Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Oregon Case Commentaries

State v. Smith: Reinforcing Standards for Death Penalty Sentencing

State v. Smith: Reinforcing Standards for Death Penalty Sentencing

Date: May 11, 1990
State v. Smith: Reinforcing Standards for Death Penalty Sentencing Introduction In the landmark case of State of Oregon v. Charles Franklin Smith, 310 Or. 1 (1990), the Oregon Supreme Court addressed...
Enhanced Jury Instructions on Mitigating Evidence in Oregon Death Penalty Cases: State v. Montez

Enhanced Jury Instructions on Mitigating Evidence in Oregon Death Penalty Cases: State v. Montez

Date: Apr 4, 1990
Enhanced Jury Instructions on Mitigating Evidence in Oregon Death Penalty Cases: State v. Montez Introduction State of Oregon v. Marco Antonio Montez, 309 Or. 564 (1990), is a pivotal judgment by the...
State v. Moen: Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Revised Death Penalty Sentencing Framework in Accordance with Wagner Precedent

State v. Moen: Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Revised Death Penalty Sentencing Framework in Accordance with Wagner Precedent

Date: Mar 31, 1990
State v. Moen: Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Revised Death Penalty Sentencing Framework in Accordance with Wagner Precedent Introduction In the landmark case of State of Oregon v. Ronald Howard...
Enhancing Sentencing Phase Procedures: Insights from STATE OF OREGON v. STEPHEN LEWIS FARRAR

Enhancing Sentencing Phase Procedures: Insights from STATE OF OREGON v. STEPHEN LEWIS FARRAR

Date: Jan 12, 1990
Enhancing Sentencing Phase Procedures: Insights from STATE OF OREGON v. STEPHEN LEWIS FARRAR Introduction In the case of STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. STEPHEN LEWIS FARRAR, Appellant, adjudicated...
Oregon Supreme Court Recognizes Constructive Discharge in Wrongful Termination Claims

Oregon Supreme Court Recognizes Constructive Discharge in Wrongful Termination Claims

Date: Oct 27, 1989
Oregon Supreme Court Recognizes Constructive Discharge in Wrongful Termination Claims Introduction The case of SHEETS v. KNIGHT addressed a pivotal issue in employment law: whether an employee's...
Non-Balancing Admission of Prior Convictions for Impeachment under Amended OEC 609

Non-Balancing Admission of Prior Convictions for Impeachment under Amended OEC 609

Date: Feb 1, 1989
Non-Balancing Admission of Prior Convictions for Impeachment under Amended OEC 609 Introduction In State of Oregon v. Robert Edward King, the Oregon Supreme Court addressed the admissibility of a...
Oregon Supreme Court Revises Standards for Unlawful Misapplication of Entrusted Property

Oregon Supreme Court Revises Standards for Unlawful Misapplication of Entrusted Property

Date: Dec 21, 1988
Oregon Supreme Court Revises Standards for Unlawful Misapplication of Entrusted Property Introduction In the landmark case State of Oregon v. Suzanne H. Hitz (307 Or. 183, 1988), the Oregon Supreme...
Restricting Community Caretaking Exceptions: Oregon Supreme Court in STATE v. BRIDEWELL

Restricting Community Caretaking Exceptions: Oregon Supreme Court in STATE v. BRIDEWELL

Date: Jul 27, 1988
Restricting Community Caretaking Exceptions: Oregon Supreme Court in STATE v. BRIDEWELL Introduction In State of Oregon v. Bridewell, the Oregon Supreme Court addressed critical issues surrounding...
Oregon Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Protection Against Warrantless Electronic Surveillance of Automobiles

Oregon Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Protection Against Warrantless Electronic Surveillance of Automobiles

Date: Jul 13, 1988
Oregon Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Protection Against Warrantless Electronic Surveillance of Automobiles Introduction The landmark case State of Oregon v. R. J. Scott Campbell addresses the...
Exclusive Jurisdiction Limits Clarified in NICHOLSON v. BLACHLY

Exclusive Jurisdiction Limits Clarified in NICHOLSON v. BLACHLY

Date: Jun 8, 1988
Exclusive Jurisdiction Limits Clarified in NICHOLSON v. BLACHLY Introduction In the landmark case of NICHOLSON v. BLACHLY et al., decided by the Oregon Supreme Court on June 7, 1988, the court...
Reevaluation of Expert Testimony on Witness Credibility in State v. Milbradt

Reevaluation of Expert Testimony on Witness Credibility in State v. Milbradt

Date: May 18, 1988
Reevaluation of Expert Testimony on Witness Credibility in State v. Milbradt Introduction State of Oregon v. Donald D. Milbradt, 305 Or. 621 (1988), addresses critical issues surrounding the...
Respondeat Superior and Vicarious Liability: Insights from CHESTERMAN v. BARMON

Respondeat Superior and Vicarious Liability: Insights from CHESTERMAN v. BARMON

Date: Apr 13, 1988
Respondeat Superior and Vicarious Liability: Insights from CHESTERMAN v. BARMON Introduction The case of CHESTERMAN v. BARMON, adjudicated by the Oregon Supreme Court on April 12, 1988, addresses...
Establishment of Substantial Evidence Review in Workers' Compensation: Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Company et al.

Establishment of Substantial Evidence Review in Workers' Compensation: Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Company et al.

Date: Mar 24, 1988
Establishment of Substantial Evidence Review in Workers' Compensation: Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Company et al. Introduction Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Company et al. is a pivotal decision rendered by the...
Oregon Supreme Court Reaffirms Right to Counsel Before Breathalyzer Tests in DUII Cases

Oregon Supreme Court Reaffirms Right to Counsel Before Breathalyzer Tests in DUII Cases

Date: Feb 18, 1988
Oregon Supreme Court Reaffirms Right to Counsel Before Breathalyzer Tests in DUII Cases Introduction In the landmark case of State of Oregon v. Ronald Ervan Spencer, decided on February 17, 1988, the...
Oregon v. Bates (1987): Defining the Boundaries of Lawful Vehicle Searches During Traffic Stops

Oregon v. Bates (1987): Defining the Boundaries of Lawful Vehicle Searches During Traffic Stops

Date: Dec 23, 1987
Oregon v. Bates (1987): Defining the Boundaries of Lawful Vehicle Searches During Traffic Stops Introduction State of Oregon v. Arthur Lee Bates is a landmark decision by the Oregon Supreme Court...
Third-Party Beneficiary Remedies in Legal Malpractice: HALE v. GROCE

Third-Party Beneficiary Remedies in Legal Malpractice: HALE v. GROCE

Date: Dec 16, 1987
Third-Party Beneficiary Remedies in Legal Malpractice: HALE v. GROCE Introduction The case of HALE v. GROCE (304 Or. 281) decided by the Oregon Supreme Court on December 15, 1987, addresses pivotal...
Entrustment of Property and Privacy Rights Under Oregon Constitution Article I, Section 9: STATE v. TANNER

Entrustment of Property and Privacy Rights Under Oregon Constitution Article I, Section 9: STATE v. TANNER

Date: Nov 18, 1987
Entrustment of Property and Privacy Rights Under Oregon Constitution Article I, Section 9: STATE v. TANNER Introduction In the landmark case of State of Oregon v. William Calvin Tanner, decided by...
STATE v. HANSEN: Clarifying Age Calculation and Psychotherapist Privilege in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

STATE v. HANSEN: Clarifying Age Calculation and Psychotherapist Privilege in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

Date: Sep 30, 1987
STATE v. HANSEN: Clarifying Age Calculation and Psychotherapist Privilege in Child Sexual Abuse Cases Introduction STATE v. HANSEN is a landmark decision by the Oregon Supreme Court that addresses...
Affirming Good Faith Obligations in Banking: Oregon Supreme Court's Decision in BEST v. U.S. NATIONAL BANK of Oregon

Affirming Good Faith Obligations in Banking: Oregon Supreme Court's Decision in BEST v. U.S. NATIONAL BANK of Oregon

Date: Sep 10, 1987
Affirming Good Faith Obligations in Banking: Oregon Supreme Court's Decision in BEST v. U.S. NATIONAL BANK of Oregon Introduction In the landmark case of Best et al, Petitioners/Cross-Respondents on...
STATE v. WHITE: Reinforcing Protections Against Prosecutorial Misconduct and the Right to Lesser Included Offense Instructions in Oregon

STATE v. WHITE: Reinforcing Protections Against Prosecutorial Misconduct and the Right to Lesser Included Offense Instructions in Oregon

Date: Jun 17, 1987
STATE v. WHITE: Reinforcing Protections Against Prosecutorial Misconduct and the Right to Lesser Included Offense Instructions in Oregon Introduction State of Oregon v. Terry James White, 303 Or. 333...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert