Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Pennsylvania Case Commentaries

PAPPAS v. ASBEL: Defining ERISA Preemption in Medical Malpractice within HMOs

PAPPAS v. ASBEL: Defining ERISA Preemption in Medical Malpractice within HMOs

Date: Apr 4, 2001
PAPPAS v. ASBEL: Defining ERISA Preemption in Medical Malpractice within HMOs Introduction In the landmark case of Basil Pappas and Theodora Pappas, H/W v. David S. Asbel, D.O., Pennsylvania Hospital...
Ex Post Facto Challenges in Parole Denials: Insights from Coady v. Vaughn

Ex Post Facto Challenges in Parole Denials: Insights from Coady v. Vaughn

Date: Mar 23, 2001
Ex Post Facto Challenges in Parole Denials: Insights from Coady v. Vaughn 1. Introduction Coady v. Vaughn, 564 Pa. 604 (2001), is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania's...
Homicide by Vehicle and DUI Offenses Do Not Merge for Sentencing Purposes: Commonwealth v. Collins

Homicide by Vehicle and DUI Offenses Do Not Merge for Sentencing Purposes: Commonwealth v. Collins

Date: Jan 18, 2001
Homicide by Vehicle and DUI Offenses Do Not Merge for Sentencing Purposes: Commonwealth v. Collins Introduction In Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Casey S. Collins, 564 Pa. 144 (2001), the Supreme...
Reversing Employer Status: Pennsylvania Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling on Independent Contractors in Workers' Compensation

Reversing Employer Status: Pennsylvania Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling on Independent Contractors in Workers' Compensation

Date: Nov 28, 2000
Reversing Employer Status: Pennsylvania Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling on Independent Contractors in Workers' Compensation Introduction The case of Universal Am-Can, Ltd. and National Union/AIAC v....
Illegality of Detention Invalidates Consent to Search: Freeman v. Commonwealth

Illegality of Detention Invalidates Consent to Search: Freeman v. Commonwealth

Date: Aug 25, 2000
Illegality of Detention Invalidates Consent to Search: Freeman v. Commonwealth Introduction In Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Diana Ericker Freeman (563 Pa. 47, 757 A.2d 884, 2000), the Supreme...
Duty of Care of Therapists Limited to Patients in Alleged Parental Sexual Abuse Cases: Althaus v. Cohen

Duty of Care of Therapists Limited to Patients in Alleged Parental Sexual Abuse Cases: Althaus v. Cohen

Date: Aug 23, 2000
Duty of Care of Therapists Limited to Patients in Alleged Parental Sexual Abuse Cases: Althaus v. Cohen Introduction Althaus v. Cohen, 562 Pa. 547 (2000) is a landmark case decided by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Commonwealth v. Spotz: Establishing Rigorous Evidentiary Standards

Affirmation of Death Sentence in Commonwealth v. Spotz: Establishing Rigorous Evidentiary Standards

Date: Aug 23, 2000
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Commonwealth v. Spotz: Establishing Rigorous Evidentiary Standards Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Mark Newton Spotz (562 Pa. 498) is a landmark decision...
Appellees v. Appellants: Reversing the Superior Court on Trial Court Discretion in Mistrial Motions

Appellees v. Appellants: Reversing the Superior Court on Trial Court Discretion in Mistrial Motions

Date: Aug 22, 2000
Appellees v. Appellants: Reversing the Superior Court on Trial Court Discretion in Mistrial Motions Introduction The case of Robert D. Harman and Dorothy E. Harman on behalf of Christopher Harman, a...
Affirmation of Juvenile Act Amendments: Transfer Provisions and Burden of Proof in Commonwealth v. Cotto

Affirmation of Juvenile Act Amendments: Transfer Provisions and Burden of Proof in Commonwealth v. Cotto

Date: Jun 21, 2000
Affirmation of Juvenile Act’s Transfer Provisions and Burden of Proof in Commonwealth v. Cotto Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Abraham Martinez Cotto (562 Pa. 32), decided on June 20,...
Anticipatory Search Warrants and Their Constitutionality Under Article I, § 8: Insights from Commonwealth v. Glass

Anticipatory Search Warrants and Their Constitutionality Under Article I, § 8: Insights from Commonwealth v. Glass

Date: Jun 21, 2000
Anticipatory Search Warrants and Their Constitutionality Under Article I, § 8: Insights from Commonwealth v. Glass Introduction The landmark case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Michael Glass,...
Strict Adherence to PCRA Time Limits: Ineffective Assistance Claims Do Not Extend Deadlines in COMMONWEALTH v. GAMBOA-TAYLOR

Strict Adherence to PCRA Time Limits: Ineffective Assistance Claims Do Not Extend Deadlines in COMMONWEALTH v. GAMBOA-TAYLOR

Date: Jun 20, 2000
Strict Adherence to PCRA Time Limits: Ineffective Assistance Claims Do Not Extend Deadlines in COMMONWEALTH v. GAMBOA-TAYLOR Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Paul Gamboa-Taylor, 562 Pa....
Annenberg v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: Establishing Severability in Commerce Clause Violations

Annenberg v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: Establishing Severability in Commerce Clause Violations

Date: Jun 2, 2000
Annenberg v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: Establishing Severability in Commerce Clause Violations Introduction The case of Walter H. and Leonore Annenberg v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania addresses a...
Strict Adherence to PCRA Timeliness Requirements Upheld: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Jamal Murray

Strict Adherence to PCRA Timeliness Requirements Upheld: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Jamal Murray

Date: May 20, 2000
Strict Adherence to PCRA Timeliness Requirements Upheld: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Jamal Murray Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Jamal Murray, 562 Pa. 1, is a pivotal case decided...
Affirmation of the Plain Feel Doctrine under Article I, Section 8

Affirmation of the Plain Feel Doctrine under Article I, Section 8

Date: May 20, 2000
Affirmation of the Plain Feel Doctrine under Article I, Section 8 Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Abdul M. Zhahir (561 Pa. 545, 2000) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Clarification of Real Estate Exception to Sovereign Immunity: Absence of Guardrail Does Not Constitute Dangerous Condition

Clarification of Real Estate Exception to Sovereign Immunity: Absence of Guardrail Does Not Constitute Dangerous Condition

Date: May 19, 2000
Clarification of Real Estate Exception to Sovereign Immunity: Absence of Guardrail Does Not Constitute Dangerous Condition Introduction The case of Stacey L. Dean v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,...
Presence Requirement Affirmed in Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Claims: Insights from Taylor v. Einstein Medical Center

Presence Requirement Affirmed in Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Claims: Insights from Taylor v. Einstein Medical Center

Date: May 18, 2000
Presence Requirement Affirmed in Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Claims: Insights from Taylor v. Einstein Medical Center Introduction Taylor v. Einstein Medical Center, decided by the...
Reaffirmation of Discretionary Sentencing Powers in Parole Violations: Commonwealth v. Sierra

Reaffirmation of Discretionary Sentencing Powers in Parole Violations: Commonwealth v. Sierra

Date: May 16, 2000
Reaffirmation of Discretionary Sentencing Powers in Parole Violations: Commonwealth v. Sierra Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Emily Sierra is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Superior...
Public Policy Exception to At-Will Employment in Pennsylvania: Limited Scope of Federal OSHA Protections

Public Policy Exception to At-Will Employment in Pennsylvania: Limited Scope of Federal OSHA Protections

Date: Apr 19, 2000
Public Policy Exception to At-Will Employment in Pennsylvania: Limited Scope of Federal OSHA Protections Introduction The case of Mary McLaughlin v. Gastrointestinal Specialists, Inc. (561 Pa. 307)...
Non-Applicability of Timeliness Exceptions for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Alan Pursell

Non-Applicability of Timeliness Exceptions for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Alan Pursell

Date: Apr 18, 2000
Non-Applicability of Timeliness Exceptions for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Alan Pursell Introduction The case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Alan...
Authorized Nunc Pro Tunc Appeals: Establishing Precedent in Property Assessment Disputes

Authorized Nunc Pro Tunc Appeals: Establishing Precedent in Property Assessment Disputes

Date: Feb 24, 2000
Authorized Nunc Pro Tunc Appeals: Establishing Precedent in Property Assessment Disputes Introduction In the landmark case of Union Electric Corporation, Appellant, v. Board of Property Assessment,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert