Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Oregon Case Commentaries

STATE v. CLOUTIER: Upholding Single Conviction for Burglary and Attempted Theft in the Same Criminal Episode

STATE v. CLOUTIER: Upholding Single Conviction for Burglary and Attempted Theft in the Same Criminal Episode

Date: Jun 13, 1979
STATE v. CLOUTIER: Upholding Single Conviction for Burglary and Attempted Theft in the Same Criminal Episode Introduction In State of Oregon v. Gaston Cloutier, 286 Or. 579 (1979), the Oregon Supreme...
Municipal Liability for Licensing Errors: A Comprehensive Analysis of BRENNEN v. CITY OF EUGENE

Municipal Liability for Licensing Errors: A Comprehensive Analysis of BRENNEN v. CITY OF EUGENE

Date: Apr 18, 1979
Municipal Liability for Licensing Errors: A Comprehensive Analysis of BRENNEN v. CITY OF EUGENE Introduction BRENNEN v. CITY OF EUGENE et al. is a landmark case decided by the Oregon Supreme Court on...
McPHERSON v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION: Redefining 'Good Cause' for Unemployment Benefits

McPHERSON v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION: Redefining 'Good Cause' for Unemployment Benefits

Date: Mar 21, 1979
McPHERSON v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION: Redefining 'Good Cause' for Unemployment Benefits Introduction In McPHERSON v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, 285 Or. 541 (1979), the Oregon Supreme Court addressed a pivotal...
Boundary Conditions for Summary Judgment in Products Liability: Seeborg v. General Motors

Boundary Conditions for Summary Judgment in Products Liability: Seeborg v. General Motors

Date: Dec 30, 1978
Boundary Conditions for Summary Judgment in Products Liability: Seeborg v. General Motors Introduction The case of Seeborg v. General Motors Corporation et al. (284 Or. 695) adjudicated by the Oregon...
Brown v. Transcon Lines: Affirmation of Common Law Remedies for Wrongful Discharge

Brown v. Transcon Lines: Affirmation of Common Law Remedies for Wrongful Discharge

Date: Dec 28, 1978
Brown v. Transcon Lines: Affirmation of Common Law Remedies for Wrongful Discharge Introduction Brown v. Transcon Lines (284 Or. 597, 1978) is a pivotal decision by the Oregon Supreme Court that...
Partial Integration Doctrine Affirmed in Hatley v. Stafford

Partial Integration Doctrine Affirmed in Hatley v. Stafford

Date: Dec 20, 1978
Partial Integration Doctrine Affirmed in Hatley v. Stafford Introduction Hatley, Respondent, v. Stafford, Defendant, and Stafford et al, Appellants is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Oregon Supreme...
Rethinking Municipal Home Rule: Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Legislative Supremacy in City Employee Benefits – City of La Grande v. Public Employes' Retirement Board et al.

Rethinking Municipal Home Rule: Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Legislative Supremacy in City Employee Benefits – City of La Grande v. Public Employes' Retirement Board et al.

Date: Oct 26, 1978
Rethinking Municipal Home Rule: Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Legislative Supremacy in City Employee Benefits – City of La Grande v. Public Employes' Retirement Board et al. Introduction In the...
Appellate Oversight on Consent Validity in Warrantless Searches: STATE v. WARNER

Appellate Oversight on Consent Validity in Warrantless Searches: STATE v. WARNER

Date: Oct 25, 1978
Appellate Oversight on Consent Validity in Warrantless Searches: STATE v. WARNER Introduction State of Oregon v. Gary William Warner is a pivotal case decided by the Oregon Supreme Court on October...
Reaffirming the Standards for Tortious Interference and Price Discrimination under ORS: Top Service Body Shop v. Allstate Insurance

Reaffirming the Standards for Tortious Interference and Price Discrimination under ORS: Top Service Body Shop v. Allstate Insurance

Date: Aug 2, 1978
Reaffirming the Standards for Tortious Interference and Price Discrimination under ORS: Top Service Body Shop v. Allstate Insurance Introduction The case of Top Service Body Shop, Inc., Appellant, v....
Habeas Corpus Rights Maintained for Oregon Inmates Following Repeal of Civil Death Statute

Habeas Corpus Rights Maintained for Oregon Inmates Following Repeal of Civil Death Statute

Date: Jul 6, 1978
Habeas Corpus Rights Maintained for Oregon Inmates Following Repeal of Civil Death Statute Introduction The Oregon Supreme Court's decision in Donald PENROD v. CUPP and Robert E. Brown v. Cupp marks...
Valid Adoption of Comprehensive Plans by Resolution and Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies: FIFTH AVENUE CORP. v. WASHINGTON COunty

Valid Adoption of Comprehensive Plans by Resolution and Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies: FIFTH AVENUE CORP. v. WASHINGTON COunty

Date: Jun 21, 1978
Valid Adoption of Comprehensive Plans by Resolution and Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies: FIFTH AVENUE CORP. v. WASHINGTON COunty Introduction In the landmark case of Fifth Avenue Corporation v....
Comprehensive Interpretation of Insurance Exclusion Clauses: Timberline Equipment Co. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company

Comprehensive Interpretation of Insurance Exclusion Clauses: Timberline Equipment Co. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company

Date: Mar 29, 1978
Comprehensive Interpretation of Insurance Exclusion Clauses: Timberline Equipment Co. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company Introduction The case of Timberline Equipment Co., Inc. v. St. Paul...
Brown v. Multnomah County: Upholding Constitutional Protections in DUII Proceedings

Brown v. Multnomah County: Upholding Constitutional Protections in DUII Proceedings

Date: Oct 13, 1977
Brown v. Multnomah County: Upholding Constitutional Protections in DUII Proceedings Introduction BROWN, Petitioner, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY DISTRICT COURT et al is a landmark decision by the Oregon...
Prosecutorial Misconduct and the Right to a Fair Trial: Oregon Supreme Court Reverses Rape Conviction

Prosecutorial Misconduct and the Right to a Fair Trial: Oregon Supreme Court Reverses Rape Conviction

Date: Jul 12, 1977
Prosecutorial Misconduct and the Right to a Fair Trial: Oregon Supreme Court Reverses Rape Conviction Introduction The case of State of Oregon v. David Andrew Jones (279 Or. 55) adjudicated by the...
Qualified Privilege in Employment Defamation: Walsh v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.

Qualified Privilege in Employment Defamation: Walsh v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.

Date: May 11, 1977
Qualified Privilege in Employment Defamation: Walsh v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc. Introduction Walsh v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Oregon Supreme Court on...
Enhanced Standards for Reasonable Suspicion: Insights from STATE v. VALDEZ

Enhanced Standards for Reasonable Suspicion: Insights from STATE v. VALDEZ

Date: Mar 25, 1977
Enhanced Standards for Reasonable Suspicion: Insights from STATE v. VALDEZ Introduction State of Oregon v. Simon R. Valdez is a landmark decision by the Oregon Supreme Court rendered on March 24,...
Statute of Limitations in Legal Malpractice: Insights from United States National Bank of Oregon v. Davies et al.

Statute of Limitations in Legal Malpractice: Insights from United States National Bank of Oregon v. Davies et al.

Date: Apr 16, 1976
Statute of Limitations in Legal Malpractice: Insights from United States National Bank of Oregon v. Davies et al. Introduction The case of United States National Bank of Oregon, Personal...
Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Stricter Standards for Involuntary Commitment in O'Neill v. State

Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Stricter Standards for Involuntary Commitment in O'Neill v. State

Date: Jan 23, 1976
Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Stricter Standards for Involuntary Commitment in O'Neill v. State Introduction The case of O'Neill v. State (274 Or. 59) represents a significant judicial examination...
Employer Liability for Termination Due to Jury Service in NEES v. HOCKS ET AL.

Employer Liability for Termination Due to Jury Service in NEES v. HOCKS ET AL.

Date: Jun 13, 1975
Employer Liability for Termination Due to Jury Service in NEES v. HOCKS ET AL. Introduction The case NEES, Respondent, v. HOCKS ET AL, Appellants (272 Or. 210), adjudicated by the Oregon Supreme...
Protection of Free Expression in Campaign Financing: Analysis of Deras v. Myers

Protection of Free Expression in Campaign Financing: Analysis of Deras v. Myers

Date: May 15, 1975
Protection of Free Expression in Campaign Financing: Analysis of Deras v. Myers Introduction The case of Warren Deras v. Clay Myers (272 Or. 47, 1975) represents a pivotal moment in Oregon's legal...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert