Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Trademark Infringement Covered as Advertising Injury under CGL and CUL Policies: Minnesota Supreme Court Decision in General Casualty Co. v. Wozniak Travel, Inc.

Trademark Infringement Covered as Advertising Injury under CGL and CUL Policies: Minnesota Supreme Court Decision in General Casualty Co. v. Wozniak Travel, Inc.

Date: Mar 20, 2009
Trademark Infringement Covered as Advertising Injury under CGL and CUL Policies: Minnesota Supreme Court Decision in General Casualty Co. v. Wozniak Travel, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of...
STATE v. NETLAND: Upholding Due Process and Search Reasonableness in Chemical Test Refusal Cases

STATE v. NETLAND: Upholding Due Process and Search Reasonableness in Chemical Test Refusal Cases

Date: Feb 13, 2009
STATE v. NETLAND: Upholding Due Process and Search Reasonableness in Chemical Test Refusal Cases Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Jakklyn M. Netland (762 N.W.2d 202, 2009), the Supreme Court of...
State v. Pendleton: Upholding First-Degree Murder Conviction and Accomplice Liability Standards

State v. Pendleton: Upholding First-Degree Murder Conviction and Accomplice Liability Standards

Date: Jan 30, 2009
State v. Pendleton: Upholding First-Degree Murder Conviction and Accomplice Liability Standards Introduction State of Minnesota appealed against the conviction of Jeffrey C. Pendleton, who was found...
Kaster v. State: Upholding Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence

Kaster v. State: Upholding Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence

Date: Jan 1, 2009
Kaster v. State: Upholding Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence Introduction State v. Tscheu, 758 N.W.2d 849 (Minn. 2008), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Minnesota that...
Reaffirming the Knaffla Rule: Bar on Postconviction Claims of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in State v. Sergio Sánchez-Díaz

Reaffirming the Knaffla Rule: Bar on Postconviction Claims of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in State v. Sergio Sánchez-Díaz

Date: Dec 25, 2008
Reaffirming the Knaffla Rule: Bar on Postconviction Claims of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in State v. Sergio Sánchez-Díaz Introduction State v. Sergio Sánchez-Díaz (758 N.W.2d 843, Supreme...
Reinforcing Standards for Juror Impartiality and Post-Trial Procedures in Criminal Appeals: STATE v. Evans

Reinforcing Standards for Juror Impartiality and Post-Trial Procedures in Criminal Appeals: STATE v. Evans

Date: Oct 24, 2008
Reinforcing Standards for Juror Impartiality and Post-Trial Procedures in Criminal Appeals: STATE of Minnesota v. Harry J. Evans Introduction STATE of Minnesota v. Harry J. Evans is a pivotal case...
Driving After Revocation for Impaired Driving is Criminal/Prohibitory Under Public Law 280

Driving After Revocation for Impaired Driving is Criminal/Prohibitory Under Public Law 280

Date: Sep 19, 2008
Driving After Revocation for Impaired Driving is Criminal/Prohibitory Under Public Law 280 Introduction STATE of Minnesota v. William Losh, 755 N.W.2d 736 (2008), presents a pivotal discussion on the...
Reaffirming the Need for Corroboration in Accomplice Testimony: STATE v. CLARK

Reaffirming the Need for Corroboration in Accomplice Testimony: STATE v. CLARK

Date: Aug 29, 2008
Reaffirming the Need for Corroboration in Accomplice Testimony: State of Minnesota v. Larry Larue Clark Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Larry Larue Clark (755 N.W.2d 241) presents a...
Comprehensive Commentary on STATE v. BARTYLLA: Upholding DNA Profiling and Evidence Admissibility Standards

Comprehensive Commentary on STATE v. BARTYLLA: Upholding DNA Profiling and Evidence Admissibility Standards

Date: Aug 22, 2008
Comprehensive Commentary on STATE v. BARTYLLA: Upholding DNA Profiling and Evidence Admissibility Standards Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of Minnesota v. Nicholas E. Bartylla,...
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction: Insights from Shamrock Development v. Smith

Establishing Personal Jurisdiction: Insights from Shamrock Development v. Smith

Date: Aug 8, 2008
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction: Insights from Shamrock Development, Inc. v. Smith Introduction The Supreme Court of Minnesota's decision in Shamrock Development, Inc. v. Randall N. Smith, 754...
Employment Misconduct in Aviation: Implications of Alcohol Policy Violations on Unemployment Benefits

Employment Misconduct in Aviation: Implications of Alcohol Policy Violations on Unemployment Benefits

Date: Aug 6, 2008
Employment Misconduct in Aviation: Implications of Alcohol Policy Violations on Unemployment Benefits Introduction The case of Gregory S. Peterson v. Northwest Airlines Inc. addresses critical issues...
STATE v. JONES: Affirmation of Conviction and Implications for Prosecutorial Misconduct and Marital Privilege Waiver

STATE v. JONES: Affirmation of Conviction and Implications for Prosecutorial Misconduct and Marital Privilege Waiver

Date: Aug 1, 2008
STATE v. JONES: Affirmation of Conviction and Implications for Prosecutorial Misconduct and Marital Privilege Waiver Introduction State of Minnesota v. Kent Richard Jones is a pivotal case...
Supreme Court Clarifies Prosecutorial Conduct in Closing Arguments: State v. McCray

Supreme Court Clarifies Prosecutorial Conduct in Closing Arguments: State v. McCray

Date: Aug 1, 2008
Supreme Court Clarifies Prosecutorial Conduct in Closing Arguments: State v. McCray Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Charles Howard McCray II (753 N.W.2d 746) presents a significant...
Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Single-Factor Exigent Circumstances for Warrantless Blood Draws in DUI Cases

Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Single-Factor Exigent Circumstances for Warrantless Blood Draws in DUI Cases

Date: Jul 15, 2008
Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Single-Factor Exigent Circumstances for Warrantless Blood Draws in DUI Cases Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Janet Sue Shriner, reported at 751...
Minnesota Supreme Court Sets Rigorous Standards for Vehicle Impoundment and Inventory Searches in STATE v. Gauster

Minnesota Supreme Court Sets Rigorous Standards for Vehicle Impoundment and Inventory Searches in STATE v. Gauster

Date: Jul 11, 2008
Minnesota Supreme Court Sets Rigorous Standards for Vehicle Impoundment and Inventory Searches in STATE v. Gauster Introduction In the landmark case STATE of Minnesota v. Steven Allen Gauster, 752...
Reaffirming Standards for Palpable Unfitness and Reasonable Rehabilitative Efforts in Parental Rights Termination

Reaffirming Standards for Palpable Unfitness and Reasonable Rehabilitative Efforts in Parental Rights Termination

Date: Jul 3, 2008
Reaffirming Standards for Palpable Unfitness and Reasonable Rehabilitative Efforts in Parental Rights Termination Introduction The Supreme Court of Minnesota's decision in In the Matter of the...
Supreme Court of Minnesota Adopts Ellerth/Faragher Standard for MHRA Sexual Harassment Claims

Supreme Court of Minnesota Adopts Ellerth/Faragher Standard for MHRA Sexual Harassment Claims

Date: May 31, 2008
Supreme Court of Minnesota Adopts Ellerth/Faragher Standard for MHRA Sexual Harassment Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Judy FRIELER v. CARLSON MARKETING GROUP, Inc. (751 N.W.2d 558,...
Reevaluation of Sentencing Departures: Analysis of State of Minnesota v. Kel

Reevaluation of Sentencing Departures: Analysis of State of Minnesota v. Kel

Date: May 31, 2008
Reevaluation of Sentencing Departures: Analysis of State of Minnesota v. Kel Introduction State of Minnesota v. Kel, 749 N.W.2d 353 (Minn. 2008), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Reaffirmation of Proximate Cause as a Substantial Factor in Dram Shop Liability

Reaffirmation of Proximate Cause as a Substantial Factor in Dram Shop Liability

Date: May 31, 2008
Reaffirmation of Proximate Cause as a Substantial Factor in Dram Shop Liability Introduction In the landmark case OSBORNE v. TWIN TOWN BOWL, Inc., the Supreme Court of Minnesota addressed critical...
Clarification of 'Policyholder' Definition in Uninsured Motorist Coverage: Carlson v. Allstate

Clarification of 'Policyholder' Definition in Uninsured Motorist Coverage: Carlson v. Allstate

Date: May 23, 2008
Clarification of 'Policyholder' Definition in Uninsured Motorist Coverage: Carlson v. Allstate Introduction Aaron R. Carlson was struck by an uninsured motorist while crossing Lyndale Avenue on foot,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert