Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Pennsylvania Case Commentaries

Establishing Exceptions to the PCRA Time Bar: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Robert Lark

Establishing Exceptions to the PCRA Time Bar: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Robert Lark

Date: Feb 24, 2000
Establishing Exceptions to the PCRA Time Bar: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Robert Lark Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Robert Lark is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Reversing Capital Sentences: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in COMMONWEALTH v. NIEVES

Reversing Capital Sentences: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in COMMONWEALTH v. NIEVES

Date: Feb 18, 2000
Reversing Capital Sentences: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in COMMONWEALTH v. NIEVES Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. William Nieves is a landmark decision rendered by the Supreme...
Four-Year Statute of Limitations Applied to Promissory Estoppel Claims in Pennsylvania

Four-Year Statute of Limitations Applied to Promissory Estoppel Claims in Pennsylvania

Date: Jan 29, 2000
Four-Year Statute of Limitations Applied to Promissory Estoppel Claims in Pennsylvania Introduction Ronald E. Crouse, Sr. and Aliquippa Forge, Inc. v. Cyclops Industries is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Establishing the Right to Effective Counsel and Fair Jury Selection in Capital Cases: Commonwealth v. Basemore Commentary

Establishing the Right to Effective Counsel and Fair Jury Selection in Capital Cases: Commonwealth v. Basemore Commentary

Date: Jan 21, 2000
Establishing the Right to Effective Counsel and Fair Jury Selection in Capital Cases: Commonwealth v. Basemore Commentary Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. William Basemore is a landmark...
Clarifying the Standards for Weight of Evidence Claims: Insights from Commonwealth v. Widmer

Clarifying the Standards for Weight of Evidence Claims: Insights from Commonwealth v. Widmer

Date: Jan 21, 2000
Clarifying the Standards for Weight of Evidence Claims: Insights from Commonwealth v. Widmer Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Barry Widmer, Jr., decided by the Supreme Court of...
Reaffirmation of the Essence Test in Judicial Review of Labor Arbitration Awards

Reaffirmation of the Essence Test in Judicial Review of Labor Arbitration Awards

Date: Dec 23, 1999
Reaffirmation of the Essence Test in Judicial Review of Labor Arbitration Awards Introduction The case of State System of Higher Education (Cheyney University) v. State College University...
Enforcement of Timeliness Restrictions under 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9545 in Post-Conviction Relief: Insights from Commonwealth v. Beasley

Enforcement of Timeliness Restrictions under 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9545 in Post-Conviction Relief: Insights from Commonwealth v. Beasley

Date: Dec 10, 1999
Enforcement of Timeliness Restrictions under 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9545 in Post-Conviction Relief: Insights from Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Leslie Charles X. Beasley Introduction Commonwealth of...
Enforceability of Settlement Agreements Requires Clear Mutual Assent on Material Terms: Mazzella v. Koken

Enforceability of Settlement Agreements Requires Clear Mutual Assent on Material Terms: Mazzella v. Koken

Date: Oct 29, 1999
Enforceability of Settlement Agreements Requires Clear Mutual Assent on Material Terms: Mazzella v. Koken Introduction Mazzella v. Koken, 559 Pa. 216 (1999), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Signatures Not Essential for Contract Formation Unless Statutorily or Contractually Mandated: Shovel Transfer and Storage, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

Signatures Not Essential for Contract Formation Unless Statutorily or Contractually Mandated: Shovel Transfer and Storage, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

Date: Oct 28, 1999
Signatures Not Essential for Contract Formation Unless Statutorily or Contractually Mandated: Shovel Transfer and Storage, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board Introduction The case of Shovel...
Establishing Employer Discretion and Burden of Proof in Willful Misconduct Cases: Guthrie v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Establishing Employer Discretion and Burden of Proof in Willful Misconduct Cases: Guthrie v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Date: Sep 30, 1999
Establishing Employer Discretion and Burden of Proof in Willful Misconduct Cases: Guthrie v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review Introduction Daniel Guthrie, an employee of the Port Authority...
Reversal of License Suspension: Emphasizing 'Reasonable Grounds' in DUI Suspension Cases

Reversal of License Suspension: Emphasizing 'Reasonable Grounds' in DUI Suspension Cases

Date: Sep 30, 1999
Reversal of License Suspension: Emphasizing 'Reasonable Grounds' in DUI Suspension Cases Introduction The case of Robert N. Banner, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation,...
Affirmation of PCRA Petition Denial and Standards for Ineffective Assistance Claims in Commonwealth v. Rollins

Affirmation of PCRA Petition Denial and Standards for Ineffective Assistance Claims in Commonwealth v. Rollins

Date: Sep 30, 1999
Affirmation of PCRA Petition Denial and Standards for Ineffective Assistance Claims in Commonwealth v. Rollins Introduction In the landmark case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Saharris Rollins,...
Strict Enforcement of PCRA Time Limitations in COMMONWEALTH v. FAHY

Strict Enforcement of PCRA Time Limitations in COMMONWEALTH v. FAHY

Date: Aug 28, 1999
Strict Enforcement of PCRA Time Limitations in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Henry Fahy Introduction The case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Henry Fahy, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege and Defendant Rights: Insights from Commonwealth v. Chmiel

Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege and Defendant Rights: Insights from Commonwealth v. Chmiel

Date: Aug 20, 1999
Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege and Defendant Rights: Insights from Commonwealth v. Chmiel Introduction The case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. David Chmiel (558 Pa. 478) addressed critical...
Comprehensive Commentary on Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance Co.: Clarifying Pollution Exclusions in Commercial Liability Policies

Comprehensive Commentary on Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance Co.: Clarifying Pollution Exclusions in Commercial Liability Policies

Date: Jul 28, 1999
Comprehensive Commentary on Madison Construction Company v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company: Clarifying Pollution Exclusions in Commercial Liability Policies Introduction The Supreme Court of...
Reasonable Suspicion Standards in Seizure of Abandoned Contraband: Commonwealth v. Cook

Reasonable Suspicion Standards in Seizure of Abandoned Contraband: Commonwealth v. Cook

Date: Jul 24, 1999
Reasonable Suspicion Standards in Seizure of Abandoned Contraband: Commonwealth v. Cook Introduction In the landmark case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Gregory Spencer Cook, 558 Pa. 50 (1999),...
Probable Cause and Exigent Circumstances in Warrantless Vehicle Searches: Insights from Commonwealth v. Luv

Probable Cause and Exigent Circumstances in Warrantless Vehicle Searches: Insights from Commonwealth v. Luv

Date: Jul 23, 1999
Probable Cause and Exigent Circumstances in Warrantless Vehicle Searches: Insights from Commonwealth v. Luv Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Daryl Luv, 557 Pa. 570 (1999), adjudicated by...
Limitations on the Closely Regulated Business Exception for Warrantless Searches in the Trucking Industry

Limitations on the Closely Regulated Business Exception for Warrantless Searches in the Trucking Industry

Date: Jul 23, 1999
Limitations on the Closely Regulated Business Exception for Warrantless Searches in the Trucking Industry Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Frederick W. Petroll, 558 Pa. 565 (1999),...
Restoration of Appellate Rights for Ineffective Counsel Under Pennsylvania's Post Conviction Relief Act: Commonwealth v. Jesse D. Lantzy

Restoration of Appellate Rights for Ineffective Counsel Under Pennsylvania's Post Conviction Relief Act: Commonwealth v. Jesse D. Lantzy

Date: Jul 8, 1999
Restoration of Appellate Rights for Ineffective Counsel Under Pennsylvania's Post Conviction Relief Act: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Jesse D. Lantzy Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v....
Procedural Due Process Violations in Sexual Violence Predator Provisions: Commonwealth v. Williams

Procedural Due Process Violations in Sexual Violence Predator Provisions: Commonwealth v. Williams

Date: Jul 1, 1999
Procedural Due Process Violations in Sexual Violence Predator Provisions: Commonwealth v. Williams Introduction The case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Donald Francis Williams addresses the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert