Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

STATE of Minnesota v. Demetrius Dobbins: Affirming Standards for Prosecutorial Conduct and Jury Selection under Batson

STATE of Minnesota v. Demetrius Dobbins: Affirming Standards for Prosecutorial Conduct and Jury Selection under Batson

Date: Dec 29, 2006
STATE of Minnesota v. Demetrius Dobbins: Affirming Standards for Prosecutorial Conduct and Jury Selection under Batson Introduction STATE of Minnesota v. Demetrius Dobbins, 725 N.W.2d 492 (Minn....
Supreme Court of Minnesota Establishes Clarified Standards for Jury Instructions on Negligence and Causation in Wrongful Death Cases

Supreme Court of Minnesota Establishes Clarified Standards for Jury Instructions on Negligence and Causation in Wrongful Death Cases

Date: Nov 23, 2006
Supreme Court of Minnesota Establishes Clarified Standards for Jury Instructions on Negligence and Causation in Wrongful Death Cases Introduction In the landmark case of George v. Estate of Baker,...
State v. Chauvin: Affirming Inherent Judicial Authority to Impanel Sentencing Juries Post-Apprendi and Blakely

State v. Chauvin: Affirming Inherent Judicial Authority to Impanel Sentencing Juries Post-Apprendi and Blakely

Date: Oct 27, 2006
State v. Chauvin: Affirming Inherent Judicial Authority to Impanel Sentencing Juries Post-Apprendi and Blakely Introduction In the landmark case State v. Richard Raymond Chauvin, decided by the...
Enhancing Confrontation Rights: Minnesota v. Caulfield Establishes Stricter Standards for Testimonial Evidence

Enhancing Confrontation Rights: Minnesota v. Caulfield Establishes Stricter Standards for Testimonial Evidence

Date: Oct 6, 2006
Enhancing Confrontation Rights: Minnesota v. Caulfield Establishes Stricter Standards for Testimonial Evidence Introduction State of Minnesota v. Scott Caulfield, 722 N.W.2d 304 (Minn. 2006), is a...
Enhanced Admissibility Standards for Other Crimes Evidence and the Proper Handling of Batson Challenges: State of Minnesota v. Charden Gomez

Enhanced Admissibility Standards for Other Crimes Evidence and the Proper Handling of Batson Challenges: State of Minnesota v. Charden Gomez

Date: Sep 29, 2006
Enhanced Admissibility Standards for Other Crimes Evidence and the Proper Handling of Batson Challenges 1. Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Charden Gomez, 721 N.W.2d 871 (2006), the Supreme...
Employment Misconduct and Unemployment Benefits: Significant Adverse Impact Beyond Economic Value

Employment Misconduct and Unemployment Benefits: Significant Adverse Impact Beyond Economic Value

Date: Sep 20, 2006
Employment Misconduct and Unemployment Benefits: Significant Adverse Impact Beyond Economic Value Introduction The case of Sarah L. Skarhus v. Davanni's Inc. addressed critical issues surrounding the...
Minnesota Supreme Court Rules Employer's Failure to Verify Work-Release Employment Does Not Constitute Employee Misconduct for Unemployment Benefits

Minnesota Supreme Court Rules Employer's Failure to Verify Work-Release Employment Does Not Constitute Employee Misconduct for Unemployment Benefits

Date: Sep 15, 2006
Employer's Failure to Verify Work-Release Employment Does Not Constitute Employee Misconduct for Unemployment Benefits: Analysis of Cassandra J. JENKINS v. AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL Corp....
Establishing the Applicability of the Plain Error Doctrine to Unobjected-to Prosecutorial Misconduct in Minnesota: State v. Ramey

Establishing the Applicability of the Plain Error Doctrine to Unobjected-to Prosecutorial Misconduct in Minnesota: State v. Ramey

Date: Sep 15, 2006
Establishing the Applicability of the Plain Error Doctrine to Unobjected-to Prosecutorial Misconduct in Minnesota: State of Minnesota v. Scott Wade Ramey Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Scott...
Thompson v. State: Upholding Defendant’s Waiver of Jury Trial on Sentencing Enhancements

Thompson v. State: Upholding Defendant’s Waiver of Jury Trial on Sentencing Enhancements

Date: Sep 8, 2006
Thompson v. State: Upholding Defendant’s Waiver of Jury Trial on Sentencing Enhancements Introduction State of Minnesota v. Margaret Thompson, 720 N.W.2d 820 (Minn. 2006), is a pivotal case...
Cumulative Prosecutorial Misconduct and Evidentiary Errors: Analyzing STATE v. Mayhorn

Cumulative Prosecutorial Misconduct and Evidentiary Errors: Analyzing STATE v. Mayhorn

Date: Sep 1, 2006
Cumulative Prosecutorial Misconduct and Evidentiary Errors: Analyzing STATE v. Mayhorn Introduction STATE of Minnesota v. Troy Demetrius Mayhorn, 720 N.W.2d 776 (Minn. 2006), is a landmark judgment...
Admissibility of Identification Statements by Domestic Abuse Victims Under Hearsay Exceptions: Insights from State v. Andre Robinson

Admissibility of Identification Statements by Domestic Abuse Victims Under Hearsay Exceptions: Insights from State v. Andre Robinson

Date: Aug 5, 2006
Admissibility of Identification Statements by Domestic Abuse Victims Under Hearsay Exceptions: Insights from State v. Andre Robinson Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Andre Robinson,...
Imputing Intent of Corporate Agents: Insights from Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bloomington Steel Supply Co.

Imputing Intent of Corporate Agents: Insights from Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bloomington Steel Supply Co.

Date: Aug 4, 2006
Imputing Intent of Corporate Agents: Insights from Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bloomington Steel Supply Co. Introduction The case The Travelers Indemnity Company, et al. v. Bloomington Steel Supply...
State Farm v. Aquila Inc.: Interpretation of Statute of Repose in Utility Pipeline Installations

State Farm v. Aquila Inc.: Interpretation of Statute of Repose in Utility Pipeline Installations

Date: Aug 4, 2006
State Farm v. Aquila Inc.: Interpretation of Statute of Repose in Utility Pipeline Installations Introduction In State Farm Fire and Casualty et al. v. Aquila Inc. et al., the Supreme Court of...
Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Reasonable Suspicion Standard for Nighttime Searches in State v. Bourke

Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Reasonable Suspicion Standard for Nighttime Searches in State v. Bourke

Date: Aug 4, 2006
Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Reasonable Suspicion Standard for Nighttime Searches in State v. Bourke Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Richard Lowell Bourke, the Minnesota Supreme Court...
Admissibility of Prior Order for Protection Violations: Insights from STATE v. BELL

Admissibility of Prior Order for Protection Violations: Insights from STATE v. BELL

Date: Jul 28, 2006
Admissibility of Prior Order for Protection Violations: Insights from STATE v. BELL Introduction State of Minnesota v. Ronald James Bell (719 N.W.2d 635, 2006) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Reaffirmation of the Knaffla Rule in Denying Postconviction Relief: STATE v. SCHLEICHER

Reaffirmation of the Knaffla Rule in Denying Postconviction Relief: STATE v. SCHLEICHER

Date: Jul 28, 2006
Reaffirmation of the Knaffla Rule in Denying Postconviction Relief: STATE v. SCHLEICHER Introduction In the landmark case of STATE v. SCHLEICHER, decided by the Supreme Court of Minnesota on July 27,...
Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Statute of Limitations for Defective Real Property Improvements in Jaenty v. Northern States Power

Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Statute of Limitations for Defective Real Property Improvements in Jaenty v. Northern States Power

Date: Jul 28, 2006
Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Statute of Limitations for Defective Real Property Improvements in Jaenty v. Northern States Power Introduction In the landmark case of Jaenty, Inc. d/b/a Taco...
Limits and Protections on Gang Expert Testimony in Murder Cases: Insights from STATE v. Jackson

Limits and Protections on Gang Expert Testimony in Murder Cases: Insights from STATE v. Jackson

Date: Jun 2, 2006
Limits and Protections on Gang Expert Testimony in Murder Cases: Insights from STATE v. Jackson Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of Minnesota v. Tyree Leland Jackson (714 N.W.2d 681, 2006),...
Minnesota Supreme Court Reinforces Comprehensive Consideration of Cumulative Potential Effects in Environmental Impact Statements

Minnesota Supreme Court Reinforces Comprehensive Consideration of Cumulative Potential Effects in Environmental Impact Statements

Date: May 12, 2006
Minnesota Supreme Court Reinforces Comprehensive Consideration of Cumulative Potential Effects in Environmental Impact Statements Introduction In the landmark case of Citizens Advocating Responsible...
Reaffirmation of 'But For' Causation in Legal Malpractice for Transactional Matters

Reaffirmation of 'But For' Causation in Legal Malpractice for Transactional Matters

Date: Apr 7, 2006
Reaffirmation of 'But For' Causation in Legal Malpractice for Transactional Matters Introduction Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly Lindgren, Ltd., et al., 711 N.W.2d 811, is a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert