Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Tenant’s Statutory Right to Cure Violations under ORS 90.392: Mandatory Notice Requirement Introduction KKMH Properties, LLC v. Shire, 373 Or 676 (2025), is a residential eviction case decided by the...
Plain-Error Review of Prosecutorial Jury Argument: Clarifying the Chitwood Framework in State v. Perez Introduction State v. Perez, 373 Or 591 (2025), is the Oregon Supreme Court’s latest guidance on...
Limitation of the Article I, Section 11 Right to Counsel to Formal Charges: Precharging Interrogation Excluded—State v. Kilby Introduction In State of Oregon v. Randall Richard Kilby (373 Or 557, May...
Expanding “Wrongful Taking” under ORS 124.110(1)(a): Improper Motive, Improper Means and Elder Abuse Liability 1. Introduction Adelsperger v. Elkside Development LLC, 373 Or 621 (2025), arises from a...
State v. Lee: Statutory Prohibition of Anticipatory Warrants Under ORS 133.545(6) Introduction In State v. Lee, 373 Or 555 (2025), the Supreme Court of Oregon considered whether Oregon’s statutory...
State v. Akins: Permitting Delayed-Disclosure Expert Testimony and Child-Declarant Hearsay Exception under OEC 803(18a)(b) Introduction State v. Akins, 373 Or 506 (2025), is a decision of the Supreme...
Tortious Basis Required for “Accident” Under CGL Policies: Twigg v. Admiral Insurance Co. Introduction Twigg v. Admiral Insurance Company is a 2025 decision of the Supreme Court of Oregon that...
Community Workforce Agreements as “Rules”: ODOT Must Follow Oregon APA Notice-and-Comment Procedures Introduction This case, Oregon-Columbia Chapter AGC of America v. Department of Transportation...
Ensuring Valid Waiver of Right to Counsel: New Remand Standard in State v. Cotter Introduction State v. Cotter, 373 Or 381 (2025), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Oregon concerning a...
Clarifying the Contribution Bar under ORS 465.480(4)(a): Settlement of the Same Environmental Claim Required to Extinguish Contribution Rights Introduction Continental Casualty Co. v. Argonaut Ins....
Director-Approved Language Determines Insurers’ Compliance with ORS 746.290(2) 1. Introduction This commentary examines the Oregon Supreme Court’s decision in Bellshaw v. Farmers Insurance Company of...
Premium-Price and Illegal-Product UTPA Theories Free from Reliance Requirement – Bohr v. Tillamook County Creamery Introduction In Bohr v. Tillamook County Creamery Assn., 373 Or 343 (2025), the...
Gilbert / March v. Dept. of Energy: Jurisdiction and Contested Case Standards for Amending Energy Facility Site Certificates Introduction In Gilbert / March v. Department of Energy, 373 Or 289...
Clarifying Double Jeopardy Protections in Indistinct Indictments: Oregon Supreme Court's Decision in State of Oregon v. Dodge Introduction In the landmark case of State of Oregon v. Darron Duane...
Interpretation of ORS 144.103: Individual Count-Based Post-Prison Supervision Terms Affirmed by Oregon Supreme Court Introduction In the landmark case of Randall J. Kragt v. Board of Parole and...
Assessing Consent Under Oregon Law: State v. Chance Neal Wallace Introduction State of Oregon v. Chance Neal Wallace (373 Or. 122, 2024) represents a significant judicial determination concerning the...
Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Civil Forfeiture Does Not Trigger Double Jeopardy Clause Introduction In the landmark case of Yamhill County v. Real Property Commonly Known as 11475 N.W. Pike Road, the...
Oregon Supreme Court Reinforces Totality-of-Circumstances Approach for "Reasonable Efforts" in Juvenile Dependency Cases Introduction The case of In the Matter of A. H., a Child addressed critical...
ORCP 59 E Jury Instruction Violations Constitute Plain Error: Oregon Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent Introduction In the landmark case State of Oregon v. Matthew Ryan Wiltse (373 Or. 1), the...
Clarifying the Admissibility of Other Acts Evidence under Oregon Evidentiary Rules: State of Oregon v. Thomas Alan Davis, Jr. Introduction In the landmark decision of State of Oregon v. Thomas Alan...