Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

Establishing the Standard for Directed Verdicts in Michigan: People v. Hampton

Establishing the Standard for Directed Verdicts in Michigan: People v. Hampton

Date: Nov 27, 1979
Establishing the Standard for Directed Verdicts in Michigan: People v. Hampton Introduction People v. Hampton, 407 Mich. 354 (1979), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan that...
Double Jeopardy Implications of Michigan's Felony-Firearm Statute: Wayne County Prosecutor v. Recorder's Court Judge (1979)

Double Jeopardy Implications of Michigan's Felony-Firearm Statute: Wayne County Prosecutor v. Recorder's Court Judge (1979)

Date: Jun 26, 1979
Double Jeopardy Implications of Michigan's Felony-Firearm Statute: Wayne County Prosecutor v. Recorder's Court Judge (1979) Introduction In the landmark decision of Wayne County Prosecutor v....
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Comparative Negligence as Replacement for Contributory Negligence in Placek v. City of Sterling Heights

Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Comparative Negligence as Replacement for Contributory Negligence in Placek v. City of Sterling Heights

Date: Feb 9, 1979
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Comparative Negligence as Replacement for Contributory Negligence in Placek v. City of Sterling Heights Introduction Placek v. City of Sterling Heights (405 Mich....
Reinterpreting No-Fault Insurance Subtractions: Insights from Workman v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange

Reinterpreting No-Fault Insurance Subtractions: Insights from Workman v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange

Date: Jan 5, 1979
Reinterpreting No-Fault Insurance Subtractions: Insights from Workman v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange Introduction Workman v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange, decided by...
Michigan Supreme Court Upholds Facial Unconstitutionality of §3109(1) Set-Off Provision under Equal Protection and Due Process

Michigan Supreme Court Upholds Facial Unconstitutionality of §3109(1) Set-Off Provision under Equal Protection and Due Process

Date: Jan 5, 1979
Michigan Supreme Court Upholds Facial Unconstitutionality of §3109(1) Set-Off Provision under Equal Protection and Due Process Introduction In O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance...
Hospital Vicarious Liability for Medical Negligence: Comprehensive Analysis of Grewe v. Mount Clemens General Hospital

Hospital Vicarious Liability for Medical Negligence: Comprehensive Analysis of Grewe v. Mount Clemens General Hospital

Date: Dec 29, 1978
Hospital Vicarious Liability for Medical Negligence: Comprehensive Analysis of Grewe v. Mount Clemens General Hospital Introduction Grewe v. Mount Clemens General Hospital, 404 Mich. 240 (1978), is a...
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Due Process Requirements for Compulsory No-Fault Insurance in SHAVERS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL

Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Due Process Requirements for Compulsory No-Fault Insurance in SHAVERS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL

Date: Jun 2, 1978
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Due Process Requirements for Compulsory No-Fault Insurance in SHAVERS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL Introduction SHAVERS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Admissibility of Similar Acts Evidence in Proving Intent: Analysis of PEOPLE v DUNCAN & McINTOSH

Affirmation of Admissibility of Similar Acts Evidence in Proving Intent: Analysis of PEOPLE v DUNCAN & McINTOSH

Date: Nov 29, 1977
Affirmation of Admissibility of Similar Acts Evidence in Proving Intent: Analysis of PEOPLE v DUNCAN & McINTOSH Introduction PEOPLE v DUNCAN & McINTOSH, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan...
Constitutional Validation of Michigan's 70% Statute in Workers' Compensation Appeals

Constitutional Validation of Michigan's 70% Statute in Workers' Compensation Appeals

Date: Oct 12, 1977
Constitutional Validation of Michigan's 70% Statute in Workers' Compensation Appeals Introduction In the landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan on October 11, 1977, the court addressed...
Cramer v. Metropolitan Savings: Upholding Foreclosure by Advertisement and Clarifying State Action in Mortgage Foreclosures

Cramer v. Metropolitan Savings: Upholding Foreclosure by Advertisement and Clarifying State Action in Mortgage Foreclosures

Date: Oct 7, 1977
Cramer v. Metropolitan Savings: Upholding Foreclosure by Advertisement and Clarifying State Action in Mortgage Foreclosures Introduction Cramer v. Metropolitan Savings Loan Association is a pivotal...
Duty of Care for Manufacturers, Wholesalers, and Retailers Toward Bystanders: Moning v Alfono (1977)

Duty of Care for Manufacturers, Wholesalers, and Retailers Toward Bystanders: Moning v Alfono (1977)

Date: Jun 16, 1977
Duty of Care for Manufacturers, Wholesalers, and Retailers Toward Bystanders: Moning v Alfono (1977) Introduction Moning v Alfono, 400 Mich. 425 (1977), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan,...
Admissibility of Polygraph Evidence: People v. Barbara Establishes Limitations Under the Davis/Frye Standard in Michigan

Admissibility of Polygraph Evidence: People v. Barbara Establishes Limitations Under the Davis/Frye Standard in Michigan

Date: Jun 14, 1977
Admissibility of Polygraph Evidence: People v. Barbara Establishes Limitations Under the Davis/Frye Standard in Michigan Introduction People v. Barbara, 400 Mich. 352 (1977), adjudicated by the...
People v Oliphant: Admitting Prior Rape Allegations to Demonstrate Defendant's Scheme

People v Oliphant: Admitting Prior Rape Allegations to Demonstrate Defendant's Scheme

Date: Jan 1, 1977
People v Oliphant: Admitting Prior Rape Allegations to Demonstrate Defendant's Scheme Introduction People v Oliphant (399 Mich. 472), decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on December 31, 1976,...
Defining the Parameters for Self-Representation: An Analysis of PEOPLE v Anderson and PEOPLE v Overby

Defining the Parameters for Self-Representation: An Analysis of PEOPLE v Anderson and PEOPLE v Overby

Date: Dec 22, 1976
Defining the Parameters for Self-Representation: An Analysis of PEOPLE v Anderson and PEOPLE v Overby Introduction The cases of People v Anderson and People v Overby (398 Mich. 361, Supreme Court of...
Galli v. KirkeBy: Limits of Governmental Immunity in Educational Institutions

Galli v. KirkeBy: Limits of Governmental Immunity in Educational Institutions

Date: Dec 22, 1976
Galli v. KirkeBy: Limits of Governmental Immunity in Educational Institutions Introduction Galli v. KirkeBy, 398 Mich. 527 (1976), is a landmark case in Michigan law that addresses the scope of...
Reaffirming Evidentiary Standards for Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Franchise Agreements

Reaffirming Evidentiary Standards for Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Franchise Agreements

Date: Dec 22, 1976
Reaffirming Evidentiary Standards for Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Franchise Agreements Introduction The case of Hi-Way Motor Company v. International Harvester Company (398 Mich. 330) adjudicated...
Clarifying Voluntary Intoxication as a Defense in First-Degree Murder: PEOPLE v. GARCIA (1976)

Clarifying Voluntary Intoxication as a Defense in First-Degree Murder: PEOPLE v. GARCIA (1976)

Date: Dec 8, 1976
Clarifying Voluntary Intoxication as a Defense in First-Degree Murder: PEOPLE v. GARCIA (1976) Introduction PEOPLE v. GARCIA is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan, delivered on...
Successor Liability in Products Liability: Turner v Bituminous Casualty Company

Successor Liability in Products Liability: Turner v Bituminous Casualty Company

Date: Aug 27, 1976
Successor Liability in Products Liability: Turner v Bituminous Casualty Company Introduction Turner v Bituminous Casualty Company is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on August...
Tuttle v. Department of State Highways: Establishing Negligence in Traffic Signal Implementation

Tuttle v. Department of State Highways: Establishing Negligence in Traffic Signal Implementation

Date: Jul 9, 1976
Tuttle v. Department of State Highways: Establishing Negligence in Traffic Signal Implementation Introduction Tuttle v. Department of State Highways, 397 Mich. 44 (1976), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Double Jeopardy Protection Reinforced in People v. Alvin Johnson

Double Jeopardy Protection Reinforced in People v. Alvin Johnson

Date: Apr 22, 1976
Double Jeopardy Protection Reinforced in People v. Alvin Johnson Introduction People v. Alvin Johnson is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan adjudicated on April 21, 1976. This case...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert