Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Affirmation of Directed Verdict in Products Liability: OWENS v. ALLIS-CHALMERS CORPoration Introduction The case of OWENS v. ALLIS-CHALMERS CORPoration, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on...
Supremacy of Statutory Limitations in Pension Benefit Claims: Lothian v. City of Detroit Introduction Robert Lothian, a retired member of the Detroit police force, initiated legal proceedings against...
Preservation of Jury Trial Rights in Default Judgments: Insights from Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange Introduction The landmark case Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance...
Exclusivity of Statutory Remedies in Dramshop Cases: Browder v. International Fidelity Insurance Co. Introduction Browder v. International Fidelity Insurance Company, 413 Mich. 603 (1982), is a...
Requiring Explicit Instruction on 'Carrying' Element in Concealed Weapon Cases: People v Butler, 1982 Introduction In the landmark case of People v Butler (413 Mich. 377, 1982), the Supreme Court of...
Strict Scrutiny of Similar-Acts Evidence: Insights from PEOPLE v GOLOCHOWICZ Introduction In the landmark case PEOPLE v GOLOCHOWICZ (413 Mich. 298, 1982), the Supreme Court of Michigan delved into...
Clarity vs. Protections: The RASKA v. FARM BUREAU Decision on Insurance Policy Exclusions Introduction The case of Raska v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Michigan (412 Mich. 355, 1982)...
Duty of Care Owed by Attorneys to Adverse Parties: Insights from FRIEDMAN v DOZORC Introduction FRIEDMAN v DOZORC (412 Mich. 1), decided on November 23, 1981, by the Supreme Court of Michigan,...
Clarifying Innocent Misrepresentation: United States Fidelity Guaranty Co. v. Black Introduction United States Fidelity Guaranty Company v. Black is a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court of...
Abolition of the Felony-Murder Doctrine in Michigan: Insights from PEOPLE v AARON, PEOPLE v THOMPSON, and PEOPLE v WRIGHT Introduction The Supreme Court of Michigan, in the consolidated cases of...
Recognition of Emotional Distress Damages in Breach of Disability Insurance Contracts Introduction The case of Kewin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Enforcing Cause-Based Termination in Indefinite Employment Contracts: Insights from TOUSSAINT v. BLUE CROSS Blue Shield of Michigan and EBLING v. MASCO CORPORATION Introduction TOUSSAINT v. BLUE...
Establishing the Standard for Directed Verdicts in Michigan: People v. Hampton Introduction People v. Hampton, 407 Mich. 354 (1979), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan that...
Double Jeopardy Implications of Michigan's Felony-Firearm Statute: Wayne County Prosecutor v. Recorder's Court Judge (1979) Introduction In the landmark decision of Wayne County Prosecutor v....
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Comparative Negligence as Replacement for Contributory Negligence in Placek v. City of Sterling Heights Introduction Placek v. City of Sterling Heights (405 Mich....
Reinterpreting No-Fault Insurance Subtractions: Insights from Workman v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange Introduction Workman v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange, decided by...
Michigan Supreme Court Upholds Facial Unconstitutionality of §3109(1) Set-Off Provision under Equal Protection and Due Process Introduction In O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance...
Hospital Vicarious Liability for Medical Negligence: Comprehensive Analysis of Grewe v. Mount Clemens General Hospital Introduction Grewe v. Mount Clemens General Hospital, 404 Mich. 240 (1978), is a...
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Due Process Requirements for Compulsory No-Fault Insurance in SHAVERS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL Introduction SHAVERS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Admissibility of Similar Acts Evidence in Proving Intent: Analysis of PEOPLE v DUNCAN & McINTOSH Introduction PEOPLE v DUNCAN & McINTOSH, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan...