Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Pennsylvania Case Commentaries

Reevaluation of Emotional Bonds in Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights

Reevaluation of Emotional Bonds in Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights

Date: Feb 18, 1993
Reevaluation of Emotional Bonds in Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights Introduction The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, in IN RE E.M. a/k/a E.W.C. and L.M. a/k/a L.C., Jr., Minors. Appeal of...
Sovereign Immunity and Jury Charge Errors: A Comprehensive Analysis of La Frankie v. Miklich

Sovereign Immunity and Jury Charge Errors: A Comprehensive Analysis of La Frankie v. Miklich

Date: Dec 8, 1992
Sovereign Immunity and Jury Charge Errors: A Comprehensive Analysis of La Frankie v. Miklich Introduction The case of Patrick J. La Frankie v. Robert A. Miklich (152 Pa. Commw. 163) adjudicated by...
Valette v. Commonwealth: Redefining Constructive Possession in Controlled Substance Cases

Valette v. Commonwealth: Redefining Constructive Possession in Controlled Substance Cases

Date: Sep 19, 1992
Valette v. Commonwealth: Redefining Constructive Possession in Controlled Substance Cases Introduction In the landmark case Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Angel Valette, decided on September 18,...
Double Jeopardy Protections Expanded in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Smith

Double Jeopardy Protections Expanded in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Smith

Date: Sep 19, 1992
Double Jeopardy Protections Expanded in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Smith Introduction The case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Jay C. Smith addressed critical issues surrounding prosecutorial...
Unconstitutional Implicit Consent in DUI Cases: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Kohl and Danforth

Unconstitutional Implicit Consent in DUI Cases: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Kohl and Danforth

Date: Sep 17, 1992
Unconstitutional Implicit Consent in DUI Cases: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Kohl and Danforth Introduction The landmark case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Kohl and Danforth established...
Intervention Denied: Establishing the Finality of Denial Orders in Pennsylvania's Judicial Proceedings

Intervention Denied: Establishing the Finality of Denial Orders in Pennsylvania's Judicial Proceedings

Date: Sep 17, 1992
Intervention Denied: Establishing the Finality of Denial Orders in Pennsylvania's Judicial Proceedings Introduction PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF RURAL AND SMALL SCHOOLS, et al. v. Robert P. Casey,...
Use of Juvenile Adjudications in Capital Sentencing: Analyzing Commonwealth v. Baker

Use of Juvenile Adjudications in Capital Sentencing: Analyzing Commonwealth v. Baker

Date: Jun 18, 1992
Use of Juvenile Adjudications in Capital Sentencing: Analyzing Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Baker Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Lee Baker, decided on June 17, 1992, by the Supreme...
Substantial Evidence Standard Affirmed in Workers' Compensation Appeals

Substantial Evidence Standard Affirmed in Workers' Compensation Appeals

Date: Jun 18, 1992
Substantial Evidence Standard Affirmed in Workers' Compensation Appeals Introduction The case of Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Skirpan) and Herman Strube v. Workmen's...
Independent Duty to Warn and Contribution Claims in Strict Products Liability: WALTON v. AVCO CORPoration

Independent Duty to Warn and Contribution Claims in Strict Products Liability: WALTON v. AVCO CORPoration

Date: May 23, 1992
Independent Duty to Warn and Contribution Claims in Strict Products Liability: WALTON v. AVCO CORPoration Introduction WALTON v. AVCO CORPoration, decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on May...
Discovery Rule in Medical Malpractice: William HAYWARD v. lyn Hayward

Discovery Rule in Medical Malpractice: William HAYWARD v. lyn Hayward

Date: May 22, 1992
Discovery Rule in Medical Malpractice: William HAYWARD v. lyn Hayward Introduction The case of William HAYWARD and Mary E v. lyn Hayward addresses a pivotal issue in medical malpractice law: the...
Enhancing the Reliability of Prior Inconsistent Statements: Insights from Commonwealth v. Lively

Enhancing the Reliability of Prior Inconsistent Statements: Insights from Commonwealth v. Lively

Date: May 19, 1992
Enhancing the Reliability of Prior Inconsistent Statements: Insights from Commonwealth v. Lively Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Kevin Lively is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Recognition of Homeowners as Third-Party Beneficiaries under Restatement (Second) Contracts §302

Recognition of Homeowners as Third-Party Beneficiaries under Restatement (Second) Contracts §302

Date: May 16, 1992
Recognition of Homeowners as Third-Party Beneficiaries under Restatement (Second) Contracts §302 Introduction The case of William F. Scarpitti, Jr. and Susan J. Scarpitti, his wife, Joseph Hines and...
Due Process Violation through Commingling of Prosecutorial and Adjudicatory Functions in Administrative Boards

Due Process Violation through Commingling of Prosecutorial and Adjudicatory Functions in Administrative Boards

Date: Mar 19, 1992
Due Process Violation through Commingling of Prosecutorial and Adjudicatory Functions in Administrative Boards Introduction The case of Samuel S. Lyness, M.D., Appellant, v. Commonwealth of...
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Clarifies Standards for Judgment N.o.v. and Informed Consent: MOURE v. RAEUCHELE

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Clarifies Standards for Judgment N.o.v. and Informed Consent: MOURE v. RAEUCHELE

Date: Feb 22, 1992
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Clarifies Standards for Judgment N.o.v. and Informed Consent: MOURE v. RAEUCHELE Introduction The case of Vicki L. Moure, now by marriage Vicki L.M. Via v. Randall R....
Presumption of Prejudice in Prolonged Litigation: Penn Piping, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North America

Presumption of Prejudice in Prolonged Litigation: Penn Piping, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North America

Date: Feb 13, 1992
Presumption of Prejudice in Prolonged Litigation: Penn Piping, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North America Introduction The case of Penn Piping, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North America (529 Pa....
Maritrans v. Pepper: Reinforcing Common Law Fiduciary Duties of Attorneys Against Conflicts of Interest

Maritrans v. Pepper: Reinforcing Common Law Fiduciary Duties of Attorneys Against Conflicts of Interest

Date: Jan 30, 1992
Maritrans v. Pepper: Reinforcing Common Law Fiduciary Duties of Attorneys Against Conflicts of Interest Introduction Maritrans GP Inc., Maritrans Partners L.P., and Maritrans Operating Partners L.P....
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Rules Against Expert Evidence on Child Sexual Abuse Behavioral Patterns: Commonwealth v. Dunkle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Rules Against Expert Evidence on Child Sexual Abuse Behavioral Patterns: Commonwealth v. Dunkle

Date: Jan 23, 1992
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Rules Against Expert Evidence on Child Sexual Abuse Behavioral Patterns: Commonwealth v. Dunkle Introduction In the landmark case of COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Neil...
Affirmation of Capital Punishment and Standards for Pre-Trial Publicity: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. McCullum

Affirmation of Capital Punishment and Standards for Pre-Trial Publicity: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. McCullum

Date: Jan 22, 1992
Affirmation of Capital Punishment and Standards for Pre-Trial Publicity: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. McCullum Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Thomas McCullum is a pivotal case...
Prohibition of Religious Justifications in Capital Sentencing: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Chambers

Prohibition of Religious Justifications in Capital Sentencing: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Chambers

Date: Nov 5, 1991
Prohibition of Religious Justifications in Capital Sentencing: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Chambers Introduction In Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Karl S. Chambers, 528 Pa. 558 (1991), the...
Prospective Application of Constitutional Tax Rulings in American Trucking Associations v. McNulty

Prospective Application of Constitutional Tax Rulings in American Trucking Associations v. McNulty

Date: Aug 15, 1991
Prospective Application of Constitutional Tax Rulings in American Trucking Associations v. McNulty Introduction American Trucking Associations, Inc., et al., v. Eileen McNulty, Acting Secretary of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert