Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

State Board of Education v. Houghton Lake Community Schools: Clarifying the Enforcement of Instructional Day Requirements

State Board of Education v. Houghton Lake Community Schools: Clarifying the Enforcement of Instructional Day Requirements

Date: Jun 28, 1988
State Board of Education v. Houghton Lake Community Schools: Clarifying the Enforcement of Instructional Day Requirements Introduction The case of State Board of Education v. Houghton Lake Community...
Supreme Court of Michigan Upholds Revised Probate Code’s Applicability Over Parties’ Stipulations

Supreme Court of Michigan Upholds Revised Probate Code’s Applicability Over Parties’ Stipulations

Date: Jun 8, 1988
Supreme Court of Michigan Upholds Revised Probate Code’s Applicability Over Parties’ Stipulations Introduction In the case of IN RE FINLAY ESTATE Thomas v Finlay, 430 Mich. 590 (1988), the Supreme...
Merchant's Duty of Care: No Obligation to Provide Armed Security Guards - WILLIAMS v. CUNNINGHAM DRUG Stores, Inc.

Merchant's Duty of Care: No Obligation to Provide Armed Security Guards - WILLIAMS v. CUNNINGHAM DRUG Stores, Inc.

Date: Jan 20, 1988
Merchant's Duty of Care: No Obligation to Provide Armed Security Guards WILLIAMS v. CUNNINGHAM DRUG Stores, Inc. (429 Mich. 495) Introduction The case of WILLIAMS v. CUNNINGHAM DRUG Stores, Inc....
Preservation of Evidential Sufficiency Challenges in Civil Appeals: NAPIER v JACOBS Establishes Strict Requirements

Preservation of Evidential Sufficiency Challenges in Civil Appeals: NAPIER v JACOBS Establishes Strict Requirements

Date: Oct 31, 1987
Preservation of Evidential Sufficiency Challenges in Civil Appeals: NAPIER v JACOBS Establishes Strict Requirements Introduction In NAPIER v JACOBS, 429 Mich. 222 (1987), the Supreme Court of...
State Immunity in Civil Rights Litigation: Insights from SMITH v DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH WILL v DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE

State Immunity in Civil Rights Litigation: Insights from SMITH v DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH WILL v DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE

Date: Aug 8, 1987
State Immunity in Civil Rights Litigation: Insights from Smith v. Department of Public Health and Will v. Department of Civil Service Introduction The consolidated cases of Smith v. Department of...
Michigan Supreme Court Abandons Lex Loci Delicti in Wrongful Death Actions: Olmstead v Anderson

Michigan Supreme Court Abandons Lex Loci Delicti in Wrongful Death Actions: Olmstead v Anderson

Date: Feb 7, 1987
Michigan Supreme Court Abandons Lex Loci Delicti in Wrongful Death Actions: Olmstead v Anderson Introduction The case of Olmstead v Anderson (428 Mich. 1, 1987) represents a pivotal moment in...
Waiver of Pretrial Motion Appeals through Guilty and Nolo Contendere Pleas: Insights from People v. New PEOPLE v. PEREZ

Waiver of Pretrial Motion Appeals through Guilty and Nolo Contendere Pleas: Insights from People v. New PEOPLE v. PEREZ

Date: Dec 31, 1986
Waiver of Pretrial Motion Appeals through Guilty and Nolo Contendere Pleas: Insights from People v. New PEOPLE v. PEREZ Introduction People v. New PEOPLE v. PEREZ, 427 Mich. 482 (1986), is a landmark...
Defining 'Governmental Function' and Affirming Sovereign Immunity in Public Hospitals: Comprehensive Analysis of 426 Mich. 223

Defining 'Governmental Function' and Affirming Sovereign Immunity in Public Hospitals: Comprehensive Analysis of 426 Mich. 223

Date: Oct 4, 1986
Defining 'Governmental Function' and Affirming Sovereign Immunity in Public Hospitals: Comprehensive Analysis of 426 Mich. 223 Introduction The Supreme Court of Michigan's decision in HYDE v....
Thornton v. Allstate Insurance Company: Defining Limits of No-Fault Insurance Coverage in Assault Cases

Thornton v. Allstate Insurance Company: Defining Limits of No-Fault Insurance Coverage in Assault Cases

Date: Aug 8, 1986
Thornton v. Allstate Insurance Company: Defining Limits of No-Fault Insurance Coverage in Assault Cases Introduction Thornton v. Allstate Insurance Company is a pivotal 1986 decision by the Supreme...
Reversing Age Discrimination Verdict: MATRAS v AMOCO OIL COMPANY

Reversing Age Discrimination Verdict: MATRAS v AMOCO OIL COMPANY

Date: Apr 19, 1986
Reversing Age Discrimination Verdict: MATRAS v AMOCO OIL COMPANY Introduction MATRAS v AMOCO OIL COMPANY is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on April 18, 1986. The dispute...
Clarifying "Mental Anguish" in Criminal Sexual Conduct: Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Precise Standard

Clarifying "Mental Anguish" in Criminal Sexual Conduct: Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Precise Standard

Date: Dec 31, 1985
Clarifying "Mental Anguish" in Criminal Sexual Conduct: Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Precise Standard Introduction The Supreme Court of Michigan, in the consolidated cases of People v Petrella...
Affirmation of Felony-Murder Conviction Based on Adequate Jury Instructions on Malice and Intent

Affirmation of Felony-Murder Conviction Based on Adequate Jury Instructions on Malice and Intent

Date: Nov 14, 1985
Affirmation of Felony-Murder Conviction Based on Adequate Jury Instructions on Malice and Intent Introduction The Supreme Court of Michigan, in the landmark case of People v. Kelly (423 Mich. 261,...
Michigan Supreme Court Restricts Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Claims in Insurance Cases: Roberts v. Auto-Owners Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court Restricts Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Claims in Insurance Cases: Roberts v. Auto-Owners Insurance

Date: Oct 2, 1985
Michigan Supreme Court Restricts Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Claims in Insurance Cases: Roberts v. Auto-Owners Insurance Introduction The case of Roberts v. Auto-Owners Insurance...
Revisiting Prescriptive Easement Burdens: Insights from Widmayer v Leonard (1985)

Revisiting Prescriptive Easement Burdens: Insights from Widmayer v Leonard (1985)

Date: Aug 27, 1985
Revisiting Prescriptive Easement Burdens: Insights from Widmayer v Leonard (1985) Introduction Widmayer v Leonard, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on August 26, 1985, addresses pivotal...
Establishing Employer Liability Across Corporate Boundaries: The Economic Reality Test in WELLS v. FIRESTONE Tire

Establishing Employer Liability Across Corporate Boundaries: The Economic Reality Test in WELLS v. FIRESTONE Tire

Date: Dec 29, 1984
Establishing Employer Liability Across Corporate Boundaries: The Economic Reality Test in WELLS v. FIRESTONE Tire Introduction The case of WELLS v. FIRESTONE Tire and Rubber Company (421 Mich. 641),...
Refining Trade Secret Protection: Insights from Hayes-Albion Corp. v. Kuberski

Refining Trade Secret Protection: Insights from Hayes-Albion Corp. v. Kuberski

Date: Dec 29, 1984
Refining Trade Secret Protection: Insights from Hayes-Albion Corporation v. Kuberski Introduction The case of Hayes-Albion Corporation v. Kuberski, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan in...
PRENTIS v. YALE Manufacturing Company: Establishing a Pure Negligence Risk-Utility Test for Design Defects in Product Liability

PRENTIS v. YALE Manufacturing Company: Establishing a Pure Negligence Risk-Utility Test for Design Defects in Product Liability

Date: Dec 29, 1984
PRENTIS v. YALE Manufacturing Company: Establishing a Pure Negligence Risk-Utility Test for Design Defects in Product Liability Introduction PRENTIS v. YALE Manufacturing Company is a seminal case...
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Comprehensive Framework for Governmental and Sovereign Immunity under the Governmental Tort Liability Act

Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Comprehensive Framework for Governmental and Sovereign Immunity under the Governmental Tort Liability Act

Date: Dec 29, 1984
Michigan Supreme Court Establishes Comprehensive Framework for Governmental and Sovereign Immunity under the Governmental Tort Liability Act Introduction The Michigan Supreme Court delivered a...
Balancing Confrontation Rights and Victim Protection: Insights from People v Hackett and Paquette

Balancing Confrontation Rights and Victim Protection: Insights from People v Hackett and Paquette

Date: Dec 29, 1984
Balancing Confrontation Rights and Victim Protection: Insights from People v Hackett and Paquette Introduction The Supreme Court of Michigan's decision in People v Hackett and People v Paquette (421...
Double Jeopardy Clause and Multiple Punishment: Insights from PEOPLE v. ROBIDEAU, GRIFFIN, BROWN, and BOUKNIGHT

Double Jeopardy Clause and Multiple Punishment: Insights from PEOPLE v. ROBIDEAU, GRIFFIN, BROWN, and BOUKNIGHT

Date: Sep 19, 1984
Double Jeopardy Clause and Multiple Punishment: Insights from PEOPLE v. ROBIDEAU, GRIFFIN, BROWN, and BOUKNIGHT Introduction The case of PEOPLE v. ROBIDEAU, GRIFFIN, BROWN, and BOUKNIGHT (419 Mich....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert