Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Minnesota Supreme Court Reinforces Standards for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas in Raleigh v. State

Minnesota Supreme Court Reinforces Standards for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas in Raleigh v. State

Date: Feb 5, 2010
Minnesota Supreme Court Reinforces Standards for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas in Raleigh v. State Introduction State of Minnesota v. Rashad Arthur Raleigh is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Aiding and Abetting Murder under Gang-Related Statutes in McDaniel v. State

Affirmation of Aiding and Abetting Murder under Gang-Related Statutes in McDaniel v. State

Date: Jan 22, 2010
Affirmation of Aiding and Abetting Murder under Gang-Related Statutes in McDaniel v. State 1. Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Jonard Brandon McDaniel (777 N.W.2d 739, 2010), the Supreme Court...
Affirmation of Circumstantial Evidence Sufficiency in Burglary Convictions: An Analysis of STATE v. Stein

Affirmation of Circumstantial Evidence Sufficiency in Burglary Convictions: An Analysis of STATE v. Stein

Date: Jan 8, 2010
Affirmation of Circumstantial Evidence Sufficiency in Burglary Convictions: An Analysis of STATE v. Stein Introduction STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Jeffrey Brian Alphonse Stein, Appellant (776...
Clarifying the Treatment of Pension Benefits in Spousal Maintenance: LEE v. LEE Establishes New Precedents

Clarifying the Treatment of Pension Benefits in Spousal Maintenance: LEE v. LEE Establishes New Precedents

Date: Dec 4, 2009
Clarifying the Treatment of Pension Benefits in Spousal Maintenance: LEE v. LEE Establishes New Precedents Case: In re the Matter of Elaine Irene LEE, Appellant, v. Raymond Michael LEE, Respondent....
State of Minnesota v. Edwards: Affirming the Multiple-Victims Exception for Upward Sentencing Departures

State of Minnesota v. Edwards: Affirming the Multiple-Victims Exception for Upward Sentencing Departures

Date: Nov 20, 2009
State of Minnesota v. Edwards: Affirming the Multiple-Victims Exception for Upward Sentencing Departures Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Christopher Edwards (774 N.W.2d 596) addressed...
Admissibility of Gang Expert Testimony and Confrontation Clause in State v. Meng Vang

Admissibility of Gang Expert Testimony and Confrontation Clause in State v. Meng Vang

Date: Oct 30, 2009
Admissibility of Gang Expert Testimony and Confrontation Clause in State of Minnesota v. Meng Vang Introduction State of Minnesota v. Meng Vang (774 N.W.2d 566) is a significant judicial decision by...
Affirmation of Aiding and Abetting Under Gang Benefit Statute in State v. Charles Yang

Affirmation of Aiding and Abetting Under Gang Benefit Statute in State v. Charles Yang

Date: Oct 30, 2009
Affirmation of Aiding and Abetting Under Gang Benefit Statute in State of Minnesota v. Charles Yang Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Charles Yang (774 N.W.2d 539, Minnesota Supreme Court, 2009),...
Clarifying the Role of 'Particular Cruelty' as a Sentencing Aggravating Factor in Minnesota: Rourke v. State

Clarifying the Role of 'Particular Cruelty' as a Sentencing Aggravating Factor in Minnesota: Rourke v. State

Date: Oct 23, 2009
Clarifying the Role of 'Particular Cruelty' as a Sentencing Aggravating Factor in Minnesota: Rourke v. State Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Chad Allen Rourke (773 N.W.2d 913) presents...
State of Minnesota v. Fardan: Clarifying Jurisprudence on Miranda Waivers and Spreigl Evidence in Juvenile Felony Murder Cases

State of Minnesota v. Fardan: Clarifying Jurisprudence on Miranda Waivers and Spreigl Evidence in Juvenile Felony Murder Cases

Date: Oct 23, 2009
State of Minnesota v. Fardan: Clarifying Jurisprudence on Miranda Waivers and Spreigl Evidence in Juvenile Felony Murder Cases Introduction State of Minnesota v. Amani Jamalludin Fardan is a landmark...
Minnesota Supreme Court Affirms Life Without Possibility of Release Sentencing for Juvenile and Upholds Race-Neutral Jury Selection in Martin v. State

Minnesota Supreme Court Affirms Life Without Possibility of Release Sentencing for Juvenile and Upholds Race-Neutral Jury Selection in Martin v. State

Date: Oct 9, 2009
Minnesota Supreme Court Affirms Life Without Possibility of Release Sentencing for Juvenile and Upholds Race-Neutral Jury Selection in Martin v. State Introduction In the landmark case of State of...
STATE v. JONES: Clarifying Standards for Public Defender Eligibility and Waiver of Right to Counsel

STATE v. JONES: Clarifying Standards for Public Defender Eligibility and Waiver of Right to Counsel

Date: Sep 11, 2009
STATE v. JONES: Clarifying Standards for Public Defender Eligibility and Waiver of Right to Counsel Introduction State of Minnesota v. Don Jones is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Impeachment Evidence Admissibility and Sentencing Calculations in STATE v. WILLIAMS

Affirmation of Impeachment Evidence Admissibility and Sentencing Calculations in STATE v. WILLIAMS

Date: Sep 4, 2009
Affirmation of Impeachment Evidence Admissibility and Sentencing Calculations in STATE v. WILLIAMS Introduction State of Minnesota v. Antoine Delany Williams is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
MERS Foreclosure Precedent: Assignments of Debt Not Required to Be Recorded for Foreclosure by Advertisement in Minnesota

MERS Foreclosure Precedent: Assignments of Debt Not Required to Be Recorded for Foreclosure by Advertisement in Minnesota

Date: Aug 14, 2009
MERS Foreclosure Precedent: Assignments of Debt Not Required to Be Recorded for Foreclosure by Advertisement in Minnesota Introduction In the landmark case of Jackson et al. v. Mortgage Electronic...
Reinforcing Probable Cause Standards for Vehicle Searches: Insights from Ortega v. Minnesota

Reinforcing Probable Cause Standards for Vehicle Searches: Insights from Ortega v. Minnesota

Date: Jul 31, 2009
Reinforcing Probable Cause Standards for Vehicle Searches: Insights from Ortega v. Minnesota Introduction The case of STATE of Minnesota v. Danny Ortega, 770 N.W.2d 145 (Minn. 2009), serves as a...
Effective Assistance of Counsel and Judicial Measures Against Witness Intimidation: Insights from STATE of Minnesota v. De-Aunteze La

Effective Assistance of Counsel and Judicial Measures Against Witness Intimidation: Insights from STATE of Minnesota v. De-Aunteze La

Date: Jul 31, 2009
Effective Assistance of Counsel and Judicial Measures Against Witness Intimidation: Insights from STATE of Minnesota v. De-Aunteze Lavion Bobo Introduction The case of STATE of Minnesota v....
Rediscovering Discovery: Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Critical Impact in Pretrial Appeals

Rediscovering Discovery: Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Critical Impact in Pretrial Appeals

Date: Jul 23, 2009
Rediscovering Discovery: Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Critical Impact in Pretrial Appeals Introduction The Minnesota Supreme Court's decision in State of Minnesota v. Dale Lee Underdahl and...
Actual Malice in Employment Defamation: Insights from Bahr v. Boise Cascade Corporation

Actual Malice in Employment Defamation: Insights from Bahr v. Boise Cascade Corporation

Date: Jun 26, 2009
Actual Malice in Employment Defamation: Insights from Bahr v. Boise Cascade Corporation Introduction Bahr v. Boise Cascade Corporation is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Immunity for Court-Appointed Expert Witnesses under Minnesota Rule 706: Peterka v Dennis

Immunity for Court-Appointed Expert Witnesses under Minnesota Rule 706: Peterka v Dennis

Date: May 8, 2009
Immunity for Court-Appointed Expert Witnesses under Minnesota Rule 706: Peterka v. Dennis Introduction Peterka v. Dennis, 764 N.W.2d 829 (Minn. 2009), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Collateral Consequences Preserve the Justiciability of Appeals in Orders for Protection - Pechovnik v. Pechovnik

Collateral Consequences Preserve the Justiciability of Appeals in Orders for Protection - Pechovnik v. Pechovnik

Date: May 6, 2009
Collateral Consequences Preserve the Justiciability of Appeals in Orders for Protection - Pechovnik v. Pechovnik Introduction Pechovnik v. Pechovnik, 765 N.W.2d 94 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009), presents a...
Enforcement of Written Notice Requirements in UCC Contracts: Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.

Enforcement of Written Notice Requirements in UCC Contracts: Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.

Date: Apr 24, 2009
Enforcement of Written Notice Requirements in UCC Contracts: Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc. Introduction The case Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc., adjudicated by the Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert