v. Pennsylvania National Mutual...
Miranda Rights and Police Inducements: Insights from Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Gibbs

Miranda Rights and Police Inducements: Insights from Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Gibbs

Date: Feb 3, 1989
Miranda Rights and Police Inducements: Insights from Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Gibbs Introduction In the landmark case Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Gibbs, 520 Pa. 151 (1989), the Supreme...
Penn Center House v. Hoffman: Reaffirming the Nanty-Glo Rule in Summary Judgment

Penn Center House v. Hoffman: Reaffirming the Nanty-Glo Rule in Summary Judgment

Date: Jan 31, 1989
Penn Center House v. Hoffman: Reaffirming the Nanty-Glo Rule in Summary Judgment Introduction Penn Center House, Inc. v. Hoffman (520 Pa. 171), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on...
Capricious Disregard of Competent Evidence in Workers' Compensation: Da v. Russell

Capricious Disregard of Competent Evidence in Workers' Compensation: Da v. Russell

Date: Dec 3, 1988
Capricious Disregard of Competent Evidence in Workers' Compensation: Da v. Russell Introduction Da v. Russell, Petitioner (121 Pa. Commw. 436) is a landmark decision rendered by the Commonwealth...
Withdrawal of Counsel in Post Conviction Hearing Act Proceedings: Insights from COMMONWEALTH of PENNSYLVANIA v. FINLEY

Withdrawal of Counsel in Post Conviction Hearing Act Proceedings: Insights from COMMONWEALTH of PENNSYLVANIA v. FINLEY

Date: Nov 1, 1988
Withdrawal of Counsel in Post Conviction Hearing Act Proceedings: Insights from COMMONWEALTH of PENNSYLVANIA v. FINLEY Introduction The case COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Dorothy Finley (379 Pa....
Constitutional Mandates for Judicial Elections: SPRAGUE v. CASEY (1988)

Constitutional Mandates for Judicial Elections: SPRAGUE v. CASEY (1988)

Date: Oct 26, 1988
Constitutional Mandates for Judicial Elections: SPRAGUE v. CASEY (1988) Introduction The case of Richard A. Sprague v. Robert P. Casey is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert