Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Same-Sex Marriage Prohibition Upheld: Baker v. Nelson (1971)

Same-Sex Marriage Prohibition Upheld: Baker v. Nelson (1971)

Date: Oct 16, 1971
Same-Sex Marriage Prohibition Upheld: Baker v. Nelson (1971) Introduction Richard John Baker and James Michael McConnell, two adult males, sought legal recognition of their marriage by applying for a...
Presumption of Maternal Custody Reinforced in Wallin v. Wallin

Presumption of Maternal Custody Reinforced in Wallin v. Wallin

Date: May 22, 1971
Presumption of Maternal Custody Reinforced in Wallin v. Wallin Introduction Wallin v. Wallin is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of Minnesota on May 21, 1971. The case centers around a...
Establishing Standards in Legal Malpractice: The Christy v. Saliterman Ruling

Establishing Standards in Legal Malpractice: The Christy v. Saliterman Ruling

Date: Aug 8, 1970
Establishing Standards in Legal Malpractice: The Christy v. Saliterman Ruling Introduction Charles Lawrence Christy v. Samuel Saliterman, reported in 288 Minn. 144, is a pivotal case decided by the...
Limits on Substitution of Appointed Counsel: Insights from STATE v. WILLIAM V. FAGERSTROM

Limits on Substitution of Appointed Counsel: Insights from STATE v. WILLIAM V. FAGERSTROM

Date: Mar 14, 1970
Limits on Substitution of Appointed Counsel: Insights from STATE v. WILLIAM V. FAGERSTROM Introduction The case of STATE v. WILLIAM V. FAGERSTROM, decided by the Supreme Court of Minnesota on March...
Equal Division of Marital Assets in Divorce: Insights from Bollenbach v. Bollenbach

Equal Division of Marital Assets in Divorce: Insights from Bollenbach v. Bollenbach

Date: Jan 3, 1970
Equal Division of Marital Assets in Divorce: Insights from Bollenbach v. Bollenbach Introduction The case of Jean C. Bollenbach v. Willard Marshall Bollenbach, Jr. (285 Minn. 418) decided by the...
Retroactive Application of Long-Arm Jurisdiction in Minnesota: Hunt v. Nevada State Bank (1969)

Retroactive Application of Long-Arm Jurisdiction in Minnesota: Hunt v. Nevada State Bank (1969)

Date: Oct 23, 1969
Retroactive Application of Long-Arm Jurisdiction in Minnesota: Hunt v. Nevada State Bank (1969) Introduction Thomas C. Hunt and Another v. Nevada State Bank and Others is a landmark decision by the...
State v. Burch: Reinforcing Probable Cause Standards under the Fourth Amendment

State v. Burch: Reinforcing Probable Cause Standards under the Fourth Amendment

Date: Aug 16, 1969
State v. Burch: Reinforcing Probable Cause Standards under the Fourth Amendment Introduction State v. Ralph Lee Burch, Jr., 284 Minn. 300 (1969), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Minnesota,...
Reevaluation of Self-Defense in Manslaughter Convictions: State v. Boyce

Reevaluation of Self-Defense in Manslaughter Convictions: State v. Boyce

Date: Aug 2, 1969
Reevaluation of Self-Defense in Manslaughter Convictions: State v. Boyce Introduction State v. Donald Theodore Boyce is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of Minnesota on August 1, 1969. The...
Zylka v. City of Crystal: Reinforcing Procedural Requirements for Special-Use Permits

Zylka v. City of Crystal: Reinforcing Procedural Requirements for Special-Use Permits

Date: Apr 4, 1969
Zylka v. City of Crystal: Reinforcing Procedural Requirements for Special-Use Permits Introduction Zylka v. City of Crystal is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Minnesota in 1969. The...
Statute of Limitations in Occupational Illness Cases: Dalton v. Dow Chemical Company

Statute of Limitations in Occupational Illness Cases: Dalton v. Dow Chemical Company

Date: Apr 20, 1968
Statute of Limitations in Occupational Illness Cases: Dalton v. Dow Chemical Company Introduction The case of Jack Dalton v. Dow Chemical Company and others is a seminal decision by the Supreme Court...
Hopp v. Hopp: Establishing Enhanced Standards for Civil Contempt in Divorce Proceedings

Hopp v. Hopp: Establishing Enhanced Standards for Civil Contempt in Divorce Proceedings

Date: Jan 27, 1968
Hopp v. Hopp: Establishing Enhanced Standards for Civil Contempt in Divorce Proceedings Introduction Janice K. Hopp filed for divorce against her husband, Rodney Hopp, leading to a pivotal case in...
Establishing Strict Tort Liability in Product Defect Cases: McCormack v. Hankscraft Co., Inc.

Establishing Strict Tort Liability in Product Defect Cases: McCormack v. Hankscraft Co., Inc.

Date: Nov 18, 1967
Establishing Strict Tort Liability in Product Defect Cases: McCormack v. Hankscraft Co., Inc. Introduction The case of Andrea Marie McCormack, by Donald McCormack, her father and natural guardian, v....
Limitations on Dismissal with Prejudice for Want of Prosecution: Firoved v. General Motors

Limitations on Dismissal with Prejudice for Want of Prosecution: Firoved v. General Motors

Date: Jul 22, 1967
Limitations on Dismissal with Prejudice for Want of Prosecution: Firoved v. General Motors Corporation Introduction Russell C. Firoved v. General Motors Corporation and Economy Motors, Inc. is a...
State v. Billstrom: Establishing Defendant's Identity Through Related Offenses

State v. Billstrom: Establishing Defendant's Identity Through Related Offenses

Date: Mar 11, 1967
State v. Billstrom: Establishing Defendant's Identity Through Related Offenses Introduction State v. Robert G. Billstrom, 276 Minn. 174 (1967), is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Kucera v. Kucera: Upholding Judicial Discretion in Divorce Proceedings

Kucera v. Kucera: Upholding Judicial Discretion in Divorce Proceedings

Date: Nov 5, 1966
Kucera v. Kucera: Upholding Judicial Discretion in Divorce Proceedings Introduction The case of Jean Kucera v. Robert Kucera (275 Minn. 252), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Minnesota on November...
Donnay v. Boulware: Defining Contract Interpretation Standards and Limits on Summary Judgment

Donnay v. Boulware: Defining Contract Interpretation Standards and Limits on Summary Judgment

Date: Aug 20, 1966
Donnay v. Boulware: Defining Contract Interpretation Standards and Limits on Summary Judgment Introduction Donnay v. Boulware and Others (275 Minn. 37), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Minnesota...
Prohibition of Double Punishment and Serialized Prosecutions in State v. George Hillman Johnson

Prohibition of Double Punishment and Serialized Prosecutions in State v. George Hillman Johnson

Date: Mar 26, 1966
Prohibition of Double Punishment and Serialized Prosecutions in State v. George Hillman Johnson Introduction State v. George Hillman Johnson, 273 Minn. 394 (1966), is a landmark decision by the...
Admissibility of Coconspirators' Statements and Expansion of the Jencks Rule: A Comprehensive Analysis of STATE v. T. Eugene Thompson

Admissibility of Coconspirators' Statements and Expansion of the Jencks Rule: A Comprehensive Analysis of STATE v. T. Eugene Thompson

Date: Jan 8, 1966
Admissibility of Coconspirators' Statements and Expansion of the Jencks Rule: A Comprehensive Analysis of STATE v. T. Eugene Thompson Introduction STATE v. T. Eugene Thompson is a landmark decision...
Minnesota Sets New Precedent on Admissibility of Prior Sex Offense Evidence in Criminal Trials

Minnesota Sets New Precedent on Admissibility of Prior Sex Offense Evidence in Criminal Trials

Date: Dec 18, 1965
Minnesota Sets New Precedent on Admissibility of Prior Sex Offense Evidence in Criminal Trials Introduction State v. Theodore Frederick Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1965),...
State ex rel. Rasmussen v. Ralph H. Tahash: Upholding Non-Retroactivity of Escobedo and Jackson Rules in Minnesota

State ex rel. Rasmussen v. Ralph H. Tahash: Upholding Non-Retroactivity of Escobedo and Jackson Rules in Minnesota

Date: Dec 11, 1965
State ex rel. Rasmussen v. Ralph H. Tahash: Upholding Non-Retroactivity of Escobedo and Jackson Rules in Minnesota Introduction State ex rel. Rasmussen v. Ralph H. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539 (1965), is a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert