Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Reasonable Suspicion Required for Drug-Detection Dog Sniffs Outside Storage Units: STATE v. CARTER

Reasonable Suspicion Required for Drug-Detection Dog Sniffs Outside Storage Units: STATE v. CARTER

Date: Jun 10, 2005
Reasonable Suspicion Required for Drug-Detection Dog Sniffs Outside Storage Units: STATE v. CARTER Introduction State of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Andre Lashon Carter, Appellant, 697 N.W.2d 199,...
State of Minnesota v. Blanche: Affirming Batson and Bruton Principles in Joint Trials

State of Minnesota v. Blanche: Affirming Batson and Bruton Principles in Joint Trials

Date: May 27, 2005
State of Minnesota v. Blanche: Affirming Batson and Bruton Principles in Joint Trials Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. Blanche, the Supreme Court of Minnesota addressed...
Reaffirmation of Harmless Error Doctrine in Confrontation Clause Violations: STATE v. COURTNEY

Reaffirmation of Harmless Error Doctrine in Confrontation Clause Violations: STATE v. COURTNEY

Date: May 13, 2005
Reaffirmation of Harmless Error Doctrine in Confrontation Clause Violations: State of Minnesota v. Antoine Edward Eugene Courtney Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Antoine Edward Eugene...
State v. Modtland: Reinforcing Austin’s Three-Factor Requirement in Probation Revocations

State v. Modtland: Reinforcing Austin’s Three-Factor Requirement in Probation Revocations

Date: May 13, 2005
State v. Modtland: Reinforcing Austin’s Three-Factor Requirement in Probation Revocations Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. Patrick James Modtland, 695 N.W.2d 602 (Minn....
Reinforcement of Lesser-Included Offense Instruction Standards in Minnesota: State v. Dahlin

Reinforcement of Lesser-Included Offense Instruction Standards in Minnesota: State v. Dahlin

Date: May 13, 2005
Reinforcement of Lesser-Included Offense Instruction Standards in Minnesota: State v. Dahlin Introduction State of Minnesota v. Michael James Dahlin, 695 N.W.2d 588 (2005), adjudicated by the Supreme...
State v. DeRosier: Upholding Hearsay Exceptions and Prosecutorial Conduct in First-Degree Murder Conviction

State v. DeRosier: Upholding Hearsay Exceptions and Prosecutorial Conduct in First-Degree Murder Conviction

Date: Apr 22, 2005
State v. DeRosier: Upholding Hearsay Exceptions and Prosecutorial Conduct in First-Degree Murder Conviction Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. Joshua John DeRosier, the...
State v. Washington: Establishing Precedents on the Admissibility of Spreigl Evidence in Sexual Conduct Cases

State v. Washington: Establishing Precedents on the Admissibility of Spreigl Evidence in Sexual Conduct Cases

Date: Mar 18, 2005
State v. Washington: Establishing Precedents on the Admissibility of Spreigl Evidence in Sexual Conduct Cases Introduction State of Minnesota v. Lionel Lee Washington is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Admissibility of Voicemail Confessions and Identifying Photographs Under Minn. R. Evid. 403: State v. Schulz Commentary

Admissibility of Voicemail Confessions and Identifying Photographs Under Minn. R. Evid. 403: State v. Schulz Commentary

Date: Feb 4, 2005
Admissibility of Voicemail Confessions and Identifying Photographs Under Minn. R. Evid. 403: State v. Schulz Commentary Introduction State of Minnesota v. Morgan Michael Schulz (691 N.W.2d 474, 2005)...
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Postconviction Appeals and Defendants' Rights During Jury Communications: Insights from A.C. Ford v. State of Minnesota

Jurisdictional Boundaries in Postconviction Appeals and Defendants' Rights During Jury Communications: Insights from A.C. Ford v. State of Minnesota

Date: Jan 14, 2005
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Postconviction Appeals and Defendants' Rights During Jury Communications: Insights from A.C. Ford v. State of Minnesota Introduction The case of A.C. Ford v. State of...
Disbarment for Failure to Notify and Felony Conviction: In re Alfred Perez, Jr.

Disbarment for Failure to Notify and Felony Conviction: In re Alfred Perez, Jr.

Date: Nov 19, 2004
Disbarment for Failure to Notify and Felony Conviction: In re Alfred Perez, Jr. Introduction The case of In re Peterson for Disciplinary Action Against Alfred Perez, Jr. serves as a pivotal example...
Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel Do Not Bar Subsequent Fiduciary Claims: Insights from Hauschildt v. Beckingham

Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel Do Not Bar Subsequent Fiduciary Claims: Insights from Hauschildt v. Beckingham

Date: Sep 17, 2004
Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel Do Not Bar Subsequent Fiduciary Claims: Insights from Hauschildt v. Beckingham Introduction The case of Wayne Hauschildt, et al. v. Dennis J. Beckingham, et al.,...
Reevaluation of Inverse and Regulatory Takings Claims in Mandamus Petitions: Xcel Energy v. Minnesota Metropolitan Council

Reevaluation of Inverse and Regulatory Takings Claims in Mandamus Petitions: Xcel Energy v. Minnesota Metropolitan Council

Date: Aug 6, 2004
Reevaluation of Inverse and Regulatory Takings Claims in Mandamus Petitions: Xcel Energy v. Minnesota Metropolitan Council 1. Introduction Parties Involved: The case of Northern States Power Company,...
Insufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence and False Law Enforcement Testimony Lead to Reversal of Aiding and Abetting Murder Conviction in Bernhardt v. Minnesota

Insufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence and False Law Enforcement Testimony Lead to Reversal of Aiding and Abetting Murder Conviction in Bernhardt v. Minnesota

Date: Aug 6, 2004
Insufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence and False Law Enforcement Testimony Lead to Reversal of Aiding and Abetting Murder Conviction in Bernhardt v. Minnesota Introduction The case of Salem Mathew...
STATE v. ANDERSON: Objective Legal Basis Essential for Lawful Traffic Stops

STATE v. ANDERSON: Objective Legal Basis Essential for Lawful Traffic Stops

Date: Jul 30, 2004
STATE v. ANDERSON: Objective Legal Basis Essential for Lawful Traffic Stops Introduction State of Minnesota v. Matthew Philip Anderson, 683 N.W.2d 818 (Minn. 2004), is a pivotal case decided by the...
Minnesota v. Lee (2004): The Importance of Jury Instructions on Accomplice Testimony – A Comprehensive Analysis

Minnesota v. Lee (2004): The Importance of Jury Instructions on Accomplice Testimony – A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Jul 23, 2004
Minnesota v. Lee (2004): The Importance of Jury Instructions on Accomplice Testimony – A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. Houa V. Lee, adjudicated by...
Mandatory Arbitration in Auto Glass Claims: Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds No-Fault Act Requirements

Mandatory Arbitration in Auto Glass Claims: Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds No-Fault Act Requirements

Date: Jul 23, 2004
Mandatory Arbitration in Auto Glass Claims: Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds No-Fault Act Requirements Introduction In the landmark case of Illinois Farmers Insurance Company, et al. v. Glass Service...
Nonassignment Clauses as Absolute Prohibitions on Contractual Assignments: Analysis of Travertine Corp. v. Lexington-Silverwood

Nonassignment Clauses as Absolute Prohibitions on Contractual Assignments: Analysis of Travertine Corp. v. Lexington-Silverwood

Date: Jul 2, 2004
Nonassignment Clauses as Absolute Prohibitions on Contractual Assignments: Analysis of Travertine Corp. v. Lexington-Silverwood Introduction The case of Travertine Corporation v....
State v. Blom: Key Insights on Rule 410 Waiver, Spreigl Evidence, and Jury Management

State v. Blom: Key Insights on Rule 410 Waiver, Spreigl Evidence, and Jury Management

Date: Jul 2, 2004
State v. Blom: Key Insights on Rule 410 Waiver, Spreigl Evidence, and Jury Management Introduction In the case of State of Minnesota v. Donald Albin Blom, the Supreme Court of Minnesota upheld Blom's...
Minnesota Stat. § 634.20 Permits Admission of Prior Similar Conduct Evidence in Domestic Abuse Cases Without Clear and Convincing Evidence

Minnesota Stat. § 634.20 Permits Admission of Prior Similar Conduct Evidence in Domestic Abuse Cases Without Clear and Convincing Evidence

Date: Jul 2, 2004
Minnesota Stat. § 634.20 Permits Admission of Prior Similar Conduct Evidence in Domestic Abuse Cases Without Clear and Convincing Evidence Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Tyrone S....
Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Strict Reasonableness Standard for Traffic Stop Seizures

Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Strict Reasonableness Standard for Traffic Stop Seizures

Date: Jun 18, 2004
Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Strict Reasonableness Standard for Traffic Stop Seizures Introduction In the case of State of Minnesota v. Todd Jeffrey Askerooth, decided on June 17, 2004, the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert