Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Oregon Case Commentaries

Defining Unitary Transactions: Insights from State of Oregon v. Sharon Kay Boyd

Defining Unitary Transactions: Insights from State of Oregon v. Sharon Kay Boyd

Date: Apr 2, 1975
Defining Unitary Transactions: Insights from State of Oregon v. Sharon Kay Boyd Introduction State of Oregon v. Sharon Kay Boyd, 271 Or. 558 (1975), is a seminal case in Oregon's legal landscape...
Duty to Warn: Establishing Manufacturer Liability for Inadequate Drug Warnings in McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.

Duty to Warn: Establishing Manufacturer Liability for Inadequate Drug Warnings in McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.

Date: Dec 11, 1974
Duty to Warn: Establishing Manufacturer Liability for Inadequate Drug Warnings in McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. Introduction McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation ET AL, 270 Or. 375...
Strict Liability in Product Design: Phillips v. Kimwood Machine Company

Strict Liability in Product Design: Phillips v. Kimwood Machine Company

Date: Sep 7, 1974
Strict Liability in Product Design: Phillips v. Kimwood Machine Company Introduction The case of Phillips v. Kimwood Machine Company ([269 Or. 485](#)), adjudicated by the Oregon Supreme Court on...
Establishing Guidelines for the Duration of Spousal Support in Oregon Divorce Cases

Establishing Guidelines for the Duration of Spousal Support in Oregon Divorce Cases

Date: Sep 5, 1974
Establishing Guidelines for the Duration of Spousal Support in Oregon Divorce Cases Introduction The case of Kitson v. Kitson, adjudicated by the Oregon Court of Appeals on September 4, 1974,...
Reaffirming the Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence in Establishing Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: STATE v. KRUMMACHER

Reaffirming the Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence in Establishing Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: STATE v. KRUMMACHER

Date: Jul 31, 1974
Reaffirming the Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence in Establishing Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: STATE v. KRUMMACHER Introduction State of Oregon v. Hazel Krummacher is a landmark case decided by...
Affirmation of Conviction Despite Trial Errors: Insights from STATE OF OREGON v. Van Hooser

Affirmation of Conviction Despite Trial Errors: Insights from STATE OF OREGON v. Van Hooser

Date: Jun 22, 1973
Affirmation of Conviction Despite Trial Errors: Insights from STATE OF OREGON v. Van Hooser Introduction STATE OF OREGON v. Harold Lynn Van Hooser (266 Or. 19), adjudicated by the Oregon Supreme...
Enhanced Judicial Standards for Zoning Changes in Oregon: Analysis of Fasano v. Board of County Commissioners of Washington County

Enhanced Judicial Standards for Zoning Changes in Oregon: Analysis of Fasano v. Board of County Commissioners of Washington County

Date: Mar 3, 1973
Enhanced Judicial Standards for Zoning Changes in Oregon: Analysis of Fasano et al. v. Board of County Commissioners of Washington County Introduction The case of Fasano et al. v. Board of County...
Proportionate Contribution Among Coguarantors: Insights from MANSFIELD v. McREARY et ux

Proportionate Contribution Among Coguarantors: Insights from MANSFIELD v. McREARY et ux

Date: Sep 22, 1972
Proportionate Contribution Among Coguarantors: Insights from MANSFIELD v. McREARY et ux Introduction MANSFIELD v. McREARY et ux is a seminal case decided by the Oregon Supreme Court on September 21,...
STATE OF OREGON v. ROYCE LOVELL BROWN: Redefining Double Jeopardy Protections Under the 'Same Transaction' Test

STATE OF OREGON v. ROYCE LOVELL BROWN: Redefining Double Jeopardy Protections Under the 'Same Transaction' Test

Date: Jul 26, 1972
STATE OF OREGON v. ROYCE LOVELL BROWN: Redefining Double Jeopardy Protections Under the 'Same Transaction' Test Introduction In State of Oregon v. Royce Lovell Brown, decided by the Oregon Supreme...
Indemnity Actions: Pleading Sufficiency and Evidentiary Cure in Fulton Insurance v. White Motor Corporation

Indemnity Actions: Pleading Sufficiency and Evidentiary Cure in Fulton Insurance v. White Motor Corporation

Date: Feb 3, 1972
Indemnity Actions: Pleading Sufficiency and Evidentiary Cure in Fulton Insurance v. White Motor Corporation Introduction Fulton Insurance Company et al. v. White Motor Corporation is a pivotal case...
Presumption of Assessment Validity and Burden of Proof: Analysis of LOUIS J. FEVES v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

Presumption of Assessment Validity and Burden of Proof: Analysis of LOUIS J. FEVES v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

Date: Feb 19, 1971
Presumption of Assessment Validity and Burden of Proof: Analysis of LOUIS J. FEVES v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Introduction The case of Louis J. Feves v. Department of Revenue, adjudicated by the Oregon...
Comprehensive Commentary on HANNAN v. GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL: Establishing De Novo Review in Workmen's Compensation

Comprehensive Commentary on HANNAN v. GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL: Establishing De Novo Review in Workmen's Compensation

Date: Feb 10, 1971
Establishing Comprehensive De Novo Review in Workmen's Compensation: HANNAN v. GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL Introduction HANNAN v. GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL is a seminal decision by the Oregon Court of...
Foreseeability and Rescue Doctrine in Negligence: Stewart v. Jefferson Plywood Company

Foreseeability and Rescue Doctrine in Negligence: Stewart v. Jefferson Plywood Company

Date: May 29, 1970
Foreseeability and Rescue Doctrine in Negligence: Stewart v. Jefferson Plywood Company Introduction Stewart v. Jefferson Plywood Company, 255 Or. 603 (1970), adjudicated by the Oregon Supreme Court,...
Establishing Duty to Defend under Liability Insurance: Burnett v. Western Pacific and the Limits of Cross-Employee Exceptions

Establishing Duty to Defend under Liability Insurance: Burnett v. Western Pacific and the Limits of Cross-Employee Exceptions

Date: May 21, 1970
Establishing Duty to Defend under Liability Insurance: Burnett v. Western Pacific and the Limits of Cross-Employee Exceptions Introduction The case of Burnett et al. v. Western Pacific Insurance...
Reasonable Suspicion and Probable Cause in Vehicle Stops and Searches: Insights from State of Oregon v. Cloman

Reasonable Suspicion and Probable Cause in Vehicle Stops and Searches: Insights from State of Oregon v. Cloman

Date: Jul 24, 1969
Reasonable Suspicion and Probable Cause in Vehicle Stops and Searches: Insights from State of Oregon v. Cloman Introduction State of Oregon v. Leonard Cloman, 254 Or. 1 (1969), adjudicated by the...
Conversion and Police Authority: Mustola v. Toddy Establishes Limits

Conversion and Police Authority: Mustola v. Toddy Establishes Limits

Date: Jul 17, 1969
Conversion and Police Authority: Mustola v. Toddy Establishes Limits Introduction Mustola v. Toddy, 253 Or. 658 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1969), is a landmark case that examines the boundaries of...
Accrual of Cause of Action in Medical Malpractice: Insights from BERRY v. BRANNER

Accrual of Cause of Action in Medical Malpractice: Insights from BERRY v. BRANNER

Date: Dec 29, 1966
Accrual of Cause of Action in Medical Malpractice: Insights from BERRY v. BRANNER Introduction BERRY v. BRANNER is a landmark decision by the Oregon Supreme Court dated December 28, 1966. The case...
Elkins v. Oregon: Enhancing Protection Against Unreasonable Seizures of Contraband

Elkins v. Oregon: Enhancing Protection Against Unreasonable Seizures of Contraband

Date: Dec 29, 1966
Elkins v. Oregon: Enhancing Protection Against Unreasonable Seizures of Contraband Introduction State of Oregon v. James Elkins, 245 Or. 279 (1966), represents a pivotal case in the realm of criminal...
Waterway Terminals v. P.S. Lord Mechanical Contractors: Establishing Liability in Construction-Related Fires

Waterway Terminals v. P.S. Lord Mechanical Contractors: Establishing Liability in Construction-Related Fires

Date: Nov 24, 1965
Waterway Terminals v. P.S. Lord Mechanical Contractors: Establishing Liability in Construction-Related Fires Introduction Waterway Terminals Company, an Oregon corporation, engaged P.S. Lord...
Neely v. State of Oregon: Reinforcing the Right to Counsel During Interrogations

Neely v. State of Oregon: Reinforcing the Right to Counsel During Interrogations

Date: Jan 28, 1965
Neely v. State of Oregon: Reinforcing the Right to Counsel During Interrogations Introduction Neely v. State of Oregon, 239 Or. 487 (1965), is a landmark decision by the Oregon Supreme Court that...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert