Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Reaffirming Circumstantial Evidence Standards in Controlled Substance Convictions: STATE v. OLHAUSEN

Reaffirming Circumstantial Evidence Standards in Controlled Substance Convictions: STATE v. OLHAUSEN

Date: Jun 11, 2004
Reaffirming Circumstantial Evidence Standards in Controlled Substance Convictions: STATE v. OLHAUSEN Introduction State of Minnesota v. Alan George Olhausen, Jr., 681 N.W.2d 21 (Minn. 2004), is a...
Affirmation of Uncorroborated Testimony in Domestic Assault Cases and Strict Adherence to Sentencing Guidelines: State of Minnesota v. James Foreman

Affirmation of Uncorroborated Testimony in Domestic Assault Cases and Strict Adherence to Sentencing Guidelines: State of Minnesota v. James Foreman

Date: Jun 11, 2004
Affirmation of Uncorroborated Testimony in Domestic Assault Cases and Strict Adherence to Sentencing Guidelines: State of Minnesota v. James Foreman Introduction In the landmark case State of...
Refining the Admissibility and Use of Spreigl Evidence: Insights from STATE v. TURE

Refining the Admissibility and Use of Spreigl Evidence: Insights from STATE v. TURE

Date: Jun 4, 2004
Refining the Admissibility and Use of Spreigl Evidence: Insights from STATE v. TURE Introduction STATE v. TURE, 681 N.W.2d 9 (Minn. 2004), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Minnesota...
Retroactivity of Federal Constitutional Rules in Criminal Sentencing: O'Meara v. State of Minnesota

Retroactivity of Federal Constitutional Rules in Criminal Sentencing: O'Meara v. State of Minnesota

Date: May 14, 2004
Retroactivity of Federal Constitutional Rules in Criminal Sentencing: O'Meara v. State of Minnesota Introduction In the landmark case of Timothy John O'Meara v. State of Minnesota, adjudicated by the...
Termination of Parental Rights: A Comprehensive Analysis of In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of R.W.

Termination of Parental Rights: A Comprehensive Analysis of In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of R.W.

Date: Apr 23, 2004
Termination of Parental Rights: A Comprehensive Analysis of In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of R.W. Introduction In the landmark case of In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of...
Rigorous Standards for Evidentiary Hearings in Postconviction Relief: Opsahl v. State of Minnesota

Rigorous Standards for Evidentiary Hearings in Postconviction Relief: Opsahl v. State of Minnesota

Date: Apr 9, 2004
Rigorous Standards for Evidentiary Hearings in Postconviction Relief: Opsahl v. State of Minnesota Introduction In Darby Jon Opsahl v. State of Minnesota, 677 N.W.2d 414 (Minn. 2004), the Supreme...
VLAHOS v. RI CONSTRUCTION: Clarifying the Start of Statute of Limitations in Home Warranty Claims

VLAHOS v. RI CONSTRUCTION: Clarifying the Start of Statute of Limitations in Home Warranty Claims

Date: Apr 2, 2004
VLAHOS v. RI CONSTRUCTION: Clarifying the Start of Statute of Limitations in Home Warranty Claims Introduction The case of Dean P. Vlahos, et al. v. RI Construction of Bloomington, Inc. represents a...
Miranda Protections and DNA Evidence Reliability in Bailey v. State of Minnesota

Miranda Protections and DNA Evidence Reliability in Bailey v. State of Minnesota

Date: Mar 19, 2004
Miranda Protections and DNA Evidence Reliability in Bailey v. State of Minnesota Introduction State of Minnesota v. Billy Daymond Bailey is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Admissibility of Alternative Perpetrator Evidence: Insights from State v. Jones

Admissibility of Alternative Perpetrator Evidence: Insights from State v. Jones

Date: Mar 12, 2004
Admissibility of Alternative Perpetrator Evidence: Insights from State of Minnesota v. Kent Richard Jones Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Kent Richard Jones, the Supreme Court of Minnesota...
Rhodes v. State: Affirming the Mandatory Inclusion of Conditional Release Terms in Plea Agreements

Rhodes v. State: Affirming the Mandatory Inclusion of Conditional Release Terms in Plea Agreements

Date: Mar 5, 2004
Rhodes v. State: Affirming the Mandatory Inclusion of Conditional Release Terms in Plea Agreements Introduction State of Minnesota v. Johnnie Lee Rhodes is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court...
Taylor v. State of Minnesota: Restricting Sentencing Enhancements for Uncharged Prior Conduct

Taylor v. State of Minnesota: Restricting Sentencing Enhancements for Uncharged Prior Conduct

Date: Nov 7, 2003
Taylor v. State of Minnesota: Restricting Sentencing Enhancements for Uncharged Prior Conduct Introduction Taylor v. State of Minnesota, 670 N.W.2d 584 (Minn. 2003), is a seminal case adjudicated by...
Admissibility of Defendant-Introduced Third-Party Character Evidence: Insights from State of Minnesota v. Jamie Glenn Richardson

Admissibility of Defendant-Introduced Third-Party Character Evidence: Insights from State of Minnesota v. Jamie Glenn Richardson

Date: Oct 24, 2003
Admissibility of Defendant-Introduced Third-Party Character Evidence: Insights from State of Minnesota v. Jamie Glenn Richardson Introduction State of Minnesota v. Jamie Glenn Richardson, 670 N.W.2d...
Retroactivity in Child Support Obligations: Clarifying Effective Dates in Expedited Proceedings

Retroactivity in Child Support Obligations: Clarifying Effective Dates in Expedited Proceedings

Date: Sep 10, 2003
Retroactivity in Child Support Obligations: Clarifying Effective Dates in Expedited Proceedings Introduction In re Kris Lynn Eisenschenk, n/k/a Kris Lynn Gruenes is a pivotal appellate decision from...
Affirmation of Admissibility of PCR-STR DNA Evidence and Product Rule in Roman Nose Case

Affirmation of Admissibility of PCR-STR DNA Evidence and Product Rule in Roman Nose Case

Date: Aug 22, 2003
Affirmation of Admissibility of PCR-STR DNA Evidence and Product Rule in Roman Nose Case Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Tony Allen Roman Nose (667 N.W.2d 386) adjudicated by the...
Admissibility of PCR-STR DNA Evidence and Fourth Amendment Compliance: Insights from State v. Miller

Admissibility of PCR-STR DNA Evidence and Fourth Amendment Compliance: Insights from State v. Miller

Date: Aug 8, 2003
Admissibility of PCR-STR DNA Evidence and Fourth Amendment Compliance: Insights from State v. Miller Introduction State of Minnesota v. Marcus Keith Miller, 666 N.W.2d 703 (Minn. 2003), is a landmark...
Adequate Notice in Contract Renewals: Insights from Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo

Adequate Notice in Contract Renewals: Insights from Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo

Date: Aug 1, 2003
Adequate Notice in Contract Renewals: Insights from Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo Introduction Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo Co. (666 N.W.2d 339) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Standing to Assert Antitrust Claims in Asset Sales: Insights from Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.

Standing to Assert Antitrust Claims in Asset Sales: Insights from Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.

Date: Jul 25, 2003
Standing to Assert Antitrust Claims in Asset Sales: Insights from Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic...
Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Threshold for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress in Employment Cases

Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Threshold for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress in Employment Cases

Date: Jul 18, 2003
Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Threshold for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress in Employment Cases Introduction The case of Sharon Langeslag v. KYMN Inc. presents a pivotal moment in...
Residence Registration Requirements Do Not Apply to Homeless Offenders: Analysis of State v. Iverson

Residence Registration Requirements Do Not Apply to Homeless Offenders: Analysis of State v. Iverson

Date: Jul 11, 2003
Residence Registration Requirements Do Not Apply to Homeless Offenders: Analysis of State of Minnesota v. Iverson Introduction State of Minnesota v. Thomas Jerome Iverson, 664 N.W.2d 346 (Minn....
Alpha Real Estate Co. v. Delta Dental: Clarifying Appellate Review and Contract Integration under Minnesota Law

Alpha Real Estate Co. v. Delta Dental: Clarifying Appellate Review and Contract Integration under Minnesota Law

Date: Jul 4, 2003
Alpha Real Estate Co. v. Delta Dental: Clarifying Appellate Review and Contract Integration under Minnesota Law Introduction Alpha Real Estate Company of Rochester, LLC (Alpha), petitioned the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert