Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Revocation of Acceptance in Sale of Goods: Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports Establishes Key Precedent

Revocation of Acceptance in Sale of Goods: Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports Establishes Key Precedent

Date: Mar 7, 1978
Revocation of Acceptance in Sale of Goods: Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports Establishes Key Precedent Introduction Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc., formerly Horvath Imports, Inc., is a significant...
Res Judicata and Jurisdictional Constraints: Supreme Court of Minnesota's Ruling in Hauser v. Mealey

Res Judicata and Jurisdictional Constraints: Supreme Court of Minnesota's Ruling in Hauser v. Mealey

Date: Feb 18, 1978
Res Judicata and Jurisdictional Constraints: Supreme Court of Minnesota's Ruling in Hauser v. Mealey Introduction Hauser v. Mealey, 263 N.W.2d 803 (Minn. 1978), is a pivotal case addressing the...
Cornfeldt v. Tongen: Establishing Standards for Informed Consent and Expert Testimony in Medical Malpractice

Cornfeldt v. Tongen: Establishing Standards for Informed Consent and Expert Testimony in Medical Malpractice

Date: Dec 31, 1977
Cornfeldt v. Tongen: Establishing Standards for Informed Consent and Expert Testimony in Medical Malpractice Introduction Cornfeldt v. Tongen, 262 N.W.2d 684 (Minn. 1977), is a pivotal case in...
Valid Contracting of Marriage Across States and Equitable Property Division: Insights from Bogen v. Bogen

Valid Contracting of Marriage Across States and Equitable Property Division: Insights from Bogen v. Bogen

Date: Dec 31, 1977
Valid Contracting of Marriage Across States and Equitable Property Division: Insights from Bogen v. Bogen Introduction Bogen v. Bogen (261 N.W.2d 606), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Minnesota...
Establishing Statutory Acceptance Date under Minn.St. 574.31: Chromy Construction Co. v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co.

Establishing Statutory Acceptance Date under Minn.St. 574.31: Chromy Construction Co. v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co.

Date: Dec 10, 1977
Establishing Statutory Acceptance Date under Minn.St. 574.31: Chromey Construction Co. v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co. Introduction A. J. Chromey Construction Company (hereafter Chromey...
Admissibility of Evidence on Appeal Tribunals: Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl Co., Ltd.

Admissibility of Evidence on Appeal Tribunals: Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl Co., Ltd.

Date: Nov 11, 1977
Admissibility of Evidence on Appeal Tribunals: Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl Co., Ltd. Introduction The case of Duane J. Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl Co., Ltd. was adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Duty of Insurers to Notify Insured of Coverage Modifications: Canadian Universal Insurance Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc.

Duty of Insurers to Notify Insured of Coverage Modifications: Canadian Universal Insurance Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc.

Date: Oct 14, 1977
Duty of Insurers to Notify Insured of Coverage Modifications: Canadian Universal Insurance Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc. Introduction Canadian Universal Insurance Company, Ltd. v. Fire Watch, Inc. (258...
Establishing the Definition of "Improvement to Real Property" Under Minn.St. 541.051: Insights from Pacific Indemnity Company v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.

Establishing the Definition of "Improvement to Real Property" Under Minn.St. 541.051: Insights from Pacific Indemnity Company v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.

Date: Sep 17, 1977
Establishing the Definition of "Improvement to Real Property" Under Minn.St. 541.051: Insights from Pacific Indemnity Company v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc. Introduction The case Pacific Indemnity Company,...
Due Process Rights in Private Educational Institutions: The Abbariao v. Hamline University School of Law Decision

Due Process Rights in Private Educational Institutions: The Abbariao v. Hamline University School of Law Decision

Date: Aug 27, 1977
Due Process Rights in Private Educational Institutions: The Abbariao v. Hamline University School of Law Decision Introduction The case of Abraham Abbariao v. Hamline University School of Law, 258...
Admissibility of Blood Alcohol Evidence in State v. Dille

Admissibility of Blood Alcohol Evidence in State v. Dille

Date: Aug 20, 1977
Admissibility of Blood Alcohol Evidence in State v. Dille Introduction State of Minnesota v. Lee Brian Dille is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Minnesota on August 19, 1977. The...
Substantial Evidence Requirement in Judicial Review of Environmental Permits: Insights from Mile Post 7 Judgment

Substantial Evidence Requirement in Judicial Review of Environmental Permits: Insights from Mile Post 7 Judgment

Date: May 28, 1977
Substantial Evidence Requirement in Judicial Review of Environmental Permits: Insights from Mile Post 7 Judgment Introduction The case of Reserve Mining Company v. Bay et al. (256 N.W.2d 808)...
Dunshee v. Douglas: Establishing Standards for Expert Testimony and Continuance in Personal Injury Cases

Dunshee v. Douglas: Establishing Standards for Expert Testimony and Continuance in Personal Injury Cases

Date: May 28, 1977
Dunshee v. Douglas: Establishing Standards for Expert Testimony and Continuance in Personal Injury Cases Introduction The case of Donald G. Dunshee v. Sheldon F. Douglas, decided by the Supreme Court...
Establishing Watershed Districts for Pollution Control: A Comprehensive Analysis of Markwardt et al. v. State of Minnesota, Water Resources Board

Establishing Watershed Districts for Pollution Control: A Comprehensive Analysis of Markwardt et al. v. State of Minnesota, Water Resources Board

Date: May 14, 1977
Establishing Watershed Districts for Pollution Control: A Comprehensive Analysis of Markwardt et al. v. State of Minnesota, Water Resources Board Introduction The landmark case of Donald H. Markwardt...
State v. Vance: Upholding Trial Court Discretion on Mistrial Requests, Evidence Admissibility, and Continuance Denials

State v. Vance: Upholding Trial Court Discretion on Mistrial Requests, Evidence Admissibility, and Continuance Denials

Date: May 7, 1977
State v. Vance: Upholding Trial Court Discretion on Mistrial Requests, Evidence Admissibility, and Continuance Denials Introduction State of Minnesota v. Phillip Charles Vance, 254 N.W.2d 353...
Establishing Comparative Negligence in Indemnity Claims: Tolbert v. Gerber Industries

Establishing Comparative Negligence in Indemnity Claims: Tolbert v. Gerber Industries

Date: Apr 23, 1977
Establishing Comparative Negligence in Indemnity Claims: Tolbert v. Gerber Industries Introduction Norman Tolbert filed an action against Gerber Industries, Inc., the manufacturer, and Voldco, Inc.,...
Dual Representation and Attorney Negligence: Insights from Hill v. Okay Construction Co.

Dual Representation and Attorney Negligence: Insights from Hill v. Okay Construction Co.

Date: Mar 19, 1977
Dual Representation and Attorney Negligence: Insights from Hill v. Okay Construction Co. Introduction Roger Hill and Another v. Okay Construction Company, Inc., and Another. E. E. Ranta, Appellant....
Lynder Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corporation: Establishing Limits on Third-Party Contribution in Workers' Compensation Cases

Lynder Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corporation: Establishing Limits on Third-Party Contribution in Workers' Compensation Cases

Date: Feb 5, 1977
Lynder Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corporation: Establishing Limits on Third-Party Contribution in Workers' Compensation Cases Introduction Lynder Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corporation, Hutchinson...
Expanding Accounting Malpractice Liability: Negligent Misrepresentation in Bonhiver v. Graff

Expanding Accounting Malpractice Liability: Negligent Misrepresentation in Bonhiver v. Graff

Date: Nov 20, 1976
Expanding Accounting Malpractice Liability: Negligent Misrepresentation in Bonhiver v. Graff Introduction The case of Bonhiver v. Graff, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Minnesota on November 19,...
Protecting Employee Rights: Reclassification of Voluntary Termination Due to Safety Concerns in Unemployment Benefits Eligibility

Protecting Employee Rights: Reclassification of Voluntary Termination Due to Safety Concerns in Unemployment Benefits Eligibility

Date: Nov 6, 1976
Protecting Employee Rights: Reclassification of Voluntary Termination Due to Safety Concerns in Unemployment Benefits Eligibility Introduction The case of Albert F. Ferguson v. Department of...
Upholding Judicial Discretion in Custody Determinations: The Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld Precedent

Upholding Judicial Discretion in Custody Determinations: The Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld Precedent

Date: Nov 6, 1976
Upholding Judicial Discretion in Custody Determinations: The Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld Precedent Introduction Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76 (1976), is a seminal case in Minnesota family law that...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert