Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Dahlberg v. Ford Motor Co.: Factors Influencing Temporary Injunction in Franchise Termination

Dahlberg v. Ford Motor Co.: Factors Influencing Temporary Injunction in Franchise Termination

Date: Sep 11, 1965
Dahlberg v. Ford Motor Co.: Factors Influencing Temporary Injunction in Franchise Termination Introduction Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Another is a landmark 1965 decision by the...
Balancing Employer Interests and Employee Freedom in Restrictive Covenants: Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Company

Balancing Employer Interests and Employee Freedom in Restrictive Covenants: Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Company

Date: Apr 3, 1965
Balancing Employer Interests and Employee Freedom in Restrictive Covenants: Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Company Introduction Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Company is a seminal case adjudicated by...
Judicial Deference to Administrative Discretion in Personnel Discipline: The Webster v. Marshall Decision

Judicial Deference to Administrative Discretion in Personnel Discipline: The Webster v. Marshall Decision

Date: Feb 12, 1965
Judicial Deference to Administrative Discretion in Personnel Discipline: The Webster v. Marshall Decision Introduction The case of Richard S. Webster v. James C. Marshall, Commissioner of Highways...
Cole v. Tahash: Expanding Habeas Corpus to Address Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Cole v. Tahash: Expanding Habeas Corpus to Address Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Date: Jul 25, 1964
Cole v. Tahash: Expanding Habeas Corpus to Address Cruel and Unusual Punishment Introduction State ex rel. Robert Lee Cole v. Ralph H. Tahash (269 Minn. 1) is a pivotal 1964 decision by the Supreme...
Relief from Default Judgment Due to Attorney Neglect: A Comprehensive Analysis of Dennis Finden v. Raymond A. Klaas

Relief from Default Judgment Due to Attorney Neglect: A Comprehensive Analysis of Dennis Finden v. Raymond A. Klaas

Date: May 23, 1964
Relief from Default Judgment Due to Attorney Neglect: A Comprehensive Analysis of Dennis Finden v. Raymond A. Klaas Introduction The case of Dennis Finden, by His Father and Natural Guardian, Harold...
Sufficiency of Counterclaims in Easement Reformation: Northern States Power Co. v. Schmidt Investment Co.

Sufficiency of Counterclaims in Easement Reformation: Northern States Power Co. v. Schmidt Investment Co.

Date: May 18, 1963
Sufficiency of Counterclaims in Easement Reformation: Northern States Power Co. v. Schmidt Investment Co. Introduction In the landmark case of Northern States Power Company v. Lydia E. Franklin and...
Overruling Sovereign Tort Immunity for School Districts and Governmental Subdivisions in Minnesota

Overruling Sovereign Tort Immunity for School Districts and Governmental Subdivisions in Minnesota

Date: Dec 15, 1962
Overruling Sovereign Tort Immunity for School Districts and Governmental Subdivisions in Minnesota Introduction In the landmark case of Jeffrey Spanel, a Minor, by Charles Spanel, His Father and...
Establishing Unilateral Employment Contracts: Insights from Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood

Establishing Unilateral Employment Contracts: Insights from Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood

Date: Sep 15, 1962
Establishing Unilateral Employment Contracts: Insights from Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood Introduction The landmark case of Elizabeth Wold Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood, decided by the...
Right to Due Process and Adequate Counsel in Plea Acceptance: Norgaard v. Tahash

Right to Due Process and Adequate Counsel in Plea Acceptance: Norgaard v. Tahash

Date: Sep 16, 1961
Right to Due Process and Adequate Counsel in Plea Acceptance: Norgaard v. Tahash Introduction In the landmark case State ex rel. James Norgaard v. Ralph Tahash, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Lifetime Employment Contracts Remain At-Will: Analysis of HARLEY A. DEGEN v. INVESTORS DIVERSIFIED SERVICES, INC. (260 Minn. 424)

Lifetime Employment Contracts Remain At-Will: Analysis of HARLEY A. DEGEN v. INVESTORS DIVERSIFIED SERVICES, INC. (260 Minn. 424)

Date: Jul 15, 1961
Lifetime Employment Contracts Remain At-Will: Analysis of HARLEY A. DEGEN v. INVESTORS DIVERSIFIED SERVICES, INC. (260 Minn. 424) Introduction The case of HARLEY A. DEGEN v. INVESTORS DIVERSIFIED...
Right to Indemnity Among Concurrent Tortfeasors: Analysis of Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power Light Company

Right to Indemnity Among Concurrent Tortfeasors: Analysis of Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power Light Company

Date: Jul 9, 1960
Right to Indemnity Among Concurrent Tortfeasors: Analysis of Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power Light Company Introduction Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power Light Company is a pivotal case decided by the...
Establishing Protocols for Juror Misconduct and Trial Errors: Insights from Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Company

Establishing Protocols for Juror Misconduct and Trial Errors: Insights from Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Company

Date: Jul 2, 1960
Establishing Protocols for Juror Misconduct and Trial Errors: Insights from Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Company Introduction The case of Laura M. Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus...
Duty to Defend Insurance Policies: Scope of Coverage and Exclusions Established in Bobich v. Oja

Duty to Defend Insurance Policies: Scope of Coverage and Exclusions Established in Bobich v. Oja

Date: Jun 18, 1960
Duty to Defend Insurance Policies: Scope of Coverage and Exclusions Established in Bobich v. Oja Introduction The case of Henry A. Bobich, Trustee for Heirs and Next of Kin of Betty Jane Bobich v....
Revisiting Burden of Proof for Prospective Damages in Personal Injury Cases: Carpenter v. Nelson

Revisiting Burden of Proof for Prospective Damages in Personal Injury Cases: Carpenter v. Nelson

Date: Mar 12, 1960
Revisiting Burden of Proof for Prospective Damages in Personal Injury Cases: Carpenter v. Nelson Introduction Robert Wallace Carpenter, a Minor, by Leon Carpenter, Guardian ad Litem, v. Roy Nelson is...
Restricting Clerk-Entered Default Judgments to Contractual Monetary Claims: CHESTER SOMMERS v. EZELL THOMAS

Restricting Clerk-Entered Default Judgments to Contractual Monetary Claims: CHESTER SOMMERS v. EZELL THOMAS

Date: Feb 22, 1958
Restricting Clerk-Entered Default Judgments to Contractual Monetary Claims: CHESTER SOMMERS v. EZELL THOMAS Introduction Chester Sommers v. Ezell Thomas is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co.: Defining Layoff vs. Discharge and the Waiver of Arbitration Rights

Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co.: Defining Layoff vs. Discharge and the Waiver of Arbitration Rights

Date: Jul 6, 1957
Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co.: Defining Layoff vs. Discharge and the Waiver of Arbitration Rights Introduction John Anderson and others v. Twin City Rapid Transit Company and others (250...
Liability of Licensed Vendors Under Civil Damage Act: BECK v. GROE

Liability of Licensed Vendors Under Civil Damage Act: BECK v. GROE

Date: May 28, 1955
Liability of Licensed Vendors Under Civil Damage Act: BECK v. GROE Introduction In the landmark case of Roy W. Beck, Trustee in re Death of Ardell L. Beck, and Another v. Gerald D. Groe and Others,...
Reversal of Summary Judgment in Personal Injury Case: Establishing Standards for Genuine Issues of Material Fact

Reversal of Summary Judgment in Personal Injury Case: Establishing Standards for Genuine Issues of Material Fact

Date: May 7, 1955
Reversal of Summary Judgment in Personal Injury Case: Establishing Standards for Genuine Issues of Material Fact Introduction The case of Doris Sauter, a Minor, by Elsie Benson, Her Mother and...
Inducing Breach of Contract in ROYAL REALTY CO. v. LEVIN: A Landmark Minnesota Decision

Inducing Breach of Contract in ROYAL REALTY CO. v. LEVIN: A Landmark Minnesota Decision

Date: Apr 8, 1955
Inducing Breach of Contract in ROYAL REALTY CO. v. LEVIN: A Landmark Minnesota Decision Introduction Case: Royal Realty Company v. Abe I. Levin and Another, d.b.a. Levin Levin, and Others. Court:...
Burden of Proof and Evidence in Partnership Accounting: Insights from WILSON v. MOLINE

Burden of Proof and Evidence in Partnership Accounting: Insights from WILSON v. MOLINE

Date: May 12, 1951
Burden of Proof and Evidence in Partnership Accounting: Insights from WILSON v. MOLINE Introduction WILSON v. MOLINE, reported in 47 N.W.2d 865 (Minn. 1951), is a seminal case adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert