Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Manthey v. Minnesota: Upholding the Plain Error Standard and Evidentiary Admissibility in Criminal Trials

Manthey v. Minnesota: Upholding the Plain Error Standard and Evidentiary Admissibility in Criminal Trials

Date: Mar 31, 2006
Manthey v. Minnesota: Upholding the Plain Error Standard and Evidentiary Admissibility in Criminal Trials Introduction Manthey v. Minnesota (711 N.W.2d 498) is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Right to Counsel in Postconviction Petitions: Insights from Deegan v. State of Minnesota

Right to Counsel in Postconviction Petitions: Insights from Deegan v. State of Minnesota

Date: Mar 24, 2006
Right to Counsel in Postconviction Petitions: Insights from Deegan v. State of Minnesota Introduction Daniel Deegan v. State of Minnesota, 711 N.W.2d 89 (Minn. 2006), is a landmark decision by the...
SCHROEDER v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY: Supreme Court of Minnesota's Landmark Decision on Vicarious Official Immunity

SCHROEDER v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY: Supreme Court of Minnesota's Landmark Decision on Vicarious Official Immunity

Date: Jan 27, 2006
SCHROEDER v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY: Supreme Court of Minnesota's Landmark Decision on Vicarious Official Immunity Introduction SCHROEDER v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Conviction Based on Sufficient Identification Evidence and Fair Trial Standards

Affirmation of Conviction Based on Sufficient Identification Evidence and Fair Trial Standards

Date: Jan 27, 2006
Affirmation of Conviction Based on Sufficient Identification Evidence and Fair Trial Standards Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. Charles Ellice Mems (708 N.W.2d 526, 2006),...
Cumulative Trial Errors and Fair Trial Rights: Insights from STATE v. Paul Penkaty, Sr.

Cumulative Trial Errors and Fair Trial Rights: Insights from STATE v. Paul Penkaty, Sr.

Date: Jan 11, 2006
Cumulative Trial Errors and Fair Trial Rights: Insights from STATE v. Paul Penkaty, Sr. Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of Minnesota v. Paul Penkaty, Sr., the Supreme Court of Minnesota...
Clarifying the Use of Prior Convictions for Impeachment and Accomplice Instructions in Minnesota: Insights from STATE v. SWANSON

Clarifying the Use of Prior Convictions for Impeachment and Accomplice Instructions in Minnesota: Insights from STATE v. SWANSON

Date: Jan 11, 2006
Clarifying the Use of Prior Convictions for Impeachment and Accomplice Instructions in Minnesota: Insights from State of Minnesota v. Clinton T. Swanson Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v....
Limits on Admitting Other-Acts Evidence in Sexual Misconduct Cases: Insights from State v. Ness

Limits on Admitting Other-Acts Evidence in Sexual Misconduct Cases: Insights from State v. Ness

Date: Jan 11, 2006
Limits on Admitting Other-Acts Evidence in Sexual Misconduct Cases: Insights from State v. Ness Introduction State v. Paul Kermit Ness, 707 N.W.2d 676 (Minn. 2006), is a pivotal case in Minnesota...
Child Pornography Possession as Included Offense: Minnesota Supreme Court in STATE v. BERTSCH

Child Pornography Possession as Included Offense: Minnesota Supreme Court in STATE v. BERTSCH

Date: Jan 11, 2006
Child Pornography Possession as Included Offense: Minnesota Supreme Court in STATE v. BERTSCH Introduction State of Minnesota v. Joshua Stafford Bertsch, 707 N.W.2d 660 (Minn. 2006), is a pivotal...
Decisive Ruling on Police Immunity: Ministerial Duties and the Limits of Qualified Immunity in Vehicular Pursuits

Decisive Ruling on Police Immunity: Ministerial Duties and the Limits of Qualified Immunity in Vehicular Pursuits

Date: Jan 11, 2006
Decisive Ruling on Police Immunity: Ministerial Duties and the Limits of Qualified Immunity in Vehicular Pursuits Introduction The case of Be v. rly MUMM, as Trustee for the Surviving Spouse and Next...
Limits on Judicial Estoppel in Sequential Prosecutions: Analysis of State v. Pendleton

Limits on Judicial Estoppel in Sequential Prosecutions: Analysis of State v. Pendleton

Date: Dec 9, 2005
Limits on Judicial Estoppel in Sequential Prosecutions: Analysis of State v. Pendleton Introduction State of Minnesota v. Robin Todd Pendleton, Jr., 706 N.W.2d 500 (Minn. 2005), is a pivotal case...
State v. Burbach: Reinforcing Reasonable Suspicion Standards for Vehicle Searches under Minnesota Constitution

State v. Burbach: Reinforcing Reasonable Suspicion Standards for Vehicle Searches under Minnesota Constitution

Date: Dec 2, 2005
State v. Burbach: Reinforcing Reasonable Suspicion Standards for Vehicle Searches under Minnesota Constitution Introduction State of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Peggy Louise Burbach, Appellant is a...
Palpable Unfitness and Termination of Parental Rights: Insights from In the Matter of the CHILDREN OF T.A.A.

Palpable Unfitness and Termination of Parental Rights: Insights from In the Matter of the CHILDREN OF T.A.A.

Date: Sep 7, 2005
Palpable Unfitness and Termination of Parental Rights: Insights from In the Matter of the CHILDREN OF T.A.A. Introduction The case In the Matter of the CHILDREN OF T.A.A. (702 N.W.2d 703) adjudicated...
Blakely Retroactivity in Sentencing: STATE v. HOUSTON

Blakely Retroactivity in Sentencing: STATE v. HOUSTON

Date: Aug 19, 2005
Blakely Retroactivity in Sentencing: STATE v. HOUSTON Introduction State of Minnesota v. Gerald E. Houston is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Minnesota on August 18, 2005. The case...
Supreme Court of Minnesota Upholds Election Timing Post-Redistricting

Supreme Court of Minnesota Upholds Election Timing Post-Redistricting

Date: Aug 12, 2005
Supreme Court of Minnesota Upholds Election Timing Post-Redistricting Introduction In the landmark case of Phyllis Kahn, et al. v. Susanne Griffin, City of Minneapolis Director of Elections, et al.,...
Limits on Judicial Inquiries and Impartiality: Insights from Minnesota Supreme Court's Decision in State v. Dorsey

Limits on Judicial Inquiries and Impartiality: Insights from Minnesota Supreme Court's Decision in State v. Dorsey

Date: Aug 5, 2005
Limits on Judicial Inquiries and Impartiality: Insights from Minnesota Supreme Court's Decision in State v. Dorsey Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Lorenzo Dorsey (701 N.W.2d 238)...
State v. Morton: Judicial Standards on Prosecutorial Conduct in Cross-Examination

State v. Morton: Judicial Standards on Prosecutorial Conduct in Cross-Examination

Date: Aug 5, 2005
State v. Morton: Judicial Standards on Prosecutorial Conduct in Cross-Examination Introduction The case of STATE of Minnesota v. Roger Allen Morton, decided by the Supreme Court of Minnesota on...
Affirmation of Convictions and Remand for Re-Adjudication in Palubicki v. State

Affirmation of Convictions and Remand for Re-Adjudication in Palubicki v. State

Date: Jul 29, 2005
Affirmation of Convictions and Remand for Re-Adjudication in Palubicki v. State Introduction The case of STATE of Minnesota v. Anthony John Palubicki (700 N.W.2d 476) was adjudicated by the Supreme...
Great Bodily Harm Jury Instructions Reversed: Analysis of State v. Moore

Great Bodily Harm Jury Instructions Reversed: Analysis of State v. Moore

Date: Jul 15, 2005
Great Bodily Harm Jury Instructions Reversed: Analysis of State v. Moore Introduction State v. Moore is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Minnesota on July 14, 2005. In this case, John...
Brian JAMES v. STATE of Minnesota: Establishing Timeliness in Plea Withdrawal Petitions

Brian JAMES v. STATE of Minnesota: Establishing Timeliness in Plea Withdrawal Petitions

Date: Jul 8, 2005
Brian JAMES v. STATE of Minnesota: Establishing Timeliness in Plea Withdrawal Petitions Introduction Brian JAMES v. STATE of Minnesota, 699 N.W.2d 723 (Minn. 2005), marks a significant judicial...
Affirmation of Life Without Possibility of Release Sentencing under Heinous Crime Statute Post Apprendi and Blakely

Affirmation of Life Without Possibility of Release Sentencing under Heinous Crime Statute Post Apprendi and Blakely

Date: Jun 24, 2005
Affirmation of Life Without Possibility of Release Sentencing under Heinous Crime Statute Post Apprendi and Blakely Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Pierre Leake (699 N.W.2d 312) marks...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert