Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Jaworski v. Michigan: Affirming Comprehensive Rights Advisory in Guilty Pleas Post-Boykin Introduction PEOPLE v. JAWORSKI is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on March 9,...
Judicial Oversight on Plea Amendments: Insights from Genesee Prosecutor v. Genesee Circuit Judge Introduction In the landmark case of Genesee Prosecutor v. Genesee Circuit Judge (386 Mich. 672,...
Michigan Supreme Court Declares 60-Day Notice Requirement Unconstitutional for Minor Plaintiffs Introduction The case of REICH v. STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT, KNAPP v. State Highway Department, and...
Reaffirming Fair Trial Standards: The Landmark Decision in People v. Robinson Introduction People v. Robinson (386 Mich. 551), a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan in 1972, addresses...
Sentencing Equity in Criminal Appeals: A Comprehensive Analysis of PEOPLE v. SNOW Introduction PEOPLE v. SNOW (386 Mich. 586) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan that addresses...
Scope and Limits of Judicial Review Under Michigan Constitution Art 6, § 28: Viculin v. Department of Civil Service Introduction Viculin v. Department of Civil Service (386 Mich. 375) is a landmark...
Reaffirming the Necessity of Mutuality in Collateral Estoppel: Howell v. Vito’s Trucking and Excavating Co. Introduction Howell v. Vito’s Trucking and Excavating Company, 386 Mich. 37 (1971), is a...
Distinction Between State and Private Institutions in MCLA § 330.21: STOWERS v. WOLODZKO Introduction STOWERS v. WOLODZKO, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on November 9, 1971, addresses...
POMPEY v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION: Establishing Judicial Remedies for Racial Discrimination in Employment Introduction POMPEY v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION is a landmark case decided by the...
SIFERS v. HOREN: Broad Interpretation of 'Transaction of Any Business' in Michigan's Long-Arm Jurisdiction Introduction SIFERS v. HOREN (385 Mich. 195) is a pivotal case in the Supreme Court of...
Michigan Supreme Court's Ruling on Proposal C: Balancing Public Funding Restrictions and Constitutional Rights Introduction The landmark case, Traverse City School District v. Attorney General (384...
Affirmation of Plea Validity in PEOPLE v. WINEGAR: Establishing Procedural Safeguards Introduction PEOPLE v. WINEGAR, 380 Mich. 719 (1968), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Waiver of Right to Counsel in Guilty Pleas: Insights from People v. Dunn Introduction People v. Dunn, 380 Mich. 693 (1968), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan that delves into...
Duty of Care in Contractor-Inspector Relationships: Insights from CLARK v. DALMAN Introduction CLARK v. DALMAN, 379 Mich. 251 (1967), is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan....
Misidentification and Jury Instruction Errors in PEOPLE v. LIGGETT: A New Precedent on Fair Trial Standards Introduction PEOPLE v. LIGGETT, 378 Mich. 706 (1967), is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Separation of Tax Types and Constitutional Compliance: Continental Motors Corp. v. Township of Muskegon Introduction Continental Motors Corporation v. Township of Muskegon is a pivotal case decided...
Admissibility of Illegally Seized Evidence: People v. Ferguson Sets Precedent on Trial Motions Introduction People v. Ferguson, 376 Mich. 90 (1965), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan,...
Enhancing Summary Judgment Standards in Libel Cases: Insights from DURANT v. STAHLIN Introduction DURANT v. STAHLIN, Appeal in re Van Dusen, Elliott, Romney (375 Mich. 628), decided by the Supreme...
Piercefield v. Remington Arms Company, Inc.: Expanding Product Liability Beyond Privity Introduction Piercefield v. Remington Arms Company, Inc. is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Restricting the Doctrine of Assumption of Risk to Employment Relationships in Michigan: FELGNER v. ANDERSON Introduction FELGNER v. ANDERSON, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on March 1,...