Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Defining Unitary Transactions: Insights from State of Oregon v. Sharon Kay Boyd Introduction State of Oregon v. Sharon Kay Boyd, 271 Or. 558 (1975), is a seminal case in Oregon's legal landscape...
Duty to Warn: Establishing Manufacturer Liability for Inadequate Drug Warnings in McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. Introduction McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation ET AL, 270 Or. 375...
Strict Liability in Product Design: Phillips v. Kimwood Machine Company Introduction The case of Phillips v. Kimwood Machine Company ([269 Or. 485](#)), adjudicated by the Oregon Supreme Court on...
Establishing Guidelines for the Duration of Spousal Support in Oregon Divorce Cases Introduction The case of Kitson v. Kitson, adjudicated by the Oregon Court of Appeals on September 4, 1974,...
Reaffirming the Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence in Establishing Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: STATE v. KRUMMACHER Introduction State of Oregon v. Hazel Krummacher is a landmark case decided by...
Affirmation of Conviction Despite Trial Errors: Insights from STATE OF OREGON v. Van Hooser Introduction STATE OF OREGON v. Harold Lynn Van Hooser (266 Or. 19), adjudicated by the Oregon Supreme...
Enhanced Judicial Standards for Zoning Changes in Oregon: Analysis of Fasano et al. v. Board of County Commissioners of Washington County Introduction The case of Fasano et al. v. Board of County...
Proportionate Contribution Among Coguarantors: Insights from MANSFIELD v. McREARY et ux Introduction MANSFIELD v. McREARY et ux is a seminal case decided by the Oregon Supreme Court on September 21,...
STATE OF OREGON v. ROYCE LOVELL BROWN: Redefining Double Jeopardy Protections Under the 'Same Transaction' Test Introduction In State of Oregon v. Royce Lovell Brown, decided by the Oregon Supreme...
Indemnity Actions: Pleading Sufficiency and Evidentiary Cure in Fulton Insurance v. White Motor Corporation Introduction Fulton Insurance Company et al. v. White Motor Corporation is a pivotal case...
Presumption of Assessment Validity and Burden of Proof: Analysis of LOUIS J. FEVES v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Introduction The case of Louis J. Feves v. Department of Revenue, adjudicated by the Oregon...
Establishing Comprehensive De Novo Review in Workmen's Compensation: HANNAN v. GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL Introduction HANNAN v. GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL is a seminal decision by the Oregon Court of...
Foreseeability and Rescue Doctrine in Negligence: Stewart v. Jefferson Plywood Company Introduction Stewart v. Jefferson Plywood Company, 255 Or. 603 (1970), adjudicated by the Oregon Supreme Court,...
Establishing Duty to Defend under Liability Insurance: Burnett v. Western Pacific and the Limits of Cross-Employee Exceptions Introduction The case of Burnett et al. v. Western Pacific Insurance...
Reasonable Suspicion and Probable Cause in Vehicle Stops and Searches: Insights from State of Oregon v. Cloman Introduction State of Oregon v. Leonard Cloman, 254 Or. 1 (1969), adjudicated by the...
Conversion and Police Authority: Mustola v. Toddy Establishes Limits Introduction Mustola v. Toddy, 253 Or. 658 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1969), is a landmark case that examines the boundaries of...
Accrual of Cause of Action in Medical Malpractice: Insights from BERRY v. BRANNER Introduction BERRY v. BRANNER is a landmark decision by the Oregon Supreme Court dated December 28, 1966. The case...
Elkins v. Oregon: Enhancing Protection Against Unreasonable Seizures of Contraband Introduction State of Oregon v. James Elkins, 245 Or. 279 (1966), represents a pivotal case in the realm of criminal...
Neely v. State of Oregon: Reinforcing the Right to Counsel During Interrogations Introduction Neely v. State of Oregon, 239 Or. 487 (1965), is a landmark decision by the Oregon Supreme Court that...