Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Pennsylvania Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Aggravating Circumstances and Mitigation Limitations in Death Penalty Sentencing: Commonwealth v. Reid

Affirmation of Aggravating Circumstances and Mitigation Limitations in Death Penalty Sentencing: Commonwealth v. Reid

Date: May 25, 1994
Affirmation of Aggravating Circumstances and Mitigation Limitations in Death Penalty Sentencing: Commonwealth v. Reid Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Anthony Reid is a pivotal case...
Renk v. City of Pittsburgh: A Landmark on Police Indemnification under the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act

Renk v. City of Pittsburgh: A Landmark on Police Indemnification under the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act

Date: May 3, 1994
Renk v. City of Pittsburgh: A Landmark on Police Indemnification under the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act Introduction Renk v. City of Pittsburgh is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Capital Murder and Robbery Convictions: Analysis of Commonwealth v. Williams

Affirmation of Capital Murder and Robbery Convictions: Analysis of Commonwealth v. Williams

Date: Apr 22, 1994
Affirmation of Capital Murder and Robbery Convictions: Analysis of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Kenneth J. Williams Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Kenneth J. Williams is a seminal...
Enforcement of "Family Car Exclusion" Under Pennsylvania's MVFRL: A Comprehensive Analysis of Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Company

Enforcement of "Family Car Exclusion" Under Pennsylvania's MVFRL: A Comprehensive Analysis of Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Company

Date: Apr 21, 1994
Enforcement of "Family Car Exclusion" Under Pennsylvania's MVFRL: A Comprehensive Analysis of Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Company Introduction In the landmark case of Janet Paylor, Administratrix of...
De Novo Review Affirmed in Liquor Code Appeals Under Amended Section 471

De Novo Review Affirmed in Liquor Code Appeals Under Amended Section 471

Date: Mar 25, 1994
De Novo Review Affirmed in Liquor Code Appeals Under Amended Section 471 Introduction PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT v. CANTINA GLORIA'S LOUNGE, INC., 15286 Rt. 30,...
Establishing Causation in Contract Killings: Insights from Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Mayhue

Establishing Causation in Contract Killings: Insights from Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Mayhue

Date: Mar 19, 1994
Establishing Causation in Contract Killings: Insights from Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Mayhue Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Frederick E. Mayhue, decided on March 18, 1994, by the...
Exigent Circumstances in Warrantless Home Searches: Analysis of Commonwealth v. Roland

Exigent Circumstances in Warrantless Home Searches: Analysis of Commonwealth v. Roland

Date: Feb 5, 1994
Exigent Circumstances in Warrantless Home Searches: Analysis of Commonwealth v. Roland Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Dennis D. Roland is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Reversal of Board Decision in Lee Hospital v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review: Establishing Strict Criteria for Necessitous and Compelling Cause in Voluntary Termination

Reversal of Board Decision in Lee Hospital v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review: Establishing Strict Criteria for Necessitous and Compelling Cause in Voluntary Termination

Date: Jan 19, 1994
Reversal of Board Decision in Lee Hospital v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review: Establishing Strict Criteria for Necessitous and Compelling Cause in Voluntary Termination Introduction The...
Due Process Standards for Expungement Proceedings: R. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Sets Precedent

Due Process Standards for Expungement Proceedings: R. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Sets Precedent

Date: Jan 5, 1994
Due Process Standards for Expungement Proceedings: R. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Sets Precedent Introduction The case of R., Appellant, v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (535 Pa. 440) adjudicated...
Employees Lack Standing to Challenge Seasonal Status Determinations under Section 802.5

Employees Lack Standing to Challenge Seasonal Status Determinations under Section 802.5

Date: Nov 13, 1993
Employees Lack Standing to Challenge Seasonal Status Determinations under Section 802.5 Introduction The case of Bonnie BEERS, Appellant v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania adjudicated by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Capital Punishment Standards in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Edmiston

Affirmation of Capital Punishment Standards in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Edmiston

Date: Nov 11, 1993
Affirmation of Capital Punishment Standards in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Edmiston Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Stephen Rex Edmiston is a landmark 1993 decision by the Supreme...
MOORE v. MOORE: Upholding Trial Court's Authority to Reconsider Custody Orders and Clarifying Appellate Review Standards

MOORE v. MOORE: Upholding Trial Court's Authority to Reconsider Custody Orders and Clarifying Appellate Review Standards

Date: Nov 6, 1993
MOORE v. MOORE: Upholding Trial Court's Authority to Reconsider Custody Orders and Clarifying Appellate Review Standards Introduction MOORE v. MOORE is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Inglis House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board: Establishing Employer Burden in Initial Compensation Claims

Inglis House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board: Establishing Employer Burden in Initial Compensation Claims

Date: Nov 5, 1993
Inglis House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board: Establishing Employer Burden in Initial Compensation Claims Introduction The case of Inglis House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Laura...
Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Morris Spence: Application and Implications of 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9711

Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Morris Spence: Application and Implications of 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9711

Date: Jul 1, 1993
Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Morris Spence: Application and Implications of 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9711 Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Morris...
Refining Appellate Review Standards for New Trial Orders: Coker v. Flickinger

Refining Appellate Review Standards for New Trial Orders: Coker v. Flickinger

Date: Jun 3, 1993
Refining Appellate Review Standards for New Trial Orders: Coker v. Flickinger Introduction In Walter L. Coker, Appellant v. S.M. Flickinger Company, Inc., Appellee (533 Pa. 441, 1993), the Supreme...
Comprehensive Liability of Insurers Under the Multiple-Trigger Theory: Analysis of J.H. France Refractories Co. v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Comprehensive Liability of Insurers Under the Multiple-Trigger Theory: Analysis of J.H. France Refractories Co. v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Date: May 28, 1993
Comprehensive Liability of Insurers Under the Multiple-Trigger Theory: Analysis of J.H. France Refractories Co. v. Allstate Insurance Co. Introduction The case of J.H. France Refractories Company and...
Exclusion of Pro Se Briefs in Counseled Appeals: Insights from COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Ellis

Exclusion of Pro Se Briefs in Counseled Appeals: Insights from COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Ellis

Date: May 28, 1993
Exclusion of Pro Se Briefs in Counseled Appeals: Insights from COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Ellis Introduction COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. James Ellis, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Perpetuating the Right to Strike: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Upholds PERA’s Provisions for Public Educators

Perpetuating the Right to Strike: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Upholds PERA’s Provisions for Public Educators

Date: May 28, 1993
Perpetuating the Right to Strike: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Upholds PERA’s Provisions for Public Educators Introduction In the landmark case of Reichley et al. v. North Penn School District et al....
Sufficiency of Evidence in Sexual Assault Convictions: Insights from Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Ian N. Karkaria

Sufficiency of Evidence in Sexual Assault Convictions: Insights from Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Ian N. Karkaria

Date: May 27, 1993
Sufficiency of Evidence in Sexual Assault Convictions: Insights from Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Ian N. Karkaria Introduction The case Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Ian N. Karkaria, decided by...
Distinguishing Standards for Criminal Malpractice Claims in Bailey v. Tucker and TRICE v. MOZENTER

Distinguishing Standards for Criminal Malpractice Claims in Bailey v. Tucker and TRICE v. MOZENTER

Date: Feb 27, 1993
Distinguishing Standards for Criminal Malpractice Claims in Bailey v. Tucker and TRICE v. MOZENTER Introduction The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, in the consolidated cases of Clarence Bailey, a/k/a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert