Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Oregon Case Commentaries

Riley Hill v. Tandy Corporation: Establishing Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Deceit in Oregon

Riley Hill v. Tandy Corporation: Establishing Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Deceit in Oregon

Date: May 28, 1987
Riley Hill v. Tandy Corporation: Establishing Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Deceit in Oregon Introduction The case of Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corporation addressed...
Establishing Foreseeability and Duty in School Negligence: Analysis of FAZZOLARI v. PORTLAND SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1J

Establishing Foreseeability and Duty in School Negligence: Analysis of FAZZOLARI v. PORTLAND SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1J

Date: Mar 18, 1987
Establishing Foreseeability and Duty in School Negligence: Analysis of FAZZOLARI v. PORTLAND SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1J Introduction FAZZOLARI v. PORTLAND SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1J is a landmark case decided by...
Admissibility of Uncharged Misconduct: Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Strict Guidelines

Admissibility of Uncharged Misconduct: Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Strict Guidelines

Date: Mar 4, 1987
Admissibility of Uncharged Misconduct: Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Strict Guidelines Introduction The case of State of Oregon v. John Edgar Mayfield, 302 Or. 631 (1987), adjudicated by the...
No Warrant Required for Opening Transparent Containers with Probable Cause: Oregon Supreme Court in STATE v. OWENS

No Warrant Required for Opening Transparent Containers with Probable Cause: Oregon Supreme Court in STATE v. OWENS

Date: Nov 21, 1986
No Warrant Required for Opening Transparent Containers with Probable Cause: Oregon Supreme Court in STATE v. OWENS Introduction State of Oregon v. Joetta Renee Owens is a landmark case decided by the...
In re v. Drew: Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Inclusionary Approach to Prior Acts Evidence under OEC 404(3)

In re v. Drew: Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Inclusionary Approach to Prior Acts Evidence under OEC 404(3)

Date: Aug 27, 1986
In re v. Drew: Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Inclusionary Approach to Prior Acts Evidence under OEC 404(3) Introduction The case of STATE OF OREGON v. Drew (301 Or. 535) was adjudicated by the Oregon...
Establishing the Oregon Automobile Exception to the Warrant Requirement

Establishing the Oregon Automobile Exception to the Warrant Requirement

Date: Jul 2, 1986
Establishing the Oregon Automobile Exception to the Warrant Requirement Introduction In the landmark case State of Oregon v. Roderick Darnell Brown (301 Or. 268, 1986), the Oregon Supreme Court...
Reaffirming 'At-Will' Employment: Comprehensive Commentary on Patton v. J.C. Penney Co. (1986)

Reaffirming 'At-Will' Employment: Comprehensive Commentary on Patton v. J.C. Penney Co. (1986)

Date: May 21, 1986
Reaffirming 'At-Will' Employment: Comprehensive Commentary on Patton v. J.C. Penney Co. (1986) Introduction In the landmark case of Patton v. J.C. Penney Co., Inc., decided by the Oregon Supreme...
Expanding Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege: Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Protection of Confidential Communications in STATE OF OREGON v. Miller

Expanding Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege: Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Protection of Confidential Communications in STATE OF OREGON v. Miller

Date: Nov 6, 1985
Expanding Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege: Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Protection of Confidential Communications in STATE OF OREGON v. Miller Introduction In the landmark case of STATE OF OREGON...
Oregon Supreme Court Upholds Harassment Statute: Balancing Free Speech and Personal Security

Oregon Supreme Court Upholds Harassment Statute: Balancing Free Speech and Personal Security

Date: Aug 28, 1985
Oregon Supreme Court Upholds Harassment Statute: Balancing Free Speech and Personal Security Introduction In the landmark case of State of Oregon v. Kenneth Allen Moyle, the Oregon Supreme Court...
Limits of the Parol Evidence Rule in Material Misrepresentation Claims: Deerfield Commodities v. Nerco

Limits of the Parol Evidence Rule in Material Misrepresentation Claims: Deerfield Commodities v. Nerco

Date: Jun 26, 1985
Limits of the Parol Evidence Rule in Material Misrepresentation Claims: Deerfield Commodities v. Nerco Introduction The case of Deerfield Commodities, Ltd. v. Nerco, Inc. et al (72 Or. App. 305,...
Inclusion of Hang Gliders within 'Any Aircraft' in Life Insurance Policies: Analysis of TOTTEN v. New York Life Insurance Co.

Inclusion of Hang Gliders within 'Any Aircraft' in Life Insurance Policies: Analysis of TOTTEN v. New York Life Insurance Co.

Date: Mar 7, 1985
Inclusion of Hang Gliders within 'Any Aircraft' in Life Insurance Policies: Analysis of TOTTEN v. New York Life Insurance Co. Introduction The case of TOTTEN v. New York Life Insurance Co. ([1985]...
HUMPHERS v. FIRST INTERSTATE BANK of Oregon: Establishing Liability for Breach of Confidentiality in Medical Relationships

HUMPHERS v. FIRST INTERSTATE BANK of Oregon: Establishing Liability for Breach of Confidentiality in Medical Relationships

Date: Mar 7, 1985
HUMPHERS v. FIRST INTERSTATE BANK of Oregon: Establishing Liability for Breach of Confidentiality in Medical Relationships A Comprehensive Commentary on Oregon Supreme Court Decision Introduction The...
Holien v. Sears: Affirmation of Common Law Wrongful Discharge in the Context of Employment Discrimination

Holien v. Sears: Affirmation of Common Law Wrongful Discharge in the Context of Employment Discrimination

Date: Oct 24, 1984
Holien v. Sears: Affirmation of Common Law Wrongful Discharge in the Context of Employment Discrimination Introduction Holien v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. is a pivotal case decided by the Oregon Supreme...
Oregon Supreme Court Sets Strict Standards for Warrantless Inventory Searches of Impounded Vehicles

Oregon Supreme Court Sets Strict Standards for Warrantless Inventory Searches of Impounded Vehicles

Date: Sep 26, 1984
Oregon Supreme Court Sets Strict Standards for Warrantless Inventory Searches of Impounded Vehicles Introduction In the landmark case State of Oregon v. James Henry Atkinson (298 Or. 1, 1984), the...
Admissibility of Computer Printouts as Business Records: Brown v. J.C. Penney Co.

Admissibility of Computer Printouts as Business Records: Brown v. J.C. Penney Co.

Date: Sep 6, 1984
Admissibility of Computer Printouts as Business Records: Brown v. J.C. Penney Co. Introduction Brown v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc. et al. is a seminal case decided by the Oregon Supreme Court on...
Oregon Supreme Court Sets Boundaries on Agency Rulemaking in Planned Parenthood v. Department of Human Resources

Oregon Supreme Court Sets Boundaries on Agency Rulemaking in Planned Parenthood v. Department of Human Resources

Date: Aug 22, 1984
Oregon Supreme Court Sets Boundaries on Agency Rulemaking in Planned Parenthood v. Department of Human Resources Introduction The case of Planned Parenthood Association, Inc. et al. v. Department of...
Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Inadmissibility of Unstipulated Polygraph Evidence

Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Inadmissibility of Unstipulated Polygraph Evidence

Date: Jul 11, 1984
Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Inadmissibility of Unstipulated Polygraph Evidence Introduction In the landmark case of State of Oregon vs. Alvin Harold Brown, the Oregon Supreme Court addressed the...
Wrongful Discharge and Defamation: Oregon's Precedent in Delaney v. Taco Time International, Inc.

Wrongful Discharge and Defamation: Oregon's Precedent in Delaney v. Taco Time International, Inc.

Date: Apr 25, 1984
Wrongful Discharge and Defamation: Oregon's Precedent in Delaney v. Taco Time International, Inc. Introduction Delaney v. Taco Time International, Inc. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Oregon...
Hall v. May Department Stores Co.: Clarifying the Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Tort in Employer-Employee Relations

Hall v. May Department Stores Co.: Clarifying the Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Tort in Employer-Employee Relations

Date: Jan 13, 1984
Hall v. May Department Stores Co.: Clarifying the Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Tort in Employer-Employee Relations Introduction Hall v. May Department Stores Co. et al, 292 Or. 131...
OREGON v. KENNEDY: Defining Retrial Bar Under Double Jeopardy in Prosecutorial Misconduct

OREGON v. KENNEDY: Defining Retrial Bar Under Double Jeopardy in Prosecutorial Misconduct

Date: Jul 7, 1983
OREGON v. KENNEDY: Defining Retrial Bar Under Double Jeopardy in Prosecutorial Misconduct Introduction Oregon v. Bruce Alan Kennedy is a pivotal case decided by the Oregon Supreme Court on July 6,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert