Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

Substantial Evidence Standard Reinforced in Employment Relations: Analysis of Michigan Employment Relations Commission v. Detroit Symphony Orchestra, Inc.

Substantial Evidence Standard Reinforced in Employment Relations: Analysis of Michigan Employment Relations Commission v. Detroit Symphony Orchestra, Inc.

Date: Nov 22, 1974
Substantial Evidence Standard Reinforced in Employment Relations: Analysis of Michigan Employment Relations Commission v. Detroit Symphony Orchestra, Inc. Introduction Michigan Employment Relations...
Bigelow v. Walraven: Affirmative Defense and the Statute of Limitations in Default Set-Asides

Bigelow v. Walraven: Affirmative Defense and the Statute of Limitations in Default Set-Asides

Date: Sep 7, 1974
Bigelow v. Walraven: Affirmative Defense and the Statute of Limitations in Default Set-Asides Introduction Bigelow v. Walraven (392 Mich. 566), decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on September...
Liability of General Contractors for Safety Oversight: Insights from FUNK v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP. (1974)

Liability of General Contractors for Safety Oversight: Insights from FUNK v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP. (1974)

Date: Aug 3, 1974
Liability of General Contractors for Safety Oversight: Insights from FUNK v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP. (1974) Introduction The case of FUNK v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION (392 Mich. 91, 1974) addresses...
People v. McGillen #1: Strengthening Miranda Rights Enforcement and Evidentiary Standards in Rape Cases

People v. McGillen #1: Strengthening Miranda Rights Enforcement and Evidentiary Standards in Rape Cases

Date: Aug 3, 1974
People v. McGillen #1: Strengthening Miranda Rights Enforcement and Evidentiary Standards in Rape Cases Introduction People v. McGillen #1 is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Aiding and Abetting in Involuntary Manslaughter: Analysis of PEOPLE v. PALMER

Aiding and Abetting in Involuntary Manslaughter: Analysis of PEOPLE v. PALMER

Date: Aug 3, 1974
Aiding and Abetting in Involuntary Manslaughter: Analysis of PEOPLE v. PALMER Introduction PEOPLE v. PALMER is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan, rendered on August 2, 1974. The...
People v. Lee (1974): Pre-Custody Photographic Identification and the Right to Counsel

People v. Lee (1974): Pre-Custody Photographic Identification and the Right to Counsel

Date: May 22, 1974
People v. Lee (1974): Pre-Custody Photographic Identification and the Right to Counsel Introduction People v. Lee, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on May 21, 1974, addresses several pivotal...
Ensuring Accurate Jury Instructions in Homicide Cases: The Precedent of PEOPLE v. TOWNES

Ensuring Accurate Jury Instructions in Homicide Cases: The Precedent of PEOPLE v. TOWNES

Date: May 22, 1974
Ensuring Accurate Jury Instructions in Homicide Cases: The Precedent of PEOPLE v. TOWNES Introduction PEOPLE v. TOWNES (391 Mich. 578), decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on May 21, 1974, is a...
Reevaluating Sentencing Procedures: Insights from People v. Moore

Reevaluating Sentencing Procedures: Insights from People v. Moore

Date: Apr 17, 1974
Reevaluating Sentencing Procedures: Insights from People v. Moore Introduction People v. Moore, 391 Mich. 426 (1974), is a pivotal case in Michigan's legal history that addresses critical issues...
Judicial Discretion in Credibility Impeachment: The Landmark Decision in PEOPLE v. JACKSON

Judicial Discretion in Credibility Impeachment: The Landmark Decision in PEOPLE v. JACKSON

Date: Apr 17, 1974
Judicial Discretion in Credibility Impeachment: The Landmark Decision in PEOPLE v. JACKSON Introduction PEOPLE v. JACKSON, decided on April 16, 1974, by the Supreme Court of Michigan, is a pivotal...
Kropf v. City of Sterling Heights: Reaffirming Plaintiff's Burden in Zoning Challenges

Kropf v. City of Sterling Heights: Reaffirming Plaintiff's Burden in Zoning Challenges

Date: Feb 16, 1974
Kropf v. City of Sterling Heights: Reaffirming Plaintiff's Burden in Zoning Challenges Introduction Kropf v. City of Sterling Heights, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on February 15,...
Elimination of Privity Requirement in Abstracter Liability: Insights from WILLIAMS v POLGAR

Elimination of Privity Requirement in Abstracter Liability: Insights from WILLIAMS v POLGAR

Date: Feb 15, 1974
Elimination of Privity Requirement in Abstracter Liability: Insights from WILLIAMS v POLGAR Introduction WILLIAMS v POLGAR, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on February 14, 1974, marks a...
Residency and Retirement Plans Recognized as Mandatory Subjects of Collective Bargaining under PERA

Residency and Retirement Plans Recognized as Mandatory Subjects of Collective Bargaining under PERA

Date: Feb 15, 1974
Residency and Retirement Plans Recognized as Mandatory Subjects of Collective Bargaining under PERA Introduction Detroit Police Officers Association v. City of Detroit, 391 Mich. 44 (1974), is a...
Legal Commentary on PEOPLE v JACKSON: Self-Defense and Felonious Homicide

Legal Commentary on PEOPLE v JACKSON: Self-Defense and Felonious Homicide

Date: Dec 19, 1973
Self-Defense and Felonious Homicide: Analyzing PEOPLE v JACKSON Introduction PEOPLE v JACKSON is a landmark judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of Michigan on December 18, 1973. This case...
Establishing Boundaries: Plain View Doctrine and Prosecutorial Conduct in People v Whalen

Establishing Boundaries: Plain View Doctrine and Prosecutorial Conduct in People v Whalen

Date: Dec 19, 1973
Establishing Boundaries: Plain View Doctrine and Prosecutorial Conduct in People v Whalen Introduction People v. Whalen is a pivotal 1973 decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan that addresses...
Revisiting the Bounds of Guilty Pleas and Effective Counsel: An Analysis of PEOPLE v. GINTHER

Revisiting the Bounds of Guilty Pleas and Effective Counsel: An Analysis of PEOPLE v. GINTHER

Date: Dec 19, 1973
Revisiting the Bounds of Guilty Pleas and Effective Counsel: An Analysis of PEOPLE v. GINTHER Introduction PEOPLE v. GINTHER, 390 Mich. 436 (Mich. 1973), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Admissibility of Antecedent Sexual Acts in Assault with Intent to Rape: Analysis of PEOPLE v DERMARTZEX

Admissibility of Antecedent Sexual Acts in Assault with Intent to Rape: Analysis of PEOPLE v DERMARTZEX

Date: Dec 19, 1973
Admissibility of Antecedent Sexual Acts in Assault with Intent to Rape: Analysis of PEOPLE v DERMARTZEX Introduction The case of PEOPLE v DERMARTZEX (390 Mich. 410) adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Affirmative Defense Amendments and Judicial Discretion: Insights from BEN P. FYKE SONS v GUNTER COMPANY

Affirmative Defense Amendments and Judicial Discretion: Insights from BEN P. FYKE SONS v GUNTER COMPANY

Date: Dec 19, 1973
Affirmative Defense Amendments and Judicial Discretion: Insights from BEN P. FYKE SONS v GUNTER COMPANY Introduction The case of BEN P. FYKE SONS v. GUNTER COMPANY, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Protecting the Right to Silence during Arrest: PEOPLE v BOBO

Protecting the Right to Silence during Arrest: PEOPLE v BOBO

Date: Nov 22, 1973
Protecting the Right to Silence during Arrest: PEOPLE v BOBO Introduction PEOPLE v. BOBO, 390 Mich. 355 (1973), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan addressing the constitutional...
Establishing the "Same Transaction Test" for Double Jeopardy in Michigan – Analysis of People v White

Establishing the "Same Transaction Test" for Double Jeopardy in Michigan – Analysis of People v White

Date: Nov 21, 1973
Establishing the "Same Transaction Test" for Double Jeopardy in Michigan – Analysis of People v White Introduction People v White, 390 Mich. 245 (1973), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
PEOPLE v. CHISM: Upholding Speedy Trial Rights and Admissibility of Prior Acts Evidence

PEOPLE v. CHISM: Upholding Speedy Trial Rights and Admissibility of Prior Acts Evidence

Date: Oct 18, 1973
PEOPLE v. CHISM: Upholding Speedy Trial Rights and Admissibility of Prior Acts Evidence Introduction PEOPLE v. CHISM (390 Mich. 104), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on October 17, 1973,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert