Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Oregon Case Commentaries

Limiting the Emergency Doctrine: Insights from State of Oregon v. Davis

Limiting the Emergency Doctrine: Insights from State of Oregon v. Davis

Date: Jun 30, 1983
Limiting the Emergency Doctrine: Insights from State of Oregon v. Davis Introduction The Supreme Court of Oregon's decision in State of Oregon v. Davis, 295 Or. 227 (1983), marks a significant...
Admissibility of Prior Consistent Statements and Expert Testimony in Familial Sexual Abuse Cases: STATE OF OREGON v. LAWRENCE E. MIDDLETON

Admissibility of Prior Consistent Statements and Expert Testimony in Familial Sexual Abuse Cases: STATE OF OREGON v. LAWRENCE E. MIDDLETON

Date: Jan 19, 1983
Admissibility of Prior Consistent Statements and Expert Testimony in Familial Sexual Abuse Cases: Analyzing State of Oregon v. Lawrence E. Middleton Introduction The case of State of Oregon v....
RENNIE v. FREEWAY TRANSPORT: Reinforcing Res Judicata in Separately Pursued Federal and State Actions

RENNIE v. FREEWAY TRANSPORT: Reinforcing Res Judicata in Separately Pursued Federal and State Actions

Date: Dec 31, 1982
RENNIE v. FREEWAY TRANSPORT: Reinforcing Res Judicata in Separately Pursued Federal and State Actions Introduction RENNIE v. FREEWAY TRANSPORT et al. (294 Or. 319, Oregon Supreme Court, December 30,...
State of Oregon v. Caraher: Defining the Boundaries of Warrantless Searches of Personal Effects Incident to Arrest

State of Oregon v. Caraher: Defining the Boundaries of Warrantless Searches of Personal Effects Incident to Arrest

Date: Dec 8, 1982
State of Oregon v. Caraher: Defining the Boundaries of Warrantless Searches of Personal Effects Incident to Arrest 1. Introduction State of Oregon v. Lois Marie Caraher, 293 Or. 741 (1982), is a...
Limiting Negligence Liability to Immediate Victims: NORWEST v. PRESBYTERIAN INTERCOMMUNITY HOSPital (1982)

Limiting Negligence Liability to Immediate Victims: NORWEST v. PRESBYTERIAN INTERCOMMUNITY HOSPital (1982)

Date: Oct 6, 1982
Limiting Negligence Liability to Immediate Victims: NORWEST v. PRESBYTERIAN INTERCOMMUNITY HOSPital (1982) Introduction NORWEST, Petitioner on Review, v. PRESIDENTROLLER INTERCOMMUNITY HOSPITAL et al...
Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Guidelines for Declaratory Relief in Attorney's Statutory Duties

Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Guidelines for Declaratory Relief in Attorney's Statutory Duties

Date: Aug 4, 1982
Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Guidelines for Declaratory Relief in Attorney's Statutory Duties Introduction In the landmark case of BROWN v. OREGON STATE BAR (1982), the Oregon Supreme Court...
Ensuring Free Speech Protections: Oregon Supreme Court Invalidates Overbroad Coercion Law in State v. EW

Ensuring Free Speech Protections: Oregon Supreme Court Invalidates Overbroad Coercion Law in State v. EW

Date: Aug 4, 1982
Ensuring Free Speech Protections: Oregon Supreme Court Invalidates Overbroad Coercion Law in State v. EW Introduction The case of State of Oregon v. EW (293 Or. 402) addressed the constitutional...
Expansion of Eligible Restitution Recipients in STATE v. DILLON

Expansion of Eligible Restitution Recipients in STATE v. DILLON

Date: Dec 10, 1981
Expansion of Eligible Restitution Recipients in State of Oregon v. Virgil Eugene Dillon Introduction State of Oregon v. Virgil Eugene Dillon, 292 Or. 172 (1981), is a seminal case decided by the...
Reaffirmation of Implied Consent and Limitation of Counsel Access in DUI Cases: State of Oregon v. Kenneth Ray Newton

Reaffirmation of Implied Consent and Limitation of Counsel Access in DUI Cases: State of Oregon v. Kenneth Ray Newton

Date: Oct 28, 1981
Reaffirmation of Implied Consent and Limitation of Counsel Access in DUI Cases: State of Oregon v. Kenneth Ray Newton Introduction State of Oregon v. Kenneth Ray Newton, 291 Or. 788 (1981), is a...
Retroactive Application of Statutory Repeals: Analysis of WHIPPLE v. HOWSER

Retroactive Application of Statutory Repeals: Analysis of WHIPPLE v. HOWSER

Date: Aug 12, 1981
Retroactive Application of Statutory Repeals: Analysis of WHIPPLE v. HOWSER Introduction WHIPPLE v. HOWSER et al. is a seminal decision by the Oregon Supreme Court rendered on August 11, 1981. The...
Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Equal Protection Compliance of Indictment and Information Procedures in STATE OF OREGON v. Andrew Clark

Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Equal Protection Compliance of Indictment and Information Procedures in STATE OF OREGON v. Andrew Clark

Date: Jul 29, 1981
Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Equal Protection Compliance of Indictment and Information Procedures in STATE OF OREGON v. Andrew Clark Introduction In STATE OF OREGON v. Andrew Clark, the Oregon...
Right to Jury Trial in Forfeiture Proceedings: STATE v. CURRAN

Right to Jury Trial in Forfeiture Proceedings: STATE v. CURRAN

Date: Jun 3, 1981
Right to Jury Trial in Forfeiture Proceedings: STATE v. CURRAN Introduction In State of Oregon v. Scott Hunter Curran, 291 Or. 119 (1981), the Oregon Supreme Court addressed critical issues...
Revisiting Effective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from KRUMMACHER v. GIERLOFF

Revisiting Effective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from KRUMMACHER v. GIERLOFF

Date: Apr 22, 1981
Revisiting Effective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from KRUMMACHER v. GIERLOFF Introduction KRUMMACHER v. GIERLOFF is a seminal case decided by the Oregon Supreme Court on April 21, 1981. The...
Protecting Prisoners' Dignity: Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Opposite-Sex Searches in Correctional Facilities

Protecting Prisoners' Dignity: Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Opposite-Sex Searches in Correctional Facilities

Date: Mar 5, 1981
Protecting Prisoners' Dignity: Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Opposite-Sex Searches in Correctional Facilities Introduction David J. Sterling et al. v. Cupp et al., decided by the Oregon...
Voluntary Consent Validates Searches Post-Unlawful Stops: Insights from State of Oregon v. Kennedy

Voluntary Consent Validates Searches Post-Unlawful Stops: Insights from State of Oregon v. Kennedy

Date: Feb 19, 1981
Voluntary Consent Validates Searches Post-Unlawful Stops: Insights from State of Oregon v. Kennedy Introduction State of Oregon v. Leroy Franklin Kennedy (290 Or. 493, 1981) is a landmark decision by...
State of Oregon v. Quinn: Oregon Supreme Court Rules ORS 163.116 Unconstitutional for Violating Jury Trial Rights in Death Penalty Sentencing

State of Oregon v. Quinn: Oregon Supreme Court Rules ORS 163.116 Unconstitutional for Violating Jury Trial Rights in Death Penalty Sentencing

Date: Jan 21, 1981
State of Oregon v. Quinn: Oregon Supreme Court Rules ORS 163.116 Unconstitutional for Violating Jury Trial Rights in Death Penalty Sentencing Introduction In the landmark case of State of Oregon v....
Judicial Primacy in Defining 'Conditions of Employment' Under ORS 243.650

Judicial Primacy in Defining 'Conditions of Employment' Under ORS 243.650

Date: Dec 17, 1980
Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Judicial Primacy in Defining 'Conditions of Employment' in Collective Bargaining Cases Introduction The Oregon Supreme Court, in the landmark case Springfield...
Garcia v. State of Oregon: Establishing Proportional Sentencing for Multiple Sexual Offenses in a Single Criminal Episode

Garcia v. State of Oregon: Establishing Proportional Sentencing for Multiple Sexual Offenses in a Single Criminal Episode

Date: Feb 27, 1980
Garcia v. State of Oregon: Establishing Proportional Sentencing for Multiple Sexual Offenses in a Single Criminal Episode Introduction Garcia v. State of Oregon (288 Or. 413, 1980) is a landmark...
Defining 'Unprofessional Conduct' Requires Rulemaking: Commentary on Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners

Defining 'Unprofessional Conduct' Requires Rulemaking: Commentary on Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners

Date: Jan 3, 1980
Defining 'Unprofessional Conduct' Requires Rulemaking: Commentary on Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners Introduction In Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners, the Oregon...
PACIFIC POWER LIGHT CO. v. DEPT. OF REVenue: Establishing a Comprehensive Valuation Method for Regulated Utility Taxation

PACIFIC POWER LIGHT CO. v. DEPT. OF REVenue: Establishing a Comprehensive Valuation Method for Regulated Utility Taxation

Date: Jul 6, 1979
PACIFIC POWER LIGHT CO. v. DEPT. OF REVenue: Establishing a Comprehensive Valuation Method for Regulated Utility Taxation Introduction Pacific Power Light Company, a Maine corporation authorized to...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert