Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Elimination of Privity Requirement in Abstracter Liability: Insights from WILLIAMS v POLGAR Introduction WILLIAMS v POLGAR, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on February 14, 1974, marks a...
Residency and Retirement Plans Recognized as Mandatory Subjects of Collective Bargaining under PERA Introduction Detroit Police Officers Association v. City of Detroit, 391 Mich. 44 (1974), is a...
Self-Defense and Felonious Homicide: Analyzing PEOPLE v JACKSON Introduction PEOPLE v JACKSON is a landmark judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of Michigan on December 18, 1973. This case...
Establishing Boundaries: Plain View Doctrine and Prosecutorial Conduct in People v Whalen Introduction People v. Whalen is a pivotal 1973 decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan that addresses...
Revisiting the Bounds of Guilty Pleas and Effective Counsel: An Analysis of PEOPLE v. GINTHER Introduction PEOPLE v. GINTHER, 390 Mich. 436 (Mich. 1973), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Admissibility of Antecedent Sexual Acts in Assault with Intent to Rape: Analysis of PEOPLE v DERMARTZEX Introduction The case of PEOPLE v DERMARTZEX (390 Mich. 410) adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Affirmative Defense Amendments and Judicial Discretion: Insights from BEN P. FYKE SONS v GUNTER COMPANY Introduction The case of BEN P. FYKE SONS v. GUNTER COMPANY, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Protecting the Right to Silence during Arrest: PEOPLE v BOBO Introduction PEOPLE v. BOBO, 390 Mich. 355 (1973), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan addressing the constitutional...
Establishing the "Same Transaction Test" for Double Jeopardy in Michigan – Analysis of People v White Introduction People v White, 390 Mich. 245 (1973), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
PEOPLE v. CHISM: Upholding Speedy Trial Rights and Admissibility of Prior Acts Evidence Introduction PEOPLE v. CHISM (390 Mich. 104), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on October 17, 1973,...
Objective Entrapment Established in PEOPLE v. TURNER (390 Mich. 7) Introduction PEOPLE v. TURNER is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan decided on September 18, 1973. The case...
People v Falkner: Establishing Limits on Cross-Examination of Witnesses’ Prior Arrests Introduction People v Falkner (389 Mich. 682), decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on July 25, 1973, is a...
Use of Juvenile Records in Adult Sentencing: People v McFarlin, People v Rabb, and People v Loomis Introduction The cases of People v McFarlin, People v Rabb, and People v Loomis, consolidated and...
Michigan Supreme Court Upholds PA 294's Substantive Provisions but Finds Procedural Flaws in Statutory Amendments Introduction The Michigan Supreme Court delivered an advisory opinion on the...
Establishing Evidentiary Standards for Summary Judgment under the Dramshop Act: Insights from Rizzo v Kretschmer Introduction The case of Rizzo v Kretschmer, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
People v Adams: Clarifying the Asportation Requirement in Michigan's Kidnapping Statute Introduction In the landmark case of People v Adams (389 Mich. 222), the Supreme Court of Michigan addressed...
PEOPLE v. ANDERSON: New Precedent on Counsel Presence in Photographic Lineups Introduction PEOPLE v. ANDERSON (389 Mich. 155), decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on March 27, 1973, addresses...
Double Jeopardy Protections Reinforced in PEOPLE v. GRIMMETT (1972) Introduction PEOPLE v. GRIMMETT, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on November 29, 1972, is a landmark case that...
Establishing Two-Thirds Ratio for Indeterminate Sentencing: People v. Tanner Introduction People v. Tanner, 387 Mich. 683 (1972), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan that...
Michigan Supreme Court Rules 20-Year Mandatory Minimum for Marijuana Sale as Cruel and Unusual Punishment Introduction People v. Lorentzen, 387 Mich. 167 (1972), is a landmark decision by the Supreme...