Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

Prospective Application of 'Name and Retain' Provision in Michigan's Dramshop Act: Insights from TEBO v HAVLIK BURNS v CARVER

Prospective Application of 'Name and Retain' Provision in Michigan's Dramshop Act: Insights from TEBO v HAVLIK BURNS v CARVER

Date: Feb 7, 1984
Prospective Application of 'Name and Retain' Provision in Michigan's Dramshop Act: Insights from TEBO v HAVLIK BURNS v CARVER Introduction The case of TEBO v HAVLIK BURNS v CARVER (418 Mich. 350),...
Affirmation of Alternative Liability in DES Cases: Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Affirmation of Alternative Liability in DES Cases: Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Date: Feb 7, 1984
Affirmation of Alternative Liability in DES Cases: Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co. Introduction Abel v. Eli Lilly & Company is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan, delivered on February 6,...
Expansion of Appellate Review in Sentencing: PEOPLE v. Coles, Gonzales, & Waits Establishes New Precedent

Expansion of Appellate Review in Sentencing: PEOPLE v. Coles, Gonzales, & Waits Establishes New Precedent

Date: Oct 25, 1983
Expansion of Appellate Review in Sentencing: PEOPLE v. Coles, Gonzales, & Waits Establishes New Precedent Introduction In the landmark decision of PEOPLE v. Coles, Gonzales, & Waits (417 Mich. 523),...
Reaffirming Articulable Suspicion: Michigan Supreme Court in People v. Burrell and Brown (1983)

Reaffirming Articulable Suspicion: Michigan Supreme Court in People v. Burrell and Brown (1983)

Date: Oct 18, 1983
Reaffirming Articulable Suspicion: Michigan Supreme Court in People v. Burrell and Brown (1983) Introduction The case of People v. Burrell and People v Brown, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
People v Killebrew and Briggs: Defining Judicial Role in Sentence Bargaining under Michigan Law

People v Killebrew and Briggs: Defining Judicial Role in Sentence Bargaining under Michigan Law

Date: Dec 24, 1982
People v Killebrew and Briggs: Defining Judicial Role in Sentence Bargaining under Michigan Law Introduction People v Killebrew and People v Briggs are landmark cases decided by the Supreme Court of...
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Judicial Oversight on Arbitration in Automobile Uninsured Motorist Coverage

Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Judicial Oversight on Arbitration in Automobile Uninsured Motorist Coverage

Date: Dec 24, 1982
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Judicial Oversight on Arbitration in Automobile Uninsured Motorist Coverage Introduction In the landmark case of Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v....
Establishing Comparative Negligence in Implied Warranty Product Liability Actions: Analysis of In re CERTIFIED QUESTIONS KARL v BRYANT AIR CONDITIONING COMPANY

Establishing Comparative Negligence in Implied Warranty Product Liability Actions: Analysis of In re CERTIFIED QUESTIONS KARL v BRYANT AIR CONDITIONING COMPANY

Date: Dec 24, 1982
Establishing Comparative Negligence in Implied Warranty Product Liability Actions Analysis of In re CERTIFIED QUESTIONS KARL v BRYANT AIR CONDITIONING COMPANY Introduction In the landmark case of In...
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Attorney General's Authority to Enforce Consumer Protection and Usury Laws Against Licensed Real Estate Brokers

Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Attorney General's Authority to Enforce Consumer Protection and Usury Laws Against Licensed Real Estate Brokers

Date: Dec 8, 1982
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Attorney General's Authority to Enforce Consumer Protection and Usury Laws Against Licensed Real Estate Brokers Introduction ATTORNEY GENERAL v. DIAMOND MORTGAGE...
Affirmation of Directed Verdict in Products Liability: OWENS v. ALLIS-CHALMERS CORPoration

Affirmation of Directed Verdict in Products Liability: OWENS v. ALLIS-CHALMERS CORPoration

Date: Nov 24, 1982
Affirmation of Directed Verdict in Products Liability: OWENS v. ALLIS-CHALMERS CORPoration Introduction The case of OWENS v. ALLIS-CHALMERS CORPoration, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on...
Supremacy of Statutory Limitations in Pension Benefit Claims: Lothian v. City of Detroit

Supremacy of Statutory Limitations in Pension Benefit Claims: Lothian v. City of Detroit

Date: Sep 14, 1982
Supremacy of Statutory Limitations in Pension Benefit Claims: Lothian v. City of Detroit Introduction Robert Lothian, a retired member of the Detroit police force, initiated legal proceedings against...
Preservation of Jury Trial Rights in Default Judgments: Insights from Wood v Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange

Preservation of Jury Trial Rights in Default Judgments: Insights from Wood v Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange

Date: Jun 29, 1982
Preservation of Jury Trial Rights in Default Judgments: Insights from Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange Introduction The landmark case Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance...
Exclusivity of Statutory Remedies in Dramshop Cases: Browder v. International Fidelity Insurance Co.

Exclusivity of Statutory Remedies in Dramshop Cases: Browder v. International Fidelity Insurance Co.

Date: Jun 29, 1982
Exclusivity of Statutory Remedies in Dramshop Cases: Browder v. International Fidelity Insurance Co. Introduction Browder v. International Fidelity Insurance Company, 413 Mich. 603 (1982), is a...
Requiring Explicit Instruction on 'Carrying' Element in Concealed Weapon Cases: People v Butler, 1982

Requiring Explicit Instruction on 'Carrying' Element in Concealed Weapon Cases: People v Butler, 1982

Date: May 28, 1982
Requiring Explicit Instruction on 'Carrying' Element in Concealed Weapon Cases: People v Butler, 1982 Introduction In the landmark case of People v Butler (413 Mich. 377, 1982), the Supreme Court of...
Strict Scrutiny of Similar-Acts Evidence: Insights from PEOPLE v GOLOCHOWICZ

Strict Scrutiny of Similar-Acts Evidence: Insights from PEOPLE v GOLOCHOWICZ

Date: May 18, 1982
Strict Scrutiny of Similar-Acts Evidence: Insights from PEOPLE v GOLOCHOWICZ Introduction In the landmark case PEOPLE v GOLOCHOWICZ (413 Mich. 298, 1982), the Supreme Court of Michigan delved into...
Clarity vs. Protections: The RASKA v. FARM BUREAU Decision on Insurance Policy Exclusions

Clarity vs. Protections: The RASKA v. FARM BUREAU Decision on Insurance Policy Exclusions

Date: Jan 9, 1982
Clarity vs. Protections: The RASKA v. FARM BUREAU Decision on Insurance Policy Exclusions Introduction The case of Raska v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Michigan (412 Mich. 355, 1982)...
Duty of Care Owed by Attorneys to Adverse Parties: Insights from FRIEDMAN v DOZORC

Duty of Care Owed by Attorneys to Adverse Parties: Insights from FRIEDMAN v DOZORC

Date: Nov 24, 1981
Duty of Care Owed by Attorneys to Adverse Parties: Insights from FRIEDMAN v DOZORC Introduction FRIEDMAN v DOZORC (412 Mich. 1), decided on November 23, 1981, by the Supreme Court of Michigan,...
Clarifying Innocent Misrepresentation: United States Fidelity Guaranty Co. v. Black

Clarifying Innocent Misrepresentation: United States Fidelity Guaranty Co. v. Black

Date: Nov 24, 1981
Clarifying Innocent Misrepresentation: United States Fidelity Guaranty Co. v. Black Introduction United States Fidelity Guaranty Company v. Black is a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court of...
Abolition of the Felony-Murder Doctrine in Michigan: Insights from PEOPLE v AARON, PEOPLE v THOMPSON, and PEOPLE v WRIGHT

Abolition of the Felony-Murder Doctrine in Michigan: Insights from PEOPLE v AARON, PEOPLE v THOMPSON, and PEOPLE v WRIGHT

Date: Nov 25, 1980
Abolition of the Felony-Murder Doctrine in Michigan: Insights from PEOPLE v AARON, PEOPLE v THOMPSON, and PEOPLE v WRIGHT Introduction The Supreme Court of Michigan, in the consolidated cases of...
Recognition of Emotional Distress Damages in Breach of Disability Insurance Contracts

Recognition of Emotional Distress Damages in Breach of Disability Insurance Contracts

Date: Aug 6, 1980
Recognition of Emotional Distress Damages in Breach of Disability Insurance Contracts Introduction The case of Kewin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Enforcing Cause-Based Termination in Indefinite Employment Contracts: Insights from TOUSSAINT v. BLUE CROSS Blue Shield of Michigan and EBLING v. MASCO CORPORATION

Enforcing Cause-Based Termination in Indefinite Employment Contracts: Insights from TOUSSAINT v. BLUE CROSS Blue Shield of Michigan and EBLING v. MASCO CORPORATION

Date: Jun 11, 1980
Enforcing Cause-Based Termination in Indefinite Employment Contracts: Insights from TOUSSAINT v. BLUE CROSS Blue Shield of Michigan and EBLING v. MASCO CORPORATION Introduction TOUSSAINT v. BLUE...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert