Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Admissibility of Identification Statements by Domestic Abuse Victims Under Hearsay Exceptions: Insights from State v. Andre Robinson

Admissibility of Identification Statements by Domestic Abuse Victims Under Hearsay Exceptions: Insights from State v. Andre Robinson

Date: Aug 5, 2006
Admissibility of Identification Statements by Domestic Abuse Victims Under Hearsay Exceptions: Insights from State v. Andre Robinson Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Andre Robinson,...
Imputing Intent of Corporate Agents: Insights from Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bloomington Steel Supply Co.

Imputing Intent of Corporate Agents: Insights from Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bloomington Steel Supply Co.

Date: Aug 4, 2006
Imputing Intent of Corporate Agents: Insights from Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bloomington Steel Supply Co. Introduction The case The Travelers Indemnity Company, et al. v. Bloomington Steel Supply...
State Farm v. Aquila Inc.: Interpretation of Statute of Repose in Utility Pipeline Installations

State Farm v. Aquila Inc.: Interpretation of Statute of Repose in Utility Pipeline Installations

Date: Aug 4, 2006
State Farm v. Aquila Inc.: Interpretation of Statute of Repose in Utility Pipeline Installations Introduction In State Farm Fire and Casualty et al. v. Aquila Inc. et al., the Supreme Court of...
Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Reasonable Suspicion Standard for Nighttime Searches in State v. Bourke

Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Reasonable Suspicion Standard for Nighttime Searches in State v. Bourke

Date: Aug 4, 2006
Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Reasonable Suspicion Standard for Nighttime Searches in State v. Bourke Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Richard Lowell Bourke, the Minnesota Supreme Court...
Admissibility of Prior Order for Protection Violations: Insights from STATE v. BELL

Admissibility of Prior Order for Protection Violations: Insights from STATE v. BELL

Date: Jul 28, 2006
Admissibility of Prior Order for Protection Violations: Insights from STATE v. BELL Introduction State of Minnesota v. Ronald James Bell (719 N.W.2d 635, 2006) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Reaffirmation of the Knaffla Rule in Denying Postconviction Relief: STATE v. SCHLEICHER

Reaffirmation of the Knaffla Rule in Denying Postconviction Relief: STATE v. SCHLEICHER

Date: Jul 28, 2006
Reaffirmation of the Knaffla Rule in Denying Postconviction Relief: STATE v. SCHLEICHER Introduction In the landmark case of STATE v. SCHLEICHER, decided by the Supreme Court of Minnesota on July 27,...
Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Statute of Limitations for Defective Real Property Improvements in Jaenty v. Northern States Power

Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Statute of Limitations for Defective Real Property Improvements in Jaenty v. Northern States Power

Date: Jul 28, 2006
Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Statute of Limitations for Defective Real Property Improvements in Jaenty v. Northern States Power Introduction In the landmark case of Jaenty, Inc. d/b/a Taco...
Limits and Protections on Gang Expert Testimony in Murder Cases: Insights from STATE v. Jackson

Limits and Protections on Gang Expert Testimony in Murder Cases: Insights from STATE v. Jackson

Date: Jun 2, 2006
Limits and Protections on Gang Expert Testimony in Murder Cases: Insights from STATE v. Jackson Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of Minnesota v. Tyree Leland Jackson (714 N.W.2d 681, 2006),...
Minnesota Supreme Court Reinforces Comprehensive Consideration of Cumulative Potential Effects in Environmental Impact Statements

Minnesota Supreme Court Reinforces Comprehensive Consideration of Cumulative Potential Effects in Environmental Impact Statements

Date: May 12, 2006
Minnesota Supreme Court Reinforces Comprehensive Consideration of Cumulative Potential Effects in Environmental Impact Statements Introduction In the landmark case of Citizens Advocating Responsible...
Reaffirmation of 'But For' Causation in Legal Malpractice for Transactional Matters

Reaffirmation of 'But For' Causation in Legal Malpractice for Transactional Matters

Date: Apr 7, 2006
Reaffirmation of 'But For' Causation in Legal Malpractice for Transactional Matters Introduction Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly Lindgren, Ltd., et al., 711 N.W.2d 811, is a...
Manthey v. Minnesota: Upholding the Plain Error Standard and Evidentiary Admissibility in Criminal Trials

Manthey v. Minnesota: Upholding the Plain Error Standard and Evidentiary Admissibility in Criminal Trials

Date: Mar 31, 2006
Manthey v. Minnesota: Upholding the Plain Error Standard and Evidentiary Admissibility in Criminal Trials Introduction Manthey v. Minnesota (711 N.W.2d 498) is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Right to Counsel in Postconviction Petitions: Insights from Deegan v. State of Minnesota

Right to Counsel in Postconviction Petitions: Insights from Deegan v. State of Minnesota

Date: Mar 24, 2006
Right to Counsel in Postconviction Petitions: Insights from Deegan v. State of Minnesota Introduction Daniel Deegan v. State of Minnesota, 711 N.W.2d 89 (Minn. 2006), is a landmark decision by the...
SCHROEDER v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY: Supreme Court of Minnesota's Landmark Decision on Vicarious Official Immunity

SCHROEDER v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY: Supreme Court of Minnesota's Landmark Decision on Vicarious Official Immunity

Date: Jan 27, 2006
SCHROEDER v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY: Supreme Court of Minnesota's Landmark Decision on Vicarious Official Immunity Introduction SCHROEDER v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Conviction Based on Sufficient Identification Evidence and Fair Trial Standards

Affirmation of Conviction Based on Sufficient Identification Evidence and Fair Trial Standards

Date: Jan 27, 2006
Affirmation of Conviction Based on Sufficient Identification Evidence and Fair Trial Standards Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. Charles Ellice Mems (708 N.W.2d 526, 2006),...
Cumulative Trial Errors and Fair Trial Rights: Insights from STATE v. Paul Penkaty, Sr.

Cumulative Trial Errors and Fair Trial Rights: Insights from STATE v. Paul Penkaty, Sr.

Date: Jan 11, 2006
Cumulative Trial Errors and Fair Trial Rights: Insights from STATE v. Paul Penkaty, Sr. Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of Minnesota v. Paul Penkaty, Sr., the Supreme Court of Minnesota...
Clarifying the Use of Prior Convictions for Impeachment and Accomplice Instructions in Minnesota: Insights from STATE v. SWANSON

Clarifying the Use of Prior Convictions for Impeachment and Accomplice Instructions in Minnesota: Insights from STATE v. SWANSON

Date: Jan 11, 2006
Clarifying the Use of Prior Convictions for Impeachment and Accomplice Instructions in Minnesota: Insights from State of Minnesota v. Clinton T. Swanson Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v....
Limits on Admitting Other-Acts Evidence in Sexual Misconduct Cases: Insights from State v. Ness

Limits on Admitting Other-Acts Evidence in Sexual Misconduct Cases: Insights from State v. Ness

Date: Jan 11, 2006
Limits on Admitting Other-Acts Evidence in Sexual Misconduct Cases: Insights from State v. Ness Introduction State v. Paul Kermit Ness, 707 N.W.2d 676 (Minn. 2006), is a pivotal case in Minnesota...
Child Pornography Possession as Included Offense: Minnesota Supreme Court in STATE v. BERTSCH

Child Pornography Possession as Included Offense: Minnesota Supreme Court in STATE v. BERTSCH

Date: Jan 11, 2006
Child Pornography Possession as Included Offense: Minnesota Supreme Court in STATE v. BERTSCH Introduction State of Minnesota v. Joshua Stafford Bertsch, 707 N.W.2d 660 (Minn. 2006), is a pivotal...
Decisive Ruling on Police Immunity: Ministerial Duties and the Limits of Qualified Immunity in Vehicular Pursuits

Decisive Ruling on Police Immunity: Ministerial Duties and the Limits of Qualified Immunity in Vehicular Pursuits

Date: Jan 11, 2006
Decisive Ruling on Police Immunity: Ministerial Duties and the Limits of Qualified Immunity in Vehicular Pursuits Introduction The case of Be v. rly MUMM, as Trustee for the Surviving Spouse and Next...
Limits on Judicial Estoppel in Sequential Prosecutions: Analysis of State v. Pendleton

Limits on Judicial Estoppel in Sequential Prosecutions: Analysis of State v. Pendleton

Date: Dec 9, 2005
Limits on Judicial Estoppel in Sequential Prosecutions: Analysis of State v. Pendleton Introduction State of Minnesota v. Robin Todd Pendleton, Jr., 706 N.W.2d 500 (Minn. 2005), is a pivotal case...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert