Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Right to Counsel Prior to Chemical Testing in Implied-Consent Laws: Minnesota's Landmark Decision in Prideaux v. State

Right to Counsel Prior to Chemical Testing in Implied-Consent Laws: Minnesota's Landmark Decision in Prideaux v. State

Date: Oct 9, 1976
Right to Counsel Prior to Chemical Testing in Implied-Consent Laws: Minnesota's Landmark Decision in Prideaux v. State Introduction Prideaux v. State, Department of Public Safety, 310 Minn. 405...
Appellate Jurisdiction and Self-Representation: Insights from RICHARD GRUENHAGEN v. CEDRIC LARSON

Appellate Jurisdiction and Self-Representation: Insights from RICHARD GRUENHAGEN v. CEDRIC LARSON

Date: Oct 9, 1976
Appellate Jurisdiction and Self-Representation: Insights from RICHARD GRUENHAGEN v. CEDRIC LARSON Introduction The case of Richard Gruenhagen v. Cedric Larson, d.b.a. Larson Auto Wrecking,...
Affirmative Duty of Banks to Disclose Known Fraudulent Activities of Depositors Before Loan Transactions

Affirmative Duty of Banks to Disclose Known Fraudulent Activities of Depositors Before Loan Transactions

Date: Jul 17, 1976
Affirmative Duty of Banks to Disclose Known Fraudulent Activities of Depositors Before Loan Transactions Introduction The case of Richfield Bank and Trust Company v. Roger E. Sjogren and Another,...
Reaffirming Postconviction Relief Rights and Evidentiary Standards in STATE v. Knaffla

Reaffirming Postconviction Relief Rights and Evidentiary Standards in STATE v. Knaffla

Date: Jun 26, 1976
Reaffirming Postconviction Relief Rights and Evidentiary Standards in STATE v. Knaffla Introduction STATE v. LESLIE KNAFFLA (309 Minn. 246) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Minnesota,...
Date of Allotment Determines Statute of Limitations for Inadequacy of Consideration Claims: Murphy v. Country House, Inc.

Date of Allotment Determines Statute of Limitations for Inadequacy of Consideration Claims: Murphy v. Country House, Inc.

Date: Mar 6, 1976
Date of Allotment Determines Statute of Limitations for Inadequacy of Consideration Claims: Murphy v. Country House, Inc. Introduction The case of Jerold E. Murphy v. Country House, Inc., and Others...
Establishing Adequate In Personam Jurisdiction: Hardrives, Inc. v. City of LaCrosse

Establishing Adequate In Personam Jurisdiction: Hardrives, Inc. v. City of LaCrosse

Date: Feb 28, 1976
Establishing Adequate In Personam Jurisdiction: Hardrives, Inc. v. City of LaCrosse Introduction The case of Hardrives, Inc., and Another v. City of LaCrosse and Another (307 Minn. 290), adjudicated...
Rule 11.03 Interpretation in State v. James D. Florence: A Landmark Decision on Probable Cause

Rule 11.03 Interpretation in State v. James D. Florence: A Landmark Decision on Probable Cause

Date: Jan 10, 1976
Rule 11.03 Interpretation in State v. James D. Florence: A Landmark Decision on Probable Cause 1. Introduction State v. James D. Florence, 306 Minn. 442 (1976), is a pivotal decision by the Supreme...
Establishing the Scope and Application of Terroristic Threats: Insights from STATE v. Thomas Lee Schweppe

Establishing the Scope and Application of Terroristic Threats: Insights from STATE v. Thomas Lee Schweppe

Date: Dec 27, 1975
Establishing the Scope and Application of Terroristic Threats: Insights from State v. Thomas Lee Schweppe Introduction State v. Thomas Lee Schweppe, 306 Minn. 395 (1975), is a landmark decision by...
Judicial Interpretation of Contractual Tax Liability: MIDWAY CENTER ASSOCIATES v. MIDWAY CENTER, INC.

Judicial Interpretation of Contractual Tax Liability: MIDWAY CENTER ASSOCIATES v. MIDWAY CENTER, INC.

Date: Dec 20, 1975
Judicial Interpretation of Contractual Tax Liability: MIDWAY CENTER ASSOCIATES v. MIDWAY CENTER, INC. Introduction The case of MIDWAY CENTER ASSOCIATES v. MIDWAY CENTER, INC., AND ANOTHER,...
City of St. Paul v. Dennis K. Vaughn: Establishing Standards for Investigatory Stops and Abandonment of Property

City of St. Paul v. Dennis K. Vaughn: Establishing Standards for Investigatory Stops and Abandonment of Property

Date: Dec 13, 1975
City of St. Paul v. Dennis K. Vaughn: Establishing Standards for Investigatory Stops and Abandonment of Property Introduction City of St. Paul v. Dennis K. Vaughn, 306 Minn. 337 (1975), is a seminal...
Summary Judgment Sua Sponte and the Statute of Frauds: Insights from Del Hayes Sons, Inc. v. Bruce Mitchell and Another

Summary Judgment Sua Sponte and the Statute of Frauds: Insights from Del Hayes Sons, Inc. v. Bruce Mitchell and Another

Date: May 31, 1975
Summary Judgment Sua Sponte and the Statute of Frauds: Insights from Del Hayes Sons, Inc. v. Bruce Mitchell and Another Introduction Del Hayes Sons, Inc. v. Bruce Mitchell and Another, 304 Minn. 275...
Establishing Faulty Metering as Continuous in NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY v. LYON FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.

Establishing Faulty Metering as Continuous in NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY v. LYON FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.

Date: May 24, 1975
Establishing Faulty Metering as Continuous in Northern States Power Company v. Lyon Food Products, Inc. Introduction Northern States Power Company v. Lyon Food Products, Inc. is a landmark case...
State v. Leinweber: Affirming the Trial Court's Duty to Submit Lesser Included Homicide Offenses

State v. Leinweber: Affirming the Trial Court's Duty to Submit Lesser Included Homicide Offenses

Date: Apr 5, 1975
State v. Leinweber: Affirming the Trial Court's Duty to Submit Lesser Included Homicide Offenses Introduction State v. Harry Alexander Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414 (1975), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Rigorous Standards for Granting New Trials Due to Pervasive Prejudicial Misconduct in Wild v. Rarig

Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Rigorous Standards for Granting New Trials Due to Pervasive Prejudicial Misconduct in Wild v. Rarig

Date: Jan 11, 1975
Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Rigorous Standards for Granting New Trials Due to Pervasive Prejudicial Misconduct in Wild v. Rarig Introduction In the landmark case of John J. Wild, M.D. v....
Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Usury Standards for Retail Credit Coupon Plans

Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Usury Standards for Retail Credit Coupon Plans

Date: Jun 15, 1974
Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Usury Standards for Retail Credit Coupon Plans Introduction The case Albert C. Rathbun and Others v. W. T. Grant Company, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Affirming Eyewitness Identification and Addressing Prosecutorial Conduct: A Comprehensive Analysis of State v. Caron

Affirming Eyewitness Identification and Addressing Prosecutorial Conduct: A Comprehensive Analysis of State v. Caron

Date: May 11, 1974
Affirming Eyewitness Identification and Addressing Prosecutorial Conduct: A Comprehensive Analysis of State v. Caron Introduction State v. David Lee Caron. (300 Minn. 123) is a landmark decision by...
Minnesota Abandons Lex Loci Delicti: Adopts the Better Law Approach in Conflict of Laws – Commentary on MILKOVICH v. SAARI

Minnesota Abandons Lex Loci Delicti: Adopts the Better Law Approach in Conflict of Laws – Commentary on MILKOVICH v. SAARI

Date: Jan 6, 1973
Minnesota Abandons Lex Loci Delicti: Adopts the Better Law Approach in Conflict of Laws – Commentary on MILKOVICH v. SAARI Introduction In the landmark case of Anne L. Milkovich v. Erma Saari and...
Minnesota Supreme Court Abolishes Traditional Licensee and Invitee Distinctions in Landowner Liability

Minnesota Supreme Court Abolishes Traditional Licensee and Invitee Distinctions in Landowner Liability

Date: Jul 15, 1972
Minnesota Supreme Court Abolishes Traditional Licensee and Invitee Distinctions in Landowner Liability Introduction The case of Willard C. Peterson, Trustee for the Heirs of Cynthia S. Peterson v....
Duty of Disclosure in Bank-Customer Relationships: Insights from VIRGINIA S. KLEIN v. FIRST EDINA NATIONAL BANK

Duty of Disclosure in Bank-Customer Relationships: Insights from VIRGINIA S. KLEIN v. FIRST EDINA NATIONAL BANK

Date: Apr 8, 1972
Duty of Disclosure in Bank-Customer Relationships: Insights from VIRGINIA S. KLEIN v. FIRST EDINA NATIONAL BANK Introduction The case of Virginia S. Klein v. First Edina National Bank, decided by the...
Redefining Assumption of Risk: Mary T. Springrose v. Bert L. Willmore

Redefining Assumption of Risk: Mary T. Springrose v. Bert L. Willmore

Date: Dec 11, 1971
Redefining Assumption of Risk: Mary T. Springrose v. Bert L. Willmore Introduction The case of Mary T. Springrose, a Minor, by James V. Springrose, Her Father and Natural Guardian, and Another v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert