Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

Objective Entrapment Established in PEOPLE v. TURNER

Objective Entrapment Established in PEOPLE v. TURNER

Date: Sep 19, 1973
Objective Entrapment Established in PEOPLE v. TURNER (390 Mich. 7) Introduction PEOPLE v. TURNER is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan decided on September 18, 1973. The case...
People v Falkner: Establishing Limits on Cross-Examination of Witnesses’ Prior Arrests

People v Falkner: Establishing Limits on Cross-Examination of Witnesses’ Prior Arrests

Date: Jul 26, 1973
People v Falkner: Establishing Limits on Cross-Examination of Witnesses’ Prior Arrests Introduction People v Falkner (389 Mich. 682), decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on July 25, 1973, is a...
Use of Juvenile Records in Adult Sentencing: People v McFarlin, People v Rabb, and People v Loomis

Use of Juvenile Records in Adult Sentencing: People v McFarlin, People v Rabb, and People v Loomis

Date: Jun 29, 1973
Use of Juvenile Records in Adult Sentencing: People v McFarlin, People v Rabb, and People v Loomis Introduction The cases of People v McFarlin, People v Rabb, and People v Loomis, consolidated and...
Michigan Supreme Court Upholds PA 294's Substantive Provisions but Finds Procedural Flaws in Statutory Amendments

Michigan Supreme Court Upholds PA 294's Substantive Provisions but Finds Procedural Flaws in Statutory Amendments

Date: Jun 19, 1973
Michigan Supreme Court Upholds PA 294's Substantive Provisions but Finds Procedural Flaws in Statutory Amendments Introduction The Michigan Supreme Court delivered an advisory opinion on the...
Establishing Evidentiary Standards for Summary Judgment under the Dramshop Act: Insights from Rizzo v Kretschmer

Establishing Evidentiary Standards for Summary Judgment under the Dramshop Act: Insights from Rizzo v Kretschmer

Date: May 26, 1973
Establishing Evidentiary Standards for Summary Judgment under the Dramshop Act: Insights from Rizzo v Kretschmer Introduction The case of Rizzo v Kretschmer, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
People v Adams: Clarifying the Asportation Requirement in Michigan's Kidnapping Statute

People v Adams: Clarifying the Asportation Requirement in Michigan's Kidnapping Statute

Date: Mar 28, 1973
People v Adams: Clarifying the Asportation Requirement in Michigan's Kidnapping Statute Introduction In the landmark case of People v Adams (389 Mich. 222), the Supreme Court of Michigan addressed...
PEOPLE v. ANDERSON: New Precedent on Counsel Presence in Photographic Lineups

PEOPLE v. ANDERSON: New Precedent on Counsel Presence in Photographic Lineups

Date: Mar 28, 1973
PEOPLE v. ANDERSON: New Precedent on Counsel Presence in Photographic Lineups Introduction PEOPLE v. ANDERSON (389 Mich. 155), decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on March 27, 1973, addresses...
Double Jeopardy Protections Reinforced in PEOPLE v. GRIMMETT (1972)

Double Jeopardy Protections Reinforced in PEOPLE v. GRIMMETT (1972)

Date: Nov 30, 1972
Double Jeopardy Protections Reinforced in PEOPLE v. GRIMMETT (1972) Introduction PEOPLE v. GRIMMETT, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on November 29, 1972, is a landmark case that...
Establishing Two-Thirds Ratio for Indeterminate Sentencing: People v. Tanner

Establishing Two-Thirds Ratio for Indeterminate Sentencing: People v. Tanner

Date: Jul 27, 1972
Establishing Two-Thirds Ratio for Indeterminate Sentencing: People v. Tanner Introduction People v. Tanner, 387 Mich. 683 (1972), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan that...
Michigan Supreme Court Rules 20-Year Mandatory Minimum for Marijuana Sale as Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Michigan Supreme Court Rules 20-Year Mandatory Minimum for Marijuana Sale as Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Date: Mar 10, 1972
Michigan Supreme Court Rules 20-Year Mandatory Minimum for Marijuana Sale as Cruel and Unusual Punishment Introduction People v. Lorentzen, 387 Mich. 167 (1972), is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Jaworski v. Michigan: Affirming Comprehensive Rights Advisory in Guilty Pleas Post-Boykin

Jaworski v. Michigan: Affirming Comprehensive Rights Advisory in Guilty Pleas Post-Boykin

Date: Mar 10, 1972
Jaworski v. Michigan: Affirming Comprehensive Rights Advisory in Guilty Pleas Post-Boykin Introduction PEOPLE v. JAWORSKI is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on March 9,...
Judicial Oversight on Plea Amendments: Insights from Genesee Prosecutor v Genesee Circuit Judge

Judicial Oversight on Plea Amendments: Insights from Genesee Prosecutor v Genesee Circuit Judge

Date: Feb 26, 1972
Judicial Oversight on Plea Amendments: Insights from Genesee Prosecutor v. Genesee Circuit Judge Introduction In the landmark case of Genesee Prosecutor v. Genesee Circuit Judge (386 Mich. 672,...
Michigan Supreme Court Declares 60-Day Notice Requirement Unconstitutional for Minor Plaintiffs

Michigan Supreme Court Declares 60-Day Notice Requirement Unconstitutional for Minor Plaintiffs

Date: Feb 26, 1972
Michigan Supreme Court Declares 60-Day Notice Requirement Unconstitutional for Minor Plaintiffs Introduction The case of REICH v. STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT, KNAPP v. State Highway Department, and...
Reaffirming Fair Trial Standards: The Landmark Decision in People v. Robinson

Reaffirming Fair Trial Standards: The Landmark Decision in People v. Robinson

Date: Feb 26, 1972
Reaffirming Fair Trial Standards: The Landmark Decision in People v. Robinson Introduction People v. Robinson (386 Mich. 551), a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan in 1972, addresses...
Sentencing Equity in Criminal Appeals: A Comprehensive Analysis of PEOPLE v. SNOW

Sentencing Equity in Criminal Appeals: A Comprehensive Analysis of PEOPLE v. SNOW

Date: Feb 26, 1972
Sentencing Equity in Criminal Appeals: A Comprehensive Analysis of PEOPLE v. SNOW Introduction PEOPLE v. SNOW (386 Mich. 586) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan that addresses...
Scope and Limits of Judicial Review Under Michigan Constitution Art 6, § 28: Viculin v. Department of Civil Service

Scope and Limits of Judicial Review Under Michigan Constitution Art 6, § 28: Viculin v. Department of Civil Service

Date: Dec 22, 1971
Scope and Limits of Judicial Review Under Michigan Constitution Art 6, § 28: Viculin v. Department of Civil Service Introduction Viculin v. Department of Civil Service (386 Mich. 375) is a landmark...
Reaffirming the Necessity of Mutuality in Collateral Estoppel: Howell v. Vito’s Trucking and Excavating Co.

Reaffirming the Necessity of Mutuality in Collateral Estoppel: Howell v. Vito’s Trucking and Excavating Co.

Date: Nov 10, 1971
Reaffirming the Necessity of Mutuality in Collateral Estoppel: Howell v. Vito’s Trucking and Excavating Co. Introduction Howell v. Vito’s Trucking and Excavating Company, 386 Mich. 37 (1971), is a...
Distinction Between State and Private Institutions in MCLA § 330.21: STOWERS v. WOLODZKO

Distinction Between State and Private Institutions in MCLA § 330.21: STOWERS v. WOLODZKO

Date: Nov 10, 1971
Distinction Between State and Private Institutions in MCLA § 330.21: STOWERS v. WOLODZKO Introduction STOWERS v. WOLODZKO, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on November 9, 1971, addresses...
POMPEY v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION: Establishing Judicial Remedies for Racial Discrimination in Employment

POMPEY v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION: Establishing Judicial Remedies for Racial Discrimination in Employment

Date: Aug 28, 1971
POMPEY v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION: Establishing Judicial Remedies for Racial Discrimination in Employment Introduction POMPEY v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION is a landmark case decided by the...
SIFERS v. HOREN: Broad Interpretation of 'Transaction of Any Business' in Michigan's Long-Arm Jurisdiction

SIFERS v. HOREN: Broad Interpretation of 'Transaction of Any Business' in Michigan's Long-Arm Jurisdiction

Date: Jul 8, 1971
SIFERS v. HOREN: Broad Interpretation of 'Transaction of Any Business' in Michigan's Long-Arm Jurisdiction Introduction SIFERS v. HOREN (385 Mich. 195) is a pivotal case in the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert