Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

State v. Burbach: Reinforcing Reasonable Suspicion Standards for Vehicle Searches under Minnesota Constitution

State v. Burbach: Reinforcing Reasonable Suspicion Standards for Vehicle Searches under Minnesota Constitution

Date: Dec 2, 2005
State v. Burbach: Reinforcing Reasonable Suspicion Standards for Vehicle Searches under Minnesota Constitution Introduction State of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Peggy Louise Burbach, Appellant is a...
Palpable Unfitness and Termination of Parental Rights: Insights from In the Matter of the CHILDREN OF T.A.A.

Palpable Unfitness and Termination of Parental Rights: Insights from In the Matter of the CHILDREN OF T.A.A.

Date: Sep 7, 2005
Palpable Unfitness and Termination of Parental Rights: Insights from In the Matter of the CHILDREN OF T.A.A. Introduction The case In the Matter of the CHILDREN OF T.A.A. (702 N.W.2d 703) adjudicated...
Blakely Retroactivity in Sentencing: STATE v. HOUSTON

Blakely Retroactivity in Sentencing: STATE v. HOUSTON

Date: Aug 19, 2005
Blakely Retroactivity in Sentencing: STATE v. HOUSTON Introduction State of Minnesota v. Gerald E. Houston is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Minnesota on August 18, 2005. The case...
Supreme Court of Minnesota Upholds Election Timing Post-Redistricting

Supreme Court of Minnesota Upholds Election Timing Post-Redistricting

Date: Aug 12, 2005
Supreme Court of Minnesota Upholds Election Timing Post-Redistricting Introduction In the landmark case of Phyllis Kahn, et al. v. Susanne Griffin, City of Minneapolis Director of Elections, et al.,...
Limits on Judicial Inquiries and Impartiality: Insights from Minnesota Supreme Court's Decision in State v. Dorsey

Limits on Judicial Inquiries and Impartiality: Insights from Minnesota Supreme Court's Decision in State v. Dorsey

Date: Aug 5, 2005
Limits on Judicial Inquiries and Impartiality: Insights from Minnesota Supreme Court's Decision in State v. Dorsey Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Lorenzo Dorsey (701 N.W.2d 238)...
State v. Morton: Judicial Standards on Prosecutorial Conduct in Cross-Examination

State v. Morton: Judicial Standards on Prosecutorial Conduct in Cross-Examination

Date: Aug 5, 2005
State v. Morton: Judicial Standards on Prosecutorial Conduct in Cross-Examination Introduction The case of STATE of Minnesota v. Roger Allen Morton, decided by the Supreme Court of Minnesota on...
Affirmation of Convictions and Remand for Re-Adjudication in Palubicki v. State

Affirmation of Convictions and Remand for Re-Adjudication in Palubicki v. State

Date: Jul 29, 2005
Affirmation of Convictions and Remand for Re-Adjudication in Palubicki v. State Introduction The case of STATE of Minnesota v. Anthony John Palubicki (700 N.W.2d 476) was adjudicated by the Supreme...
Great Bodily Harm Jury Instructions Reversed: Analysis of State v. Moore

Great Bodily Harm Jury Instructions Reversed: Analysis of State v. Moore

Date: Jul 15, 2005
Great Bodily Harm Jury Instructions Reversed: Analysis of State v. Moore Introduction State v. Moore is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Minnesota on July 14, 2005. In this case, John...
Brian JAMES v. STATE of Minnesota: Establishing Timeliness in Plea Withdrawal Petitions

Brian JAMES v. STATE of Minnesota: Establishing Timeliness in Plea Withdrawal Petitions

Date: Jul 8, 2005
Brian JAMES v. STATE of Minnesota: Establishing Timeliness in Plea Withdrawal Petitions Introduction Brian JAMES v. STATE of Minnesota, 699 N.W.2d 723 (Minn. 2005), marks a significant judicial...
Affirmation of Life Without Possibility of Release Sentencing under Heinous Crime Statute Post Apprendi and Blakely

Affirmation of Life Without Possibility of Release Sentencing under Heinous Crime Statute Post Apprendi and Blakely

Date: Jun 24, 2005
Affirmation of Life Without Possibility of Release Sentencing under Heinous Crime Statute Post Apprendi and Blakely Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Pierre Leake (699 N.W.2d 312) marks...
Reasonable Suspicion Required for Drug-Detection Dog Sniffs Outside Storage Units: STATE v. CARTER

Reasonable Suspicion Required for Drug-Detection Dog Sniffs Outside Storage Units: STATE v. CARTER

Date: Jun 10, 2005
Reasonable Suspicion Required for Drug-Detection Dog Sniffs Outside Storage Units: STATE v. CARTER Introduction State of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Andre Lashon Carter, Appellant, 697 N.W.2d 199,...
State of Minnesota v. Blanche: Affirming Batson and Bruton Principles in Joint Trials

State of Minnesota v. Blanche: Affirming Batson and Bruton Principles in Joint Trials

Date: May 27, 2005
State of Minnesota v. Blanche: Affirming Batson and Bruton Principles in Joint Trials Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. Blanche, the Supreme Court of Minnesota addressed...
Reaffirmation of Harmless Error Doctrine in Confrontation Clause Violations: STATE v. COURTNEY

Reaffirmation of Harmless Error Doctrine in Confrontation Clause Violations: STATE v. COURTNEY

Date: May 13, 2005
Reaffirmation of Harmless Error Doctrine in Confrontation Clause Violations: State of Minnesota v. Antoine Edward Eugene Courtney Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Antoine Edward Eugene...
State v. Modtland: Reinforcing Austin’s Three-Factor Requirement in Probation Revocations

State v. Modtland: Reinforcing Austin’s Three-Factor Requirement in Probation Revocations

Date: May 13, 2005
State v. Modtland: Reinforcing Austin’s Three-Factor Requirement in Probation Revocations Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. Patrick James Modtland, 695 N.W.2d 602 (Minn....
Reinforcement of Lesser-Included Offense Instruction Standards in Minnesota: State v. Dahlin

Reinforcement of Lesser-Included Offense Instruction Standards in Minnesota: State v. Dahlin

Date: May 13, 2005
Reinforcement of Lesser-Included Offense Instruction Standards in Minnesota: State v. Dahlin Introduction State of Minnesota v. Michael James Dahlin, 695 N.W.2d 588 (2005), adjudicated by the Supreme...
State v. DeRosier: Upholding Hearsay Exceptions and Prosecutorial Conduct in First-Degree Murder Conviction

State v. DeRosier: Upholding Hearsay Exceptions and Prosecutorial Conduct in First-Degree Murder Conviction

Date: Apr 22, 2005
State v. DeRosier: Upholding Hearsay Exceptions and Prosecutorial Conduct in First-Degree Murder Conviction Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. Joshua John DeRosier, the...
State v. Washington: Establishing Precedents on the Admissibility of Spreigl Evidence in Sexual Conduct Cases

State v. Washington: Establishing Precedents on the Admissibility of Spreigl Evidence in Sexual Conduct Cases

Date: Mar 18, 2005
State v. Washington: Establishing Precedents on the Admissibility of Spreigl Evidence in Sexual Conduct Cases Introduction State of Minnesota v. Lionel Lee Washington is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Admissibility of Voicemail Confessions and Identifying Photographs Under Minn. R. Evid. 403: State v. Schulz Commentary

Admissibility of Voicemail Confessions and Identifying Photographs Under Minn. R. Evid. 403: State v. Schulz Commentary

Date: Feb 4, 2005
Admissibility of Voicemail Confessions and Identifying Photographs Under Minn. R. Evid. 403: State v. Schulz Commentary Introduction State of Minnesota v. Morgan Michael Schulz (691 N.W.2d 474, 2005)...
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Postconviction Appeals and Defendants' Rights During Jury Communications: Insights from A.C. Ford v. State of Minnesota

Jurisdictional Boundaries in Postconviction Appeals and Defendants' Rights During Jury Communications: Insights from A.C. Ford v. State of Minnesota

Date: Jan 14, 2005
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Postconviction Appeals and Defendants' Rights During Jury Communications: Insights from A.C. Ford v. State of Minnesota Introduction The case of A.C. Ford v. State of...
Disbarment for Failure to Notify and Felony Conviction: In re Alfred Perez, Jr.

Disbarment for Failure to Notify and Felony Conviction: In re Alfred Perez, Jr.

Date: Nov 19, 2004
Disbarment for Failure to Notify and Felony Conviction: In re Alfred Perez, Jr. Introduction The case of In re Peterson for Disciplinary Action Against Alfred Perez, Jr. serves as a pivotal example...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert