Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Ohio Case Commentaries

“From Cafeteria Line to Taxable Line Item” – Aramark Corp. v. Harris Clarifies the Sales-Tax Treatment of Contract Food-Service Arrangements in Ohio

“From Cafeteria Line to Taxable Line Item” – Aramark Corp. v. Harris Clarifies the Sales-Tax Treatment of Contract Food-Service Arrangements in Ohio

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“From Cafeteria Line to Taxable Line Item” – Aramark Corp. v. Harris Clarifies the Sales-Tax Treatment of Contract Food-Service Arrangements in Ohio 1. Introduction On 18 June 2025 the Supreme Court...
“From Tort to Contract: Ohio’s Discretionary Sovereign Immunity Now Bars State-Contract Suits” — Commentary on 06/18/2025 Case Announcements #2, 2025-Ohio-2119

“From Tort to Contract: Ohio’s Discretionary Sovereign Immunity Now Bars State-Contract Suits” — Commentary on 06/18/2025 Case Announcements #2, 2025-Ohio-2119

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“From Tort to Contract: Ohio’s Discretionary Sovereign Immunity Now Bars State-Contract Suits” 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of Ohio, in its 06/18/2025 Case Announcements #2 (2025-Ohio-2119),...
From “Actual-Authority” to “Possession & Pass-Through”: The Supreme Court of Ohio Narrows the Agency Exclusion under the Commercial-Activity Tax (Aramark Corp. v. Harris, 2025-Ohio-2114)

From “Actual-Authority” to “Possession & Pass-Through”: The Supreme Court of Ohio Narrows the Agency Exclusion under the Commercial-Activity Tax (Aramark Corp. v. Harris, 2025-Ohio-2114)

Date: Jun 23, 2025
From “Actual-Authority” to “Possession & Pass-Through”: The Supreme Court of Ohio Narrows the Agency Exclusion under the Commercial-Activity Tax (Commentary on Aramark Corp. v. Harris,...
“Received, Used, or Followed”: State ex rel. Ayers v. Sackett (2025) Fortifies Ohio’s Public-Records Duty and Dispels Exhaustion Myth for Inmate Requesters

“Received, Used, or Followed”: State ex rel. Ayers v. Sackett (2025) Fortifies Ohio’s Public-Records Duty and Dispels Exhaustion Myth for Inmate Requesters

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Received, Used, or Followed”: State ex rel. Ayers v. Sackett (2025) Fortifies Ohio’s Public-Records Duty and Dispels Exhaustion Myth for Inmate Requesters Supreme Court of Ohio – Slip Opinion No....
State ex rel. Macksyn v. Spencer: The Supreme Court of Ohio’s New 21-Day “Produce-or-Certify” Rule for Prison-Email Public-Records Requests

State ex rel. Macksyn v. Spencer: The Supreme Court of Ohio’s New 21-Day “Produce-or-Certify” Rule for Prison-Email Public-Records Requests

Date: Jun 23, 2025
State ex rel. Macksyn v. Spencer (2025-Ohio-2116) The Supreme Court of Ohio’s New 21-Day “Produce-or-Certify” Rule for Prison-Email Public-Records Requests 1. Introduction In State ex rel. Macksyn v....
Mandatory Compliance: Ohio Supreme Court Affirms Municipal-Court Judges’ Authority over Elected Clerks in Record-Access Matters

Mandatory Compliance: Ohio Supreme Court Affirms Municipal-Court Judges’ Authority over Elected Clerks in Record-Access Matters

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Mandatory Compliance: Ohio Supreme Court Affirms Municipal-Court Judges’ Authority over Elected Clerks in Record-Access Matters Introduction On 18 June 2025 the Supreme Court of Ohio delivered its...
The Dual-Trigger Doctrine: Supreme Court of Ohio Affirms Multiple 60-Day Windows for PUCO Appeals

The Dual-Trigger Doctrine: Supreme Court of Ohio Affirms Multiple 60-Day Windows for PUCO Appeals

Date: Jun 23, 2025
The Dual-Trigger Doctrine: Supreme Court of Ohio Affirms Multiple 60-Day Windows for PUCO Appeals Introduction In In re Application of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc., 2025-Ohio-2082, the Supreme Court of...
Exhaustion Doctrine Inapplicable to Public-Records Mandamus: A Commentary on State ex rel. Brown v. Sackett (2025-Ohio-2080)

Exhaustion Doctrine Inapplicable to Public-Records Mandamus: A Commentary on State ex rel. Brown v. Sackett (2025-Ohio-2080)

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Exhaustion Doctrine Inapplicable to Public-Records Mandamus: Comprehensive Commentary on State ex rel. Brown v. Sackett (2025-Ohio-2080) Introduction The Supreme Court of Ohio’s decision in State ex...
“Reasonable Period” Redefined:  State ex rel. Fenstermaker v. Phillips (2025) and the Automatic $1,000 Cap for Delayed Public-Records Compliance

“Reasonable Period” Redefined: State ex rel. Fenstermaker v. Phillips (2025) and the Automatic $1,000 Cap for Delayed Public-Records Compliance

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Reasonable Period” Redefined: State ex rel. Fenstermaker v. Phillips (2025) and the Automatic $1,000 Cap for Delayed Public-Records Compliance 1. Introduction Ohio’s Public Records Act (R.C. 149.43)...
“From Privileged Memo to Public Record” – The Ohio Supreme Court’s New Two-Track Rule on Transmittal E-mails and Unauthorized Forwards (Commentary on State ex rel. Platt v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Elections, 2025-Ohio-2079)

“From Privileged Memo to Public Record” – The Ohio Supreme Court’s New Two-Track Rule on Transmittal E-mails and Unauthorized Forwards (Commentary on State ex rel. Platt v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Elections, 2025-Ohio-2079)

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“From Privileged Memo to Public Record” – The Ohio Supreme Court’s New Two-Track Rule on Transmittal E-mails and Unauthorized Forwards Commentary on State ex rel. Platt v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of...
“Beyond Unfair-Labor-Practice Allegations” – The Supreme Court of Ohio Re-defines the Boundary Between SERB and Common Pleas Court Jurisdiction

“Beyond Unfair-Labor-Practice Allegations” – The Supreme Court of Ohio Re-defines the Boundary Between SERB and Common Pleas Court Jurisdiction

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“Beyond Unfair-Labor-Practice Allegations” Clarifying the Exclusive Jurisdiction of the State Employment Relations Board (SERB) Over Public-Sector Labor Disputes Introduction On 12 June 2025 the...
State v. Coker (2025): Vernacular Proof of “Sexual Conduct” & the Re-Entrenchment of the Jenks Sufficiency Standard

State v. Coker (2025): Vernacular Proof of “Sexual Conduct” & the Re-Entrenchment of the Jenks Sufficiency Standard

Date: Jun 18, 2025
State v. Coker (2025): Vernacular Proof of “Sexual Conduct” & the Re-Entrenchment of the Jenks Sufficiency Standard Introduction State v. Coker, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-2051, is a landmark...
“Lawfully Entitled to Have Applied” – Ohio Supreme Court Bars Dependents from Reviving a Denied Scheduled-Loss Claim (Commentary on State ex rel. Byk v. Industrial Commission, 2025-Ohio-2044)

“Lawfully Entitled to Have Applied” – Ohio Supreme Court Bars Dependents from Reviving a Denied Scheduled-Loss Claim (Commentary on State ex rel. Byk v. Industrial Commission, 2025-Ohio-2044)

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“Lawfully Entitled to Have Applied” – Ohio Supreme Court Bars Dependents from Reviving a Denied Scheduled-Loss Claim Commentary on State ex rel. Byk v. Industrial Commission (2025-Ohio-2044) 1....
“Five-Years-Means-Five-Years”:  Supreme Court of Ohio Clarifies that Jail-Time Credit Cannot Shorten the Post-Mandatory Waiting Period for Judicial Release

“Five-Years-Means-Five-Years”: Supreme Court of Ohio Clarifies that Jail-Time Credit Cannot Shorten the Post-Mandatory Waiting Period for Judicial Release

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“Five-Years-Means-Five-Years”: Supreme Court of Ohio Clarifies that Jail-Time Credit Cannot Shorten the Post-Mandatory Waiting Period for Judicial Release Introduction State v. Clinkscale, Slip...
Public Reprimand for Practicing Law During Interim Suspension Amid Mental-Health Crisis: Columbus Bar Assn. v. Bryant

Public Reprimand for Practicing Law During Interim Suspension Amid Mental-Health Crisis: Columbus Bar Assn. v. Bryant

Date: May 30, 2025
Public Reprimand for Practicing Law During Interim Suspension Amid Mental-Health Crisis: Columbus Bar Assn. v. Bryant Introduction In Columbus Bar Assn. v. Bryant (2025-Ohio-1879), the Supreme Court...
Jurisdiction Unaffected by Name Errors and Sentence Ambiguities: Limits on Habeas Corpus Relief

Jurisdiction Unaffected by Name Errors and Sentence Ambiguities: Limits on Habeas Corpus Relief

Date: May 30, 2025
Jurisdiction Unaffected by Name Errors and Sentence Ambiguities: Limits on Habeas Corpus Relief Introduction In State ex rel. Dodson v. Smith, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-1878, the Supreme Court of...
Reasonable Response Time Under Ohio’s Public Records Act in High-Volume Contexts

Reasonable Response Time Under Ohio’s Public Records Act in High-Volume Contexts

Date: May 29, 2025
Reasonable Response Time Under Ohio’s Public Records Act in High-Volume Contexts Introduction In State ex rel. Robinson v. Wesson, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-1874 (May 28, 2025), the Supreme Court of...
Ohio Supreme Court Restricts Statutory Damages in Public-Records Mandamus: State ex rel. Robinson v. Wesson

Ohio Supreme Court Restricts Statutory Damages in Public-Records Mandamus: State ex rel. Robinson v. Wesson

Date: May 29, 2025
Ohio Supreme Court Restricts Statutory Damages in Public-Records Mandamus: State ex rel. Robinson v. Wesson Introduction The Supreme Court of Ohio’s May 28, 2025 announcement in State ex rel....
Employee Directive as Compliance with Ohio’s Public Records Act:  
         State ex rel. Ware v. Smith

Employee Directive as Compliance with Ohio’s Public Records Act: State ex rel. Ware v. Smith

Date: May 28, 2025
Employee Directive as Compliance with Ohio’s Public Records Act: State ex rel. Ware v. Smith Introduction In State ex rel. Ware v. Smith, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-1856, decided May 27, 2025, the...
Clarifying the Scope of R.C. 149.43(B)(8): Prosecutorial Personnel and Payroll Records Are Public

Clarifying the Scope of R.C. 149.43(B)(8): Prosecutorial Personnel and Payroll Records Are Public

Date: May 28, 2025
Clarifying the Scope of R.C. 149.43(B)(8): Prosecutorial Personnel and Payroll Records Are Public Introduction In State ex rel. Ware v. O’Malley (2025-Ohio-1855), the Supreme Court of Ohio resolved a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert