Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

Michigan Supreme Court's Ruling on Proposal C: Balancing Public Funding Restrictions and Constitutional Rights

Michigan Supreme Court's Ruling on Proposal C: Balancing Public Funding Restrictions and Constitutional Rights

Date: Apr 1, 1971
Michigan Supreme Court's Ruling on Proposal C: Balancing Public Funding Restrictions and Constitutional Rights Introduction The landmark case, Traverse City School District v. Attorney General (384...
Affirmation of Plea Validity in PEOPLE v. WINEGAR: Establishing Procedural Safeguards

Affirmation of Plea Validity in PEOPLE v. WINEGAR: Establishing Procedural Safeguards

Date: May 9, 1968
Affirmation of Plea Validity in PEOPLE v. WINEGAR: Establishing Procedural Safeguards Introduction PEOPLE v. WINEGAR, 380 Mich. 719 (1968), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Waiver of Right to Counsel in Guilty Pleas: Insights from People v. Dunn

Waiver of Right to Counsel in Guilty Pleas: Insights from People v. Dunn

Date: May 9, 1968
Waiver of Right to Counsel in Guilty Pleas: Insights from People v. Dunn Introduction People v. Dunn, 380 Mich. 693 (1968), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan that delves into...
Duty of Care in Contractor-Inspector Relationships: Insights from CLARK v. DALMAN

Duty of Care in Contractor-Inspector Relationships: Insights from CLARK v. DALMAN

Date: Jun 7, 1967
Duty of Care in Contractor-Inspector Relationships: Insights from CLARK v. DALMAN Introduction CLARK v. DALMAN, 379 Mich. 251 (1967), is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan....
Misidentification and Jury Instruction Errors in PEOPLE v. LIGGETT: A New Precedent on Fair Trial Standards

Misidentification and Jury Instruction Errors in PEOPLE v. LIGGETT: A New Precedent on Fair Trial Standards

Date: Mar 8, 1967
Misidentification and Jury Instruction Errors in PEOPLE v. LIGGETT: A New Precedent on Fair Trial Standards Introduction PEOPLE v. LIGGETT, 378 Mich. 706 (1967), is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Separation of Tax Types and Constitutional Compliance: Continental Motors Corp. v. Township of Muskegon

Separation of Tax Types and Constitutional Compliance: Continental Motors Corp. v. Township of Muskegon

Date: Jul 14, 1965
Separation of Tax Types and Constitutional Compliance: Continental Motors Corp. v. Township of Muskegon Introduction Continental Motors Corporation v. Township of Muskegon is a pivotal case decided...
Admissibility of Illegally Seized Evidence: People v. Ferguson Sets Precedent on Trial Motions

Admissibility of Illegally Seized Evidence: People v. Ferguson Sets Precedent on Trial Motions

Date: Jun 8, 1965
Admissibility of Illegally Seized Evidence: People v. Ferguson Sets Precedent on Trial Motions Introduction People v. Ferguson, 376 Mich. 90 (1965), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan,...
Enhancing Summary Judgment Standards in Libel Cases: Insights from DURANT v. STAHLIN

Enhancing Summary Judgment Standards in Libel Cases: Insights from DURANT v. STAHLIN

Date: Jun 8, 1965
Enhancing Summary Judgment Standards in Libel Cases: Insights from DURANT v. STAHLIN Introduction DURANT v. STAHLIN, Appeal in re Van Dusen, Elliott, Romney (375 Mich. 628), decided by the Supreme...
Piercefield v. Remington Arms Company, Inc.: Expanding Product Liability Beyond Privity

Piercefield v. Remington Arms Company, Inc.: Expanding Product Liability Beyond Privity

Date: Mar 2, 1965
Piercefield v. Remington Arms Company, Inc.: Expanding Product Liability Beyond Privity Introduction Piercefield v. Remington Arms Company, Inc. is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Restricting the Doctrine of Assumption of Risk to Employment Relationships in Michigan: FELGNER v. ANDERSON

Restricting the Doctrine of Assumption of Risk to Employment Relationships in Michigan: FELGNER v. ANDERSON

Date: Mar 2, 1965
Restricting the Doctrine of Assumption of Risk to Employment Relationships in Michigan: FELGNER v. ANDERSON Introduction FELGNER v. ANDERSON, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on March 1,...
Separate Determination of Voluntariness of Confessions: Impact of PEOPLE v. WALKER

Separate Determination of Voluntariness of Confessions: Impact of PEOPLE v. WALKER

Date: Jan 6, 1965
Separate Determination of Voluntariness of Confessions: Impact of PEOPLE v. WALKER Introduction PEOPLE v. WALKER, 374 Mich. 331 (1965), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan that...
Negligent Entrustment of Automobiles Affirmed Despite Statutory Liability: PERIN v. PEULER

Negligent Entrustment of Automobiles Affirmed Despite Statutory Liability: PERIN v. PEULER

Date: Sep 3, 1964
Negligent Entrustment of Automobiles Affirmed Despite Statutory Liability: PERIN v. PEULER Introduction PERIN v. PEULER is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on September...
Affirmation of Qualified Privilege in Defamation: The Nuyen v. Slater Precedent

Affirmation of Qualified Privilege in Defamation: The Nuyen v. Slater Precedent

Date: Apr 7, 1964
Affirmation of Qualified Privilege in Defamation: The Nuyen v. Slater Precedent Introduction Nuyen v. Slater, 372 Mich. 654 (1964), is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan that...
Ensuring Voluntariness in Guilty Pleas: Analysis of In re VALLE (364 Mich. 471)

Ensuring Voluntariness in Guilty Pleas: Analysis of In re VALLE (364 Mich. 471)

Date: Sep 24, 1961
Ensuring Voluntariness in Guilty Pleas: Analysis of In re VALLE (364 Mich. 471) 1. Introduction In re VALLE (364 Mich. 471), decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on September 23, 1961, addresses...
Williams v. City of Detroit: Upholding Governmental Immunity and Separation of Powers

Williams v. City of Detroit: Upholding Governmental Immunity and Separation of Powers

Date: Sep 23, 1961
Williams v. City of Detroit: Upholding Governmental Immunity and Separation of Powers Introduction Williams v. City of Detroit (364 Mich. 231, 1961) is a seminal case in Michigan's legal history,...
Abolition of Charitable Immunity for Nonprofit Hospitals in Michigan

Abolition of Charitable Immunity for Nonprofit Hospitals in Michigan

Date: Sep 16, 1960
Abolition of Charitable Immunity for Nonprofit Hospitals in Michigan Introduction Parker v. Port Huron Hospital is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan, rendered on September 15,...
Recognition of Spousal Loss of Consortium Claims in Michigan Law

Recognition of Spousal Loss of Consortium Claims in Michigan Law

Date: Feb 26, 1960
Recognition of Spousal Loss of Consortium Claims in Michigan Law Introduction Montgomery v. Stephan is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on February 25, 1960. The case involves...
Manufacturer Liability and the Scope of Duty to Warn: An Analysis of Comstock v. General Motors Corporation

Manufacturer Liability and the Scope of Duty to Warn: An Analysis of Comstock v. General Motors Corporation

Date: Nov 26, 1959
Manufacturer Liability and the Scope of Duty to Warn: An Analysis of Comstock v. General Motors Corporation Introduction Comstock v. General Motors Corporation, 358 Mich. 163 (1959), adjudicated by...
Division of Municipal Assets and Liabilities in Annexation: Insights from CITY OF LANSING v. TOWNSHIP OF LANSING

Division of Municipal Assets and Liabilities in Annexation: Insights from CITY OF LANSING v. TOWNSHIP OF LANSING

Date: Jul 14, 1959
Division of Municipal Assets and Liabilities in Annexation: Insights from CITY OF LANSING v. TOWNSHIP OF LANSING Introduction CITY OF LANSING v. TOWNSHIP OF LANSING, 356 Mich. 641 (1959), is a...
Mitcham v. City of Detroit: Establishing Circumstantial Negligence in Public Transportation Cases

Mitcham v. City of Detroit: Establishing Circumstantial Negligence in Public Transportation Cases

Date: Jan 13, 1959
Mitcham v. City of Detroit: Establishing Circumstantial Negligence in Public Transportation Cases Introduction Mitcham v. City of Detroit, 355 Mich. 182 (1959), is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert