Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

Elimination of Privity Requirement in Abstracter Liability: Insights from WILLIAMS v POLGAR

Elimination of Privity Requirement in Abstracter Liability: Insights from WILLIAMS v POLGAR

Date: Feb 15, 1974
Elimination of Privity Requirement in Abstracter Liability: Insights from WILLIAMS v POLGAR Introduction WILLIAMS v POLGAR, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on February 14, 1974, marks a...
Residency and Retirement Plans Recognized as Mandatory Subjects of Collective Bargaining under PERA

Residency and Retirement Plans Recognized as Mandatory Subjects of Collective Bargaining under PERA

Date: Feb 15, 1974
Residency and Retirement Plans Recognized as Mandatory Subjects of Collective Bargaining under PERA Introduction Detroit Police Officers Association v. City of Detroit, 391 Mich. 44 (1974), is a...
Legal Commentary on PEOPLE v JACKSON: Self-Defense and Felonious Homicide

Legal Commentary on PEOPLE v JACKSON: Self-Defense and Felonious Homicide

Date: Dec 19, 1973
Self-Defense and Felonious Homicide: Analyzing PEOPLE v JACKSON Introduction PEOPLE v JACKSON is a landmark judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of Michigan on December 18, 1973. This case...
Establishing Boundaries: Plain View Doctrine and Prosecutorial Conduct in People v Whalen

Establishing Boundaries: Plain View Doctrine and Prosecutorial Conduct in People v Whalen

Date: Dec 19, 1973
Establishing Boundaries: Plain View Doctrine and Prosecutorial Conduct in People v Whalen Introduction People v. Whalen is a pivotal 1973 decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan that addresses...
Revisiting the Bounds of Guilty Pleas and Effective Counsel: An Analysis of PEOPLE v. GINTHER

Revisiting the Bounds of Guilty Pleas and Effective Counsel: An Analysis of PEOPLE v. GINTHER

Date: Dec 19, 1973
Revisiting the Bounds of Guilty Pleas and Effective Counsel: An Analysis of PEOPLE v. GINTHER Introduction PEOPLE v. GINTHER, 390 Mich. 436 (Mich. 1973), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Admissibility of Antecedent Sexual Acts in Assault with Intent to Rape: Analysis of PEOPLE v DERMARTZEX

Admissibility of Antecedent Sexual Acts in Assault with Intent to Rape: Analysis of PEOPLE v DERMARTZEX

Date: Dec 19, 1973
Admissibility of Antecedent Sexual Acts in Assault with Intent to Rape: Analysis of PEOPLE v DERMARTZEX Introduction The case of PEOPLE v DERMARTZEX (390 Mich. 410) adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Affirmative Defense Amendments and Judicial Discretion: Insights from BEN P. FYKE SONS v GUNTER COMPANY

Affirmative Defense Amendments and Judicial Discretion: Insights from BEN P. FYKE SONS v GUNTER COMPANY

Date: Dec 19, 1973
Affirmative Defense Amendments and Judicial Discretion: Insights from BEN P. FYKE SONS v GUNTER COMPANY Introduction The case of BEN P. FYKE SONS v. GUNTER COMPANY, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Protecting the Right to Silence during Arrest: PEOPLE v BOBO

Protecting the Right to Silence during Arrest: PEOPLE v BOBO

Date: Nov 22, 1973
Protecting the Right to Silence during Arrest: PEOPLE v BOBO Introduction PEOPLE v. BOBO, 390 Mich. 355 (1973), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan addressing the constitutional...
Establishing the "Same Transaction Test" for Double Jeopardy in Michigan – Analysis of People v White

Establishing the "Same Transaction Test" for Double Jeopardy in Michigan – Analysis of People v White

Date: Nov 21, 1973
Establishing the "Same Transaction Test" for Double Jeopardy in Michigan – Analysis of People v White Introduction People v White, 390 Mich. 245 (1973), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
PEOPLE v. CHISM: Upholding Speedy Trial Rights and Admissibility of Prior Acts Evidence

PEOPLE v. CHISM: Upholding Speedy Trial Rights and Admissibility of Prior Acts Evidence

Date: Oct 18, 1973
PEOPLE v. CHISM: Upholding Speedy Trial Rights and Admissibility of Prior Acts Evidence Introduction PEOPLE v. CHISM (390 Mich. 104), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on October 17, 1973,...
Objective Entrapment Established in PEOPLE v. TURNER

Objective Entrapment Established in PEOPLE v. TURNER

Date: Sep 19, 1973
Objective Entrapment Established in PEOPLE v. TURNER (390 Mich. 7) Introduction PEOPLE v. TURNER is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan decided on September 18, 1973. The case...
People v Falkner: Establishing Limits on Cross-Examination of Witnesses’ Prior Arrests

People v Falkner: Establishing Limits on Cross-Examination of Witnesses’ Prior Arrests

Date: Jul 26, 1973
People v Falkner: Establishing Limits on Cross-Examination of Witnesses’ Prior Arrests Introduction People v Falkner (389 Mich. 682), decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on July 25, 1973, is a...
Use of Juvenile Records in Adult Sentencing: People v McFarlin, People v Rabb, and People v Loomis

Use of Juvenile Records in Adult Sentencing: People v McFarlin, People v Rabb, and People v Loomis

Date: Jun 29, 1973
Use of Juvenile Records in Adult Sentencing: People v McFarlin, People v Rabb, and People v Loomis Introduction The cases of People v McFarlin, People v Rabb, and People v Loomis, consolidated and...
Michigan Supreme Court Upholds PA 294's Substantive Provisions but Finds Procedural Flaws in Statutory Amendments

Michigan Supreme Court Upholds PA 294's Substantive Provisions but Finds Procedural Flaws in Statutory Amendments

Date: Jun 19, 1973
Michigan Supreme Court Upholds PA 294's Substantive Provisions but Finds Procedural Flaws in Statutory Amendments Introduction The Michigan Supreme Court delivered an advisory opinion on the...
Establishing Evidentiary Standards for Summary Judgment under the Dramshop Act: Insights from Rizzo v Kretschmer

Establishing Evidentiary Standards for Summary Judgment under the Dramshop Act: Insights from Rizzo v Kretschmer

Date: May 26, 1973
Establishing Evidentiary Standards for Summary Judgment under the Dramshop Act: Insights from Rizzo v Kretschmer Introduction The case of Rizzo v Kretschmer, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
People v Adams: Clarifying the Asportation Requirement in Michigan's Kidnapping Statute

People v Adams: Clarifying the Asportation Requirement in Michigan's Kidnapping Statute

Date: Mar 28, 1973
People v Adams: Clarifying the Asportation Requirement in Michigan's Kidnapping Statute Introduction In the landmark case of People v Adams (389 Mich. 222), the Supreme Court of Michigan addressed...
PEOPLE v. ANDERSON: New Precedent on Counsel Presence in Photographic Lineups

PEOPLE v. ANDERSON: New Precedent on Counsel Presence in Photographic Lineups

Date: Mar 28, 1973
PEOPLE v. ANDERSON: New Precedent on Counsel Presence in Photographic Lineups Introduction PEOPLE v. ANDERSON (389 Mich. 155), decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on March 27, 1973, addresses...
Double Jeopardy Protections Reinforced in PEOPLE v. GRIMMETT (1972)

Double Jeopardy Protections Reinforced in PEOPLE v. GRIMMETT (1972)

Date: Nov 30, 1972
Double Jeopardy Protections Reinforced in PEOPLE v. GRIMMETT (1972) Introduction PEOPLE v. GRIMMETT, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on November 29, 1972, is a landmark case that...
Establishing Two-Thirds Ratio for Indeterminate Sentencing: People v. Tanner

Establishing Two-Thirds Ratio for Indeterminate Sentencing: People v. Tanner

Date: Jul 27, 1972
Establishing Two-Thirds Ratio for Indeterminate Sentencing: People v. Tanner Introduction People v. Tanner, 387 Mich. 683 (1972), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan that...
Michigan Supreme Court Rules 20-Year Mandatory Minimum for Marijuana Sale as Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Michigan Supreme Court Rules 20-Year Mandatory Minimum for Marijuana Sale as Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Date: Mar 10, 1972
Michigan Supreme Court Rules 20-Year Mandatory Minimum for Marijuana Sale as Cruel and Unusual Punishment Introduction People v. Lorentzen, 387 Mich. 167 (1972), is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert